Case report: A complete lower cervical fracture dislocation without permanent neurological impairment.

BACKGROUND: Complete fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine are usually associated with severe spinal cord injury. However, a very small number of patients do not have severe spinal cord injury symptoms, patients with normal muscle strength or only partial nerve root symptoms, known as "lucky fracture dislocation". The diagnosis and treatment of such patients is very difficult. Recently, we successfully treated one such patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old male patient had multiple neck and body aches after trauma, but there was sensory movement in his limbs. However, preoperative cervical radiographs showed no significant abnormalities, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed complete fracture and dislocation of C7. Before operation, the halo frame was fixed traction, but the reduction was not successful. Finally, the fracture reduction and internal fixation were successfully performed by surgery. The postoperative pain of the patient was significantly relieved, and the sensory movement of the limbs was the same as before. Two years after surgery, the patient's left little finger and ulnar forearm shallow sensation recovered, and the right flexion muscle strength basically returned to normal. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that when patients with trauma are encountered in the clinic, they should be carefully examined, and the presence of cervical fracture and dislocation should not be ignored because of the absence of neurological symptoms or mild symptoms. In addition, positioning during handling and surgery should be particularly avoided to increase the risk of paralysis.

Open reduction and internal fixation of crescent fracture-dislocation: anterior or posterior approach?

INTRODUCTION: To date, the approach that prevails in the open reduction and internal fixation of crescent fracture-dislocations (CFD) remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of CFD treated via the anterior or posterior approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 64 cases of CFDs openly reduced through an anterior (group A, n = 31) or a posterior (group B, n = 33) approach were retrospectively analyzed. Functional results, reduction quality, residual displacements in the axial and coronal planes, pelvic asymmetry deformity, and correlations between Day's classification were compared. Complications and fracture union were also recorded. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. RESULTS: The functional scores were similar between the two groups, and all fractures achieved good or excellent reduction postoperatively. In the coronal plane, the excellent/good ratio in group B was higher than in group A. The mean residual displacement in the coronal plane was significantly higher in group A than in group B, with group A showing greater displacement in both planes for Day I fractures and in the coronal plane for Day II fractures. The residual displacement in both planes for Day III fractures was comparable between the groups. The pelvic asymmetry deformity was equal between the two groups and among the different Day's fracture types. CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation of CFDs obtained satisfactory outcomes through an anterior or posterior approach. The posterior approach achieved a better sacroiliac joint reduction. The optimal indication for the posterior approach was a Day I fracture, followed by a Day II fracture. No correlation was found between the surgical approach and reduction quality in Day III fractures.

Chopart dislocations: a review of diagnosis, treatment and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Chopart injuries can be allocated into 4 broad groups, ligamentous injury with or without dislocation and fracture with or without dislocation, which must occur at the talonavicular joint (TNJ) and/or calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ). Chopart dislocations are comprised of pure-dislocations and fracture-dislocations. We aim to review the literature, to enable evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles from the electronic databases, PubMed, Medline and Scopus. The PRISMA flow chart was used to scrutinise the search results. Articles were screened by title, abstract and full text to confirm relevance. RESULTS: We identified 58 papers for analysis, 36 case reports, 4 cohort studies, 4 case series and 14 other articles related to the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of Chopart dislocations. Diagnostic recommendations included routine imaging to contain computed tomography (CT) and routine examination for compartment syndrome. Treatment recommendations included early anatomical reduction, with restoration and maintenance of column length and joint congruency. For both pure-dislocations and fracture-dislocations urgent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) provided the most favourable long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Chopart dislocations are a complex heterogenous midfoot injury with historically poor outcomes. There is a relative paucity of research discussing these injuries. We have offered evidence-based recommendations related to the clinical and surgical management of these rare pathologies.

[Bilateral Dorsal Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Humerus]. / Bilaterálna dorzálna luxacná zlomenina proximálneho humeru.

Fractures of the proximal humerus constitute approximately 5% of all fractures. Shoulder joint injuries without any external mechanical impact during seizures with the occurrence of spasms occur only sporadically. The occurrence rate is reported in approximately 0.4% of patients. Very rarely they occur in the form of epileptic seizure-induced dorsal fracturedislocation impacting both sides. The case report describes a case of a 48-year-old woman with no treatment for epileptic seizures in her medical history. During the first seizure she sustained a bilateral dorsal fracture-dislocation caused by a muscle spasm, without any other mechanical impact. The fractures were classified as a 3-fragment fracture on the right side and a 4-fragment fracture on the left side. After the patient's admission to the inpatient emergency department, reduction under anaesthesia was attempted. Subsequently, after preparation, open reduction and osteosynthesis using an angularly stable plate were performed as a two-stage surgery. No complications were observed postoperatively Currently, at 3 years after surgeries, the female patient has full mobility of her shoulder joints with no subjective difficulties. Key words: epilepsy, seizure, dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus.

Fracture Dislocation of the Pisiform Bone in 14-Year-Old Boy-A Case Report.

We present the case of a 14-year-old patient who suffered fracture dislocation of the pisiform bone (PB) along with fractures of the scaphoid, proximal radius, and proximal phalanx of the thumb due to high-energy trauma directly to the extended wrist. This combination of fractures has not been previously reported in the literature. Currently, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal treatment approach for such cases. In our management, initial attempts at closed and open reduction were unsuccessful, leading to the decision for primary pisiformectomy. Our report includes a follow-up of 3.5 years, demonstrating a very good outcome. Based on this case and a few similar published cases, primary pisiformectomy appears to be a viable and well-accepted option, particularly among young patients. Additionally, we conducted a review of radiographic criteria and management strategies for this specific injury and related conditions.

Comparison of temporary external and percutaneous k-wire fixations for treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations.

PURPOSE: Ankle fracture-dislocations are among the most severe injuries, and the use of an external fixator as a recommended fixation method has some disadvantages. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and complication rates of external and K-wire fixations in the treatment of ankle fracture dislocations. METHODS: A total of 67 patients with ankle fracture-dislocations requiring temporary external or percutaneous K-wire fixation were included. The exclusion criteria were pilon fractures, open fractures, and those who required acute open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) score (range 0-10), and complications before and after the definitive surgery were recorded. RESULTS: A significant difference between the two groups was not observed for age, sex, affected side, fracture type, smoking status, or diabetes. The average AOFAS scores were 83.2 and 83.3, the median VAS scores were 3 and 3, and the complication rates were 32.4% and 6.7% in the external and K-wire fixation groups, respectively (p = 0.010). However, skin necrosis, re-dislocation of the ankle, surgical wound infection, and posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis frequency were not significantly different between the groups, except for pin-sites infection (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Ankle fracture-dislocations using percutaneous k-wire fixation showed a low rate of complications and favorable clinical outcomes. This method could be a good alternative treatment option for ankle fracture-dislocations.

Hemihamate Arthroplasty Revisited: A Retrospective Review of 11 Cases.

PURPOSE: Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fracture dislocations are complex injuries that can result in persistent pain, stiffness, and angulation. Hemihamate arthroplasty (HHA) can be used to reconstruct the base of the middle phalanx in cases of unstable PIPJ fracture dislocations. Despite previous case series describing good outcomes with HHA, it has not gained widespread use. The purpose of this study is to describe our straightforward, reproducible technique and to demonstrate the benefit in motion after the procedure in chronic unstable PIPJ fracture dislocations. METHODS: All patients with chronic, unstable PIPJ fracture dislocations requiring joint resurfacing of greater than 40% of the base of the middle phalanx treated with HHA were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, injury features, surgical technique, preoperative and postoperative PIPJ range of motion and arc of motion, time to surgery, and complications were reviewed. Any fracture amenable to fixation or cases with radiographic evidence of arthritis or injury to the head of the proximal phalanx were excluded. RESULTS: Eleven cases were reviewed. The mean patient age was 35 years. The mean time from injury to surgery was 6 months. The mean joint surface involved was 64%. The mean PIPJ arc of motion was 17 degrees preoperatively and 63 degrees postoperatively. The mean bone block size required was 8 × 8 × 8 mm. The mean follow-up was 26 months. Postoperative pain at the PIPJ on the visual analog scale was 0.4 (scale of 0 to 10). Complications included 2 patients requiring tenolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of a perfect geometric recreation of the base of the middle phalanx with the hamate, patients recover acceptable PIPJ motion and have minimal pain. Hemihamate arthroplasty is a good option for any patient with minimal motion of their PIPJ and a chronic, unstable fracture dislocation.

Variable Adjustment Methods for Hemihamate Autograft Arthroplasty in Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture/Dislocations: A Surgical Technique Revisited and Case Series.

ABSTRACT: Proximal interphalangeal joint fracture/dislocations, even after surgical correction, often lead to long-term complications including posttraumatic arthritis, prolonged joint stiffness, and chronic joint instability. A wide range of surgical techniques has been devised to resolve this issue, but none has been promising enough. Despite this circumstance, arthroplasty using a hemihamate autograft of size and contour that match the middle phalangeal base has progressed into one of more acceptable methods that provide both articular congruency and osseous stability. In this article, we introduce various types of proximal interphalangeal joint fracture/dislocations and individualized surgical approach using hemihamate autograft and lag screw and/or hook plate as fixation methods.

Comparison of 3 Dynamic External Fixation Devices for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations in a Cadaver Model.

PURPOSE: Several improvised dynamic external fixation devices are used for treating unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture-dislocations. We compared the effectiveness of 3 constructs for simulated dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations in a cadaver model. METHODS: We tested 30 digits from 10 fresh-frozen, thawed cadaver hands. We aimed to remove the palmar 50% of the base of each digit's middle phalanx (P2), simulating an unstable dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocation. Each PIP joint was then stabilized via external fixation with either a pins-and-rubber-bands construct, pins-only construct, or tuberculin syringe-pins construct. We allocated 10 digits per fixation group. The finger tendons were secured to a computer-controlled stepper motor-driven linear actuator. Via this mechanism, all PIP joints were taken through 1,400 cycles of flexion-extension. With the PIP joint in neutral extension, we measured the P2 dorsal translation at baseline, after fixator stabilization, and after the motion protocol. RESULTS: The actual mean P2 palmar defect created was 48% of the base. All PIP joints were unstable after creating the defect, with a mean initial P2 dorsal displacement of 3.7 mm. After application of the fixators, all PIP joint dislocations were reduced. The median residual P2 dorsal displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group, 0.1 mm for the pins-only group, and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group. There were no cases of PIP joint redislocation after flexion-extension cycling, and the median dorsal P2 displacements were 0.0 mm for the pins-rubber bands group; 0.0 mm for the pins-only group; and 0.5 mm for the syringe-pins group. CONCLUSIONS: All 3 external fixators restored PIP joint stability following simulated dorsal fracture-dislocation, with all reductions maintained after motion testing. The syringe-pins construct had significantly greater median residual P2 dorsal displacement after the initial reduction and motion testing, which is of unclear clinical importance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study informs surgeon decision-making when considering dynamic external fixator options for dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations.

Reverse Hemi-Hamate Autograft for Volar Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations.

Volar proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations are rare injuries. Treatment is challenging when they are not identified acutely, with poor outcomes reported. We report a surgical technique to treat chronic volar proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations: a reverse hemi-hamate autograft.

High rate of avascular necrosis but excellent patient-reported outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fracture dislocations: should ORIF be considered as primary treatment?

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fracture dislocations, excluding 2-part greater tuberosity fracture dislocations, are rare injuries. Outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these injuries have not been well described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the radiographic and functional outcomes of patients who underwent ORIF of a proximal humerus fracture dislocation. METHODS: All skeletally mature patients who underwent ORIF of a proximal humerus fracture dislocation between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Patients with isolated greater tuberosity fracture dislocations were excluded. The primary outcome was American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score at a minimum of 2 years. Secondary outcomes were the development of avascular necrosis (AVN) and reoperation rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 45 years (standard deviation 16), and 77% were men. Median time to reduction and surgery was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 1-5). There were 2 (8%) Neer 2-part fractures, 7 (27%) 3-part, and 17 (65%) 4-part fractures. Fifty-four percent (54%) involved the anatomic neck and 31% included a head-split component. Thirty-nine percent (39%) were anterior dislocations. The rate of AVN was 19%. The reoperation rate was 15%. Reoperations included removal of hardware (2), subscapularis repair (1), and manipulation under anesthesia (1). No patients went on to arthroplasty. ASES scores were available for 22 patients (84%) including 4 of 5 patients with AVN. The median ASES score at a mean of 6.0 years postoperatively was 98.3 (IQR 86.7-100, range 63.3-100) and was not different in those with or without AVN (median 98.3 vs. 92.0, P = .175). Only the presence of medial comminution and nonanatomic head shaft alignment on postoperative radiographs were associated with increased risk of AVN. CONCLUSION: Radiographic rates of AVN (19%) and reoperation (15%) were high in this series of patients undergoing ORIF of proximal humerus fracture dislocations. Despite this, none of the patients required arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at an average of 6 years postinjury were excellent, with a median ASES score of 98.5. ORIF should be considered as primary method of treatment in proximal humerus fracture dislocations not only in young patients but also middle-aged patients.

A coronoid-centric classification system of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations has almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

BACKGROUND: Fracture-dislocations of the elbow, particularly those that involve a fracture through the proximal ulna, are complex and can be difficult to manage. Moreover, current classification systems often cannot discriminate between Monteggia-variant injury patterns and trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations, particularly when the fracture involves the coronoid. The Mayo classification of proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations categorizes these fractures into 3 types according to what the coronoid is still attached to: trans-olecranon fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the ulnar metaphysis); Monteggia-variant fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is still attached to the olecranon); and ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations (the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the ulnar metaphysis). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of the Mayo classification system when assessing elbow fracture-dislocations involving the proximal ulna based on radiographs and computed tomography scans. METHODS: Three fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons and 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons blindly and independently evaluated the radiographs and computed tomography scans of 90 consecutive proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations treated at a level I trauma center. The inclusion criteria included subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and/or radioulnar joint with a complete fracture through the proximal ulna. Each surgeon classified all fractures according to the Mayo classification, which is based on what the coronoid remains attached to (ulnar metaphysis, olecranon, or neither). Intraobserver reliability was determined by scrambling the order of the fractures and having each observer classify all the fractures again after a washout period ≥ 6 weeks. Interobserver reliability was obtained to assess the overall agreement between observers. κ Values were calculated for both intraobserver reliability and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The average intraobserver agreement was 0.87 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.76-0.91). Interobserver agreement was 0.80 (substantial agreement; range, 0.70-0.90) for the first reading session and 0.89 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.85-0.93) for the second reading session. The overall average interobserver agreement was 0.85 (almost perfect agreement; range, 0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: Classifying proximal trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations based on what the coronoid remains attached to (olecranon, ulnar metaphysis, or neither) was associated with almost perfect intraobserver and interobserver agreement, regardless of trauma vs. shoulder and elbow fellowship training. Further research is needed to determine whether the use of this classification system leads to the application of principles specific to the management of these injuries and translates into better outcomes.

Comparison of Dislocation and Outcome Between Piriformis-Sparing and Conventional Posterior Approach After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Over 60 Years.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is a treatment option for femoral neck fractures in patients aged more than 60 years and postoperative dislocation after a posterior approach is not uncommon. The piriformis tendon is one of the structures providing posterior hip stability. However, evidence of piriformis-sparing approach in hemiarthroplasty is unclear regarding a reduced dislocation rate. METHODS: Between January 2017 and December 2019, 321 patients underwent a posterior approach in consecutive cohorts for a hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures with the minimum 24 months follow-up time (24-60 months). There were two cohorts: (1) 129 underwent the conventional posterior (CP) approach and (2) 192 underwent the piriformis-sparing (PS) approach. The differences in dislocation rate, postoperative Harris Hip Society at 1 and 2 years and other surgical complications were compared in both groups. RESULTS: There were 6 dislocations of 129 (4.7%) underwent the CP approach and 0 dislocation from 192 underwent the PS approach that had posterior hip dislocations (P = .004). In addition, the CP group had a significantly higher mortality rate (14.7% versus 7.3%, P = .031) and lower functional outcomes as assessed by mean Harris Hip Scores at 1 year (73 versus 78, P = .005) and 2 years postoperatively (73 versus 80, P < .001) relative to the PS group. CONCLUSION: PS hemiarthroplasty was associated with a lower dislocation and mortality rate. Moreover, this approach gained a superior early to the mid-term functional outcome than the conventional posterior approach in elderly femoral neck fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Fracture-dislocation of the radiocarpal joint: bony and capsulo-ligamentar management, outcomes and long-term complications.

PURPOSE: Radiocarpal dislocation fractures (RCDF) are rare injuries that usually occur in a violent trauma setting. Our work aimed to analyze our patients' functional and radiological results after surgery and identify potential medium- and long-term complications while reviewing other series previously reported in the literature. METHODS: We have performed a retrospective study over five years at our university hospital, eleven patients were selected, and the mean follow-up was about 33 months. We used Dumontier's and Moneim's classifications for classifying the injuries. All the patients underwent surgery followed by cast immobilization. The QuickDash score and Green O'Brien score modified by Cooney were used to assess the functional result, while the radiological result was judged on standard wrist radiographs. RESULTS: Out of the eleven patients, only one described a Dumontier type I radiocarpal dislocation; all the others were type II. Following the Moneim classification, two patients were type II. Most cases showed posterior displacement. In 80% of cases, the radiocarpal fracture-dislocation was combined with other bone or ligament injuries. All patients received surgical treatment followed by cast immobilization for 45 days. The mean loss of range of motion at the last follow-up was about 39%, keeping the arch intact in most cases. Quick dash score was 29.54, and Green O'Brien's score was 71.1. Three of the patients showed osteoarthritic remodeling. CONCLUSION: A careful clinical and radiological evaluation, followed by an anatomic surgical reduction of the articulating surface of the distal radius, as well as the handling of the associated lesions, are major conditions for a satisfactory clinical result.

Two-staged management of ankle fracture-dislocations with a posterior fragment: computer-tomography-based classification, treatment and its outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Trimalleolar fractures are difficult to treat and malreduction can lead to functional impairment. Involvement of the posterior malleolus has a poor predictive value. Current computed-tomography (CT)-based fracture classifications led to an increase in fixation of the posterior malleolus. The aim of this study was to describe the functional outcome after a two-stage stabilisation with direct fixation of the posterior fragment in trimalleolar dislocation fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, all patients presenting with a trimalleolar dislocation fracture, an available CT scan, and a two-stage operative stabilisation including the posterior malleolus by a posterior approach were included. All fractures were treated with initial external fixator and delayed definitive stabilisation including fixation of the posterior malleolus. Next to clinical and radiological follow-up, outcome measures (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Hulsmans implant removal score) and complications were analysed. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, of 320 trimalleolar dislocation fractures, 39 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 49 months (standard deviation (SD) 29.7, range 16-148). Mean age was 60 years (SD 15.3, 17-84) with 69% female patients. The mean FAOS was 93/100 (SD 9.7, 57-100), NRS 2 (interquartile range (IQR) 0-3) and ADL 2 (IQR 1-2). Four patients showed a postoperative infection, three re-operations had to be performed and implants were removed in 24 individuals. CONCLUSION: A two-stage procedure of trimalleolar dislocation fractures with in-direct reduction and fixation of the posterior tibial fragment through a posterior approach leads to good functional outcome scores with a low rate of complications.

The JAY (Joint Active Yoke) orthosis for a complex pip fracture-dislocation with failed volar plate repair: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: This case report details the postsurgical rehabilitation and outcome of a 57-year old neurosurgeon who underwent hemi-hamate arthroplasty and volar plate repair for a complex ring finger proximal interphalangeal (PIP) fracture-dislocation sustained after a fall while snowboarding. Following re-rupture and repair of his volar plate, the patient was fitted for a "yoke" relative motion flexor orthosis, termed a JAY (Joint Active Yoke) orthosis, in a manner reverse to that which is commonly used for extensor-related injuries. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: A 57 yo right hand-dominant male who suffered a complex PIP fracture-dislocation with failed volar plate repair undwent hemi-hamate arthroplasty and early active motion following using a custom-fabricated joint active yoke orthosis. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study is to illustrate the benefits of this orthosis design in allowing for active controlled flexion of the repaired PIP joint with assist from the adjacent fingers, while also reducing joint torque and dorsal displacement forces. RESULTS: A satisfactory active motion outcome was achieved with maintenance of PIP joint congruity allowing the patient to return to work as a neurosurgeon at 2-months post-operatively. DISCUSSION: There is little published literature on the use of relative motion flexion orthoses following PIP injuries. Most current studies are isolated case reports on boutonniere deformity, flexor tendon repair, and closed reduction of PIP fractures. The following therapeutic intervention was considered an important contributor to a favorable functional outcome, as it minimized unwanted joint reaction forces in a complex PIP fracture-dislocation and unstable volar plate. CONCLUSION: Future research with greater level of evidence is required to establish the various applications of relative motion flexion orthoses, as well as determine the appropriate time at which to place the patient in a relative motion orthosis following operative repair to prevent long-term stiffness and poor motion.

Screws Alone for Acute Lisfranc Injuries Fixed Without Arthrodesis: A Better "Value" Than Plating in the Short Term.

This study compares outcomes of patients with Lisfranc injuries treated with screw only fixation constructs to those treated with dorsal plate and screw constructs. Seventy patients who underwent surgical treatment for acute Lisfranc injury without arthrodesis and minimum 6-month (mean >1-year) follow-up were identified. Demographics, surgical information, and radiographic imaging were reviewed. Cost data were compared. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) midfoot score. Univariate analysis through independent sample t tests, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-squared compared the populations. Twenty-three (33%) patients were treated with plate constructs and 47 (67%) with screw only fixation. The plate group was older (49 ± 18 vs 40 ± 16 years, p = .029). More screw constructs treated isolated medial column injuries compared to plate constructs (92% vs 65%, p = .006). At latest follow-up (mean 14 ± 13 months), all tarsometatarsal joints were aligned. There was no difference in AOFAS midfoot scores. Plate patients experienced longer operations (131 ± 70 vs 75 ± 31 minutes, p < .001) and tourniquet time (101 ± 41 vs 69 ± 25 minutes, p = .001). Plate constructs were more expensive than screw ($2.3X ± $2.3X vs $X ± $0.4X, p < .001) ($X is the mean cost of screws alone). Plate patients had a higher incidence of wound complications (13% vs 0%, p = .012). Treatment of Lisfranc fracture dislocation injuries with screws only demonstrated a higher value procedure as similar outcomes were found amidst lower implant costs. Screw only fixation required a shorter operative and tourniquet time with less frequent wound complications. Screw only fixations proved mechanically sound enough to achieve goals of repair without inferior outcomes.

Temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixation in ankle fracture-dislocation while posterior malleolar fragment size predicts loss of reduction: a case control study.

BACKGROUND: To determine if temporizing cast immobilization is a safe alternative to external fixator (ex-fix) in ankle fracture-dislocations with delayed surgery or moderate soft-tissue injury, we analysed the early complications and re-dislocation rates of cast immobilization in relation to ex-fix in patients sustaining these injuries. METHODS: All skeletally mature patients with a closed ankle fracture-dislocation and a minimum 6-months follow-up treated between 2007 and 2017 were included. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, injury description, treatment history and complications were assessed. RESULTS: In 160 patients (94 female; mean age 50 years) with 162 ankle fracture-dislocations, 35 underwent primary ex-fix and 127 temporizing cast immobilizations. Loss of reduction (LOR) was observed in 25 cases (19.7%) and 19 (15.0%) were converted to ex-fix. The rate of surgical site infections (ex-fix: 11.1% vs cast: 4.6%) and skin necrosis (ex-fix: 7.4% vs cast: 6.5%) did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.122 and p = 0.825). Temporizing cast immobilization led to an on average 2.7 days earlier definite surgery and 5.0 days shorter hospitalization when compared to ex-fix (p < 0.001). Posterior malleolus fragment (PMF) size predicted LOR with ≥ 22.5% being the threshold for critical PMF-size (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Temporizing cast immobilization was a safe option for those ankle fracture-dislocations in which immediate definite treatment was not possible. Those temporized in a cast underwent definite fixation earlier than those with a fix-ex and had a complication rate no worse than the ex-fix patients. PMF-size was an important predictor for LOR. Primary ex-fix seems appropriate for those with ≥ 22.5% PMF-size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study does not meet the criteria of a prospective, clinical trial. There was no registration.

The Syringe External Fixator: Short- and Medium-Term Functional Outcomes From This Inexpensive and Customizable Treatment for Comminuted Intra-Articular Fractures of the Hand.

PURPOSE: Comminuted intra-articular fractures and fracture dislocations of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal joints are challenging. Dynamic external fixation, permitting early joint motion while still minimizing forces across the healing joint, can result in acceptable postoperative active range of motion (AROM). However, some fractures are not initially stable enough for early dynamic motion; further, many available dynamic external fixation systems are costly and cumbersome. We reviewed our experience using an external fixator made from a 1-mL syringe and K-wires and report outcomes using it as a static fixator, dynamic fixator, or configured as a static fixator and then converted to a dynamic fixator in the clinic. METHODS: Patients with intra-articular fractures and fracture dislocations of the MCP and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints treated between 2014 and 2020 using syringe external fixators were retrospectively reviewed. We reviewed demographics, mechanisms, treatment types and durations, and postoperative AROM, as well as complications including infection, pin loosening, nonunion, hardware failure, and need for further surgery. Patients were analyzed by the level of joint injury (MCP versus PIP) and by treatment pattern. RESULTS: After excluding 23 patients with 25 joint injuries who were lost to follow-up or had inadequate outcome data, 27 patients with 29 joint injuries were reviewed. The average follow-up was 171 days after surgery. The postoperative AROM at the MCP level averaged 55° for static fixation and 30° for static-to-dynamic fixation. The postoperative AROM at the PIP level averaged 64° for static fixation, 66° for static-to-dynamic fixation, and 80° for dynamic fixation. Three pin site infections and 2 loose pins were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The syringe external fixator is an inexpensive, effective, and customizable treatment for intra-articular MCP and interphalangeal fractures and fracture dislocations, and results in acceptable postoperative AROM outcomes and complication rates. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Blocking Plate for Volar Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture Dislocation.

PURPOSE: To assess the use of a 2-mm miniplate as a dorsal blocking plate to stabilize the central avulsion fragment in a proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) volar fracture dislocation. METHODS: This was a case series comprising 8 patients with volar fracture dislocation of the PIP joint. The average age of the patients was 36 years. The patients were managed by this technique within an average of 11 days following the injury. The clinical outcome measurements included the assessment of pain and range of motion of the PIP and distal interphalangeal joints. RESULTS: The average follow-up duration was 20 months. The mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.9. The average range of motion of the PIP joint was 82°, whereas the average range of motion of the distal interphalangeal joint was 43°. Reduction of the subluxation was achieved in all cases, with no articular step remaining. CONCLUSIONS: A dorsal blocking plate is a simple technique, associated with a satisfactory outcome, for volar fracture dislocation injuries of the PIP joint. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.