Topical ivermectin ointment treatment of Demodex blepharitis: a 6-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of topical ivermectin 1% ointment, for the treatment of Demodex blepharitis. METHODS: A retrospective study was designed to review electronic medical records of patients seen between January 2017 and December 2022, who had a diagnosis of Demodex blepharitis, treated with topical ivermectin 1% with at least 6 months of follow-up (Centro de Ojos Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina). The presence of collarettes was graded from 0 to 4. An imaging system (Keratograph) was used, to evaluate tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIKBUT), and degree of conjunctival redness. In addition, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) test was performed. Results were compared before and after ivermectin treatment, which was performed once a day for 2 months. RESULTS: A total of 2157 patients (4314 eyes) were included. The mean age was 50.43 ± 15.3 years, and the follow-up time was 26.1 ± 8.5 months. No one discontinued treatment due to intolerance, although 14 cases (0.6 %) reported occasional discomfort. The grade of collarettes decreased with statistical significance, from 3.37 ± 0.7 to 0.1 ± 0.3 (p < 0.01), as well as conjunctival redness from 1.32 ± 0.3 to 0.94 ± 0.4 (p < 0.01) and OSDI score from 58.74 ± 17.9 to 17.1 ± 10.5 (p = 0.02). TMH and NIKBUT improved without statistical difference. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ivermectin 1% topical ointment, once daily for 2 months, was effective in reducing the presence of collarettes and in improving symptoms in patients with Demodex blepharitis.

Double-Blind Comparison of Eyelash Epilation Techniques for the Purpose of Demodex folliculorum Mite Retrieval.

OBJECTIVE: Demodex folliculorum blepharitis is typically confirmed with lash epilation and microscopic identification of mites. However, mite counts may vary with the epilation technique. As there is no gold standard to epilating lashes for the purposes of mite counts, the aim of this study was to compare three epilation techniques. METHOD: A prospective randomized double-blind study compared three epilation techniques on lashes with cylindrical dandruff. Techniques included (A) direct pulling of the lash; (B) rotating the lash before epilation; and (C) sliding the cylindrical dandruff away, lash rotation, and epilation. Mean mite counts were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Forty (n=40) participants (20 M: 20 F, mean age of 62.3±17.1 years) revealed similar mite counts between right (1.43±1.74) and left (1.35±1.59) eyes ( P =0.63). A significant difference ( P =0.03) in mite count was noted (technique A: 1.05 ± 1.60; technique B 1.76 ± 1.80; and technique C 1.36 ± 1.54) with technique B yielding the highest mite count ( P =0.04). CONCLUSION: Demodex mite count is a key parameter in establishing infestation or to determine treatment efficacy. This study revealed that rotating the lash before epilation yielded the highest mite count. Future studies should report the epilation technique used to allow for study comparisons.

"Demodicosis" Mimicking PreSeptal Cellulitis: Severe Periocular and Facial Inflammation Caused by "Normal" Skin Flora.

Due to their relatively high prevalence and commensalism, the pathogenicity of Demodex mites has been debated. Recent data, however, show Demodex to be associated with skin and ocular surface diseases such as rosacea, blepharitis, and keratitis. Here the authors report the first known case, to the best of the their knowledge, of Demodex infestation mimicking preseptal cellulitis in an adult human. A 29-year-old male bilaterally blind from advanced retinopathy of prematurity presented with a 2-month history of right-greater-than-left upper eyelid and periocular/cheek swelling, redness, and ocular discharge that did not resolve with oral antibiotics or oral steroids. Based on MRI findings, biopsies of the right lacrimal gland, right orbital fat, and right upper eyelid preseptal skin were obtained which revealed marked intrafollicular Demodex mite density and budding yeasts in the upper eyelid skin. This case serves to alert clinicians to this entity that may not otherwise be usually considered in ophthalmic clinical practice.

Diagnosis and treatment of filamentary keratitis in a patient with Demodex infestation--an overlooked risk factor: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Filamentary keratitis is an ocular condition that is tricky to handle for the difficulty to find the underlying cause. Here we report a case of filamentary keratitis associated with Demodex infestation which highlights the importance of Demodex mites as an easily-overlooked risk factor. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old woman had recurrent symptoms of foreign body sensation and sometimes painful feelings in her left eye soon after her surgical correction of ptosis in this eye. She was then diagnosed as conjunctivitis and given antibiotic eye drops. After one week, the patient complained of aggravation of symptoms with small corneal filaments in the left eye under slit-lamp examination. Despite the removal of filaments and addition of topical corticosteroids and bandage contact lenses, the patient's condition persisted with enlarged filaments and severe ocular discomfort. 3 days later, eyelashes with cylindrical dandruff were noticed and Demodex infestation was confirmed by microscopic examination of these eyelashes at our clinic this time. She was asked to use tea tree oil lid scrub twice daily. After 3 weeks, her filamentary keratitis was resolved with a dramatic improvement in symptoms and signs. And no recurrence of filamentary keratitis was noticed during the one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this case, filamentary keratitis was resolved only with treatment of Demodex infestation while conventional treatment failed. Considering the fact that Demodex infestation is a common but easily overlooked condition, it may be suggestive to take Demodex infestation into account as a risk factor of filamentary keratitis, especially in refractory cases.

A rapid diagnosis and treatment of Ornithonyssus bacoti infection.

Mites serve as pathogens, allergens, or microbial containers, which can seriously damage the health of humans and animals. The substantial amount of mite species and their similar morphology make it complicated to identify and classify. Our mouse breeder incidentally noticed papular-type erythema with itching and peeling of the skin in several places, and an investigation revealed that this symptom was caused by an uncommon parasite that appeared on the skin and around the nest of the mice. By morphological observation, DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and DNA sequencing, we roughly identified the category of the parasite as a mite. Then, we designed a specific primer cox1, amplified and sequenced the mitochondrial cox1 gene fragment of the mite, calculated the intraspecific and interspecific differences, and reconstructed the phylogenetic tree for sequence alignment. Finally, this species was identified and named this Ornithonyssus bacoti-KF. According to the ivermectin gradient test, we found that 0.1 mg/mL concentration of ivermectin solution was the most effective for mite removal in the bath, with no recurrence after 6 months of treatment. Ornithonyssus bacoti, diagnosed by microscopic exam and confirmed by PCR amplification sequencing, was treated with ivermectin to control the rodent-borne parasite effectively.

Pigeon mite: An underdiagnosed cause of papular urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Dermanyssus gallinae, known as bird mite, generally lives on nestlings' featherless skin. Humans are accidentally infected, and itchy dermatitis is induced when the mites are unable to use birds' blood. The diagnosis is difficult due to the very small size and rapid movement of the mites, which make them hard to spot. CASE PRESENTATION: A 14-year-old male and his mother were referred to the allergy clinic complaining of a 2-week generalized itchy cutaneous papular lesion, unresponsive to antihista-mines, with the feeling of an insect moving on the surface of the skin. Due to the history of recently hatched pigeons nesting on their balcony and finding very small bugs, diagnosed as D. gallinae, they were instructed to clean the pigeon's nest as the source of these parasites, which successfully solved the problem. CONCLUSION: Bird mite infestation should be considered in the differential diagnosis of recurrent pruritus and urticaria, refractory to conventional treatments. Physicians should be aware of this mite infestation in approach to any patient with papular urticaria.

Demodex Blepharitis: A Comprehensive Review of the Disease, Current Management, and Emerging Therapies.

ABSTRACT: Demodex blepharitis is a common disease of the eyelid, affecting approximately 25 million Americans. This article reviews what is known about the mechanisms and impact of Demodex blepharitis, risk factors, signs and symptoms, diagnostic techniques, current management options, and emerging treatments. Demodex mites contribute to blepharitis in several ways: direct mechanical damage, as a vector for bacteria, and by inducing hypersensitivity and inflammation. Risk factors for Demodex blepharitis include increasing age, rosacea, and diabetes. The costs, symptom burden, and psychosocial effects of Demodex blepharitis are considerable. The presence of collarettes is pathognomonic for Demodex blepharitis. Redness, dryness, discomfort, foreign body sensation, lash anomalies, and itching are also hallmarks of the disease. Although a number of oral, topical, eyelid hygiene and device-based options have been used clinically and evaluated in studies for the management of Demodex blepharitis, none have been FDA approved to treat the disease. Recent randomized controlled clinical trials suggest that lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25%, is a topical treatment with the potential to eradicate Demodex mites and eliminate collarettes and eyelid redness for an extended period.

Rosacea, an infectious disease: why rosacea with papulopustules should be considered a demodicosis. A narrative review.

Rosacea and demodicosis are common facial conditions in dermatology practice. While demodicosis is clearly the result of Demodex mite infestation, the pathogenicity of rosacea is still not sufficiently explained, so that it is defined by its symptoms, and not by its cause. It is usually considered as a disease of the immune system associated with neurogenic inflammation triggered by various factors (ultraviolet light, heat, spicy food, alcohol, stress and microorganisms). Its links with demodicosis remain controversial, although there is increasing evidence that Demodex mites may play a key role in the inflammatory process. Indeed, high Demodex densities are observed in nearly all cases of rosacea with papulopustules (PPR) and the papulopustules of rosacea can be effectively treated with topical acaricidal agents. Recent studies suggest that Demodex induces two opposite actions on host immunity: a defensive immune response aimed at eliminating the mite and an immunosuppressive action aimed at favouring its own proliferation. Moreover, the initial defensive immune response is likely diverted towards benefit for the mite, via T-cell exhaustion induced by the immunosuppressive properties of vascular endothelial growth factor, which may also explain the favourable influence that the altered vascular background of rosacea seems to exert on Demodex proliferation. In this review, the evidence for and against a causal role of Demodex in rosacea is discussed, applying three systems traditionally used to attribute causality to a disease (modified Koch criteria, Hill criteria for causality and Rothman model). The findings suggest that PPR can reasonably be attributed to Demodex proliferation, which appears to be a necessary factor in the centre of a causal network in which multiple co-factors interact and influence the occurrence and severity of inflammatory symptoms, from limited (pityriasis folliculorum) to more marked (PPR). PPR could, therefore, be considered as a chronic infection by Demodex mites with associated T-cell exhaustion.

Prevalence of Demodex gatoi in shelter and feral cats in a southeastern region of the United States.

BACKGROUND: Demodex gatoi is a contagious ectoparasite that causes pruritic dermatitis in otherwise healthy cats. The diagnosis of this mite can be difficult, and its prevalence is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify the prevalence of D. gatoi in a population of cats with no known previous exposure to treatments using real-time PCR and superficial skin scrapings. ANIMALS: Fifty cats from shelters and 50 cats from feral populations of eastern Tennessee were included in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To identify the presence of D. gatoi, superficial skin scrapings and plucked hairs were collected from multiple sites for microscopic and PCR evaluation, respectively. RESULTS: Ten of 100 cats were positive for D. gatoi. Nine cats had a positive PCR for D. gatoi with negative skin scrapings. One mite was identified on superficial skin scrapings from one cat, which was negative on PCR. Four of 50 feral cats (8%) were positive for D. gatoi. Of the shelter cats, four of 20 stray cats (20%) and two of 30 owner-surrendered cats (6.67%) were positive. Only one of 10 positive cats had skin lesions. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings demonstrate that asymptomatic cats represent a source of infection for D. gatoi to healthy cats. This mite should be considered a differential diagnosis in pruritic cats with a history of potential exposure. Additionally, skin scrapings appear to be insensitive; thus, multiple diagnostic tests, including PCR, should be performed to identify the presence of D. gatoi.

Demodex Blepharitis: An Analysis of Nine Patients.

Inflammatory eyelid symptoms are common in primary care and there have been several reports on Demodex blepharitis. In the present study, we evaluate the 9 patients with Demodex blepharitis, who showed inflammation of the eyelids, dry eye, and cylindrical dandruff at the base of the eyelashes. The causative species from all patients was Demodex folliculorum of either the adult or nymph stage. Two patients had recurrent chalazion and 3 patients had keratitis. Weekly lid scrubs with 50% tee tree oil were performed for 6 weeks. After treatment, the symptoms of blepharitis and keratitis had improved in all patients. This case report provides clinical reference source for the proper treatment of ocular demodicosis.

First case report of dermatitis associated with Leporacarus gibbus in cat.

BACKGROUND: Leporacarus gibbus is a highly specific acarian parasitizing in rabbits, with a proven zoonotic potential. While the majority of cases of L. gibbus infestation are asymptomatic, several cases of pruritic cutaneous condition in both laboratory and pet rabbits were reported. Up to date, L. gibbus has not been linked with clinical signs in any other species than rabbits and humans. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report described the clinical case of a 14-month-old cat with a dermatitis linked to L. gibbus. Mites specimens were collected by brushing, followed by light microscopy examination and species identification. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of L. gibbus-related dermatitis in cat. CONCLUSIONS: L. gibbus infestation should be considered as a possible differential diagnosis of pruritic skin conditions in cat.

Evaluation of a clinical scoring system for canine demodicosis.

BACKGROUND: Canine demodicosis is a common disease in small animal practice. Although a number of studies evaluating treatment efficacy for canine demodicosis have used clinical scoring systems, none have been validated. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the validity, reliability, reproducibility and sensitivity to change of a clinical scoring system for canine demodicosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-eight dogs with generalised demodicosis were evaluated using a clinical scoring system that assessed erythema, comedones/ papules/pustules, follicular casts/scales/crusts and alopecia, rated from none to mild, moderate and severe in 36 body locations. Two evaluators scored lesions at monthly consecutive visits during treatment. Mites were counted to a maximum of 50 in four deep skin scrapings. With >50 mites, the approximate mite number was calculated with the help of a grid drawn onto the slide before placing the scraped material onto it. RESULTS: A Pearson correlation coefficient showed a high interobserver reliability (r = 0.97) between two different clinicians evaluating the same dog. The Wilcoxon signed rank test showed good sensitivity to change with a reduction of clinical scores with each of the first six evaluations (P < 0.0001). A linear mixed model also showed a clear reduction in mite counts (P < 0.001) and clinical scores (P < 0.0001) from the first evaluation with time. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The clinical scoring system for canine demodicosis evaluated in this study showed a good sensitivity to change and interobserver reliability, and can be used in studies evaluating canine demodicosis.

Psoroptes ovis-Early Immunoreactive Protein (Pso-EIP-1) a novel diagnostic antigen for sheep scab.

AIMS: Serodiagnosis of sheep scab is an established diagnostic method and has become popular in recent years. However, the current diagnostic antigen, Pso o 2, has shown promise as a component of a recombinant vaccine for scab, making it incompatible with discriminating between infected and vaccinated animals (DIVA). Here, we describe the discovery and characterization of a novel Psoroptes ovis immunodiagnostic antigen, P. ovis-Early Immunoreactive Protein-1 (Pso-EIP-1). METHODS AND RESULTS: Pso-EIP-1 is a highly abundant member of a six-gene family with no known homologs, indicating its potential uniqueness to P. ovis. Expression of recombinant Pso-EIP-1 (rPso-EIP-1) required a C-terminal fusion protein for stability and specific IgG immunoreactivity against rPso-EIP-1 was observed in sheep serum from 1 to 2 weeks post-infestation, indicating its highly immunogenic nature. Two of the three in silico-predicted B-cell epitopes of Pso-EIP-1 were confirmed by in vitro epitope mapping and, in a direct comparison by ELISA, Pso-EIP-1 performed to the same levels as Pso o 2 in terms of sensitivity, specificity and ability to diagnose P. ovis on sheep within 2 weeks of infestation. CONCLUSION: Pso-EIP-1 represents a novel diagnostic antigen for sheep scab with comparable levels of sensitivity and specificity to the existing Pso o 2 antigen.

Symptomatic vulvar demodicosis: A case report and review of the literature.

Demodex folliculorum is a mite that commonly inhabits the pilosebaceous units of facial skin, particularly in a perioral and periorbital distribution. While typically an incidental and asymptomatic parasite, Demodex spp. are proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of facial folliculitis, chronic blepharitis and papulopustular rosacea. Reports of demodicosis in anatomic locations other than the face are exceedingly rare. Here we report a 36-year-old woman with symptomatic Demodex spp. infestation of Fordyce spots of the labia minora. She was referred to dermatology after a 9-month history of tender red bumps on the vulva that would arise and drain over a 24 to 72 hours period, several times per week. Physical examination revealed erythema of the labia minora and introitus with a 4 mm, pink, dome-shaped soft papule on the left labium minus. Wet mount, microbiologic cultures and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screenings were unremarkable. Histopathologic examination revealed a well-circumscribed nodule of suppurative granulomatous inflammation arising in a background of mucosa with Fordyce spots, the majority of which were infiltrated by Demodex spp. Treatment with oral ivermectin and topical metronidazole cream resulted in a symptom-free period of 22 months. This case represents an unusual presentation of symptomatic Demodex infestation.

Demodex positive discoid lupus erythematosus: Is it a separate entity or an overlap syndrome?

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a chronic inflammatory erythematous skin disease that can be triggered by several factors. Rosacea is another skin disease that causes facial redness and tenderness. Demodex mites have been reported in rosacea and DLE patients commonly in the literature. These two diseases can be seen concomitant, mimic each other clinically and share common possible etiologic factors. To assess demodex mite infestation in both clinical and histopathological findings in DLE patients. We retrospectively evaluated the files of 42 patients with DLE who had been diagnosed DLE based on clinical and histopathological findings between August 2018 and August 2019. Demodex positivity was detected 50% of patients (n = 21). Neutrophile percentages in the dermal and perivascular area were higher in the demodex positive patients (4.43%) than in the Demodex negative patients (2.19%). The intensity of demodex mites correlated positively with dermal neutrophile percentages. ANA was negative in 29 patients (69%) and positive in 13 patients (31%). Anti-dsDNA was negative in serology and follicular plugging was positive in histopathology in all 42 patients (100%). This was a retrospective study. DLE and rosacea share common features in etiopathogenesis and clinical presentation. Inflammation and exacerbations caused by the demodex mites may increase the clinical severity of DLE. Although the position of demodex mites in DLE etiopathogenesis is not known exactly, the presence of high demodex in DLE patients has been determined. Standard skin surface biopsy can be a routine procedure for the evaluation of DLE patients in daily clinical practice.

Acute inflammatory Demodex-induced pustulosis in an immunocompetent patient related to topical steroid use.

Demodex spp. mites are a common colonizer of sebaceous adult skin. Though usually clinically insignificant, demodicosis may be associated with a wide spectrum of skin diseases in immunocompetent hosts, such as erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular rosacea, Demodex folliculorum, and blepharitis. We present a case of a healthy 9-year-old boy with an exuberant, inflammatory, Demodex-associated pustular eruption of the face, induced by the use of a high-potency topical steroid and successfully treated with oral ivermectin.

Demodex-Mite Infestation in Cilia and its Association With Ocular Surface Parameters in Japanese Volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the presence of Demodex mites on the eyelashes of a Japanese population and to explore its associations with subjective ocular symptoms and clinical ocular surface signs, including lid margin findings and fluorescein breakup time (FBUT). METHODS: Sixty-three Japanese Tokyo-based volunteers were examined (24 men and 39 women; mean±SD of age, 50.6±15.8 years). Eyelash sampling was performed by epilating three lashes from the center of the right upper eyelid. Eyelashes were tested for Demodex mites with a light microscope. The subjects completed questionnaires to assess subjective symptoms and risk factors for dry eye disease (DED) and underwent general examinations for DED, including FBUT and cornea-conjunctival staining with fluorescein. Meibomian gland function was also investigated in lid margin findings, vascularity and mucocutaneous junction movement, lid irregularity, plugging, pouting, and meibum secretion grade scores. RESULTS: Demodex mites were found in 20.6% (13/63) of the volunteers. Lid margin vascularity and meibum grades in the upper eyelid margins were significantly associated with the presence of Demodex mites. However, there were no significant differences in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction, FBUT, or ocular surface discomfort between the subjects with or without Demodex mites. CONCLUSIONS: Demodex mites are not rare in the cilia of a Japanese population. Lid margin vascularity and lower meibum quality may be associated with the presence of Demodex mites.

Comparison of Biomicroscopy and Light Microscopy Findings in Demodex Diagnosis in Patients With Chronic Blepharitis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the results of biomicroscopic examination and light microscopy in the diagnosis of Demodex infestation in chronic blepharitis cases. METHODS: The study was performed with retrospective data and included patients with chronic blepharitis and who were admitted to the Medipol University Ophthalmology Outpatient Clinic. Biomicroscopic evaluation was performed intentionally under 40x magnification to investigate the presence of Demodex ectoparasites. Three or four pieces of eyelashes were obtained from all cases with epilation technique, and Demodex parasites were examined under ×100 and ×400 magnifications with light microscopy. The presence of one or more Demodex parasites in the examined area under light microscopy was considered to be positive for infestation. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, and positive and negative predictive values of biomicroscopic examination compared with those of positive light microscopy. RESULTS: Of the 255 subjects included in the study, 134 (52.5%) were men and 121 (47.5%) were women. The mean age was 43.9±11.9 years. Of the 255 chronic blepharitis cases, 130 (51%) presented Demodex infestation on light microscopy. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate, false-negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value and were found to be 83.07%, 90.4%, 9.6%, 16.9%, 90%, and 83.7%, respectively, for the biomicroscopic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Careful biomicroscopic examination can be time-efficient and cost-effective, and the need for more advanced and invasive procedures for the identification of Demodex in patients with chronic blepharitis can be reduced.

The Effect of Ocular Demodex Colonization on Schirmer test and OSDI Scores in Newly Diagnosed Dry Eye Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ocular Demodex colonization results in differences in Schirmer test scores and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire values in individuals with dry eye disease (DED) diagnosed for the first time. METHOD: Eighty-eight adults aged 40 to 68 years who were admitted to Ophthalmology outpatient clinic for routine ophthalmological examination or presbyopia examination and diagnosed with DED for the first time and who do not have any chronic disease were included in the study. All the patients were asked to complete the OSDI, which is widely used for assessing dry eye symptom severity and vision-related functioning. The Schirmer test was performed, and then two eyelashes were taken from the inferior eyelids of each eyes. After saline (0.09% NaCl) was added to the sample, it was quickly taken to the microbiology laboratory, which is located next to the Ophthalmology policlinic. The sample was evaluated by a parasitologist experienced in Demodex. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight eyes of 84 patients were included in the study. Average Schirmer test score was 2.1±0.5, the OSDI questionnaire score was 61.82±10.95, and the mean age was 55.36±8.74 years in patients who had Demodex colonization (n=30), whereas the average Schirmer test score was 6.6±0.9 score, OSDI questionnaire score was 40.96±12.73, and the mean age was 49.12±6.87 years in patients without Demodex colonization (n=58). It has been observed that dry eye patients with Demodex colonization had a higher mean age (P: 0.001), higher mean OSDI score (P: 0.001), and lower average Schirmer test score (P: 0.001) compared with those without Demodex. The significant relationship between lower Schirmer test score and higher OSDI rates and occurrence of Demodex infestation continued after adjusting for mean age values (P=0.012; P=0.035). CONCLUSION: It was determined that the presence of ocular Demodex colonization was associated with the average Schirmer test scores, OSDI scores, and age values in patients with newly diagnosed DED. Demodex quantity was found increased in older aged patients, but the significant relationship between lower Schirmer test score and higher OSDI rates and Demodex infestation persisted even after controlling the mean age values. Supporting these findings with large-numbered and randomized-controlled studies will help in clarifying the association of the Demodex infestation with etiopathogenesis of dry eye.

The Clinical Use of Eyelash Manipulation in the Diagnosis of Demodex folliculorum Blepharitis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of using an eyelash manipulation technique to the traditional eyelash epilation and subsequent microscopic examination technique, when investigating for the presence of Demodex folliculorum in a clinical setting. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-eight eyelashes of 107 subjects were chosen to compare the quantity of D. folliculorum visible on eyelash manipulation with the slitlamp biomicroscope to that counted on microscopic examination of the same epilated eyelash. One eyelash from each eyelid was rotated with sterile forceps in situ, and the number of D. folliculorum seen emerging from the follicle was counted. The same eyelash was then epilated, and the number of D. folliculorum on the epilated eyelash was counted. Data were analyzed to check for agreement between the two techniques. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient showed moderately good agreement for assessing the quantity of D. folliculorum (0.78) between the techniques. However, the Bland-Altman plot suggested that consistently higher quantities were found on eyelash manipulation. The overall mean quantity of D. folliculorum was also greater on eyelash manipulation (1.45 mites; range, 0-13 mites) than on microscopic examination of the epilated eyelash (0.81 mites; range, 0-16; P= <0.001). Weighted kappa (κw=0.56) indicated weak levels of agreement between the two methods for addressing severity of infestation. CONCLUSION: Eyelash manipulation exhibited larger quantities of D. folliculorum than complete epilation of the eyelash. In a clinical setting, complete eyelash epilation is not necessary to accurately detect Demodex blepharitis requiring treatment.