Tucidinostat Plus Exemestane as a Neoadjuvant in Early-Stage, Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy and safety of tucidinostat plus exemestane as a neoadjuvant strategy in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, single-arm phase II trial enrolled patients with stage II-III breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative. Eligible patients received tucidinostat plus exemestane, and then breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or modified radical mastectomy. RESULTS: Among 20 enrolled patients, 3 of them achieved preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score of 0. Additionally, complete cell cycle arrest was observed in 7, radiologic objective response rate in 10, and disease control rate in 20 patients, pathological complete response in 1 patient, and 5 patients performed BCS. Ki67 suppression from baseline to surgery was observed in 17 of patients, with the Ki67 change ratio of -73.5%. Treatment-emergent adverse event included neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, hypoalbuminemia, aspartate aminotransferase elevation, glutamyl transpeptidase elevation, anemia, and alanine aminotransferase elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the rate of PEPI score 0 was not high, tucidinostat plus exemestane as a neoadjuvant therapy might be well tolerated and showed promising clinical responses in patients with early hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. To clarify the safety and efficacy of this strategy, further investigation is warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2100046678.

[Successful treatment with tucidinostat in a patient with relapsed adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

Aggressive types of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL), namely, the acute type, lymphoma type, and chronic type with poor prognostic factors, have a poor prognosis. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may improve prognosis, relapse is common. In June 2021, tucidinostat was approved for relapsed or refractory ATL in Japan. We report a case of a 62-year-old man with relapsed ATL after allogeneic HSCT. In March 2017, he was diagnosed with ATL (acute type) and received two courses of mLSG-15 therapy. ATL cells reappeared in his peripheral blood, so he underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in September 2017. In June 2021, his soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) level increased, and he began experiencing sensory abnormalities in his face and legs. In September, he developed respiratory failure and was diagnosed with relapse of ATL. He was again treated with mLSG-15. His sIL-2R normalized and the sensory abnormalities decreased, but sIL-2R rose again in February 2022. After tucidinostat treatment was initiated, sIL-2R normalized and the patient's general condition improved. Tucidinostat shows promise as an effective treatment for ATL that has relapsed after allogeneic HSCT.

Oral histone deacetylase inhibitor tucidinostat (HBI-8000) in patients with relapsed or refractory adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma: Phase IIb results.

This multicenter, prospective phase IIb trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tucidinostat (HBI-8000) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) was undertaken in Japan. Eligible patients had R/R ATLL and had failed standard of care treatment with chemotherapy and with mogamulizumab. Twenty-three patients received tucidinostat 40 mg orally twice per week and were included in efficacy and safety analyses. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent committee. The ORR was 30.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2, 52.9]. Median progression-free survival was 1.7 months (95% CI, 0.8, 7.4), median duration of response was 9.2 months (95% CI, 2.6, not reached), and median overall survival was 7.9 months (95% CI, 2.3, 18.0). All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), which were predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal. Incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs was 78.3%; most were laboratory abnormalities (decreases in platelets, neutrophils, white blood cells, and hemoglobin). Tucidinostat was well tolerated with AEs that could be mostly managed with supportive care and dose modifications. Tucidinostat is a meaningful treatment option for R/R ATLL patients; further investigation is warranted.

Optimized dose selective HDAC inhibitor tucidinostat overcomes anti-PD-L1 antibody resistance in experimental solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have influenced the treatment paradigm for multiple solid tumors, increasing evidence suggests that primary and adaptive resistance may limit the long-term efficacy of ICIs. New therapeutic strategies with other drug combinations are hence warranted to enhance the antitumor efficacy of ICIs. As a novel tumor suppressor, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor tucidinostat has been successfully confirmed to act against hematological malignancies. However, the underlying mechanisms of action for tucidinostat and whether it can manipulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors remain unclear. METHODS: Three murine tumor models (4T1, LLC, and CT26) were developed to define the significant role of different doses of tucidinostat in TME. The immunotherapeutic effect of tucidinostat combined with anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody (aPD-L1) was demonstrated. Furthermore, the effect of tucidinostat on phenotypic characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from lung cancer patients was investigated. RESULTS: With an optimized dose, tucidinostat could alter TME and promote the migration and infiltration of CD8+ T cells into tumors, partially by increasing the activity of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) via NF-κB signaling. Moreover, tucidinostat significantly promoted M1 polarization of macrophages and increased the in vivo antitumor efficacy of aPD-L1. Tucidinostat also enhanced the expression of the costimulatory molecules on human monocytes, suggesting a novel and improved antigen-presenting function. CONCLUSIONS: A combination regimen of tucidinostat and aPD-L1 may work synergistically to reduce tumor burden in patients with cancer by enhancing the immune function and provided a promising treatment strategy to overcome ICI treatment resistance.

Oral histone deacetylase inhibitor HBI-8000 (tucidinostat) in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: phase I safety and efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: HBI-8000 (tucidinostat) is a novel, oral histone deacetylase inhibitor that selectivity inhibits Class I (histone deacetylase 1, 2, 3) and Class II (histone deacetylase 10) with direct anti-tumor activity through various mechanisms of action, including epigenetic reprogramming and immunomodulation. It has been approved in China for the treatment of relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective phase I dose-escalation trial evaluating the safety of twice weekly HBI-8000 was conducted in Japan. Eligible patients had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and no available standard therapy. The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose; secondary endpoints included anti-tumor activity, safety and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study. Twelve patients were assessed for dose-limiting toxicity: six patients in the 30 mg BIW cohort had no dose-limiting toxicitys; two of six patients in the 40 mg BIW cohort had asymptomatic dose-limiting toxicitys. Treatment was well tolerated; adverse events were predominantly mild to moderate hematologic toxicities and were managed with dose modification and supportive care. Thirteen patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Objective response was seen in five of seven patients in the 40 mg BIW cohort; three partial responders had adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma. In the 30 mg BIW cohort, three of six patients had stable disease after the first cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with HBI-8000 30 and 40 mg BIW were well-tolerated and safe, with hematological toxicities as expected from other studies of histone deacetylase inhibitor. The maximum tolerated dose and recommended dosage for phase II studies of HBI-8000 is 40 mg BIW. Preliminary efficacy results are encouraging.

Targeted agents plus CHOP compared with CHOP as the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (GUIDANCE-03): an open-label, multicentre phase 2 clinical trial.

Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogeneous disease with dismal outcomes. We conducted an open-label, phase 2 nonrandomised, externally controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted agents plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) (CHOPX) for PTCL in the front-line setting. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age and newly diagnosed PTCL. Patients in the CHOPX group received standard CHOP at Cycle 1. Specific targeted agents were added from Cycle 2, decitabine if TP53 mut, azacytidine if TET2/KMT2D mut, tucidinostat if CREBBP/EP300 mut, and lenalidomide if without mutations above. Patients in the CHOP group received CHOP for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was the complete response rate (CRR) at the end of treatment (EOT). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04480099. Findings: Between July 29, 2020, and Sep 22, 2022, 96 patients were enrolled and included for efficacy and safety analysis with 48 in each group. The study met its primary endpoint. CRR at EOT in the CHOPX group was superior to the CHOP group (64.6% vs. 33.3%, OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.12-0.64; p = 0.004). At a median follow-up of 24.3 months (IQR 12.0-26.7), improved median PFS was observed in the CHOPX group (25.5 vs. 9.0 months; HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.34-0.98; p = 0.041). The median OS was similar between two groups (not reached vs. 30.9 months; HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.28-1.10; p = 0.088). The most common grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events in the CHOPX group were neutropenia (31, 65%) and infection (5, 10%). Interpretation: Targeted agents combined with CHOP demonstrated effective and safe as first-line treatment in PTCL. Biomarker-driven therapeutic strategy is feasible and may lead to promising efficacy specifically toward molecular features in PTCL. Funding: This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2022YFC2502600) and the General Program of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (202040400).

Efficacy and safety of tucidinostat in patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: real-world insights.

Background: Tucidinostat, which is a subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor, has been approved in China for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, existing evidence mainly stemmed from randomized controlled trials, and might have limitations in representing the complexities of clinical practice and diverse patient populations. Therefore, there is a need to explore the efficacy and optimal therapeutic modality for tucidinostat in real-world clinical settings. Methods: The objective of this real-world study was to analyze the clinical data of 47 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received tucidinostat treatment at West China Hospital, Sichuan University, between August 2020 and May 2023. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate [CBR; defined as partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) for ≥6 months on clinical evaluation]. Results: A total of 47 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 18.20 months. The median line of tucidinostat therapy was 3 (range, 1-9). In all, 52.17% patients were treated with tucidinostat plus fulvestrant, while 38.30% were treated with tucidinostat plus aromatase inhibitors. Notably, 10.64% of the patients with rapidly progressing visceral metastases received tucidinostat plus endocrine therapy as maintenance treatment after achieving disease control with chemotherapy. The median PFS was 4.43 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.77-10.53], and the median overall survival was 19.57 months (95% CI, 12.83-not reached). The 6-month CBR for the overall population was 41.86%. Patients undergoing maintenance therapy demonstrated a significantly longer PFS than did those who did not receive it as maintenance therapy (14.13 vs. 3.93 months; P=0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that use of tucidinostat in lines 1-2, use of tucidinostat plus fulvestrant, presence of one metastatic site, and lack of brain metastasis were favorable factors for PFS. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequently reported adverse event, with an incidence rate of 31.91% at all grades and 14.89% at grade ≥3. Four (8.51%) patients discontinued the treatment. Conclusions: For patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, tucidinostat combination therapy offers certain survival benefits with controllable safety. Furthermore, compared with non-maintenance therapy, maintenance therapy after chemotherapy may have promising efficacy.

Current and emerging therapeutic strategies in adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma.

Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) is classified into four clinical subtypes: acute, lymphoma, chronic, and smoldering. Chronic ATL is further divided into unfavorable and favorable chronic types according to serum lactate dehydrogenase, blood urea nitrogen, and serum albumin values. Acute, lymphoma, and unfavorable chronic types are categorized as aggressive ATL, whereas favorable chronic and smoldering types are categorized as indolent ATL. Intensive chemotherapy alone is not sufficient to prevent relapse of aggressive ATL. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potential therapeutic option to cure aggressive ATL in younger patients. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have decreased transplantation-related mortality, and increased donor availability has dramatically improved transplant access. New agents, including mogamulizumab, brentuximab vedotin, tucidinostat, and valemetostat, have recently become available for patients with aggressive ATL in Japan. Here, I provide an overview of recent advances in therapeutic strategies for ATL.

Tucidinostat plus exemestane for postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a long-term safety and overall survival update from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Background: The ACE study previously demonstrated that tucidinostat (chidamide), a subtype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, plus exemestane significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients with a manageable safety profile. The analysis of long-term safety and overall survival (OS) is presented here. Methods: ACE is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial comparing tucidinostat 30 mg/twice weekly plus exemestane 25 mg/day versus placebo plus exemestane 25 mg/day in postmenopausal patients with advanced, HR+ breast cancer. The primary endpoint was PFS, and OS was the secondary endpoint. Results: Of the 365 patients enrolled between July 2015, and June 2017, 244 were assigned to tucidinostat plus exemestane (tucidinostat group) and 121 to placebo plus exemestane group (placebo group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. The median follow-up from randomization to data cut-off (February 25, 2021) of this analysis was 26.5 months (range, 13.9-45.5 months). A total of 231 deaths (63.3%) from 365 patients occurred, including 155 deaths (63.5%) in the tucidinostat group and 76 deaths (62.8%) in the placebo group. The median OS was 30.3 months (95% CI, 26.7-36.7) in the tucidinostat group and 30.3 months (95% CI, 24.8-38.1) in the placebo group. The safety profiles of both tucidinostat and placebo groups remained consistent with those previously reported, and no new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. Neutropenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 51.6% of the patients in the tucidinostat group and 2.5% of the patients in the placebo group. Adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuations from any cause occurred in 28 (11.5%) patients in the tucidinostat group and 4 (3.3%) in the placebo group. Conclusions: Although tucidinostat in combination with exemestane had produced a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in the primary endpoint PFS, the ACE study did not show a prolongation of the secondary endpoint OS in the tucidinostat combination regimen. Ongoing studies have been considered in terms of potential identification of what patient subpopulations could benefit most from the tucidinostat combination regimens in advanced HR+ breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib-based therapy versus tucidinostat-based therapy after progression on palbociclib in patients with HR+HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Background: For patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negeative metastatic breast cancer (HR+HER2- MBC), switching to another cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) or targeted drugs with different mechanism are considerable treatment strategies post-CDK4/6i. However, no clinical data has been reported on which of the two strategies is more effective. In order to explore optimal treatment option post-CDK4/6i, we performed a retrospective comparative cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib-based therapy versus tucidinostat-based therapy after progression on palbociclib. Methods: We identified patients with HR+HER2- MBC who had received abemaciclib-based therapy or tucidinostat-based therapy after progression on palbociclib from the database of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC). Baseline characteristics, efficacy and safety information of treatments were derived from seven research centers' medical records. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR), PFS according to PIK3CA gene type, and safety. Results: Between April 1st 2020 and June 30th 2022, a total of 149 patients were included, of whom 73 patients received abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET), and 76 patients received tucidinostat plus ET. The majority of patients had visceral disease (124/149, 83.2%) and ≥3 metastatic organs (76/149, 51.0%), one third (48/149, 32.2%) had previously been treated ≥3 lines of ET at baseline in MBC setting. CBR was 38.4% (28/73) in abemaciclib group and 17.1% (13/76) in tucidinostat group (P=0.004). There was significant difference in PFS between abemaciclib group and tucidinostat group in both the whole population (5.0 vs. 2.0 months; hazard ratio =0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.64; P<0.001) and propensity score matched population. PIK3CA mutations occurred in 44.20% of patients who had undergone multigene sequencing. PIK3CA-mutant showed a negative effect on PFS of abemaciclib-based therapy. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event in both groups for any grade and grades 3-4. Common non-hematological toxicity occurred in abemaciclib group was diarrhea (27.4%), and were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (26.3%), nausea (25.0%), vomiting (11.8%) and hypokalemia (13.2%) in tucidinostat group. Conclusions: Our study suggests superiority of abemaciclib-based therapy over tucidinostat-based therapy in patients progressed on palbociclib, which merits further assessment in larger and prospective trials.

Therapeutic potential of tucidinostat, a subtype-selective HDAC inhibitor, in cancer treatment.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) is one of the most characterized epigenetic modifiers, modulating chromatin structure and gene expression, which plays an important role in cell cycle, differentiation and apoptosis. Dysregulation of HDAC promotes cancer progression, thus inhibitors targeting HDACs have evidently shown therapeutic efficacy in multiple cancers. Tucidinostat (formerly known as chidamide), a novel subtype-selective HDAC inhibitor, inhibits Class I HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, as well as Class IIb HDAC10. Tucidinostat is approved in relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), advanced breast cancer and R/R adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATLL). Compared with other HDAC inhibitors, tucidinostat shows notable antitumor activity, remarkable synergistic effect with immunotherapy, and manageable toxicity. Here, we comprehensively summarize recent advances in tucidinostat as both monotherapy and a regimen of combination therapy in both hematological and solid malignancies in clinic. Further studies will endeavor to identify more combination strategies with tucidinostat and to identify specific clinical biomarkers to predict the therapeutic effect.

Selinexor improves the anti-cancer effect of tucidinostat on TP53 wild-type breast cancer.

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) is closely related to the initiation and development of breast cancer (BC). Its inhibitor (HDACi) has been used to treat BC, while the efficacy of clinical trials was not reached expectations. HDACi combined with other drugs may be an effective strategy. This study explored the effect of HDACi tucidinostat combined with selinexor, an exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitor, on ER+Her2- BC cell lines of MCF-7 (wt-TP53), MDA-MB-175 (wt-TP53), MDA-MB-134 (mut-TP53) and T47D (mut-TP53) in vitro and cell derived xenografts (CDX) of MCF-7 in nude mice in vivo. Results showed that both tucidinostat and selinexor showed better inhibitory activities on wt-TP53 BC (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-175) comparing with mut-TP53 BC (MDA-MB-134 and T47D). Tucidinostat combined with selinexor significantly improved the effects of tucidinostat alone on the proliferation and invasion inhibitions and apoptosis promotions of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-175 cells in vitro. It also significantly enhanced the effects of tucidinostat on up-regulating the expression levels of acetyl-p53, nuclear p53, total p53, p21, Bax and Cleaved Caspase-3, and down-regulating the expression levels of Cyclin D1 and Bcl-2 in MCF-7 or MDA-MB-175 cells. Results consistent with in vitro were also obtained in CDX of MCF-7 in vivo. Taken together, we believe that tucidinostat and selinexor are potentially effective drug combinations for the treatment of wt-TP53 BC, and the molecular mechanism may be through enhancing the activity of p53 in the nucleus of BC cells to suppress proliferation and invasion and promote apoptosis.

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Acquired resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) remains a big challenge in the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A novel therapeutic agent, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), targets the abnormal epigenetic modification and may overcome acquired resistance. However, HDACi efficacy and the safety profile for hormone receptor (HoR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative MBC remain controversial. Methods: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for relevant studies on HDACi and HoR+/HER2- MBC. Demographic and clinicopathological parameters were extracted and presented as means and proportions, and between-group differences were assessed by Pearson chi-square test. Fixed- or random-effects models were used for meta-analysis based on inter-study heterogeneity. Pooled results were presented as L'Abbé plot and forest plot. Funnel plot and Egger's test were employed for evaluation of publication bias. Results: Four studies with 1,457 patients were included for meta-analysis. The overall objective response rates (ORRs) of HDACi + ET (HE) and placebo + ET (PE) groups were 11.52% and 6.67%, respectively. The HE regimen significantly increased ORR (odds ratio [OR] 1.633, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.103-2.418, p < 0.05) and showed higher clinical benefit rate (CBR) than the PE regimen (HE vs. PE groups: 38.82% vs. 30.58%, OR 1.378, 95% CI = 1.020-1.861, p < 0.05). Additionally, the HE regimen was associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.761, 95% CI = 0.650-0.872, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.849, 95% CI = 0.702-0.996, p < 0.001). Regarding safety profile, the HE regimen had increasing toxicity in terms of higher overall adverse event (AE), Grade ≥3 AE, dose modification, and discontinuation rate. Conclusions: This meta-analysis validated that the HE regimen had superior efficacy over control in terms of ORR, CBR, PFS, and OS, but was accompanied with increasing toxicity. HDACi plus ET could serve as an important option in managing HoR+/HER2- MBC. Future studies may focus on the clinical difference among different HDACi and AE managements to enhance tolerability.

Clinical outcomes of tucidinostat-based therapy after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor progression in hormone receptor-positive heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy are standard first- or second-line treatment for patients with HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, however, there is currently no optimal recommendation for therapeutic strategies after progression on CDK4/6i. The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy and safety of HDAC inhibitor Tucidinostat combined with endocrine therapy in patients after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor progression. METHODS: The pathological and clinical data of 44 HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients treated with tucidinostat after progression on CDK4/6i at the Breast Oncology Department of the Fifth Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from July 2019 to October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Observation indexes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events. At the same time, we attempted to identify potential genomic predictors using available next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled in this study. Median follow-up was 10 months (1-26 months) by the data cutoff date (February 2022). The CBR was 6.8% (3/44), the median PFS was 2.0 months (95% CI 1.9-2.1), and the median OS was 14 months (95% CI 6.3-21.7). The mPFS was 4.1 months (95%CI: 0-8.2) in patients with 1 metastatic site, and the mPFS was 4.5 months (95%CI: 4.2-4.8) in patients who received sequential tucidinostat after CDK4/6i failure. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with 1 metastatic site or sequential tucidinostat treatment after failure of CDK4/6i were more likely to benefit from tucidinostat combined with endocrine therapy. Preliminary data showed PIK3CA mutation may be associated with resistance of tucidinostat therapy. No grade 4 adverse events and no treatment-related deaths were recorded in the study. Dose reductions because of adverse events occurred in 4 (9.1%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study preliminarily shows that tucidinostat combined with endocrine therapy may be an optional sequential strategy for patients with HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer that has progressed on CDK4/6 inhibitor, especially for these with lower tumor burden and fewer prior palliative treatment.

Clinical efficacy and molecular biomarkers in a phase II study of tucidinostat plus R-CHOP in elderly patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) present with poor clinical outcome and intolerance to intensive chemotherapy. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) show anti-lymphoma activities and can be applied to treat DLBCL. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of oral HDACI tucidinostat (formerly known as chidamide) plus R-CHOP (CR-CHOP) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL (International Prognostic Index ≥ 2). RESULTS: Among 49 patients, the complete response rate was 86%, with overall response rate achieving 94%. The 2-year progression survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68% (95% CI 52-79) and 83% (95% CI 68-91). Comparing with historical control (NCT01852435), the 2-year PFS and OS rates of double-expressor lymphoma phenotype (DEL) were improved, and negative prognostic effect of histone acetyltransferases CREBBP/EP300 mutations was also mitigated by CR-CHOP. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 171, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 27, and grade 3 anemia in 11 of 283 cycles. No grade 4 non-hematological adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: CR-CHOP is effective and safe in elderly patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. Relevance of DEL phenotype and molecular biomarkers on CR-CHOP response warrants further investigation in DLBCL. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02753647. Registered on April 28, 2016.