The Pitfalls of Using Pop-Off Valves in Adult Emergency Airway.

BACKGROUND: Although common in pediatric airway equipment, positive-pressure relief ("pop-off") valves are also present on some adult resuscitator bags. These valves are designed to decrease barotrauma but, in doing so, limit the airway pressure provided during manual bag-assisted ventilation. In critically ill adult patients with high airway pressures, these valves can be detrimental and result in hypoventilation and subsequent hypoxemia. CASE REPORTS: In the 7 days after an unannounced introduction of new resuscitator bags with pop-off valves in the emergency department, there were 3 adult patients for whom an open pop-off valve resulted in hypoventilation and hypoxemia. These cases involved both medical and traumatic pathologies. In each case, there was a delay in discovering the change to a resuscitator bag equipped with a pop-off valve. Once the emergency physicians noticed the pop-off valve and closed them, there was significant improvement in ventilation and oxygenation. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Hand-operated resuscitator bags are an essential tool for airway management. These cases represent two main lessons: changing airway equipment without notifying staff is dangerous, and an open pop-off valve will result in inadequate ventilation when patients have high airway pressures, without the tactile feedback of difficult bagging. Emergency physicians should be aware of equipment changes and know to disable the pop-off valve on resuscitator bags if they find them in their departments.

Reengineering Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Systems to Improve End-User Experience.

This paper presents an indoor air quality (IAQ) monitoring system designed for a better end-user experience. The monitoring system consists of elements, from the monitoring sensor to the monitoring interface, designed and implemented by the research team, especially for the proposed monitoring system. The monitoring solution is intended for users who live in houses without automatic ventilation systems. The air quality sensor is designed at a minimum cost and complexity to allow multi-zone implementation without significant effort. The user interface uses a spatial graphic representation that facilitates understanding areas with different air quality levels. Presentation of the outdoor air quality level supports the user's decision to ventilate a space. An innovative element of the proposed monitoring interface is the real-time forecast of air quality evolution in each monitored space. The paper describes the implementation of an original monitoring solution (monitoring device, Edge/Cloud management system, innovative user monitoring interface) and presents the results of testing this system in a relevant environment. The research conclusions show the proposed solution's benefits in improving the end-user experience, justified both by the technical results obtained and by the opinion of the users who tested the monitoring system.

Prehospital Manual Ventilation: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document.

Manual ventilation using a self-inflating bag device paired with a facemask (bag-valve-mask, or BVM ventilation) or invasive airway (bag-valve-device, or BVD ventilation) is a fundamental airway management skill for all Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians. Delivery of manual ventilations is challenging. Several strategies and adjunct technologies can increase the effectiveness of manual ventilation. NAEMSP recommends:All EMS clinicians must be proficient in bag-valve-mask ventilation.BVM ventilation should be performed using a two-person technique whenever feasible.EMS clinicians should use available techniques and adjuncts to achieve optimal mask seal, improve airway patency, optimize delivery of the correct rate, tidal volume, and pressure during manual ventilation, and allow continual assessment of manual ventilation effectiveness.

Quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during manual facemask ventilation.

Manual facemask ventilation, a core component of elective and emergency airway management, is classified as an aerosol-generating procedure. This designation is based on one epidemiological study suggesting an association between facemask ventilation and transmission during the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in 2003. There is no direct evidence to indicate whether facemask ventilation is a high-risk procedure for aerosol generation. We conducted aerosol monitoring during routine facemask ventilation and facemask ventilation with an intentionally generated leak in anaesthetised patients. Recordings were made in ultraclean operating theatres and compared against the aerosol generated by tidal breathing and cough manoeuvres. Respiratory aerosol from tidal breathing in 11 patients was reliably detected above the very low background particle concentrations with median [IQR (range)] particle counts of 191 (77-486 [4-1313]) and 2 (1-5 [0-13]) particles.l-1 , respectively, p = 0.002. The median (IQR [range]) aerosol concentration detected during facemask ventilation without a leak (3 (0-9 [0-43]) particles.l-1 ) and with an intentional leak (11 (7-26 [1-62]) particles.l-1 ) was 64-fold (p = 0.001) and 17-fold (p = 0.002) lower than that of tidal breathing, respectively. Median (IQR [range]) peak particle concentration during facemask ventilation both without a leak (60 (0-60 [0-120]) particles.l-1 ) and with a leak (120 (60-180 [60-480]) particles.l-1 ) were 20-fold (p = 0.002) and 10-fold (0.001) lower than a cough (1260 (800-3242 [100-3682]) particles.l-1 ), respectively. This study demonstrates that facemask ventilation, even when performed with an intentional leak, does not generate high levels of bioaerosol. On the basis of this evidence, we argue facemask ventilation should not be considered an aerosol-generating procedure.

An evaluation of manual tidal volume and respiratory rate delivery during simulated resuscitation.

INTRODUCTION: Excessive minute ventilation during cardiac arrest may cause lung injury and decrease the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, little is known about how clinicians deliver tidal volumes and respiratory rates during CPR. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, licensed practitioners attending an American Heart Association (AHA) Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course performed CPR and manual ventilation on a high-fidelity simulator during the megacode portion of the course. Delivered tidal volumes and respiratory rates were measured on a monitor. During the first scenario, results were not displayed to participants, but were displayed during the second scenario. RESULTS: Fifty-two clinicians participated in this study. Average height was 169 (157,178) cm. Pre-monitor display tidal volumes delivered were larger in male participants compared to female participants (684.6 ± 134.4 vs 586.7 ± 167.6 ml, P = 0.05). Those using medium-sized gloves delivered smaller tidal volumes than those using small or large gloves. Twenty-two (42.3%) delivered tidal volume in the range of 5-8 ml/kg of predicted body weight for the simulation manikin, and 35 (67.3%) delivered tidal volumes with >20% variability among breaths. All participants met the target respiratory rate around 10 breaths/min. CONCLUSION: Tidal volume delivery varied greatly during manual ventilation and fewer than half participants delivered tidal volume at 5-8 ml/kg to the manikin. Sex and glove size appeared to impact tidal volume delivery when the participants were unaware of what they were delivering. Participants were able to meet the target respiratory rate around 10 without audio or visual feedback.

Electroconvulsive therapy, personal protective equipment and aerosol generating procedures: a review to guide practice during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the definition of aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), identify high-risk AGPs, guidelines to use personal protective equipment (PPE) and review evidence to see if electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a high-risk AGP requiring the use of PPE. METHODS: Existing guidelines and research data were reviewed to answer the questions. RESULTS: There is consensus about the type of anaesthesia used during ECT, what constitutes AGPs and what PPE should be used. It was not clear if ECT was an AGP, but we argue that it is one based on evidence. CONCLUSION: We conclude that ECT is an AGP and that it requires the appropriate use of PPE after taking in to account local supply and demand.

The effect of experience, simulator-training and biometric feedback on manual ventilation technique.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of provision and main providers (veterinary surgeons, nurses or trainees) of manual ventilation in UK veterinary practices. Furthermore, to determine the variation in peak inspiratory (inflation) pressure (PIP), applied to a lung model during manual ventilation, by three different groups of operators (inexperienced, experienced and specialist), before and after training. STUDY DESIGN: Questionnaire survey, lung model simulator development and prospective testing. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were sent to 100 randomly selected veterinary practices. The lung model simulator was manually ventilated in a staged process over 3 weeks, with and without real-time biometric feedback (PIP display), by three groups of volunteer operators: inexperienced, experienced and specialist. RESULTS: The questionnaires determined that veterinary nurses were responsible for providing the majority of manual ventilation in veterinary practices, mainly drawing on theoretical knowledge rather than any specific training. Thoracic surgery and apnoea were the main reasons for provision of manual ventilation. Specialists performed well when manually ventilating the lung model, regardless of feedback training. Both inexperienced and experienced operators showed significant improvement in technique when using the feedback training tool: variation in PIP decreased significantly until operators provided manual ventilation at PIPs within the defined optimum range. Preferences for different forms of feedback (graphical, numerical or scale display), revealed that the operators' choice was not always the method which gave least variation in PIP. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlighted a need for training in manual ventilation at an early stage in veterinary and veterinary nursing careers and demonstrated how feedback is important in the process of experiential learning. A manometer device which can provide immediate feedback during training, or indeed in a real clinical setting, should improve patient safety.

Performances and limits of Bag-Valve-Device for pre-oxygenation and manual ventilation: A comparative bench and cadaver study.

INTRODUCTION: Bag-Valve-Device (BVD) is the most frequently used device for pre-oxygenation and ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). A minimal expired fraction of oxygen (FeO2) above 0.85 is recommended during pre-oxygenation while insufflated volume (VTi) should be reduced during manual ventilation. The objective was to compare the performances of different BVD in simulated conditions. METHODS: Nine BVD were evaluated during pre-oxygenation: spontaneous breathing patients were simulated on a test lung (mild and severe conditions). FeO2 was measured with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). CO2 rebreathing was evaluated. Then, manual ventilation was performed by 36 caregivers (n = 36) from three hospitals on a specific manikin; same procedure was repeated by 3 caregivers (n = 3) on two human cadavers with three of the nine BVD: In non-CPR scenario and during mechanical CPR with Interrupted Chest Compressions strategy (30:2). RESULTS: Pre-oxygenation: FeO2 was lower than 0.85 for three BVD in severe condition and for two BVD in mild condition. FeO2 was higher than 0.85 in eight of nine BVD with an additional PEEP valve (PEEP 5 cmH2O). One BVD induced CO2 rebreathing. Manual ventilation: For non-CPR manual ventilation, mean VTi was within the predefined lung protective range (4-8 mL/kg PBW) for all BVD on the bench. For CPR manual ventilation, mean VTi was above the range for three BVD on the bench. Similar results were observed on cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Several BVD did not reach the FeO2 required during pre-oxygenation. Manual ventilation was significantly less protective in three BVD. These observations are related to the different BVD working principles.

Assessment of Ventilation Using Adult and Pediatric Manual Resuscitators in a Simulated Adult Patient.

BACKGROUND: The bag-valve-mask (BVM) or manual resuscitator bag is used as a first-line technique to ventilate patients with respiratory failure. Volume-restricted manual resuscitator bags (eg, pediatric bags) have been suggested to minimize overventilation and associated complications. There are studies that both support and caution against the use of a pediatric resuscitator bag to ventilate an adult patient. In this study, we evaluated the ability of pre-hospital clinicians to adequately ventilate an adult manikin with both an adult- and pediatric-size manual resuscitator bag without the assistance of an advanced airway or airway adjunct device. METHODS: This study was conducted at an international conference in 2022. Conference attendees with pre-hospital health care experience were recruited to ventilate an adult manikin using a BVM for 1 min with both an adult and pediatric resuscitator bag, without the use of adjunct airway devices, while 6 ventilatory variables were collected or calculated: tidal volume (VT), breathing frequency, adequate breaths (VT > 150 mL), proportion of adequate breaths, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), and estimated alveolar ventilation (EAV). RESULTS: A total of 208 participants completed the study. Ventilation with the adult-sized BVM delivered an average VT of 290.4 mL compared to 197.1 mL (P < .001) when using the pediatric BVM. PIP with the adult BVM was higher than with the pediatric BVM (10.6 cm H2O vs 8.6 cm H2O, P < .001). The median EAV with the adult bag (1,138.1 [interquartile range [IQR] 194.0-2,869.9] mL/min) was markedly greater than with the pediatric BVM (67.7 [IQR 0-467.3] mL/min, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Both pediatric- and adult-sized BVM provided lower ventilation volumes than those recommended by professional guidelines for an adult. Ventilation with the pediatric BVM was significantly worse than with the adult bag when ventilating a simulated adult subject.

Bag valve resuscitator versus Mapleson C circuit during manual ventilation: A bench top study.

BACKGROUND: Manual ventilation is life saving in critically ill patients. The lack of airway pressure monitoring makes it operator and device dependent. In this bench top-study, we compared a self- inflating bag valve resuscitator and a Mapleson C circuit during manual ventilation performed by critical care nurses under normal and pathologic conditions, with a special focus on delivered positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). METHODS: Three different respiratory patterns (normal, restrictive and obstructive) were reproduced by a breathing simulator. Twenty nurses provided manual ventilation with a specific ventilatory pattern. Airway pressure, tidal volume and respiratory rate were recorded. Absolute value, error (difference between recorded and target values) and variability of PEEP were analysed. RESULTS: 3820 breathing traces were analysed. PEEP error was significantly higher with Mapelson C (43.3% vs 5.9% respectively, p < 0.001). This finding was confirmed regardless of operator skill and scenario. PEEP was more variable with Mapelson C (p < 0.05 in all scenarios). Ventilation of obstructive patients with Mapelson C resulted in higher PEEP levels compared to the reference value. Conversely, in the restrictive setting, PEEP was lower. Difference between PEEP and the minimum pressure recorded during the respiratory cycle was significantly higher with Mapelson C (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Manual ventilation with a Mapleson C circuit delivered a less accurate and less stable PEEP level compared to a self-inflating bag valve resuscitator.

Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease.

Background: MR or CT scans are often required in the treatment of pediatric intensive care patients. During the therefore needed intrahospital transport continuous ventilation of the patient must be maintained. Intrahospital transport is considered safe regarding changes in hemodynamics or adverse events (AEs). As those studies cover inhomogeneous patient groups, we analyzed the safety for ventilated pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) focusing on differences between manual and mechanical ventilation during transport and examination. Methods: Retrospective monocentric case-control study covering a 10 years' period in a tertiary cardiac center for CHD. Sixty-three critically ill ventilator-dependent patients, median 2 (0-37) months, were included. Fifty-one patients got ventilated manually and 12 patients got ventilated with a mobile ventilator. The data include vital parameters and blood gas data, as well as catecholamine support, occurrence of AEs and total duration of transport and examination. Results: In both groups we found minor changes of vital parameters or blood gas data. Regarding the HR we found a drop from median 135/min before leaving the ICU to 130/min after returning to the ICU (P=0.0072) in the manually ventilated group and a drop from median 133/min to 123/min (P=0.0703) in the mechanically ventilated group. The median transport time including scan was higher in the manually ventilated group (P=0.0098) with a median duration of transport and scan time of 100 minutes (30-245 minutes) in the manually ventilated group and of 97.5 minutes (60-224 minutes) in the mechanically ventilated group. A total of 9 AEs was recorded, 7 (13.7%) of them in the manually and 2 (16.7%) in the mechanically ventilated group with a drop of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and an increase in catecholamine support. Conclusions: We consider both manual ventilation and mechanical ventilation for intrahospital transport safe for pediatric intensive care patients with CHD. Using a mechanical ventilator might have the advantage to react faster to changes in hemodynamics.

Experimental validation of a portable tidal volume indicator for bag valve mask ventilation.

INTRODUCTION: Short-term emergency ventilation is most typically accomplished through bag valve mask (BVM) techniques. BVMs like the AMBU® bag are cost-effective and highly portable but are also highly prone to user error, especially in high-stress emergent situations. Inaccurate and inappropriate ventilation has the potential to inflict great injury to patients through hyper- and hypoventilation. Here, we present the BVM Emergency Narration-Guided Instrument (BENGI) - a tidal volume feedback monitoring device that provides instantaneous visual and audio feedback on delivered tidal volumes, respiratory rates, and inspiratory/expiratory times. Providing feedback on the depth and regularity of respirations enables providers to deliver more consistent and accurate tidal volumes and rates. We describe the design, assembly, and validation of the BENGI as a practical tool to reduce manual ventilation-induced lung injury. METHODS: The prototype BENGI was assembled with custom 3D-printed housing and commercially available electronic components. A mass flow sensor in the central channel of the device measures air flow, which is used to calculate tidal volume. Tidal volumes are displayed via an LED ring affixed to the top of the BENGI. Additional feedback is provided through a speaker in the device. Central processing is accomplished through an Arduino microcontroller. Validation of the BENGI was accomplished using benchtop simulation with a clinical ventilator, BVM, and manikin test lung. Known respiratory quantities were delivered by the ventilator which were then compared to measurements from the BENGI to validate the accuracy of flow measurements, tidal volume calculations, and audio cue triggers. RESULTS: BENGI tidal volume measurements were found to lie within 4% of true delivered tidal volume values (95% CI of 0.53 to 3.7%) when breaths were delivered with 1-s inspiratory times, with similar performance for breaths delivered with 0.5-s inspiratory times (95% CI of 1.1 to 6.7%) and 2-s inspiratory times (95% CI of -1.1 to 2.3%). Audio cues "Bag faster" (1.84 to 2.03 s), "Bag slower" (0.35 to 0.41 s), and "Leak detected" (43 to 50%) were triggered close to target trigger values (2.00 s, 0.50 s, and 50%, respectively) across varying tidal volumes. CONCLUSIONS: The BENGI achieved its proposed goals of accurately measuring and reporting tidal volumes delivered through BVM systems, providing immediate feedback on the quality of respiratory performance through audio and visual cues. The BENGI has the potential to reduce manual ventilation-induced lung injury and improve patient outcomes by providing accurate feedback on ventilatory parameters.

Manual bag valve mask ventilation performance among respiratory therapists.

BACKGROUND: High peak pressures delivered via bag valve mask (BVM) can be dangerous for patients. OBJECTIVE: To examine manual ventilation performance among respiratory therapists (RTs) in a simulation model. METHODS: Respiratory therapists (n=98) were instructed to ventilate a manikin for 18 breaths. Linear regression was utilized to determine associated predictors with the outcomes: delivered tidal volume, pressure and flow rate. RESULTS: Among all participants, the mean ventilation parameters include a tidal volume of 599.70 ml, peak pressure of 26.35 cmH2O, and flow rate of 77.20 l/min. Higher confidence values were positively associated with delivered peak pressure (p=0.01) and flow rate (p=0.008). Those with the most confidence in using the BVM actually delivered higher peak pressures and flow rates compared to those with lower confidence levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the urgent need to create an intervention that allows providers to deliver safe and optimal manual ventilation.

The impact of introducing real time feedback on ventilation rate and tidal volume by ambulance clinicians in the North East in cardiac arrest simulations.

BACKGROUND: Research suggests rescuers deliver ventilations outside of recommendations during out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), which can be deleterious to survival. We aimed to determine if ambulance clinician compliance with ventilation recommendations could be improved using the Zoll Accuvent real time ventilation feedback device (VFD). METHODS: Participants simulated a two-minute cardiac arrest scenario using a mannequin and defibrillator without ventilation feedback. Eligible for inclusion were all clinicians aged ≥18 years who perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as part of their role, who had completed an internal advanced life support (ALS) refresher. Following familiarisation of a few minutes with the VFD, participants repeated the two-minute scenario with ventilation feedback. Ventilation rate and volume and CPR quality were recorded. Primary outcome was % difference in ventilation compliance with and without feedback. Secondary outcomes were differences between paramedic and non-paramedic clinicians and compliance with chest compression guidelines. RESULTS: One hundred and six participants completed the study. Median ventilation rate without feedback was 10 (IQR 8-14, range 4-30) compared to 9 (IQR 9-9, range 6-17) with feedback; median tidal volume without feedback was 630 mls (IQR 518-725, range 201-1114) compared to 546 mls (IQR 531-560, range 490-750) with feedback. Proportion of clinicians ≥50% compliant with European Resuscitation Council ventilation recommendations were significantly greater with ventilation feedback compared to without, 91% vs. 9%, (McNemars test p = <0.0001). Paramedics out performed non-paramedic clinicians with and without feedback and compression quality was not compromised by using the VFD. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulance clinician baseline ventilation quality was frequently outside of recommendations, but a VFD can ensure treatment is within evidence-based recommendations. Further research is required to validate the use of the VFD in true clinical practice and to evaluate the relationship between improved ventilation quality during OHCA and patient outcomes.

Six-Hour Manual Ventilation with a Bag-Valve-Tube Device by Briefly Trained Non-Medical Personnel is Feasible.

RATIONALE: Manual ventilation with a bag-valve device (BVD) is a Basic Life Support skill. Prolonged manual ventilation may be required in resource-poor locations and in severe disasters such as hurricanes, pandemics, and chemical events. In such circumstances, trained operators may not be available and lay persons may need to be quickly trained to do the job. OBJECTIVES: The current study investigated whether minimally trained operators were able to manually ventilate a simulated endotracheally intubated patient for six hours. METHODS: Two groups of 10 volunteers, previously unfamiliar with manual ventilation, received brief, structured BVD-tube ventilation training and performed six hours of manual ventilation on an electronic lung simulator. Operator cardiorespiratory variables and perceived effort, as well as the quality of the delivered ventilation, were recorded. Group One ventilated a "normal lung" (compliance 50cmH2O/L, resistance 5cmH2O/L/min). Group Two ventilated a "moderately injured lung" (compliance 20cmH2O/L, resistance 20cmH2O/L/min). RESULTS: Volunteers' blood pressure, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) were stable throughout the study. Perceived effort was minimal. The two groups provided clinically adequate and similar RRs (13.3 [SD = 3.0] and 14.1 [SD = 2.5] breaths/minute, respectively) and minute volume (MV; 7.6 [SD = 2.1] and 7.7 [SD = 1.4] L/minute, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that minimally trained persons can effectively perform six hours of manual BVD-tube ventilation of normal and moderately injured lungs, without undue effort. Quality of delivered ventilation was clinically adequate.

Ventilation feedback device for manual ventilation in simulated respiratory arrest: a crossover manikin study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that providing adequate ventilation during CPR is essential. While hypoventilation is often feared by most caregivers on the scene, the most critical problem remains hyperventilation. We developed a Ventilation Feedback Device (VFD) for manual ventilation which monitors ventilatory parameters and provides direct feedback about ventilation quality to the rescuer. This study aims to compare the quality of conventional manual ventilation to ventilation with VFD on a simulated respiratory arrest patient. METHODS: Forty healthcare providers were enrolled and instructed to ventilate a manikin simulating respiratory arrest. Participants were instructed to ventilate the manikin for 5 min with and without the VFD in random order. They were divided in two groups of 20 people, one group ventilating through a mask and the other through an endotracheal tube. RESULTS: Ventilation with the VFD improved from 15 to 90% (p < 0.001) with the mask and from 15 to 85% (p < 0.001) with the endotracheal tube (ETT) by significantly reducing the proportion of hyperventilation. The mean ventilation rates and tidal volumes were in the recommended ranges in respectively 100% with the mask and 97.5% of participants with the ETT when using the VFD. CONCLUSION: VFD improves the performance of manual ventilation by over 70% in different simulated scenarios. By providing the rescuer direct feedback and analysis of ventilatory parameters, this device can significantly improve ventilation while performing CPR and thus save lives.

Manual ventilation and open suction procedures contribute to negative pressures in a mechanical lung model.

INTRODUCTION: Removal of pulmonary secretions in mechanically ventilated patients usually requires suction with closed catheter systems or flexible bronchoscopes. Manual ventilation is occasionally performed during such procedures if clinicians suspect inadequate ventilation. Suctioning can also be performed with the ventilator entirely disconnected from the endotracheal tube (ETT). The aim of this study was to investigate if these two procedures generate negative airway pressures, which may contribute to atelectasis. METHODS: The effects of device insertion and suctioning in ETTs were examined in a mechanical lung model with a pressure transducer inserted distal to ETTs of 9 mm, 8 mm and 7 mm internal diameter (ID). A 16 Fr bronchoscope and 12, 14 and 16 Fr suction catheters were used at two different vacuum levels during manual ventilation and with the ETTs disconnected. RESULTS: During manual ventilation with ETTs of 9 mm, 8 mm and 7 mm ID, and bronchoscopic suctioning at moderate suction level, peak pressure (PPEAK) dropped from 23, 22 and 24.5 cm H2O to 16, 16 and 15 cm H2O, respectively. Maximum suction reduced PPEAK to 20, 17 and 11 cm H2O, respectively, and the end-expiratory pressure fell from 5, 5.5 and 4.5 cm H2O to -2, -6 and -17 cm H2O. Suctioning through disconnected ETTs (open suction procedure) gave negative model airway pressures throughout the duration of the procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Manual ventilation and open suction procedures induce negative end-expiratory pressure during endotracheal suctioning, which may have clinical implications in patients who need high PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure).

Should a Portable Ventilator Be Used in All In-Hospital Transports?

Movement of the mechanically ventilated patient may be for a routine procedure or medical emergency. The risks of transport seem manageable, but the memory of a respiratory-related catastrophe still gives many practitioners pause. The risk/benefit ratio of transport must be assessed before movement. During transport of the ventilated patients, should we always use a transport ventilator? What is the risk of using manual ventilation? How are PEEP and FIO2 altered? Is there an impact on the ability to trigger during manual ventilation? Is hyperventilation and hypoventilation a common problem? Does hyperventilation or hypoventilation result in complications? Are portable ventilators worth the cost? What about the function of portable ventilators? Can these devices faithfully reproduce ICU ventilator function? The following pro and con discussion will attempt to address many of these issues by reviewing the current evidence on transport ventilation.

Evaluation of manual and automatic manually triggered ventilation performance and ergonomics using a simulation model.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of endotracheal intubation, the manual bag-valve-mask (BVM) is the most frequently used ventilation technique during resuscitation. The efficiency of other devices has been poorly studied. The bench-test study described here was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an automatic, manually triggered system, and to compare it with manual BVM ventilation. METHODS: A respiratory system bench model was assembled using a lung simulator connected to a manikin to simulate a patient with unprotected airways. Fifty health-care providers from different professional groups (emergency physicians, residents, advanced paramedics, nurses, and paramedics; n = 10 per group) evaluated manual BVM ventilation, and compared it with an automatic manually triggered device (EasyCPR). Three pathological situations were simulated (restrictive, obstructive, normal). Standard ventilation parameters were recorded; the ergonomics of the system were assessed by the health-care professionals using a standard numerical scale once the recordings were completed. RESULTS: The tidal volume fell within the standard range (400-600 mL) for 25.6% of breaths (0.6-45 breaths) using manual BVM ventilation, and for 28.6% of breaths (0.3-80 breaths) using the automatic manually triggered device (EasyCPR) (P < .0002). Peak inspiratory airway pressure was lower using the automatic manually triggered device (EasyCPR) (10.6 ± 5 vs 15.9 ± 10 cm H2O, P < .001). The ventilation rate fell consistently within the guidelines, in the case of the automatic manually triggered device (EasyCPR) only (10.3 ± 2 vs 17.6 ± 6, P < .001). Significant pulmonary overdistention was observed when using the manual BVM device during the normal and obstructive sequences. The nurses and paramedics considered the ergonomics of the automatic manually triggered device (EasyCPR) to be better than those of the manual device. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an automatic manually triggered device may improve ventilation efficiency and decrease the risk of pulmonary overdistention, while decreasing the ventilation rate.

Elective intubation.

Endotracheal intubation is a commonly performed operating room (OR) procedure that provides safe delivery of anesthetic gases and airway protection during surgery. The most common intubation technique in the perioperative environment is direct laryngoscopy with orotracheal tube insertion. Infrequently, difficulties that require an alternative intubation technique are encountered due to patient anatomy, equipment limitations, or patient pathophysiology. Careful patient evaluation, advanced planning, equipment preparation, system redundancy, use of checklists, familiarity with airway algorithms, and availability of additional help when needed during OR intubations have resulted in exceptional success and safety. Airway difficulties during intubation outside the controlled environment of the OR are more frequent and more serious. Translating the intubation processes practiced in the OR to intubations outside the perioperative setting should improve patient safety. This paper considers each step in the OR intubation process in detail and proposes ways of incorporating perioperative procedures into intubations outside the OR. Management of the physiologic impact of intubation, lack of readily available specialized equipment and experienced help, and planning for transfer of care following intubation are all challenges during these intubations.