Anaesthesiologic Considerations for Intraoperative ECMO Anticoagulation During Lung Transplantation: A Single-Centre, Retrospective, Observational Study.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is frequently used during lung transplantation. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is mainly used as part of ECMO support for anticoagulation. One of the most common perioperative complications is bleeding, which high-dose UFH can aggravate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed (n = 141) patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2020 and 2022. All subjects (n = 109) underwent central cannulated VA ECMO with successful intraoperative ECMO weaning. Patients on ECMO bridge, postoperative ECMO, heart-lung transplants and transplants without ECMO were excluded. The dose of UFH for the entire surgical procedure, blood loss and consumption of blood derivatives intraoperatively and 48 h after ICU admission were recorded. Surgical revision for postoperative bleeding were analyzed. Thrombotic complications, mortality and long-term survival were evaluated. Results: Lower doses of UFH administered for intraoperative ECMO anticoagulation contribute to a reduction in intraoperative blood derivates consumption and blood loss with no thrombotic complications related to the patient or the ECMO circuit. Lower doses of UFH may lead to a decreased incidence of surgical revision for hemothorax. Conclusion: Lower doses of UFH as part of intraoperative ECMO anticoagulation might reduce the incidence of complications and lead to better postoperative outcomes.

Incidence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolisms in Stroke Patients.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common but preventable complication observed in critically ill patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the most common type of VTE, with clinical significance based on location and symptoms. There is an increased incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) in ischemic stroke patients using unfractionated heparin (UFH) for VTE prophylaxis compared with those using enoxaparin. However, UFH is still used in some patients due to its perceived safety, despite conflicting literature suggesting that enoxaparin may have a protective effect. The current study aimed to determine the incidence of VTEs in patients with acute ischemic strokes on UFH versus enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis, subclassifying the VTEs depending on their location and symptoms. It also aimed to examine the safety profile of both drugs. A total of 909 patients admitted to the Neuro-ICU with the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke were identified, and 634 patients were enrolled in the study-170 in the enoxaparin group and 464 in the UFH group-after applying the exclusion criteria. Nineteen patients in the UFH group (4.1%) and 3 patients in the enoxaparin group (1.8%) had a VTE. The incidence of DVT in the UFH group was 12 (2.6%), all of which were symptomatic, compared with 3 (1.8%) in the enoxaparin group, wherein one case was symptomatic. Nine patients (1.9%) in the UFH group developed a PE during the study period, and all of them were symptomatic. No patients in the enoxaparin group developed PE. No statistically significant difference was found between both groups. However, 18 patients in the UFH group (3.9%) experienced intracranial hemorrhage compared with none in the enoxaparin group, and this difference was statistically significant. Enoxaparin was found to be as effective as and potentially safer than UFH when used for VTE prophylaxis in stroke patients.

Anticoagulants in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: alternatives to standardized anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a vital technique for severe respiratory or heart failure patients. Bleeding and thrombotic events are common during ECMO and negatively impact patient outcomes. Unfractionated heparin is the primary anticoagulant, but its adverse effects limit its use, necessitating alternative anticoagulants. OBJECTIVE: Review available alternative anticoagulants for adult ECMO patients. Explore potential novel anticoagulants for future ECMO use. Aim to reduce complications (bleeding and thrombosis) and improve safety and efficacy for critically ill ECMO patients. METHODS: Comprehensive literature review of existing and emerging anticoagulants for ECMO. RESULTS: Identified a range of alternative anticoagulants beyond unfractionated heparin. Evaluated their potential utility in mitigating ECMO-related complications. CONCLUSION: Diverse anticoagulant options are available and under investigation for ECMO. These alternatives may enhance patient safety and outcomes during ECMO support. Further research and clinical studies are warranted to determine their effectiveness and safety profiles.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and potential risk of thromboembolic events: Analysis of the WHO global database of individual case safety reports.

Introduction: Thromboembolic events with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer have been reported in few studies. However, the detailed profile of these cases remains mostly uncertain. Method: A descriptive analysis of Thromboembolic events associated with ICIs retrieved from the VigiBase, between 1967 to November 2020. We extracted the data using the terms of 'pulmonary embolism' OR 'deep vein thrombosis' OR 'acute coronary syndrome' OR 'myocardial infarction' OR 'ischemic stroke' (preferred term (PT) (MedDRA). Results: We included 161 cases from 26 countries in our descriptive analysis. Patients' ages were reported in 141 (87.6%) cases, with a median of 68 years (interquartile range 61-74), and 63.4% of the patients were male. Indications for ICIs were reported in 151 (93.8%) cases, as follows: lung cancer (n = 85, 52.8%), renal cell carcinoma (n = 24, 14.9%), melanoma (n = 20, 12.4%), urethral carcinoma (n = 12, 7.45%), breast cancer (n = 4, 2.48%), adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (n = 3, 1.9%), gastric cancer (n = 2, 1.24%), and skin cancer (n = 1, 0.62%). Nivolumab was reported as a suspected drug in 76 cases (47%), pembrolizumab in 46 cases (28.5%), atezolizumab in 21 cases (13%), durvalumab in 14 cases (8.6%), and avelumab in four cases (2.4%).The time to onset of thromboembolic events was reported in 127 (78.8%) cases. Most of these patients (n = 109, 85.8%) reported thromboembolic events within the first six months. The causality assessment of included cases showed that 50.3% of reported thromboembolic events were possibly related to the suspected reported medication, 13.7% were probably related, 13% were unlikely to be related, and 23% were not assessable due to insufficient information. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a possible association between the use of ICIs and thromboembolic events. Further epidemiological studies are needed to assess this association and to elucidate the underlying mechanism.

Systematic review of machine learning models for personalised dosing of heparin.

AIM: To identify and critically appraise studies of prediction models, developed using machine learning (ML) methods, for determining the optimal dosing of unfractionated heparin (UFH). METHODS: Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and IEEE Xplore databases were searched from inception to 31 January 2020 to identify relevant studies using key search terms synonymous with artificial intelligence or ML, 'prediction', 'dose', 'activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)' and 'UFH.' Studies had to have used ML methods for developing models that predicted optimal dose of UFH or target therapeutic aPTT levels in the hospital setting. The CHARMS Checklist was used to assess quality and risk of bias of included studies. RESULTS: Of 8393 retrieved abstracts, 61 underwent full text review and eight studies met inclusion criteria. Four studies described models for predicting aPTT, three studies described models predicting optimal dose of heparin during dialysis and one study described a model that used surrogate outcomes of clotting and bleeding to predict a therapeutic aPTT. Studies varied widely in reporting of study participants, feature characterisation and selection, handling of missing data, sample size calculations and the intended clinical application of the model. Only one study conducted an external validation and no studies evaluated model impacts in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Studies of ML models for UFH dosing are few and none report a model ready for routine clinical use. Existing studies are limited by low methodological quality, inadequate reporting of study factors and absence of external validation and impact analysis.

Unfractionated heparin infusion for treatment of venous thromboembolism based on actual body weight without dose capping.

Controversy exists regarding the use of dose capping of weight-based unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions in obese and morbidly obese patients. The primary objective of this study was to compare time to first therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in hospitalized patients receiving UFH for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) among three body mass index (BMI) cohorts: non-obese (< 30 kg/m2), obese (30-39.9 kg/m2), and morbidly obese (⩾ 40 kg/m2). In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they ⩾ 18 years of age, had a documented VTE, and were on an infusion of UFH for at least 24 hours. Weight-based UFH doses were calculated using actual body weight. A total of 423 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 230 (54.4%), 146 (34.5%), and 47 (11.1%) patients in the non-obese, obese, and morbidly obese cohorts, respectively. Median times to therapeutic aPTT were 16.4, 16.6, and 17.1 hours in each cohort. Within 24 hours, the cumulative incidence rates for therapeutic aPTT were 70.7% for the non-obese group, 69.9% for the obese group, and 61.7% for the morbidly obese group (obese vs non-obese: HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82-1.26, p = 0.88; morbidly obese vs non-obese: HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.62-1.21, p = 0.41). There was no significant difference in major bleeding events between BMI groups (obese vs non-obese, p = 0.91; morbidly obese vs non-obese, p = 0.98). Based on our study, heparin dosing based on actual body weight without a dose cap is safe and effective.

Quality performance for indirect Xa inhibitor monitoring in patients using international external quality data.

Objectives Chromogenic anti-activated factor X (FXa) assays are currently the "gold standard" for monitoring indirect anticoagulants. However, anti-FXa has been shown to vary according to the choice of reagents. In the present study, the performance of anti-FXa measurement was evaluated in order to gain more insight into the clinical applications. Furthermore, the longitudinal coefficient of variation (CV) was studied to investigate whether there is improvement over time. Methods Laboratory tests results were evaluated for samples spiked with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux and danaparoid sodium. External quality assessment (EQA) data from multiple years were used from more than 100 laboratories. Results Comparison of the results for all methods showed significant differences in measured values between the frequently used methods (ANOVA: p < 0.001). The largest differences were observed for LMWH and UFH measurements. These differences may be caused by differences in method composition, such as the addition of dextran sulphate. Substantial interlaboratory variation in anti-FXa monitoring was observed for all parameters, particularly at low concentrations. Our results showed that below 0.35 IU/mL, the CVs for UFH and LMWH increase dramatically and results below this limit should be used with caution. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that the choice of the anti-FXa method is particularly important for UFH and LMWH measurement. The variation in measurements may have an effect on clinical implications, such as therapeutic ranges. Furthermore, the longitudinal EQA data demonstrated a constant performance and, in at least 50% of the cases, improvement in the CV% of the anti-Xa results over time.

Characterization of a Bioflocculant (MBF-UFH) Produced by Bacillus sp. AEMREG7.

A bioflocculant named MBF-UFH produced by a Bacillus species isolated from sediment samples of Algoa Bay of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa was characterized. The bacterial identification was through 16S rDNA sequencing; nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank as Bacillus sp. AEMREG7 with Accession Number KP659187. The production of the bioflocculant was observed to be closely associated with cell growth. The bioflocculant had the highest flocculating activity of 83.2% after 72 h of cultivation, and approximately 1.6 g of purified MBF-UFH was recovered from 1 L of fermentation broth. Its chemical analyses indicated that it is a glycoprotein composed of polysaccharide (76%) and protein (14%). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) revealed that it consisted of hydroxyl, amide, carboxyl and methoxyl as the functional moieties. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed the amorphous structure of MBF-UFH and flocculated kaolin clay particles. The maximum flocculating activity of 92.6% against kaolin clay suspension was achieved at 0.3 mg/mL over pH ranges of 3-11 with the peak flocculating rate at pH 8 in the presence of MgCl2. The bioflocculant retained high flocculating activity of 90% after heating at 100 °C for 1 h. MBF-UFH appears to have immense potential as an alternative to conventional chemical flocculants.

Pharmacokinetic Modeling Using Real-World Data to Optimize Unfractionated Heparin Dosing in Pediatric Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Evaluate Target Achievement-Clinical Outcomes Relationship.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a commonly used anticoagulant for pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), but evidence is lacking on the ideal dosing. We aimed to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for UFH, measured through anti-factor Xa assay; (2) optimize UFH starting infusions and dose titrations through simulations; and (3) explore UFH exposure-clinical outcomes relationship. Data from 218 patients admitted to Utah's Primary Children's Hospital were retrospectively collected. A 1-compartment PK model with time-varying clearance (CL) adequately described UFH PK. Weight on CL and volume of distribution and ECMO circuit change on CL were significant covariates. The typical estimates for initial CL and first-order rate constant to reach steady-state CL were 0.57 L/(h·10 kg) and 0.02/h. Comparable to non-ECMO patients, the typical steady-state CL was 0.81 L/(h·10 kg). Simulations showed that a 75 IU/kg UFH bolus dose followed by starting infusions of 25 and 20 IU/h/kg for patients aged younger than 6 years and 6 years or older, respectively, achieved the therapeutic target in 56.6% of all patients, whereas only 3.1% exceeded the target. The proposed UFH titration schemes achieved the target in more than 90% of patients while less than 0.63% were above the target after 24 and 48 hours of treatment. The median intensive care unit survival time in patients within and below the target at 24 hours was 136 and 66 hours, respectively. In conclusion, PK model of UFH was developed for pediatric patients on ECMO. The proposed UFH dosing scheme attained the anti-factor Xa target rapidly and safely.

Standardization of Anti-Xa Assay and its Comparison with Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin Therapy.

Monitoring of anticoagulant activity of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is primarily done with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), which is affected by many factors. Anti-Xa assays are considered to overcome these factors and may provide a better method for monitoring patients on UFH with a narrow therapeutic range. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of aPTT and anti-Xa assays in UFH monitoring. A prospective non-randomized study was carried out in two stages: first, the anti-Xa assay was standardized using kit instructions; each sample was then analyzed by both tests. The outcomes of the two assays were compared and assessed for agreement of maintaining therapeutic anticoagulant levels. These levels for anti-Xa assay were between 0.3 and 0.7 IU/ml, while it was 1.5-2.5 times the control for aPTT assay. Below this range was regarded as subtherapeutic, and above this as supratherapeutic. A total of 90 samples were tested and analyzed using both assays. Most of them (> 70%) were noted to be in subtherapeutic levels with both tests. The overall concordance was 73.3%, and the estimated kappa value was 0.483 (0.396-0.57). The correlation between aPTT and anti-Xa assay was 0.74 (p < 0.001). With anti-Xa levels in the therapeutic range, aPTT levels were in subtherapeutic in 60% and supratherapeutic in 13.3% cases. Although both the testing strategies had a good agreement and correlation, discordance was observed in interpretative values with anti-Xa levels in therapeutic range and aPTT levels in non-therapeutic range. Its clinical implications need to be evaluated further in future studies.

An approach for integrating toxicogenomic data in risk assessment: the dibutyl phthalate case study.

An approach for evaluating and integrating genomic data in chemical risk assessment was developed based on the lessons learned from performing a case study for the chemical dibutyl phthalate. A case study prototype approach was first developed in accordance with EPA guidance and recommendations of the scientific community. Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) was selected for the case study exercise. The scoping phase of the dibutyl phthalate case study was conducted by considering the available DBP genomic data, taken together with the entire data set, for whether they could inform various risk assessment aspects, such as toxicodynamics, toxicokinetics, and dose-response. A description of weighing the available dibutyl phthalate data set for utility in risk assessment provides an example for considering genomic data for future chemical assessments. As a result of conducting the scoping process, two questions--Do the DBP toxicogenomic data inform 1) the mechanisms or modes of action?, and 2) the interspecies differences in toxicodynamics?--were selected to focus the case study exercise. Principles of the general approach include considering the genomics data in conjunction with all other data to determine their ability to inform the various qualitative and/or quantitative aspects of risk assessment, and evaluating the relationship between the available genomic and toxicity outcome data with respect to study comparability and phenotypic anchoring. Based on experience from the DBP case study, recommendations and a general approach for integrating genomic data in chemical assessment were developed to advance the broader effort to utilize 21st century data in risk assessment.

[Use of heparin calibrated anti-Xa assay for apixaban and rivaroxaban measurement in the context of regional telestroke activity]. / Estimation de la concentration en apixaban et en rivaroxaban par l'activité anti-Xa héparine en contexte d'activité régionale de télé-AVC.

INTRODUCTION: In Bordeaux University Hospital, neurologists are required to prescribe thrombolysis using telemedicine (telethrombolysis) for anticoagulated stroke patients admitted in peripheral centers in the Nouvelle-Aquitaine region. However, due to the bleeding risk, the maximum concentration of DOAC authorizing thrombolysis is 30, 50 or 100 ng/mL (depending on the sources and the patient-specific benefit-risk ratio). Most of the time, specific assays of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are not available in these peripheral centers. We therefore studied an alternative test: the Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) anti-Xa activity which is available in most laboratories and could be used to estimate the DOAC concentration. METHODS: Five centers were included in our study: three centers using the Liquid Anti-Xa HemosIL® Werfen reagent and two centers using the STA-Liquid Anti-Xa® Stago reagent. For each reagent, we established correlation curves between DOAC and UFH anti-Xa activities and determinated UFH cut-offs for the thresholds of 30, 50 and 100 ng/mL respectively. RESULTS: A total of 1455 plasmas were tested. There is an excellent correlation between DOAC and UFH anti-Xa activities using a third-degree modeling curve, independently the reagent used. However, a significant inter-reagent variability is observed concerning the obtained cut-offs. CONCLUSION: Our study makes unsuitable the use of a universal cut-off. In opposition to recommendations made by other publications, the UFH cut-offs must be adapted to the reagent used locally by the laboratory, and to the considered DOAC.

A Case Series of Parturients With Mechanical Mitral Valves: Anticoagulation Management During Labor and Delivery.

More women with mechanical mitral valves (MMVs) are pursuing pregnancy. Guidelines exist for pregnancy anticoagulation, but they do not address individualized anticoagulation during delivery-a period of risk for bleeding, thrombosis, and anesthetic complications. This case series of parturients with MMVs highlights the challenges in, and the evidence and strategies for, treating these patients. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Smoking and Activated Clotting Time during coronary angiography and angioplasty: protocol for the ACT-Tobacco trial.

Background: During percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), activated clotting time (ACT) measurements are recommended to attest a correct anticoagulation level and, if needed, to administer further unfractionated heparin (UFH) to obtain a therapeutic ACT value. Our clinical routine led us to observe that smokers had lower ACT values after standardized UFH administration during PTCA. Procoagulant status in smokers is well documented. Objectives: To determine whether tobacco negatively affects UFH anticoagulation during PTCA when evaluated by ACT. Methods: The ACT-TOBACCO trial is a single-center, noninterventional, prospective study. The primary end point is the comparison of ACT values after standardized UFH administration between active smokers and nonsmokers (active smoker group vs nonsmoker group) requiring coronary angiography followed by PTCA. The main secondary end points include ACT comparison after the first and second standardized UFH administration according to the patient's smoking status (active, ex-, or nonsmoker) and the clinical presentation of ischemic cardiomyopathy: stable (silent ischemia or stable angina) or unstable (unstable angina or acute coronary syndrome without or with ST-segment elevation). Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, ACT values during PTCA between smokers and nonsmokers have not previously been compared. As current PTCA procedures increase in complexity and duration, the understanding of procoagulant risk factors such as smoking and the need for reliable anticoagulation monitoring becomes essential to balance hemorrhagic risk against thrombotic risk.

Differential Neutralization of Unfractionated Heparin and Enoxaparin by Andexanet Alfa.

INTRODUCTION: Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is an approved antidote used to reverse the bleeding effects of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (Direct-Xa agents) agents because it reverses anti-Xa activity. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) exhibit anti-Xa activity. The purpose is to investigate the neutralization of UFH and LMWH by andexanet in activated clotting time (ACT), thrombelastography (TEG), and anti-Xa due to the protamine sulfate shortage. METHODS: UFH and LMWH were studied with andexanet, PS, or saline as potential reversal agents/controls at varying concentrations in ACT, TEG, and anti-Xa and compared to each other. RESULTS: Andexanet partially neutralized both drugs several TEG parameters at high andexanet concentrations, but it was not as effective as protamine sulfate in any of the assays used. Most TEG parameters were correlated with andexanet concentration. In ACT, significant neutralization was demonstrated at many andexanet concentrations for UFH, but not LMWH. UFH was completely neutralized by PS in ACT, while LMWH was partially neutralized by PS in ACT. Andexanet alfa was a less effective neutralization agent than the protamine sulfate as it only partially neutralized UFH in ACT and was ineffective at neutralizing LMWH when tested at the same concentration as PS (10 ug/mL). CONCLUSION: Andexanet partially neutralized UFH and LMWH with variability between assays, necessitating investigation into assay-dependent differences.

Reassessing the Pediatric Dosing Recommendations for Unfractionated Heparin Using Real-World Data: A Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling Approach.

Optimal pediatric dosing of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is challenging because of the paucity of clinical outcome and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies in pediatrics. This study aimed to: (i) develop a PK/PD model for UFH, quantified by anti-factor Xa assay, and the UFH effect, measured by activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT); and (ii) use simulations to evaluate pediatric UFH infusions for achieving the anti-factor Xa (0.3-0.7 IU/mL) therapeutic target. Electronic health record data were retrospectively collected from 633 patients aged <19 years admitted to Texas Children's Hospital. The PK/PD model was developed using a 70% (training)/30% (testing) split-sample approach. A 1-compartment PK model with linear elimination adequately described the UFH PK. An allometrically scaled body weight on clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) with an age-dependent maturation function of extracellular water on Vd were the covariates identified. Comparable with literature, the typical values for CL and Vd were 3.28 L/(h·50 kg) and 8.83 L/50 kg, respectively. A linear model adequately described the UFH-aPTT relationship with an estimated slope of 150 seconds/(IU/mL). Simulations of the currently recommended starting infusions (28 IU/h/kg for pediatrics <1 year old or 20 IU/h/kg for pediatrics >1 year old) showed that the anti-factor Xa therapeutic target was achieved only in 15.3%, 14.6%, 36.9%, and 45.11% of subjects in the age groups of <1 year, 1-6 years, 6-12 years, and 12-19 years, respectively. In conclusion, the UFH anti-factor Xa target is not achieved initially, especially in young pediatrics, suggesting the need to optimize UFH dosing to achieve higher therapeutic success.

Low-molecular-weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis in COVID-19 worsens mortality. In our study, we sought to investigate how the dose and type of anticoagulation (AC) can influence patient outcomes. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of critically ill intubated patients with COVID-19, comparing low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) at therapeutic and prophylactic doses. Of 218 patients, 135 received LMWH (70 prophylactic, 65 therapeutic) and 83 UFH (11 prophylactic, 72 therapeutic). The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were thromboembolic complications confirmed on imaging and major bleeding complications. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to determine whether the type and dose of AC were independent predictors of survival. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to compare the cumulative survivals. RESULTS: Overall, therapeutic AC, with either LMWH (65% vs 79%, P = .09) or UFH (32% vs 46%, P = .73), conveyed no survival benefit over prophylactic AC. UFH was associated with a higher mortality rate than LMWH (66% vs 28%, P = .001), which was also evident in the multivariable analysis (LMWH vs UFH mortality, hazard ratio: 0.47, P = .001) and in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Thrombotic and bleeding complications did not depend on the AC type (prophylactic LMWH vs UFH: thrombosis P = .49, bleeding P = .075; therapeutic LMWH vs UFH: thrombosis P = .5, bleeding P = .17). When comparing prophylactic with therapeutic AC, the rate of both thrombotic and bleeding complications was higher with the use of LMWH compared with UFH. In addition, transfusion requirements were significantly higher with both therapeutic LMWH and UFH. CONCLUSIONS: Among intubated critically ill COVID-19 intensive care unit patients, therapeutic AC, with either LMWH or UFH, conveyed no survival benefit over prophylactic AC. AC with LMWH was associated with higher cumulative survival compared with AC with UFH.

Inhalational injury and use of heparin & N-acetylcysteine nebulization: A case report.

Inhalational injury to the upper and lower airway occurs due to thermal or chemical irritation causing airway edema, capillary leak, mucin, and fibrin debris forming clots and soot. The use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) nebulization was found to be effective by dissolving airway clots. We report a case of inhalational burn injury where UFH nebulization led to a better outcome. A healthy male was trapped in a residential room during a fire in the building. He sustained facial, neck, upper chest, and left upper extremity burns accounting for 25% of body surface area. He was intubated at the site and started on supportive care. In the surgical intensive care unit, bronchoscopy showed severe tracheobronchial burn injury; a thorough lavage was done, started on UFH and N-acetylcysteine nebulization (NAC). The patient improved, and his trachea was extubated on day 6. In our patient, unfractionated heparin nebulization was beneficial as the patient was extubated early without landing to acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Real-World Management of Pharmacological Thromboprophylactic Strategies for COVID-19 Patients in Japan: From the CLOT-COVID Study.

Background: Data on prophylactic anticoagulation are important in understanding the current issues, unmet needs, and optimal management of Japanese COVID-19 patients. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the clinical management strategies for prophylactic anticoagulation of COVID-19 patients in Japan. Methods: The CLOT-COVID study was a multicenter observational study that enrolled 2,894 consecutive hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The study population consisted of 2,889 patients (after excluding 5 patients with missing data); it was divided into 2 groups: patients with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (n = 1,240) and those without (n = 1,649). Furthermore, we evaluated the 1,233 patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation-excluding 7 patients who could not be classified based on the intensity of their anticoagulants-who were then divided into 2 groups: patients receiving prophylactic anticoagulant doses (n = 889) and therapeutic anticoagulant doses (n = 344). Results: The most common pharmacological thromboprophylaxis anticoagulant was unfractionated heparin (68.2%). The severity of COVID-19 at admission was a predictor of the implementation of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the multivariable analysis (moderate vs mild: OR: 16.6; 95% CI:13.2-21.0; P < 0.001, severe vs mild: OR: 342.6, 95% CI: 107.7-1090.2; P < 0.001). It was also a predictor of the usage of anticoagulants of therapeutic doses in the multivariable analysis (moderate vs mild: OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.46-3.02; P < 0.001, severe vs mild: OR: 5.96; 95% CI: 3.91-9.09; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In the current real-world Japanese registry, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, especially anticoagulants at therapeutic doses, was selectively implemented in COVID-19 patients with comorbidities and severe COVID-19 status at admission.