Interleukin-37 reduces inflammation and impairs phagocytosis of platelets in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP).

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet count with heterogeneous bleeding manifestations. Severe bleeding in ITP is not completely related with low platelet count. Fcγ receptor (FcγR)-mediated platelet destruction is one of the major mechanisms of ITP. Interleukin-37 (IL-37) is a fundamental natural suppressor of innate immunity and inflammatory responses in several autoimmune diseases. However, the role of IL-37 in the pathogenesis of ITP is unknown. In the present study, we identified that IL-37 expression was elevated in ITP patients, which was correlated with platelet count and the severity of bleeding in ITP, indicating that IL-37 could be a candidate in evaluating disease severity of ITP. In the in vitro study, IL-37 initiated an anti-inflammatory effect on monocytes/macrophages from ITP patients by down-regulating the phosphorylation of MAPK, AKT, and NF-κB signaling pathways. Moreover, IL-37 restored the balance of activating and inhibitory FcγRs and decreased antibody-mediated platelet phagocytosis by monocytes/macrophages. Our findings suggest that IL-37 may be a promising indicator of the disease severity and supplementation of IL-37 may be therapeutically beneficial for ITP patients.

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the performance of a novel combination powder vs hemostatic matrix in cardiothoracic operations.

AIM: This trial compared the hemostatic performance of a novel combination powder (CP) to a control hemostatic matrix (HM) in cardiothoracic operations. METHODS: Patients meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled after providing informed consent. Subjects were randomized intraoperatively to receive CP (HEMOBLAST Bellows; Biom'up, France) or HM (FLOSEAL Hemostatic Matrix; Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Hayward, CA). Bleeding was assessed using a clinically validated, quantitative bleeding severity scale. The primary endpoint was total time to hemostasis (TTTH), from the start of device preparation, as an indicator of when a surgeon asks for a surgical hemostat until hemostasis was achieved. TTTH at 3 minutes was utilized for the primary analysis, while TTTH at 5 minutes was considered as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 105 subjects were enrolled across four institutions. The primary efficacy endpoint for the superiority of CP relative to HM for success at achieving hemostasis within 3 minutes was met, with 64.2% of the CP group achieving hemostasis compared with 9.6% of the HM group, a difference of 54.54% (37.4%-71.6%; P < .001 for superiority). The secondary efficacy endpoint was also met, with 92.5% of the CP group achieving hemostasis at 5 minutes versus 44.2% in the HM group, a difference of 48.2% (31.1%-65.4%; P < .001 for noninferiority). There were no device-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, comparison of CP to HM revealed CP superiority and noninferiority for TTTH at 3 and 5 minutes, respectively.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a new hemostatic powder using a quantitative surface bleeding severity scale.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The safety and efficacy of a hemostatic powder (HP) versus a control agent, absorbable gelatin sponge and thrombin (G + T), were assessed, using a validated, quantitative bleeding severity scale. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to receive HP (256 subjects) or G + T (132 subjects) for treatment of minimal, mild, or moderate bleeding at 20 investigational sites. The primary efficacy endpoint was non-inferiority of HP relative to G + T for success at achieving hemostasis within 6 minutes. Secondary endpoints in rank order included: superiority of HP relative to G + T in mean preparation time; non-inferiority of HP relative to G + T for achieving hemostasis within 3 min; superiority of HP relative to G + T for achieving hemostasis within 6 min; and superiority of HP relative to G + T for success for achieving hemostasis within 3 min. RESULTS: A total of 388 subjects were included in the primary efficacy analysis. At 6 min, hemostasis was achieved in 93.0% (238/256) of the HP group compared to 77.3% (102/132) of the G + T group (non-inferiority P < 0.0001, superiority P < 0.0001). All secondary endpoints were met. Complications were comparable between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: HP had superior rates of hemostasis, shorter preparation time, and a similar safety profile compared to G + T in this prospective, randomized trial using quantitative bleeding severity criteria.

The Utility of the Validated Intraoperative Bleeding Scale in Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Prospective Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of the validated intraoperative bleeding severity scale (VIBe) in thoracolumbar spine surgery. METHODS: Adult patients aged 18 through 88 undergoing elective decompression, instrumentation, and fusion of the thoracolumbar spine were prospectively enrolled after informed consent was provided and written consent was obtained. Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scores were recorded intraoperatively. Univariate analysis consisted of Student T-tests, Pearson's χ2 Tests, Fisher's Exact Tests, linear regression, and binary logistic regression. Multivariable regression was conducted to adjust for baseline characteristics and potential confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of N = 121 patients were enrolled and included in the analysis. After adjusting for confounders, VIBe scores were correlated with an increased likelihood of intraoperative blood transfusion (ß = 2.46, P = .012), postoperative blood transfusion (ß = 2.36, P = .015), any transfusion (ß = 2.49, P < .001), total transfusion volume (ß = 180.8, P = .020), and estimated blood loss (EBL) (ß = 409, P < .001). Validated intraoperative bleeding severity scores had no significant association with length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, 30-day reoperation, 30-day emergency department visit, change in pre- to post-op hemoglobin and hematocrit, total drain output, or length of surgery. CONCLUSION: The VIBe scale is associated with perioperative transfusion rates and EBL in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Overall, the VIBe scale has clinically relevant meaning in spine surgery, and shows potential utility in clinical research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Development of a bleeding scale and hemostasis algorithm in cranial neurosurgery.

Effective hemostasis is crucial in neurosurgery as anatomical and functional considerations reduce tolerance for any bleeding. The classification of bleeding severities is a necessary step to enable neurosurgeons to counteract bleeding during surgery. Even though bleeding scales are used for a variety of surgical specialties, they cannot be transferred to cranial neurosurgery without adaption, and no consensus on the nature of such a classification exists to date. Moreover, there is plethora of topical hemostasis products with diverse mechanisms of action and application available. Clinical studies investigating those products used in neurosurgery did not define standardized procedures. This article demonstrates the systematic establishment of both a bleeding scale and a hemostasis algorithm to close this gap in the assessment of intracranial bleeding. The expert panel consisting of 7 members from different neurosurgical centers developed a qualitative bleeding scale with the peculiarities of neurosurgical procedures, based on the experience of each member in daily practice. The hemostasis algorithm is a recommendation for neurosurgeons to aid in the decision-making process to control any sort of bleeding, taking into account the rational use of available hemostatics, depending on type and location of bleeding, as well as the mechanism of action of such agents. Effectiveness of hemostasis, surgery times and economic costs can be optimized by applying the algorithm in daily practice.

Adequacy of Anesthesia and Pupillometry for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

Inadequate intraoperative analgesia causes the deterioration of the condition of the surgical field (CSF) as a result of hemodynamic instability. Analgesia monitors are used to guide remifentanil) infusion to optimize intraoperative analgesia. The main aim of the current randomized controlled trial was to investigate the potential advantages of intraoperative analgesia monitoring using surgical Pleth index (SPI)- or pupillometry (PRD)-guided remifentanil administration for managing the volume of total intraoperative blood loss (TEIBL), CSF, and length of operation (LOP) in comparison with the standard practice in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The 89 patients in our study were grouped as follows: 30 patients were assigned to the general analgesia (GA) group, 31 patients were assigned to the SPI group, and 28 patients were assigned to the PRD group. The speed of remifentanil infusion was accelerated by 50% when SPI, PRD, or BSS were increased by >15 points, >5%, or >2, respectively, in adjacent groups until their normalization. The SPI group showed significantly lower TEIBL in comparison to the GA group (165.2 ± 100.2 vs. 283.3 ± 193.5 mL; p < 0.05) and a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP; 73.9 ± 8 vs. 69.2 ± 6.8 mmHg; p < 0.05). In the PRD group, a shorter LOP compared with the GA group was observed (63.1 ± 26.7 min vs. 82.6 ± 33.1 min; p < 0.05). It was noted that the PRD group had a lower total remifentanil consumption than the SPI group (1.3 ± 1.4 vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 mg; p < 0.05). In ASA I-III patients undergoing ESS, intraoperative monitoring based on state entropy and SPI values can optimize the CSF and reduce TEIBL, whereas monitoring based on state entropy and PRD measurements can optimize the cost effectiveness of anesthetic drugs and the use of the operation room.

Development and implementation of a novel immune thrombocytopenia bleeding score for dogs.

BACKGROUND: A method of quantifying clinical bleeding in dogs with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is needed because ITP patients have variable bleeding tendencies that inconsistently correlate with platelet count. A scoring system will facilitate patient comparisons and allow stratification based on bleeding severity in clinical trials. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a bleeding assessment tool for dogs, and a training course for improving its consistent implementation. ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 61) with platelet counts <50,000/µL; 34 classified as primary ITP, 17 as secondary ITP, and 10 as non-ITP. METHODS: A novel bleeding assessment tool, DOGiBAT, comprising bleeding grades from 0 (none) to 2 (severe) at 9 anatomic sites, was developed. Clinicians and technicians completed a training course and quiz before scoring thrombocytopenic patients. The training course was assessed by randomizing student volunteers to take the quiz with or without prior training. A logistic regression model assessed the association between training and quiz performance. The correlation of DOGiBAT score with platelet count and outcome measures was assessed in the thrombocytopenic dogs. RESULTS: Clinicians and technicians consistently applied the DOGiBAT, correctly scoring all quiz cases. The odds of trained students answering correctly were higher than those of untrained students (P < .0001). In clinical cases, DOGiBAT score and platelet count were inversely correlated (rs = -0.527, P < .0001), and DOGiBAT directly correlated with transfusion requirements (rs = 0.512, P < .0001) and hospitalization duration (rs = 0.35, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The DOGiBAT and assessment quiz are simple tools to standardize evaluation of bleeding severity. With further validation, the DOGiBAT may provide a clinically relevant metric to characterize ITP severity and monitor response in treatment trials.