Severe aortic stenosis: secular trends of incidence and outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is the guideline-based indication for aortic valve replacement (AVR), which has markedly increased with transcatheter approaches, suggesting possible increasing AS incidence. However, reported secular trends of AS incidence remain contradictory and lack quantitative Doppler echocardiographic ascertainment. METHODS: All adults residents in Olmsted County (MN, USA) diagnosed over 20 years (1997-2016) with incident severe AS (first diagnosis) based on quantitatively defined measures (aortic valve area ≤ 1 cm2, aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2, mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg, peak velocity ≥ 4 m/s, Doppler velocity index ≤ 0.25) were counted to define trends in incidence, presentation, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: Incident severe AS was diagnosed in 1069 community residents. The incidence rate was 52.5 [49.4-55.8] per 100 000 patient-year, slightly higher in males vs. females and was almost unchanged after age and sex adjustment for the US population 53.8 [50.6-57.0] per 100 000 residents/year. Over 20 years, severe AS incidence remained stable (P = .2) but absolute burden of incident cases markedly increased (P = .0004) due to population growth. Incidence trend differed by sex, stable in men (incidence rate ratio 0.99, P = .7) but declining in women (incidence rate ratio 0.93, P = .02). Over the study, AS clinical characteristics remained remarkably stable and AVR performance grew and was more prompt (from 1.3 [0.1-3.3] years in 1997-2000 to 0.5 [0.2-2.1] years in 2013-16, P = .001) but undertreatment remained prominent (>40%). Early AVR was associated with survival benefit (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55 [0.42-0.71], P < .0001). Despite these improvements, overall mortality (3-month 8% and 3-year 36%), was swift, considerable and unabated (all P ≥ .4) throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Over 20 years, the population incidence of severe AS remained stable with increased absolute case burden related to population growth. Despite stable severe AS presentation, AVR performance grew notably, but while declining, undertreatment remained substantial and disease lethality did not yet decline. These population-based findings have important implications for improving AS management pathways.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement After Surgical Repair or Replacement: Comprehensive Midterm Evaluation of Valve-in-Valve and Valve-in-Ring Implantation From the VIVID Registry.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve-in-valve (ViV) and valve-in-ring (ViR) are alternatives to surgical reoperation in patients with recurrent mitral valve failure after previous surgical valve repair or replacement. Our aim was to perform a large-scale analysis examining midterm outcomes after mitral ViV and ViR. METHODS: Patients undergoing mitral ViV and ViR were enrolled in the Valve-in-Valve International Data Registry. Cases were performed between March 2006 and March 2020. Clinical endpoints are reported according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) definitions. Significant residual mitral stenosis (MS) was defined as mean gradient ≥10 mm Hg and significant residual mitral regurgitation (MR) as ≥ moderate. RESULTS: A total of 1079 patients (857 ViV, 222 ViR; mean age 73.5±12.5 years; 40.8% male) from 90 centers were included. Median STS-PROM score 8.6%; median clinical follow-up 492 days (interquartile range, 76-996); median echocardiographic follow-up for patients that survived 1 year was 772.5 days (interquartile range, 510-1211.75). Four-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 62.5% in ViV versus 49.5% for ViR (P<0.001). Mean gradient across the mitral valve postprocedure was 5.7±2.8 mm Hg (≥5 mm Hg; 61.4% of patients). Significant residual MS occurred in 8.2% of the ViV and 12.0% of the ViR patients (P=0.09). Significant residual MR was more common in ViR patients (16.6% versus 3.1%; P<0.001) and was associated with lower survival at 4 years (35.1% versus 61.6%; P=0.02). The rates of Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium-defined device success were low for both procedures (39.4% total; 32.0% ViR versus 41.3% ViV; P=0.01), mostly related to having postprocedural mean gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Correlates for residual MS were smaller true internal diameter, younger age, and larger body mass index. The only correlate for residual MR was ViR. Significant residual MS (subhazard ratio, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.74-12.56; P=0.002) and significant residual MR (subhazard ratio, 7.88; 95% CI, 2.88-21.53; P<0.001) were both independently associated with repeat mitral valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: Significant residual MS and/or MR were not infrequent after mitral ViV and ViR procedures and were both associated with a need for repeat valve replacement. Strategies to improve postprocedural hemodynamics in mitral ViV and ViR should be further explored.

Current Indications for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valves: Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-Mitral Annulus Calcification.

Use of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice is limited to patients with failing bioprostheses and rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annulus calcification. Whereas the use of valve-in-valve TMVR appears to be a reasonable alternative to surgery in patients at high surgical risk, much less evidence supports valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annulus calcification interventions. Data on the results of TMVR in these settings are derived from small case series or voluntary registries. This review summarizes the current evidence on TMVR using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice from the characteristics of the TMVR candidates, screening process, performance of the procedure, and description of current results and future perspectives. TMVR using dedicated devices in native noncalcified mitral valve diseases is beyond the scope of the article.

The Year in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2020.

THIS SPECIAL article is the 13th in an annual series for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor-in-chief, Dr Kaplan, and the editorial board for the opportunity to continue this series; namely, the research highlights of the past year in the specialty of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiology.1 The major themes selected for 2020 are outlined in this introduction, and each highlight is reviewed in detail in the main body of the article. The literature highlights in the specialty for 2020 begin with an update on valvular disease, with a focus on updates in management of aortic and mitral valve disorders. The second major theme is an update on coronary artery disease, with discussion of both medical and surgical management. The third major theme is focused on the perioperative management of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with the authors highlighting literature discussing medical, surgical, and anesthetic considerations for their cardiac care. The fourth major theme is an update in heart failure, with discussion of medical, psychosocial, and procedural aspects of this complicated disease process. The fifth and final theme focuses on the latest analyses regarding survival in heart transplantation. The themes selected for this 13th special article are only a few of the diverse advances in the specialty during 2020. These highlights will inform the reader of key updates on a variety of topics, leading to improvement of perioperative outcomes for patients with cardiothoracic and vascular disease.

Gender-related differences in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve interventions in clinical practice: 1-year results from the German TRAMI registry.

OBJECTIVES: Information on gender-related differences in terms of baseline characteristics and clinical outcome of patients undergoing MitraClip® implantation in daily clinical practice have been studied in smaller populations previously. This study sought to additionally evaluate gender-related differences in a larger German real-world patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from the prospective and multicenter German TRAMI Registry. Between 08/2010 and 07/2013 327 women and 501 men underwent MitraClip® implantation for significant mitral valve regurgitation. Female patients were significantly older and showed higher rates of frailty compared to men. In contrast, men had significantly higher rates of comorbidities compared to women. The majority of patients underwent MitraClip® implantation for secondary mitral regurgitation, with no significant gender-related differences. MitraClip® treatment was equally effective in terms of procedural results and residual mitral regurgitation in women and men and complication rates were low. However, in this real-world analysis severe bleeding complications were significantly higher in women (p = .02) and re-intervention rates were significantly higher in men after MitraClip® treatment (p = .02). Women showed less improvement in functional NYHA class after MitraClip® treatment compared to men at 1-year follow-up (FU; p < .001). No significant differences between female and male patients were found in 1-year mortality and in re-hospitalization rates. CONCLUSION: In this analysis from a large prospective, multicenter real-world registry MitraClip® implantation is safe and effective for treatment of significant mitral regurgitation with equal postprocedural results and mortality rates during 1-year follow-up. Men and women showed a persisting and significant clinical benefit at 1-year FU after treatment. Complication and re-intervention rates were low. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate our findings on increased bleeding complications and decreased functional improvement in women at 1-year follow-up after MitraClip® therapy.

Contemporary Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Given the rapid expansion in the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), recent outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) should be re-evaluated.Methods and Results:Using the data from the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database of 160 enrolled hospitals, trends in elective isolated SAVR were evaluated until the introduction of TAVI in Japan. Trend analyses were performed over 4 periods: period 1, 2008-2009 (4,415 cases); period 2, 2010-2011 (4,861 cases); period 3, 2012-2013 (5,674 cases); and period 4, 2014-2015 (5,563 cases). Baseline risk, evaluated on JapanSCORE, increased significantly over the 4 periods, from a median of 1.56 (IQR, 0.99-2.61) in period 1 to 2.08 (IQR, 1.33-3.96) in period 4 (P<0.001, trend test). Despite the increased risk, the composite major complication and operative mortality rate decreased significantly (10.7% in period 1 to 9.2% in period 4, P=0.01). Using a risk-adjusted model, the OR of operative mortality was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.29-2.02) in period 1 (P<0.0001) compared with period 4. An increase in the use of bioprostheses was also observed, from 60.4% to 76.8% (P<0.001) over the 4 periods. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a short 8-year period, SAVR outcomes improved in Japan. This should be taken into account when discussing the indications for aortic valve intervention.

Population trends in aortic valve surgery in Finland between 2001 and 2016.

Objectives. To investigate nationwide changes in procedure rates, patient selection, and prognosis after all surgical aortic valve replacements. Design. Patients undergoing primary surgical aortic valve replacement between 2001 and 2016 were identified from three nationwide registers with compulsory reporting to examine trends in aortic valve surgery over four four-year time periods. Results. A total of 12,139 surgical aortic valve replacement procedures (mean age 61.9 ± 11.8 years, 39.1% women) were performed. The total number of biological valves increased from 1001 (42.9%) to 2526 (75.5%) from 2001-2004 to 2013-2016 (p < .001). During the first and last time periods the comorbidity burden increased; share of patients with hypertension increased from 37.5% to 46.9% (p < .001), diabetes from 14% to 16.5% (p = .01) and previous stroke from 5.2% to 7.2% (p = .01). The proportion of women undergoing surgery decreased from 40% to 36.1% from 2001-2004 to 2013-2016, respectively (p = .01). Overall 28-day mortality was 3.5%. In patients with biologic valve the multivariable-adjusted risk of short-term mortality decreased steadily in every four-year period from 2001-2004 to 2005-2008 (HR, 0.66; 95% CI 0.47-9.92), 2009-2012 (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75) and 2013-2016 (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.58), whereas short-term mortality remained similar in patients with mechanical valve. The risk of four-year postoperative mortality after all surgical aortic valve replacements stayed constant. Conclusions. The use of biologic aortic valve prosthesis has increased from 2001 to 2016. The proportion of women has declined markedly. The short-term mortality has decreased and the long-term mortality has stayed constant despite increasing comorbidity burden.

Transcatheter heart valve interventions: where are we? Where are we going?

Transcatheter heart valve interventions have transformed the outcomes of patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) who are unfavourable candidates for surgery. Technological advances have allowed extension of these interventions to younger or lower risk patients and those with other forms of VHD and may in the future permit earlier treatment of VHD in less symptomatic patients or those with moderate disease. The balance of risks and benefits is likely to differ between lower and higher risk patients, and more evidence is needed to evaluate the net benefit of transcatheter technology in these groups. As academic researchers, clinicians, industry, and patient stakeholders collaborate to research these broader indications for transcatheter valve interventions, it is essential to address (i) device durability and deliverability, (ii) specific anatomical needs (e.g. bicuspid aortic valves, aortic regurgitation, mitral and tricuspid valve disease), (iii) operator training, and (iv) the reinforced importance of the multidisciplinary Heart Team.

Regulation and Clinical Implication of Arginine Vasopressin in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Referred to Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Background and objectives: Plasma arginine vasopressin (P-AVP) is regulated by the non-osmotic pathway in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. However, the regulation of P-AVP in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains unknown. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with severe AS who received trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) between Apr 2016 and Apr 2019 were enrolled in this prospective study. Clinical data including P-AVP were obtained just before TAVI, and the correlation between P-AVP and other variables was investigated. Results: In total, 159 patients with severe AS (85.3 ± 4.6 years, male 26%) were enrolled. P-AVP was 1.45 ± 1.13 ng/mL and cardiac index was relatively preserved (2.76 ± 0.54 L/min/m2). There was no significant correlation between cardiac index and P-AVP (p > 0.05), whereas plasma osmolality had a moderate positive correlation with P-AVP (r = 0.35, p < 0.01), predominantly due to blood urea nitrogen (r = 0.27, p < 0.01). Patients with diuretics had significantly higher P-AVP than those without diuretics (1.65 ± 1.43 vs. 1.22 ± 0.57 pg/mL, p < 0.01). Two-year survivals free from HF readmission were statistically comparable irrespective of the level of pre-procedural P-AVP (p = 0.44). Conclusion: In patients with severe high-gradient AS who received TAVI, the P-AVP level was dominantly regulated by plasma osmolality instead of arterial underfilling. The clinical implication of elevated P-AVP in the TAVI candidates is the next concern.

Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the utilization and in-hospital outcomes of surgical mitral valve replacement in Spain (2001-2015).

BACKGROUND: The main aims of this study were to examine the incidence and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) among patients with and without T2DM. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database from 2001 to 2015. We included patients with SMVR codified in their discharge report. We grouped admissions by diabetes status. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare outcomes of isolated SMVR. RESULTS: We identified 42,937 patients (16.41% with T2DM). Incidence rates of mechanical and bioprosthetic SMVR were higher among T2DM patients than among non-T2DM patients. In both groups of patients, the use of bioprosthetic SMVR increased over time. The use of mechanical valves remained stable among T2DM patients. In T2DM and non-T2DM patients with mechanical SMVR, in hospital mortality (IHM) and MACCE decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 2001 to 2015. T2DM patients had an overall 11.37% IHM, compared with 10.76% among non-T2DM patients (p = 0.176). Regarding MACCE figures were 14.72% vs. 14.22% (p = 0.320) after mechanical SMVR. Total crude IHM were 14.29% for T2DM patients and 15.13% for those without T2DM with bioprosthetic SMVR (p = 0.165) and 18.22 vs. 19.64%, for a MACCE (p = 0.185). Using PSM we found that the IHM and the MACCE of isolated SMVR did not differ significantly between patients with or without T2DM beside the type of valve replacement. Among T2DM patients, those who received bioprosthetic valves had higher IHM (14.29% vs. 11.37%; p = 0.003) and a higher rate of MACCE (18.22% vs. 14.72%; p = 0.001) than T2DM patients with mechanical SMVR. CONCLUSIONS: In Spain from 2001 to 2015, the incidence rates of hospitalization to undergo mechanical or bioprosthetic SMVR were higher among the population suffering T2DM than among the non-T2DM population. In both groups of patients the use of bioprosthetic SMVR increased over time and the use of mechanical valves remained stable in T2DM. T2DM patients have IHM and MACCE after mechanical and bioprosthetic SMVR which are not significantly different to those found among non-diabetic patients. Among T2DM patients, the crude IHM was significantly higher in those who received a bioprosthetic SMVR than those with mechanical SMVR.

Trends in volume and risk profiles of patients undergoing isolated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports describe increases in the case volume of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after centers establish a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) program. We investigate contemporary temporal trends in SAVR and TAVR case volumes and risk profiles at a high volume academic medical center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive evaluation of consecutive patients who underwent TAVR (n = 538) or SAVR (n = 657) in 2011-2016. The STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) for isolated SAVR was used to calculate PROM for both SAVR and TAVR patients. Patients were stratified based on STS PROM as follows: low risk (<4%), intermediate risk (4-8%), and high risk (≥8%). Temporal changes in patient risk-profile were characterized descriptively. RESULTS: Median STS PROM for the study period was 6.3% and 2.0% for TAVR and SAVR cohorts, respectively (P < 0.001). Since 2011, TAVR volume consistently increased, while SAVR volume increased initially, peaking in 2013 and steadily declined. The STS PROM for SAVR remained stable during the entire study period, while that for TAVR showed a steady decline. The proportions of intermediate and low STS PROM patients undergoing TAVR increased. Proportions of each risk category in SAVR cohort remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR volume increased initially but declined eventually following the implementation of TAVR program. The distribution of the STS PROM in TAVR cohort changed dramatically with increasing proportion of patients in lower risk categories. These findings suggest the converging patient populations in TAVR and SAVR, which may be associated with the decline in the overall SAVR volume.

Characteristics of and current practice patterns of pacing for high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the current practice patterns of permanent pacing, especially the timing of implantation, for high-degree AV block (HDAVB) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). BACKGROUND: Comparative data regarding current practice patterns of permanent pacing for HDAVB between TAVI and SAVR is limited. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients who underwent TAVI or SAVR between 2012 and 2014. The incidence of HDAVB, the rate of permanent pacemaker implantation, and the timing of implantations were compared between TAVI and SAVR groups. RESULTS: We identified 33 690 and 202 110 patients who underwent TAVI and SAVR, respectively. HDAVB occurred in 3480 patients (10.3%) in the TAVI group and 11 405 patients (5.6%) in the SAVR group (P < 0.001). Among the patients who developed HDAVB, patients in the TAVI group were more likely to undergo permanent pacemaker implantation than those in the SAVR group (74.1% vs 64.7%; P < 0.001). The median interval from TAVI to pacemaker implantation was 2 days (interquartile range 1-3 days) vs 5 days (interquartile range 3-7 days) from SAVR to pacemaker implantation (P < 0.001). Among the patients who developed HDAVB, TAVI was associated with higher rates of permanent pacemaker implantation after adjusting for other comorbidities (odds ratio 1.41:95% confidence interval 1.13-1.77; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: HDAVB occurred more commonly after TAVI compared to SAVR. HDAVB after TAVI compared to SAVR was associated with a higher rate of permanent pacemaker implantation at an earlier timing from the index procedure.

Evaluation of Strategies in the Management of Infective Aortic Valve Endocarditis at German Cardiac Surgical Departments.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of infective aortic valve endocarditis (AVE) remains a therapeutic challenge, necessitating interdisciplinary approach to limit morbidity and mortality in this high-risk cohort. With a considerable spectrum of available laboratory testings, imaging techniques, as well as operative strategies developed in recent years, there is a lack of standardization across cardiac surgical departments in Germany. Thus, the optimal treatment strategy of AVE has yet to be defined. METHODS: A nationwide survey on infective AVE was conducted, including 64 cardiac surgical departments responding to a 41-item questionnaire. The evaluation included common surgical practice, routine diagnostic steps, surgical techniques, perioperative medical treatment, as well as postoperative management. RESULTS: Remarkable differences were observed among the participating institutions, including the following components of the treatment: (1) standardization and extent of the use of imaging techniques and (2) success rate in identification AVE-causing germs, (3) timing of operation in case of cerebral embolization, and (4) choice of valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement for infective AVE. CONCLUSION: The findings of this survey underline the need for a nationwide registry to further elucidate the nature and course of AVE in Germany, as well as to serve as a solid basis for prospective trials, addressing the most important clinical purposes in the diagnosis and treatment of AVE.

A Comparison of Global Longitudinal, Circumferential, and Radial Strain to Predict Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography detects subtle regional and global left ventricular dysfunction. Myocardial strain is measured in the longitudinal, circumferential, and radial dimensions; however, it is unclear which dimension of strain is the best predictor of postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from a clinical trial (NCT01187329). SETTING: The cardiothoracic surgical operating rooms of an academic tertiary-care center. PARTICIPANTS: Cardiothoracic surgery patients with aortic stenosis having aortic valve replacement (AVR) with or without coronary artery bypass grafting enrolled in a clinical trial. INTERVENTIONS: Myocardial deformation analysis from standardized investigative transesophageal echocardiographic examinations performed after induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors compared the ability of intraoperative global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS) strain to predict adverse postoperative outcomes, including prolonged hospitalization and the need for pharmacologic hemodynamic support after cardiac surgery. The association of GLS, GCS, and GRS with prolonged hospitalization (>7 days) and the need for pharmacologic hemodynamic support, with epinephrine or norepinephrine after cardiopulmonary bypass, were assessed using separate multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Of 100 patients, 86 had acceptable measurements for GLS analysis, 73 for GCS, and 72 for GRS. Worse GLS was associated with prolonged hospitalization [odds ratio [OR] (98.3% confidence interval [CI]) of 1.21 (1.01-1.46) per-unit worsening in strain (p = 0.01, significance criterion <0.0167)] and the need for inotropic support with epinephrine [OR (99.2% CI) of 1.81 (1.10-2.97) per-unit worsening in strain (p = 0.002, significance criterion <0.0083)], but not norepinephrine. GCS and GRS were not associated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: GLS, but not GCS or GRS, predicts prolonged hospitalization and the requirement for inotropic support with epinephrine after AVR.

The Year in Perioperative Echocardiography: Selected Highlights from 2018.

This article is the third of an annual series reviewing the research highlights of the year pertaining to the subspecialty of perioperative echocardiography for the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. The authors thank the editor-in-chief, Dr. Kaplan, and the editorial board for the opportunity to continue this series. In most cases, these will be research articles targeted at the perioperative echocardiography diagnosis and treatment of patients after cardiothoracic surgery; but in some cases, these articles will target the use of perioperative echocardiography in general.

Accuracy and Trending Ability of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/EV1000 System in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Before and After Surgical Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/EV1000 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) system in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis by comparing FloTrac/EV1000-derived cardiac output (CCO-FT) with continuous thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter (CCO-PAC) measurements before and after surgical valve replacement. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Anesthesia for cardiac surgery, operating room, single-center university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five patients were included. After exclusion, 20 patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement were analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: After induction of general anesthesia, CCO-FT and CCO-PAC values were recorded every 30 seconds before and after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were analyzed separately from skin incision to last suture and before and after CPB. Regression analyses, Bland-Altman analyses, and trending analyses (4-quadrant plot, polar plot) were performed. The percentage errors of the FloTrac/EV1000 were 69.7% and 59.3% before and after CPB, respectively. The concordance rates (CRs) and angular CRs of the FloTrac/EV1000 were 50.9% and 57.1%, and 48.7% and 61.9% before and after CPB, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a low level of agreement and poor trending ability of the FloTrac/EV1000 system compared to continuous thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Although there was a slight improvement after surgical valve replacement and CPB, the results were not within acceptable limits to replace CCO-PAC in this patient population.

Impact of Sex on the Outcome of Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement and the Role of Different Preoperative Profiles.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the patient profiles and outcomes of men and women undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement. DESIGN: Patient data were analyzed retrospectively. SETTING: This single-center study was performed at Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 2,362 patients, of whom 1,040 (44%) were women and 1,322 were men (56%). INTERVENTIONS: Isolated aortic valve replacement was performed between January 1998 and December 2016. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.1 years. Women were relatively older (69.9 years v 64.6 years; p < 0.001); more of them were underweight, obese, and diabetic; and they had lower hemoglobin values and worse renal function than did men. However, fewer women than men experienced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic regurgitation, left ventricular dysfunction, and endocarditis. Early mortality did not differ significantly between men and women (p = 0.238). Overall survival was worse in women (p < 0.001). After correction for potential risk factors, female sex was not associated with worse survival. During the study period, the mean age of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement increased. In addition, the mean age at the time of death increased, following the trend of national statistics. CONCLUSIONS: Although women undergoing aortic valve replacement have relatively more risk factors than do men, early mortality in women is not significantly higher than in men. Overall survival is worse in women than in men; however, after adjustment for preoperative risk factors, there is no difference in overall survival between women and men.

Pulmonary-Systemic Pressure Ratio Correlates with Morbidity in Cardiac Valve Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary hypertension portends worse outcomes in cardiac valve surgery; however, isolated pulmonary artery pressures may not reflect patients' global cardiac function accurately. To better account for the interventricular relationship, the authors hypothesized that patients with greater pulmonary-systemic ratios (mean pulmonary arterial pressure)/(mean systemic arterial pressure) would correlate with worse outcomes after valve surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 314 patients undergoing valve surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (2004-2016) with Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk scores and preoperative right heart catheterization. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pulmonary-systemic ratio was calculated as follows: mean pulmonary arterial pressure/mean systemic arterial pressure. Patients were stratified by pulmonary-systemic ratio quartile. Logistic regression was used to assess the risk-adjusted association between pulmonary-systemic ratio or mean pulmonary arterial pressure. Median pulmonary-systemic ratio was 0.33 (Q1-Q3: 0.23-0.65); median pulmonary arterial pressure was 29 (21-30) mmHg. Patients with the highest pulmonary-systemic ratio had the highest rates of morbidity and mortality (p < 0.0001). A high pulmonary-systemic ratio was associated with longer duration in the intensive care unit (p < 0.0001) and hospital (p < 0.0001). After risk-adjustment, pulmonary-systemic ratio and pulmonary arterial pressure were independently associated with morbidity and mortality, but the pulmonary-systemic ratio (odds ratio 23.88, p = 0.008, Wald 7.1) was more strongly associated than the pulmonary arterial pressure (odds ratio 1.035, p = 0.011, Wald 6.5). CONCLUSIONS: The pulmonary-systemic ratio is more strongly associated with risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality in valve surgery than pulmonary arterial pressure. By integrating ventricular interactions, this metric may better characterize the risk of valve surgery.

Prophylactic Effect of Amiodarone Infusion on Reperfusion Ventricular Fibrillation After Release of Aortic Cross-Clamp in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: ARandomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether prophylactic amiodarone infusion prevents ventricular fibrillation after aortic cross-clamp release and attenuates cytokine production in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 68 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 150mg bolus then 30mg/h continuous infusion of amiodarone (amiodarone group) or a 1 mg/kg bolus then 1 mg/kg/h continuous infusion of lidocaine (lidocaine group). The primary outcome was the ventricular fibrillation incidence rate after aortic cross-clamp release. Secondary outcomes included perioperative serum interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The ventricular fibrillation incidence rate was significantly lower in the amiodarone than in the lidocaine group (20.6% v 50%, relative risk 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.86; p = 0.021). Interleukin-6 levels 1hour after aortic cross-clamp release and at intensive care unit admission were significantly lower in the amiodarone than in the lidocaine group (geometric mean [95% CI] 117.4pg/mL [87.1-158.4] v 339.5pg/mL [210.6-547.2]; p < 0.01 and 211.1pg/mL [162.8-73.6] v 434.1pg/mL [293.7-641.5]; p < 0.01, respectively). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels 1hour after aortic cross-clamp release were significantly lower in the amiodarone than in the lidocaine group (geometric mean [95% CI] 1.624pg/mL [1.359-1.940] v 2.283pg/mL [1.910-2.731]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Amiodarone prevented reperfusion ventricular fibrillation in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy undergoing aortic valve replacement to a greater extent than did lidocaine. Furthermore, amiodarone inhibited postoperative interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production.

Transcatheter Therapy for Mitral Regurgitation Clinical Challenges and Potential Solutions.

Severe mitral regurgitation is a common and complex disease that is associated with an adverse prognosis. For decades, surgical treatment has been the standard of care. Recently, multiple technologies for transcatheter mitral therapy have emerged, with the potential for both repair and replacement in patients with native mitral regurgitation. Transcatheter mitral technologies have potential as solutions for unmet clinical needs. Further rigorous clinical studies are needed to determine their efficacy and safety, as well as the appropriate patient candidates. These evaluations will help to define the role of transcatheter mitral therapy as a potentially exciting new strategy to improve the lives of patients with mitral regurgitation.