RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate how canal area size changed from before surgery and up to 2 years after decompressive lumbar surgery lumbar spinal stenosis. Further, to investigate if an area change postoperatively (between 3 months to 2 years) was associated with any preoperative demographic, clinical or MRI variables or surgical method used. METHODS: The present study is analysis of data from the NORDSTEN- SST trial where 437 patients were randomized to one of three mini-invasive surgical methods for lumbar spinal stenosis. The patients underwent MRI examination of the lumbar spine before surgery, and 3 and 24 months after surgery. For all operated segments the dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) was measured in mm2. Baseline factors collected included age, gender, BMI and smoking habits. Furthermore, surgical method, index level, number of levels operated, all levels operated on and baseline Schizas grade were also included in the analysis. RESULTS: 437 patients were enrolled in the NORDSTEN-SST trial, whereof 310 (71%) had MRI at 3 months and 2 years. Mean DSCA at index level was 52.0 mm2 (SD 21.2) at baseline, at 3 months it increased to 117.2 mm2 (SD 43.0) and after 2 years the area was 127.7 mm2 (SD 52.5). Surgical method, level operated on or Schizas did not influence change in DSCA from 3 to 24 months follow-up. CONCLUSION: The spinal canal area after lumbar decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis increased from baseline to 3 months after surgery and remained thereafter unchanged 2 years postoperatively.
Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica , Dura-Máter , Vértebras Lombares , Estenose Espinal , Humanos , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Estenose Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Dura-Máter/cirurgia , Dura-Máter/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Resultado do Tratamento , Canal Medular/diagnóstico por imagem , Canal Medular/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can be challenging because radicular pain is not often present in the culprit-level localization. Accurate segmentation and quantitative analysis of the lumbar dura on radiographic images are key to the accurate differential diagnosis of LSS. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic dura-contouring tool for radiographic quantification on computed tomography myelogram (CTM) for patients with LSS. METHODS: A total of 518 CTM cases with or without lumbar stenosis were included in this study. A deep learning (DL) segmentation algorithm 3-dimensional (3D) U-Net was deployed. A total of 210 labeled cases were used to develop the dura-contouring tool, with the ratio of the training, independent testing, and external validation datasets being 150:30:30. The Dice score (DCS) was the primary measure to evaluate the segmentation performance of the 3D U-Net, which was subsequently developed as the dura-contouring tool to segment another unlabeled 308 CTM cases with LSS. Automatic masks of 446 slices on the stenotic levels were then meticulously reviewed and revised by human experts, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dura was compared. RESULTS: The mean DCS of the 3D U-Net were 0.905 ± 0.080, 0.933 ± 0.018, and 0.928 ± 0.034 in the five-fold cross-validation, the independent testing, and the external validation datasets, respectively. The segmentation performance of the dura-contouring tool was also comparable to that of the second observer (the human expert). With the dura-contouring tool, only 59.0% (263/446) of the automatic masks of the stenotic slices needed to be revised. In the revised cases, there were no significant differences in the dura CSA between automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (p = 0.652). Additionally, a strong correlation of dura CSA was found between the automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (r = 0.805). CONCLUSIONS: A dura-contouring tool was developed that could automatically segment the dural sac on CTM, and it demonstrated high accuracy and generalization ability. Additionally, the dura-contouring tool has the potential to be applied in patients with LSS because it facilitates the quantification of the dural CSA on stenotic slices.
Assuntos
Aprendizado Profundo , Dura-Máter , Vértebras Lombares , Mielografia , Estenose Espinal , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Estenose Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Dura-Máter/diagnóstico por imagem , Dura-Máter/patologia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Mielografia/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Algoritmos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: In the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), finding stenosis with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not always correlate with symptoms such as sciatica or intermittent claudication. We perform decompression surgery only for cases where the levels diagnosed from neurological findings are symptomatic, even if multiple stenoses are observed on MRI. The objective of this study was to examine the time course of asymptomatic stenosis in patients with LSS after they underwent decompression surgery for symptomatic stenosis. Materials and Methods: The participants in this study comprised 137 LSS patients who underwent single-level L4-5 decompression surgery from 2003 to 2013. The dural sac cross-sectional area at the L3-4 disc level was calculated based on preoperative MRI. A cross-sectional area less than 50 mm2 was defined as stenosis. The patients were grouped, according to additional spinal stenosis at the L3-4 level, into a double group (16 cases) with L3-4 stenosis, and a single group (121 cases) without L3-4 stenosis. Incidences of new-onset symptoms originating from L3-4 and additional L3-4-level surgery were examined. Results: Five years after surgery, 98 cases (72%) completed follow-up. During follow-up, 2 of 12 patients in the double group (16.7%) and 9 of 86 patients in the single group (10.5%) presented with new-onset symptoms originating from L3-4, showing no significant difference between groups. Additional L3-4 surgery was performed for one patient (8.3%) in the double group and three patients (3.5%) in the single group; again, no significant difference was shown. Conclusion: Patients with asymptomatic L3-4 stenosis on preoperative MRI were not prone to develop new symptoms or need additional L3-4-level surgery within 5 years after surgery when compared to patients without preoperative L3-4 stenosis. These results indicate that prophylactic decompression for asymptomatic levels is unnecessary.
Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica , Vértebras Lombares , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Estenose Espinal , Humanos , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Estenose Espinal/complicações , Estenose Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Feminino , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is used in lumbar surgery, but initial adequate analgesia fails in some patients. In these cases, spinal redosing or conversion to general endotracheal anesthesia is required, both of which are detrimental to the patient experience and surgical workflow. METHODS: We reviewed cases of lumbar surgery performed under SA from 2017-2021. We identified 12 cases of inadequate first dose and then selected 36 random patients as controls. We used a measurement tool to approximate the volume of the dural sac for each patient using T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging sequences. RESULTS: Patients who had an inadequate first dose of anesthesia had a significantly larger dural sac volume, 22.8 ± 7.9 cm3 in the inadequate dose group and 17.4 ± 4.7 cm3 in controls (P = 0.043). The inadequate dose group was significantly younger, 54.2 ± 8.8 years in failed first dose and 66.4 ± 11.9 years in controls (P = 0.001). The groups did not differ by surgical procedure (P = 0.238), level (P = 0.353), American Society of Anesthesia score (P = 0.546), or comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: We found that age, larger height, and dural sac volume are risk factors for an inadequate first dose of SA. The availability of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing spine surgery allows the preoperative measurement of their thecal sac size. In the future, these data may be used to personalize spinal anesthesia dosing on the basis of individual anatomic variables and potentially reduce the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia in spine surgery.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Vértebras Lombares , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Raquianestesia/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dura-Máter/cirurgia , Dura-Máter/diagnóstico por imagem , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/métodosRESUMO
Background: Lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) is a rare condition characterized by the pathological proliferation of adipose tissue in the epidural space of the spinal canal. This study presents the case of a 59-year-old male with lumbar SEL treated effectively in the short term through arthroscopic-assisted uniportal spinal surgery (AUSS) combined with a modified circle-drawing unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression (ULBD) technique. Methods: A modified circle-drawing ULBD procedure was executed via AUSS for a patient with SEL. The procedure involved the excision of diseased adipose tissue from the spinal canal, enlargement and decompression of the spinal canal, liberation of nerves, and post-operative evaluation of imaging results and clinical outcomes. Results: The patient exhibited improvements in the dural sac cross-sectional area, low back pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS, leg pain VAS, lumbar spine Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), and EQ-5D post-surgery. Conclusions: AUSS offers comprehensive visualization, straightforward positioning, facilitating a broad field of view and precise lesion management. The modified circle-drawing ULBD technique characterized by its simplicity, operational freedom, and extensive decompression range, contributes to symptom alleviation and patient recovery.