Telehealth services for children with neuro-developmental disabilities in the Asia-Pacific region: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In recent years telehealth became a popular and a rational health service delivery approach, especially amidst multiple challenges posed while providing health care interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: We synthesized available evidence on telehealth for managing children with NDDs in the Asia-Pacific region with the aim of identifying successful methods. METHODOLOGY: We systematically reviewed six electronic databases: MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Web of Science, and (CINAHL plus) using the keywords and database-specific subject headings from their inception to 25th August 2021. Review findings were synthesized narratively, and harvest plots were used to demonstrate the effect of interventions. The protocol and reporting the findings of this review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PROSPERO registration: CRD 340690. RESULTS: We harvested 30,823 records; 17,563 duplicates were removed, and 196 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 16 studies with multiple research designs were included in the review. Eight were from the Pacific region and eight represented Asia. The interventions targeted families and children with a variety of NDDs (autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, cleft lip and palate, hearing impairment, cerebral palsy etc.) via telehealth. Telehealth packages consisted of direct and indirect methods of synchronous, asynchronous, and hybrid approaches. All studies used parent-led intervention strategies. Telehealth reported a positive effect in 7/16 studies while five showed a neutral effect. CONCLUSIONS: According to published evidence telehealth for children with NDDs is an evolving, evidence-based service facilitation modality in the Asia-Pacific region, with only a few published randomized controlled trials. The systematic review shows promising telehealth practices emerging across the region despite the diversity in NDDs studied.

Telehealth Intervention for Social Behavioral Change Communication Toward Enhanced Partner Conversations on Family Planning Among Men: A Qualitative Analysis of a Pilot Project in Uganda.

Background: Lack of credible sexual partner dialog and support regarding family planning (FP) and other sexual reproductive health issues is a major impediment to contraception service uptake and utilization. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of attitudes toward using telehealth for remote education of couples through behavioral, motivational, and informational messaging on FP methods and its eventual impact on partner conversations around FP. Methods: The study was conducted in Kampala, Uganda, and involved recruiting 450 men from diverse settings. These men received regular SMS content on FP and sexual and reproductive health for a duration of 6 months. The content aimed to provide information and motivation while serving as a resource for discussions with their spouses. Following the main quantitative study, a qualitative follow-up study was conducted with a subset of 15 randomly selected men. In-depth interviews were conducted with these men to gain deeper insights into their experiences and perspectives. Results: The study revealed positive outcomes where men reported improved knowledge of FP methods such as child spacing, and types of contraception. The messaging prompted discussions with spouses on family size and spousal support. Couples reported a shift toward viewing FP as a joint responsibility, with some couples even taking concrete actions. The findings suggested that telehealth interventions can promote social and behavioral change and can improve couple communication and male involvement in FP decisions in Uganda. Conclusion: The study found that using telehealth messaging to educate men about FP in Uganda successfully improved communication between couples on the topic.

Research and engagement considerations for alcohol use telehealth services within HIV care: a qualitative exploration in federally qualified health centers.

The prevalence of alcohol misuse is high among people with HIV (PWH); however, access to and utilization of evidence-based alcohol misuse interventions remain limited. Telehealth is one treatment approach with the potential for enhancing substance use disorder treatment utilization for PWH served by Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). However, questions remain regarding barriers to alcohol-focused telehealth service integration and telehealth research in FQHCs. This study employed qualitative methods, guided by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework, to evaluate barriers and cultural factors impacting FQHC telehealth integration. Eighteen qualitative interviews were completed with staff and leaders across four FQHCs. Interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis, and codes were organized into a priori and emergent themes. Key themes included the presence of common workflows for referring clients to substance use disorder treatment; existing research workflows and preferences for active project staff involvement; telehealth barriers including exacerbation of healthcare disparities and high provider turnover; and the importance of cultural humility and telehealth adaptations for sexual, gender, racial and ethnic minority clients. Findings from this study will inform the development of an alcohol-focused telehealth implementation strategy for a Hybrid Type 1 implementation effectiveness trial to enhance FQHC substance use disorder treatment.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02563574..

A randomized trial using telehealth technology to link caregivers with dementia care experts for in-home caregiving support: FamTechCare protocol.

The number of persons with dementia (PWD) in the United States is expected to reach 16 million by 2050. Due to the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, caregivers face challenging in-home care situations that lead to a range of negative health outcomes such as anxiety and depression for the caregivers and nursing home placement for PWD. Supporting Family Caregivers with Technology for Dementia Home Care (FamTechCare) is a multisite randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of a telehealth intervention on caregiver well-being and PWD behavioral symptoms. The FamTechCare intervention provides individualized dementia-care strategies to in-home caregivers based on video recordings that the caregiver creates of challenging care situations. A team of dementia care experts review videos submitted by caregivers and provide interventions to improve care weekly for the experimental group. Caregivers in the control group receive feedback for improving care based on a weekly phone call with the interventionist and receive feedback on their videos at the end of the 3-month study. Using linear mixed modeling, we will compare experimental and control group outcomes (PWD behavioral symptoms and caregiver burden) after 1 and 3 months. An exploratory descriptive design will identify a typology of interventions for telehealth support for in-home dementia caregivers. Finally, the cost for FamTechCare will be determined and examined in relation to hypothesized effects on PWD behavioral symptoms, placement rates, and caregiver burden. This research will provide the foundation for future research for telehealth interventions with this population, especially for families in rural or remote locations.

Improving prospective memory in persons with multiple sclerosis via telehealth: A randomized feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) can experience deficits in prospective memory (PM) or "remembering to remember," which are associated with functional difficulties. However, no cognitive rehabilitation intervention has specifically addressed improving PM in PwMS. The Telehealth PM Intervention (TPMI) provides a novel combination of two strategies-visual imagery and implementation intentions-that have each been beneficial in other populations. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of TPMI and its preliminary efficacy, which could be used to inform future trials. METHODS: Participants (n = 35) were PwMS who were pre-screened and endorsed experiencing problems "remembering places they have to be" and "things they have to do." After completing a baseline evaluation, which included objective (Memory for Intentions Test; MIST) and subjective (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire; PDQ-PM) measures of PM, participants were randomized to either the active treatment (TPMI; n = 17) or active control group (Control; n = 18). TPMI was offered through remote one-on-one sessions twice a week over a four-week period. Participants were asked about treatment credibility and expectancy during the first session. The MIST and PDQ-PM were repeated at post-treatment, where treatment satisfaction was also captured. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to examine the feasibility measures, while repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine changes in the PM outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 88.2 % of the TPMI group completed all eight sessions, with moderate-to-high (≥7 out of 10) treatment credibility/expectancy and satisfaction reported by 93.3 % and 86.7 %, respectively. While there were no significant effects on overall PM, the TPMI group had an improvement in objective time-based PM after adjusting for baseline differences (F(1,29) = 4.61, p = 0.040; d = 0.80). Furthermore, the TPMI group had a significant reduction in the number of time-based loss of content errors compared to the Control group, which remained significant after covariate adjustment (F(1,25) = 4.29, p = 0.049; d = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: TPMI is a feasible intervention, with high completion rates and moderate-to-high treatment ratings, that can be delivered remotely. Early evidence shows its potential benefit for improving time-based PM, a particular concern for PwMS, which should be further evaluated in a larger clinical trial.

Telehealth Utilization to Address Health Care Disparities Among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders: A Scoping Review.

Research has reported health care disparities, including low rates of health care utilization, among racial and ethnic minority groups compared to Whites. Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders (AANHPIs) have experienced these disparities, attributed to various barriers such as limited access to linguistically and culturally concordant health care services. Telehealth may offer a viable mode of health service delivery for AANHPIs. The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic sparked the adoption of technology for receiving health services. However, the literature on telehealth utilization before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among AANHPIs is limited. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review of telehealth intervention empirical studies serving AANHPIs published between January 2010 and February 2024, using five databases. Twenty-four articles met our inclusion criteria, which required the use of a telehealth intervention program, provision of disaggregated AANHPIs, and targeting of physical and/or mental health outcomes. Our review revealed positive findings of telehealth interventions in helping AANHPIs access health care, with a primary focus on education and consultation for self-management. The review highlighted a range of technological platforms used in AANHPIs telehealth interventions, including web-based, mobile, and blended approaches. Additionally, the review emphasized the need for improved access to technology and reduction in digital exclusion. The findings affirm the usefulness and potential of telehealth interventions, providing implications for how health professionals can serve AANHPIs. Telehealth technology offers the ability for greater accessibility and individualization to address health care disparities in AANHPIs.

Assessment of the impact of telehealth intervention in patients with bone and joint infection.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with bone and joint infections (BJI) are involved in a complex care pathway and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Some studies have suggested that a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention (TI) could help to ensure better follow-up of chronic diseases. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of pharmacist-led TI on patients with BJI. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a TI on patients treated for BJIs at three weeks after hospital discharge. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients encountered during hospitalization and receiving standardized care including TI were included in the study. All adverse events (AE) reported by patients during TI were evaluated. Impact of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) provided by a clinical pharmacist following TI was evaluated by CLEO© (CLinical, Economic and Organizational) scale. Patient satisfaction concerning TI was assessed by an anonymous questionnaire following medical consultation at the end of antimicrobial treatment. RESULTS: Over a 4-month period, 36 patients received TI. Fifty-two AEs were identified in 21 patients (58%). Two patients were hospitalized due to an AE. Clinical pharmacists provided 34 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for 23 patients (64%). According to CLEO scale, 11 PIs had a major clinical impact (32%), 6 PIs (18%) had a favorable impact on the direct cost of treatment and 27 PIs (79%) had positive organizational impact. Concerning TI process, patients were satisfied or very satisfied, with an average score of 9.6/10. CONCLUSION: TI led to a high number of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs), with a meaningful clinical, organizational, and economic impact. Patients were also highly satisfied with this intervention.

Evaluating a Telephone and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Intervention to Improve Blood Pressure Control and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Low-Socioeconomic Status.

Hypertension (HTN) affects nearly 75 million in the United States, and percentages increase with low socioeconomic status (SES) due to poor access to, and quality of, care, and poor self-care behaviors. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) employ evidence-based strategies, such as telehealth interventions, to improve blood pressure (BP) control in under-resourced communities, yet a southeastern FQHC could achieve a BP control rate of only 27.6%, well below the Health People 2020 goal of 61.2%. This pilot project used a pre/post, matched-cohort design to evaluate the effect of a telehealth intervention on BP control and self-care behaviors. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy and perceived stress. Frequency and percentage, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis of results from a convenience sample of 27 participants. Baseline HTN management guidance that incorporated home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) was reinforced through telephone counseling every two weeks. Although BP control was not achieved, average scores for systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased significantly: 13 mm Hg (p = 0.0136) and 5 mm Hg (p = 0.0095), respectively. Statistically significant differences were also seen in select self-care behaviors. Greater BP reduction aligned with higher self-efficacy scores and call engagement. Overall, telephone counseling and HBPM were feasible and effective in reducing BP and increasing self-care behaviors. The inability to control BP may be attributable to under-recognition of stress, lack of medication adherence/reconciliation, and underutilization of guideline-based prescribing recommendations. Findings elucidate the potential effectiveness of a sustainable telehealth intervention to improve BP in low-SES populations.

Remote PEERS® for preschoolers: A pilot parent-mediated social skills intervention for young children with social challenges over telehealth.

Introduction: Social differences characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other developmental disabilities are evident in early childhood and are associated with later difficulties. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of evidence-based interventions explicitly targeting social skills development for young children, few actively integrate parents and caregivers, and even fewer have remote models. The importance of providing accessible, tailored services for families in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, prompted the creation of a parent-mediated telehealth version of Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS®) for Preschoolers (P4P), a pre-existing, evidence-based social skills intervention for children 4-6 years focused on making and keeping friends. Method: This methodological paper documents the implementation, feasibility, and satisfaction of a novel telehealth group-based delivery of P4P. Results: Qualitative results indicate acceptable feasibility and satisfaction. Additionally, following completion there was an increase in parental confidence in social coaching and increased use of child social skills. Discussion: Future work will evaluate quantitative outcomes and comparisons between delivery methods (e.g., telehealth vs. in-person).

Anthropometric Outcomes of Children and Adolescents Using Telehealth with Weight Management Interventions Compared to Usual Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective:This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of telehealth (TH) weight management interventions compared to usual care on anthropometric outcomes in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity.Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted identifying randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 1, 2005 and June 1, 2019. Studies using a web-based, smartphone or email TH intervention in children between 2-18 years of age were included. Outcome measures of interest included body mass index (BMI) z-score, BMI percentile, waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip-ratio (WHR). The Grade Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate strength of evidence (SOE) and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed when five or more RCTs reported the same outcome.Results: Thirteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Random effects meta-analysis of 10 RCTs detected a small effect for TH interventions compared to usual care in reducing BMI z-score (pooled net change in BMI z-score = -0.04; 95% CI -0.07, 0.00: I2 = 12%). No significant differences were found between groups for other outcomes. Strength of evidence ratings were low or very low in part due to concerns with heterogeneity in study designs, intervention durations, ages of participants, the type of TH used and risk of bias (ROB) of included studies.Conclusions: There is a low strength of evidence that TH had a small effect on anthropometric outcomes compared to usual care. Future RCTs should be well designed to minimize clinical heterogeneity and ROB. Studies of longer intervention duration with adequate, statistically powered analyses should be conducted.Key teaching pointsStudies using TH with pediatric weight management interventions may be effective to improve health of children with overweight and obesity.Future RCTs should consider clinical heterogeneity of study design for setting, age-group of children, preferences for type of TH and ROB.Studies that include children with severe obesity (<95th%) may need more sensitive outcome measures.Studies of longer duration are needed to better understand long-term weight management success.

The Effect of a Telehealth Intervention on Mother-Child's Feeding Interactions During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Purpose: This study evaluated the outcomes of a telehealth intervention aimed at enhancing exchanges in mother-child dyads who showed an impoverishment of the quality of their feeding interactions and a worsening of their psychopathological symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: N=334 mothers and their three-year-old children were recruited to assess their feeding interactions through an observational tool administered via a web platform, and maternal and offspring psychopathological symptoms were measured through the SCL/90-R and the CBCL 1.5-5. This study constitutes the third wave (T3) of a longitudinal research. Results: Our results showed that the intervention significantly improved the quality of mother-child feeding interactions. Moreover, mothers' psychopathological symptoms reduced after the intervention, especially in the interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive-compulsive subscales; offspring emotional/behavioral functioning and dysregulation symptoms also decreased, particularly in the subscales of withdrawn anxious/depressed attention problems and aggressive behavior. Conclusion: This study adds knowledge to the literature on COVID-19 pandemic effects on psychological health of parents and young children, proposing a method of intervention that had been effectively adopted previously but whose effectiveness had not been investigated during the pandemic.

Feasibility of a Novel COVID-19 Telehealth Care Management Program Among Individuals Receiving Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Analysis of a Pilot Program.

BACKGROUND: The emergence of COVID-19 exacerbated the existing epidemic of opioid use disorder (OUD) across the United States due to the disruption of in-person treatment and support services. Increased use of technology including telehealth and the development of new partnerships may facilitate coordinated treatment interventions that comprehensively address the health and well-being of individuals with OUD. OBJECTIVE: The analysis of this pilot program aimed to determine the feasibility of delivering a COVID-19 telehealth care management program using SMS text messages for patients receiving OUD treatment. METHODS: Eligible individuals were identified from a statewide opioid treatment program (OTP) network. Those who screened positive for COVID-19 symptoms were invited to connect to care management through a secure SMS text message that was compliant with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act standards. Care management monitoring for COVID-19 was provided for a period of up to 14 days. Monitoring services consisted of daily SMS text messages from the care manager inquiring about the participant's physical health in relation to COVID-19 symptoms by confirming their temperature, if the participant was feeling worse since the prior day, and if the participant was experiencing symptoms such as coughing or shortness of breath. If COVID-19 symptoms worsened during this observation period, the care manager was instructed to refer participants to the hospital for acute care services. The feasibility of the telehealth care management intervention was assessed by the rates of adoption in terms of program enrollment, engagement as measured by the number of SMS text message responses per participant, and retention in terms of the number of days participants remained in the program. RESULTS: Between January and April 2021, OTP staff members referred 21 patients with COVID-19 symptoms, and 18 (82%) agreed to be contacted by a care manager. Participants ranged in age from 27 to 65 years and primarily identified as female (n=12, 67%) and White (n=15, 83%). The majority of participants were Medicaid recipients (n=14, 78%). There were no statistically significant differences in the demographic characteristics between those enrolled and not enrolled in the program. A total of 12 (67%) patients were enrolled in the program, with 2 (11%) opting out of SMS text message communication and choosing instead to speak with a care manager verbally by telephone. The remaining 10 participants answered a median of 7 (IQR 4-10) SMS text messages and were enrolled in the program for a median of 9 (IQR 7.5-12) days. No participants were referred for acute care services or hospitalized during program enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the feasibility of a novel telehealth intervention to monitor COVID-19 symptoms among OTP patients in treatment for OUD. Further research is needed to determine the applicability of this intervention to monitor patients with comorbid chronic conditions in addition to the acceptability among patients and providers using the SMS text messaging modality.

Psychological interventions during COVID pandemic: Telehealth for individuals with cystic fibrosis and caregivers.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in China, leading to worldwide morbidity and mortality, including depression and anxiety. As the pandemic spread throughout Italy, mental health concerns increased for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF), who are at greater risk. The aim was to pilot a Telehealth Psychological Support Intervention for pwCF and caregivers to reduce stress, depression, and anxiety during the lockdown in Italy in March 2020. METHODS: This intervention utilized cognitive behavioral skills (e.g., cognitive reframing). Participants included 16 pwCF and 14 parents, who completed four individual telehealth sessions with a psychologist. Stress ratings, Patient Health Questionnaire and General Anxiety Disorder, PHQ-8 and GAD-7, were completed, in addition to Feasibility and Satisfaction ratings. RESULTS: Ratings of stress significantly decreased from pre- to post-testing for pwCF (paired t(14) = -4.06, p < .01) and parents (paired t = -5.2, p < .001). A large percentage of both groups scored in the clinical range for depression and anxiety at baseline (pwCF: depression/anxiety = 71%; parents: depression = 57%; anxiety = 79%); a large proportion (20%-40%) reported moderate to severe symptomatology. Significant reductions in depression for pwCF were found (pre: M = 8.0 to post: M = 4.7; paired t(14) = 2.8, p < .05) but not anxiety (pre: M = 6.9 to post: M = 5.6, t(14) = 1.2, p = NS-non-significant). Parental depression decreased for parents (pre: M = 6.4 to post: M = 5.1, t(14) = -2.5, p < .05), but not anxiety (pre: M = 8.1 to post: M = 7.9, t(14) = -0.2, p = NS). Feasibility and Satisfaction were positive. CONCLUSION: This telehealth intervention yielded reductions in stress and depression for participants. Anxiety did not significantly decrease, possibly because COVID was ongoing. This feasible, satisfactory intervention was effective for improving mental health.

Engagement With a Health Information Technology-Augmented Self-Management Support Program in a Population With Limited English Proficiency: Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Limited English proficiency (LEP) is an important driver of health disparities. Many successful patient-level interventions to prevent chronic disease progression and complications have used automated telephone self-management support, which relies on patient activation and communication to achieve improved health outcomes. It is not clear whether these interventions are similarly applicable to patients with LEP compared to patients with English proficiency. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) To examine the impact of LEP on patient engagement (primary outcome) with a 12-month language-concordant self-management program that included automated telephone self-management support, designed for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). (2) To assess the impact of LEP on change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and albuminuria (secondary outcomes) resulting from the self-management program. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the Kidney Awareness Registry and Education (KARE) pilot trial (NCT01530958) which was funded by the National Institutes of Health in August 2011, approved by the University of California Institutional Review Board in October 2011 (No. 11-07399), and executed between 2013 and 2015. Multivariable logistic and linear models were used to examine various facets of patient engagement with the CKD self-management support program by LEP status. Patient engagement was defined by patient's use of educational materials, completion of a health coaching action plan, and degree of participation with automated telephone self-management support. Changes in SBP and albuminuria at 12 months by LEP status were determined using multivariable linear mixed models. RESULTS: Of 137 study participants, 53 (38.7%) reported LEP, of which 45 (85%) were Spanish speaking and 8 (15%) Cantonese speaking. While patients with LEP and English proficiency similarly used the program's educational materials (85% [17/20] vs 88% [30/34], P=.69) and completed an action plan (81% [22/27] vs 74% [35/47], P=.49), those with LEP engaged more with the automated telephone self-management support component. Average call completion was 66% among patients with LEP compared with 57% among those with English proficiency; patients with LEP requested more health coach telephone calls (P=.08) and had a significantly longer average automated call duration (3.3 [SD 1.4] min vs 2.2 [1.1 min], P<.001), indicating higher patient engagement. Patients with LEP randomized to self-management support had a larger, though nonstatistically significant (P=.74), change in SBP (-4.5 mmHg; 95% CI -9.4 to 0.3) and albuminuria (-72.4 mg/dL; 95% CI -208.9 to 64.1) compared with patients with English proficiency randomized to self-management support (-2.1 mmHg; 95% CI -8.6 to 4.3 and -11.1 mg/dL; 95% CI -166.9 to 144.7). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LEP with CKD were equally or more engaged with a language-concordant, culturally appropriate telehealth intervention compared with their English-speaking counterparts. Augmented telehealth may be useful in mitigating communication barriers among patients with LEP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01530958; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01530958.

Application of telehealth intervention in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth intervention has been proposed as a sustainable and innovative intervention approach to Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, but there are still conflicting results in the literature about its effect. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of telehealth intervention for PD patients. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched from the inception to June 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies, without language restrictions. When feasible, data were statistically pooled for meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3. Otherwise, narrative summaries were used. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included. With respect to PD severity, compared with usual care, telehealth intervention was beneficial in lowering motor impairment of PD patients significantly (mean difference (MD) = -2.27, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -4.25 to -0.29, p = 0.02), rather than mental status (MD = -0.98, 95% CI -2.61 to 0.65, p = 0.24), activities of daily living (MD = -1.51, 95% CI -4.91 to 1.89, p = 0.38) and motor complications (MD = -0.36, 95% CI -1.31 to 0.59, p = 0.46). Telehealth intervention did not lead to significant reduction in quality of life (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.04, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.28, p = 0.76), depression (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.13, p = 0.34), cognition (MD = 0.37, 95% CI -0.34 to 1.09, p = 0.31) and balance (MD = 0.09, 95% CI -2.49 to 2.66, p = 0.95). DISCUSSION: Telehealth intervention is an effective option for individuals with PD to improve their motor impairment. Further well-designed studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Practical telehealth to improve control and engagement for patients with clinic-refractory diabetes mellitus (PRACTICE-DM): Protocol and baseline data for a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Persistent poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (PPDM), or maintenance of a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥8.5% despite receiving clinic-based diabetes care, contributes disproportionately to the national diabetes burden. Comprehensive telehealth interventions may help ameliorate PPDM, but existing approaches have rarely been designed with clinical implementation in mind, limiting use in routine practice. We describe a study testing a novel telehealth intervention that comprehensively targets clinic-refractory PPDM, and was explicitly developed for practical delivery using existing Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinical infrastructure. METHODS: Practical Telehealth to Improve Control and Engagement for Patients with Clinic-Refractory Diabetes Mellitus (PRACTICE-DM) is an ongoing randomized controlled trial comparing two 12-month interventions: 1) standard VHA Home Telehealth (HT) telemonitoring/care coordination; or 2) the PRACTICE-DM intervention, a comprehensive HT-delivered intervention combining telemonitoring, self-management support, diet/activity support, medication management, and depression management. The primary outcome is HbA1c. Secondary outcomes include diabetes distress, self-care, self-efficacy, weight, depressive symptoms, implementation barriers/facilitators, and costs. We hypothesize that the PRACTICE-DM intervention will reduce HbA1c by >0.6% versus standard HT over 12 months. RESULTS: Enrollment for this ongoing trial concluded in January 2020; 200 patients were randomized (99 to standard HT and 101 to the PRACTICE-DM intervention). The cohort has a mean age of 58 and is 23% female and 72% African American. Mean baseline HbA1c and BMI were 10.2% and 34.8 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Because it comprehensively targets factors underlying PPDM using existing clinical infrastructure, the PRACTICE-DM intervention may be well suited to lower the complications and costs of PPDM in routine practice.

Effect of telehealth intervention on breast cancer patients' quality of life and psychological outcomes: A meta-analysis.

Introduction Telehealth intervention has been proposed as an innovative intervention approach to breast cancer patients, but there are still conflicting results in the literature about its effect. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched from inception to 3 October 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the effect of telehealth intervention versus usual care in breast cancer patients. No language restrictions were used. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was pooled when needed. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted if necessary and feasible. Results Twenty RCTs with a total of 2190 participants were included into this meta-analysis. Compared with usual care, telehealth intervention was associated with higher quality of life (SMD = 0.60, 95% CI 0.18-1.01, p = 0.005) and self-efficacy (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI 0.19-0.98, p = 0.003), with less depression (SMD = -1.29, 95% CI -2.28 to -0.30, p = 0.01), distress (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.10, p = 0.001) and perceived stress (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.02, p = 0.04). However, anxiety score did not differ significantly between the two groups (SMD = -0.09, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.04, p = 0.17). Discussion Telehealth intervention is superior to usual care in breast cancer patients for improved quality of life, higher self-efficacy and less depression, distress, and perceived stress. However, these results should be recognized cautiously due to between-study heterogeneity, indicating that further well-designed RCTs are warranted.

Using a Nurse-Led Telehealth Intervention to Improve Fasting Glucose Levels in Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Undergoing a Surgical Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled diabetes during the perioperative period can result in a variety of adverse postoperative outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate a nurse-led telehealth preoperative intervention to improve glycemic control. METHODS: Provide telehealth diabetes education prior to surgery and evaluate time spent and pre-/post-glucose levels. Between-group differences were used to assess glycemic control. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in scores for those who received the telephone intervention (M = 167.71, SD = 59.9) and those who did not receive the intervention (M = 171.44, SD = 54.9; t (44) = 0.220, p = .82, two-tailed). The magnitude of the differences in the means was very small (Cohen's d = 0.03). There was a reduction in pre- and post-glucose levels for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings were not statistically significant, there may be some clinical significance. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The clinical significance has implications for nursing due to participants choosing to delay surgery and potentially preventing adverse outcomes.