Amivantamab plus Lazertinib in Previously Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab-lazertinib) has shown clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in patients with previously untreated or osimertinib-pretreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In a phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab-lazertinib (in an open-label fashion), osimertinib (in a blinded fashion), or lazertinib (in a blinded fashion, to assess the contribution of treatment components). The primary end point was progression-free survival in the amivantamab-lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group, as assessed by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: Overall, 1074 patients underwent randomization (429 to amivantamab-lazertinib, 429 to osimertinib, and 216 to lazertinib). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-lazertinib group than in the osimertinib group (23.7 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.85; P<0.001). An objective response was observed in 86% of the patients (95% CI, 83 to 89) in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and in 85% of those (95% CI, 81 to 88) in the osimertinib group; among patients with a confirmed response (336 in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and 314 in the osimertinib group), the median response duration was 25.8 months (95% CI, 20.1 to could not be estimated) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 18.5), respectively. In a planned interim overall survival analysis of amivantamab-lazertinib as compared with osimertinib, the hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05). Predominant adverse events were EGFR-related toxic effects. The incidence of discontinuation of all agents due to treatment-related adverse events was 10% with amivantamab-lazertinib and 3% with osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab-lazertinib showed superior efficacy to osimertinib as first-line treatment in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARIPOSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04487080.).

Osimertinib after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a recommended treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and as adjuvant treatment for resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown preliminary efficacy in unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable EGFR-mutated stage III NSCLC without progression during or after chemoradiotherapy to receive osimertinib or placebo until disease progression occurred (as assessed by blinded independent central review) or the regimen was discontinued. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients who had undergone chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib (143 patients) or placebo (73 patients). Osimertinib resulted in a significant progression-free survival benefit as compared with placebo: the median progression-free survival was 39.1 months with osimertinib versus 5.6 months with placebo, with a hazard ratio for disease progression or death of 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.24; P<0.001). The percentage of patients who were alive and progression free at 12 months was 74% (95% CI, 65 to 80) with osimertinib and 22% (95% CI, 13 to 32) with placebo. Interim overall survival data (maturity, 20%) showed 36-month overall survival among 84% of patients with osimertinib (95% CI, 75 to 89) and 74% with placebo (95% CI, 57 to 85), with a hazard ratio for death of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.56; P = 0.53). The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 35% in the osimertinib group and 12% in the placebo group; radiation pneumonitis (majority grade, 1 to 2) was reported in 48% and 38%, respectively. No new safety concerns emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with osimertinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than placebo in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; LAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03521154.).

Tepotinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with MET amplification following progression on first-line osimertinib (INSIGHT 2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib have few treatment options. Here, we report the primary analysis of the phase 2 INSIGHT 2 study evaluating tepotinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor, combined with osimertinib in this population. METHODS: This open-label, phase 2 study was conducted at 179 academic centres and community clinics in 17 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC of any histology, with MET amplification by tissue biopsy fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH; MET gene copy number of ≥5 or MET-to-CEP7 ratio of ≥2) or liquid biopsy next-generation sequencing (MET plasma gene copy number of ≥2·3), following progression on first-line osimertinib. Patients received oral tepotinib 500 mg plus oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed objective response in patients with MET amplification by central FISH treated with tepotinib plus osimertinib with at least 9 months of follow-up. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one study drug dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03940703 (enrolment complete). FINDINGS: Between Feb 13, 2020, and Nov 4, 2022, 128 patients (74 [58%] female, 54 [42%] male) were enrolled and initiated tepotinib plus osimertinib. The primary activity analysis population included 98 patients with MET amplification confirmed by central FISH, previous first-line osimertinib and at least 9 months of follow-up (median 12·7 months [IQR 9·9-20·3]). The confirmed objective response rate was 50·0% (95% CI 39·7-60·3; 49 of 98 patients). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events were peripheral oedema (six [5%] of 128 patients), decreased appetite (five [4%]), prolonged electrocardiogram QT interval (five [4%]), and pneumonitis (four [3%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 16 (13%) patients. Deaths of four (3%) patients were assessed as potentially related to either trial drug by the investigator due to pneumonitis (two [2%] patients), decreased platelet count (one [1%]), respiratory failure (one [1%]), and dyspnoea (one [1%]); one death was attributed to both pneumonitis and dyspnoea. INTERPRETATION: Tepotinib plus osimertinib showed promising activity and acceptable safety in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and MET amplification as a mechanism of resistance to first-line osimertinib, suggesting a potential chemotherapy-sparing oral targeted therapy option that should be further investigated. FUNDING: Merck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945).

Liquid biopsy for the management of NSCLC patients under osimertinib treatment.

Therapeutic management of NSCLC patients is quite challenging as they are mainly diagnosed at a late stage of disease, and they present a high heterogeneous molecular profile. Osimertinib changed the paradigm shift in treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients achieving significantly better clinical outcomes. To date, osimertinib is successfully administered not only as first- or second-line treatment, but also as adjuvant treatment while its efficacy is currently investigated during neoadjuvant treatment or in stage III, unresectable EGFR mutant NSCLC patients. However, resistance to osimertinib may occur due to clonal evolution, under the pressure of the targeted therapy. The utilization of liquid biopsy as a minimally invasive tool provides insight into molecular heterogeneity of tumor clonal evolution and potent resistance mechanisms which may help to develop more suitable therapeutic approaches. Longitudinal monitoring of NSCLC patients through ctDNA or CTC analysis could reveal valuable information about clinical outcomes during osimertinib treatment. Therefore, several guidelines suggest that liquid biopsy in addition to tissue biopsy should be considered as a standard of care in the advanced NSCLC setting. This practice could significantly increase the number of NSCLC patients that will eventually benefit from targeted therapies, such as EGFR TKIs.

A case of response to combination treatment with TSA-DC-CTL immunotherapy and osimertinib in EGFR mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study details a case of a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring an exon 19 deletion in the EGFR gene. METHOD: A 46-year-old female patient was diagnosed with stage IVb left lung adenocarcinoma, with multiple bone and lymph node metastases. Following the identification of tumor-specific antigen peptides, the patient received a combination treatment of immunotherapy (TSA-DC-CTL) and oral osimertinib. Peripheral blood circulating immune cells and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were monitored before and after treatment. PET-CT and CT scans were used to assess the tumor response to treatment. RESULTS: A significant increase in total lymphocyte percentage and decrease in the number of CTCs in the patient was observed. Imaging studies showed a notable reduction in tumor metastases. CONCLUSION: This report demonstrates the safety and efficacy of TSA-DC-CTL cell immunotherapy combined with osimertinib in the treatment of a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR exon 19 deletions. This study describes a promising new treatment option for patients with advanced lung cancer with EGFR mutations.

Afatinib plus PEM and CBDCA overcome osimertinib resistance in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with high thrombospondin-1 expression.

Osimertinib induces a marked response in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations. However, acquired resistance to osimertinib remains an inevitable problem. In this study, we aimed to investigate osimertinib-resistant mechanisms and evaluate the combination therapy of afatinib and chemotherapy. We established osimertinib-resistant cell lines (PC-9-OR and H1975-OR) from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma cell lines PC-9 and H1975 by high exposure and stepwise method. Combination therapy of afatinib plus carboplatin (CBDCA) and pemetrexed (PEM) was effective in both parental and osimertinib-resistant cells. We found that expression of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) was upregulated in resistant cells using cDNA microarray analysis. We demonstrated that TSP-1 increases the expression of matrix metalloproteinases through integrin signaling and promotes tumor invasion in both PC-9-OR and H1975-OR, and that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was involved in H1975-OR. Afatinib plus CBDCA and PEM reversed TSP-1-induced invasion ability and EMT changes in resistant cells. In PC-9-OR xenograft mouse models (five female Balb/c-Nude mice in each group), combination therapy strongly inhibited tumor growth compared with afatinib monotherapy (5 mg/kg, orally, five times per week) or CBDCA (75 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, one time per week) + PEM (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, one time per week) over a 28-day period. These results suggest that the combination of afatinib plus CBDCA and PEM, which effectively suppresses TSP-1 expression, may be a promising option in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after the acquisition of osimertinib resistance.

MS4A3 Promotes the Chemosensitivity of Lung Cancer via THAP1/EGFR Pathways.

MS4A3 functions as a tumor suppressor in multiple cancer types. However, the roles of MS4A3 in lung cancer are still unknown. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the potentials of MS4A3 in lung cancer. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was carried out to determine mRNA expression. CCK-8 and colony formation assay are conducted to determine cell proliferation. Tube formation assay is performed to determine angiogenesis. Flow cytometry is used to determine cell apoptosis. JASPAR is used to analyze the binding motif of THAP1. Luciferase and ChIP assay are conducted to verify whether MS4A3 can interact with THAP1 to transcriptionally inactivate EGFR. The results showed that MS4A3 is downregulated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, which predicts poor clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients. Overexpressed MS4A3 enhances the chemosensitivity of NSCLC cells to osimertinib, whereas MS4A3 knockdown exerts the opposite effects. MS4A3 suppresses the proliferation and angiogenesis and promotes the apoptosis of NSCLC cells. Moreover, MS4A3 upregulates apoptosis-related THAP1 to inactivate EGFR. However, THAP1 knockdown attenuates the effects of MS4A3 and promotes the malignant behavior of NSCLC cells. In conclusion, MS4A3 functions as an anti-tumor gene in NSCLC. MS4A3/THAP1/EGFR signaling enhances the chemosensitivity of lung cancer to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Complete response to capmatinib in a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring CD47-MET fusion: a case report.

Comprehensive genomic profiling is highly recommended for treatment decision in nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, rare genomic alterations are still being unveiled, with scarce data to guide therapy. Herein, we describe the treatment journey of a 56-year-old, never-smoker Caucasian woman with a metastatic NSCLC harboring a CD47-MET fusion, initially classified as a variant of unknown significance. She had undergone 3 lines of therapy over the course of 3 years, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and anti-angiogenic therapy. After reanalysis of her next-generation sequencing data in our service, the fusion was reclassified as likely oncogenic. The patient was started with fourth-line capmatinib, with a good tolerance so far and a complete metabolic response in the active sites of disease, currently ongoing for 18 months. In conclusion, we highlight the sensitivity of a novel MET fusion to capmatinib and emphasize the need for comprehensive panels in NSCLC and molecular tumor board discussions with specialized centers when rare findings arise.

Osimertinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Overall Survival, Post-progression Management and Budget Impact Analysis in Real-World.

INTRODUCTION: The observational multicenter prospective FLOWER study (NCT04965701) confirmed effectiveness and safety of osimertinib in the real-world (RW) management of untreated EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients. METHODS: Herein, we report updated survival data, post-progression management, cost/effectiveness and budget impact (BI) of osimertinib compared with a RW population receiving gefitinib or erlotinib. RESULTS: Overall, 189 Caucasian patients receiving first-line osimertinib were included. After a follow-up of 20.7 months, 74(39.2%) patients discontinued osimertinib, median time-to-treatment discontinuation (mTTD) was 27.9 months, overall survival 36.8 months. At progression, tissue biopsy was performed in 29 (56.9%), liquid biopsy in 15 (29.4%) and both in 7 (13.7%) cases. The most frequent resistant mechanism was MET amplification (N = 14, 29.8%). At data cutoff, 13 (6.9%) patients were continuing osimertinib beyond progression; 52 (67.5%) received second-line treatment; no further treatments were administered in 25 (32.5%) cases. Thirty-three (63.4%) patients received chemotherapy, 12(23.1%) TKIs combination. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed a total cost per patient based on RW mTTD of 98,957.34€, 21,726.28€ and 19,637.83€ for osimertinib, erlotinib and gefitinib, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/month for osimertinib was 359,806.0€/life-year-gained (LYG) and 197,789.77€/LYG compared to erlotinib and gefitinib. For osimertinib, the BI-gap between RW-TTD and theoretical-TTD was 16,501.0€ per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This updated analysis confirms the effectiveness of osimertinib in RW. Although the ICER of osimertinib seems not cost-effective, additional costs for the management of disease progression to old generation TKIs were not considered in this study. The BI-gap suggests RW mTTD as a more reliable measure for expense estimation.

Amivantamab plus lazertinib versus osimertinib in first-line EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with biomarkers of high-risk disease: a secondary analysis from MARIPOSA.

BACKGROUND: Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC; hazard ratio (HR) 0.70; P < 0.001], including those with a history of brain metastases (HR 0.69). Patients with TP53 co-mutations, detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), baseline liver metastases, and those without ctDNA clearance on treatment have poor prognoses. We evaluated outcomes in these high-risk subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This analysis included patients with treatment-naive, EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC randomized to amivantamab-lazertinib (n = 429) or osimertinib (n = 429) in MARIPOSA. Pathogenic alterations were identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of baseline blood ctDNA with Guardant360 CDx. Ex19del and L858R ctDNA in blood was analyzed at baseline and cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1) with Biodesix droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR). RESULTS: Baseline ctDNA for NGS of pathogenic alterations was available for 636 patients (amivantamab-lazertinib, n = 320; osimertinib, n = 316). Amivantamab-lazertinib improved median PFS (mPFS) versus osimertinib for patients with TP53 co-mutations {18.2 versus 12.9 months; HR 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.87]; P = 0.003} and for patients with wild-type TP53 [22.1 versus 19.9 months; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.52-1.07)]. In patients with EGFR-mutant, ddPCR-detectable baseline ctDNA, amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged mPFS versus osimertinib [20.3 versus 14.8 months; HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53-0.86); P = 0.002]. Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly improved mPFS versus osimertinib in patients without ctDNA clearance at C3D1 [16.5 versus 9.1 months; HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.27-0.87); P = 0.015] and with clearance [24.0 versus 16.5 months; HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.48-0.87); P = 0.004]. Amivantamab-lazertinib significantly prolonged mPFS versus osimertinib among randomized patients with [18.2 versus 11.0 months; HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.37-0.91); P = 0.017] and without baseline liver metastases [24.0 versus 18.3 months; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.60-0.91); P = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab-lazertinib effectively overcomes the effect of high-risk features and represents a promising new standard of care for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

Osimertinib in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy presents a promising option for osimertinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib has become standard care for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whereas drug resistance remains inevitable. Now we recognize that the interactions between the tumor and the tumor microenvironment (TME) also account for drug resistance. Therefore, we provide a new sight into post-osimertinib management, focusing on the alteration of TME. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on the prognosis of different treatments after osimertinib resistance. Next, we carried out in vivo experiment to validate our findings using a humanized mouse model. Furthermore, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing (scRNA-seq) of tumor tissue from the above treatment groups to explore the mechanisms of TME changes. RESULTS: Totally 111 advanced NSCLC patients have been enrolled in the retrospective study. The median PFS was 9.84 months (95% CI 7.0-12.6 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly longer than chemotherapy (P = 0.012) and osimertinib (P = 0.003). The median OS was 16.79 months (95% CI 14.97-18.61 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly better than chemotherapy (P = 0.026), the chemotherapy plus osimertinib (P = 0.021), and the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (P = 0.006). The efficacy of osimertinib plus anlotinib in the osimertinib-resistant engraft tumors (R-O+A) group was significantly more potent than the osimertinib (R-O) group (P<0.05) in vitro. The combinational therapy could significantly increase the infiltration of CD4+ T cells (P<0.05), CD25+CD4+ T cells (P<0.001), and PD-1+CD8+ T cells (P<0.05) compared to osimertinib. ScRNA-seq demonstrated that the number of CD8+ T and proliferation T cells increased, and TAM.mo was downregulated in the R-O+A group compared to the R-O group. Subtype study of T cells explained that the changes caused by combination treatment were mainly related to cytotoxic T cells. Subtype study of macrophages showed that proportion and functional changes in IL-1ß.mo and CCL18.mo might be responsible for rescue osimertinib resistance by combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, osimertinib plus anlotinib could improve the prognosis of patients with a progressed disease on second-line osimertinib treatment, which may ascribe to increased T cell infiltration and TAM remodeling via VEGF-VEGFR blockage.

Effect of early dose reduction of osimertinib on efficacy in the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

Osimertinib is used as the first-line therapy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, early dose reduction is often required due to adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early dose reduction of osimertinib on efficacy and safety. This was a retrospective study including patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were started on osimertinib as the first-line therapy between August 2018 and December 2021. Patients whose doses were reduced to less than 80 mg/day within 6 months of osimertinib initiation or started at 40 mg/day were defined as the dose reduction group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Factors affecting PFS were explored using the Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 85 patients were included in this study. No significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between the dose reduction (n = 25) and standard dose groups (n = 60). The median PFS in the dose reduction group was significantly prolonged compared with that in the standard dose group (26.0 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis of 84 patients, excluding a patient with unknown brain metastasis, revealed that EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, malignant pleural effusion or pleural metastasis, liver metastasis, and dose reduction within 6 months were independent factors affecting PFS. Early dose reduction of osimertinib is an effective therapeutic strategy for prolonging PFS in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Enhancement of Chemotherapy Efficacy in Cervical Cancer via MAPK Pathway Inhibition by Osimertinib.

Addressing recurrent cervical cancer poses a substantial challenge. Osimertinib, an FDA-approved EGFR inhibitor, has emerged as a promising option. Our study examined its potential to enhance paclitaxel's efficacy against cervical cancer. Osimertinib effectively hindered cancer cell growth and induced apoptosis across multiple cell lines. Combined with paclitaxel, it exhibited synergy in suppressing cervical cancer cells. Importantly, osimertinib's inhibitory effect was EGFR-independent; it targeted Mnk phosphorylation, reducing eIF4E activity. In mice, the combined osimertinib-paclitaxel treatment surpassed individual drugs in inhibiting cancer growth. These preclinical findings suggest osimertinib's repurposing as a means to improve paclitaxel's effectiveness in cervical cancer treatment.

Pyrotinib combined with metronomic etoposide in heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a single-arm, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Exploration of novel combination mode of pyrotinib and chemotherapy for heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and how to balance survival benefits and compliance are still urgent problems in clinical practice. The current single-arm prospective phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in combination with metronomic oral etoposide in heavily pretreated HER2-positive MBC. METHODS: HER2-positive MBC patients previously treated with trastuzumab were enrolled to receive oral pyrotinib 400 mg per day and metronomic oral etoposide 50 mg per day d1-21 every 28 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: 22 patients were enrolled with a median of 4 prior treatment regimens for MBC. During the follow-up of 20 evaluable patients, the median PFS was 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.6-10.4 months), and the median OS was 27.0 months (95%CI, 20.9-33.1 months). The ORR was 30% (6/20), the DCR was 80% (16/20), and the CBR was 65% (13/20). The most common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) included nausea (15%), vomiting (15%), diarrhea (5%), anemia (5%), and peripheral neuropathy (5%). No grade 4 or lethal AEs were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of pyrotinib with metronomic oral etoposide has achieved promising clinical benefits in heavily pretreated HER2-positive MBC, with acceptable and manageable toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry number: NCT03923179. Registered April 18, 2019.

HER2-positive advanced biliary tract cancer responds to second-line pyrotinib therapy: a case report.

Biliary tract cancers are solid tumors with poor prognosis and over 70% of patients present in advanced stages. The efficacy of second-line treatment for patients who progressed on GC chemotherapy is limited. Median OS of these patients is less than 1 year with palliative treatment. Despite the success of anti-HER2 therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer, the targeted therapy of HER2 mutations in BTCs is still being explored. This case report is the first report suggesting a 15-month PFS and partial response of pyrotinib in HER2-positive BTC. We report a 64-year-old female with HER2-positive biliary tract cancer. She was diagnosed with AJCC clinical stage IV (cT3N1M1) intrahepatic biliary tract cancer and got PD after 3 cycles of systemic chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Due to the HER2-positive signature, pyrotinib (400 mg daily in 21-day cycles), an oral irreversible pan-ErbB TKI was prescribed in September 2021, with her informed consent. The tumor shrank significantly after this treatment and imaging assessments conducted on 24 September 2022 showed PR. Until the writing of the case draft, the patient had achieved 15 months of PFS. The present case suggests that Pyrotinib might be a potential effective treatment for HER2-positive advanced BTC.

Delayed cardiotoxicity following osimertinib therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a unique case report.

This case report features a 62-year-old male with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletion, who underwent treatment with osimertinib following a left upper lobectomy and lymph node dissection. Despite a history of smoking and well-managed type 2 diabetes, the patient developed heart failure 18 months post-initiation of osimertinib therapy, marking one of the latest occurrences of heart failure following osimertinib treatment documented in limited literature. Cardiac MRI revealed significant left ventricular enlargement, lateral wall myocardial thinning, and localized myocardial fibrosis without perfusion defects, a finding not previously reported in literature. This case underscores the severe and unusual cardiac effects of osimertinib in patients with latent risk factors, highlighting the importance of vigilant cardiac monitoring and a multidisciplinary management approach.

EGFR exon 18 delE709_T710insD mutated stage IV non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib: a case report.

Mutations in tyrosine kinase domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are observed in approximately 15% of non-small cell lung cancer adenocarcinoma. Exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations are predominant in frequency and show high sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Exon 18 mutations are extremely rare and the delE709_T710insD mutation accounts for only 0.16% of mutations when occurring as a sole mutation. This specific mutation in exon 18 seems to respond to certain EGFR TKIs such as afatinib. However, given the rarity of this mutation, determining the most effective TKI for its treatment remains unclear. We report a 70-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IV-A lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR delE709_T710insD mutation treated in first-line with Osimertinib using standard schedule and doses experiencing renal toxicity and disease progression after 9 weeks of treatment.

Icotinib in a lung adenocarcinoma patient with acquired EGFR 19del/C797S mutation-mediated resistance to osimertinib: a case report.

Based on the FLAURA and AURA III trials, compared to first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), osimertinib provides a longer overall survival benefit for patients with untreated EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer. Similar to other EGFR-TKIs, drug resistance is, however, inevitable. The most common mechanism of acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib therapy is the C797S mutation, which accounts for 6% of cases. In view of the current challenges of the development of the next generation of EGFR inhibitors, the mechanism of third-generation targeted drug resistances and targeted strategies are key for further exploration. Our case report discusses a female patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma carrying the EGFR exon19 E746_A750delinsIP mutation who received osimertinib as first-line therapy and acquired C797S resistance during treatment. The patient was then treated with icotinib for 8 months until the disease progressed. Icotinib may be effective in patients with the EGFR 19del-C797S resistant mutation acquired after osimertinib treatment.

Furmonertinib and intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy rechallenges osimertinib-refractory leptomeningeal metastasis in a non-small cell lung cancer patient harboring EGFR20 R776S, C797S, and EGFR21 L858R compound EGFR mutations: a case report.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are considered the first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. However, due to the rarity of cases, the response of EGFR-TKIs in patients harboring uncommon compound EGFR mutations still needs to be determined. Here, we demonstrated the case of a 47-year-old smoker diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastasis from NSCLC and had EGFR20 R776S, C797S, and EGFR21 L858R compound mutations. He was treated with furmonertinib combined with intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy following progression on osimertinib, which led to clinical improvement and successfully prolonged his survival by 3 months. Regrettably, the patient eventually died from heart disease. This report provides the first reported evidence for the use of furmonertinib and intrathecal pemetrexed chemotherapy in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR R776S/C797S/L858R mutations who progressed on previous EGFR-TKIs.