Immunohistochemical expression of SPARC in odontogenic keratocysts: a comparative study with other odontogenic cysts.

BACKGROUND: Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) has been shown to modulate aggressive behavior in several benign and malignant tumors. Little is known about SPARC expression in odontogenic keratocyst (OKC), an odontogenic cyst with an aggressive nature. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has been investigated the expression of this protein in OKCs. This study aimed to characterize SPARC expression in OKCs. Additionally, to determine whether SPARC is associated with aggressive behavior in OKCs, SPARC expression in OKCs was compared with radicular cysts (RCs), dentigerous cysts (DCs) and calcifying odontogenic cysts (COCs). These odontogenic cysts showed no or less aggressive behavior. METHODS: SPARC expression was evaluated in 38 OKCs, 39 RCs, 35 DCs and 14 COCs using immunohistochemistry. The percentages of positive cells and the intensities of immunostaining in the epithelial lining and the cystic wall were evaluated and scored. RESULTS: Generally, OKCs showed similar staining patterns to RCs, DCs and COCs. In the epithelial lining, SPARC was not detected, except for ghost cells in all COCs. In the cystic wall, the majority of positive cells were fibroblasts. Compared between 4 groups of odontogenic cysts, SPARC expression in OKCs was significantly higher than those of RCs (P < 0.001), DCs (P < 0.001) and COCs (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase of SPARC expression in OKCs compared with RCs, DCs and COCs suggests that SPARC may play a role in the aggressive behavior of OKCs.

Immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in radicular and residual radicular cysts

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed and compared the immunoexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in radicular cysts (RCs) and residual radicular cysts (RRCs), relating them to the angiogenic index and the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty RCs and 10 RRCs were evaluated by immunohistochemistry using anti-VEGF and anti-MMP-9 antibodies. The angiogenic index was determined by microvessel count (MVC) using anti-von Willebrand factor antibody. RESULTS: The expression of both VEGF and MMP-9 was higher in RCs than in RRCs. RCs and RRCs presented strong epithelial expression of VEGF, irrespective of the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate. Lesions with strong expression of MMP-9 showed significantly higher number of immunopositive cells for VEGF (p<0.05) and higher MVC (p<0.05). Lesions with dense inflammatory infiltrate exhibited significantly higher MVC (p<0.05) and higher number of immunopositive cells for VEGF (p<0.05). There was a positive correlation between both MVC (p<0.05) and the quantity of immunopositive cells for VEGF (p<0.05), with intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate. In addition, it was observed a positive correlation between the number of immunopositive cells for VEGF and MVC (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: VEGF and MMP-9 might play important roles in the angiogenesis in RCs and RRCs. In these lesions, the expression of these molecules and the MVC is closely related to the intensity of the inflammatory infiltrate. The expression of VEGF in the epithelial lining of RCs and RRCs might be important for the enlargement of these lesions.