Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 22.248
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 388(22): 2025-2036, 2023 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37256974

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effects of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke but who have no evidence of complete occlusion of large or medium-sized vessels have not been extensively studied. METHODS: In a multicenter trial in China, we enrolled patients with ischemic stroke without occlusion of large or medium-sized vessels and with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 5 or more and at least one moderately to severely weak limb. Eligible patients had any of four clinical presentations: ineligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy and within 24 hours after the patient was last known to be well; progression of stroke symptoms 24 to 96 hours after onset; early neurologic deterioration after thrombolysis; or thrombolysis with no improvement at 4 to 24 hours. Patients were assigned to receive intravenous tirofiban (plus oral placebo) or oral aspirin (100 mg per day, plus intravenous placebo) for 2 days; all patients then received oral aspirin until day 90. The primary efficacy end point was an excellent outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days. Secondary end points included functional independence at 90 days and a quality-of-life score. The primary safety end points were death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 606 patients were assigned to the tirofiban group and 571 to the aspirin group. Most patients had small infarctions that were presumed to be atherosclerotic. The percentage of patients with a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 29.1% with tirofiban and 22.2% with aspirin (adjusted risk ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.53, P = 0.02). Results for secondary end points were generally not consistent with the results of the primary analysis. Mortality was similar in the two groups. The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 1.0% in the tirofiban group and 0% in the aspirin group. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving heterogeneous groups of patients with stroke of recent onset or progression of stroke symptoms and nonoccluded large and medium-sized cerebral vessels, intravenous tirofiban was associated with a greater likelihood of an excellent outcome than low-dose aspirin. Incidences of intracranial hemorrhages were low but slightly higher with tirofiban. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; RESCUE BT2 Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2000029502.).


Assuntos
Fibrinolíticos , AVC Isquêmico , Tirofibana , Humanos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Hemorragias Intracranianas/induzido quimicamente , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico , AVC Isquêmico/tratamento farmacológico , AVC Isquêmico/etiologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Tirofibana/efeitos adversos , Tirofibana/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Arteriais Cerebrais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Arteriais Cerebrais/etiologia
2.
N Engl J Med ; 389(26): 2413-2424, 2023 Dec 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet treatment has been shown to lower the risk of recurrent stroke as compared with aspirin alone when treatment is initiated early (≤24 hours) after an acute mild stroke. The effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin as compared with aspirin alone administered within 72 hours after the onset of acute cerebral ischemia from atherosclerosis has not been well studied. METHODS: In 222 hospitals in China, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial involving patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) of presumed atherosclerotic cause who had not undergone thrombolysis or thrombectomy. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, within 72 hours after symptom onset to receive clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1 and 75 mg daily on days 2 to 90) plus aspirin (100 to 300 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 21) or matching clopidogrel placebo plus aspirin (100 to 300 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 90). There was no interaction between this component of the factorial trial design and a second part that compared immediate with delayed statin treatment (not reported here). The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke, and the primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding - both assessed within 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 6100 patients were enrolled, with 3050 assigned to each trial group. TIA was the qualifying event for enrollment in 13.1% of the patients. A total of 12.8% of the patients were assigned to a treatment group no more than 24 hours after stroke onset, and 87.2% were assigned after 24 hours and no more than 72 hours after stroke onset. A new stroke occurred in 222 patients (7.3%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 279 (9.2%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.94; P = 0.008). Moderate-to-severe bleeding occurred in 27 patients (0.9%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 13 (0.4%) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.07 to 4.04; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with mild ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA of presumed atherosclerotic cause, combined clopidogrel-aspirin therapy initiated within 72 hours after stroke onset led to a lower risk of new stroke at 90 days than aspirin therapy alone but was associated with a low but higher risk of moderate-to-severe bleeding. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and others; INSPIRES ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03635749.).


Assuntos
Aspirina , Clopidogrel , AVC Isquêmico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Humanos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Aterosclerose/complicações , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Clopidogrel/administração & dosagem , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/tratamento farmacológico , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , AVC Isquêmico/tratamento farmacológico , AVC Isquêmico/etiologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Secundária , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Blood ; 143(23): 2351-2362, 2024 Jun 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364188

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Arterial and venous thromboses are classically considered distinct disease states, with arterial thrombosis mediated predominantly by platelets and therefore, treated with antiplatelet therapy, and venous thrombosis mediated by the plasmatic coagulation system and treated with anticoagulation. However, co-occurrence of arterial and venous events is common, and there is increasing evidence of shared risk factors and pathophysiologic overlap. This presents a management challenge: does the patient with venous and arterial thrombosis, require anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, or both? Herein, we present a structured approach to the evaluation and management of patients with venous thrombosis who are also at risk for or have a history of an arterial thromboembolic event. We emphasize the importance of defining the indications for antithrombotic therapy, as well as the evaluation of factors that influence both thrombotic and bleeding risk, including disorder-specific and patient-specific factors, as well as the inherent risk balance of antithrombotic therapy regimens. We illustrate this approach in 4 cases, discussing the unique considerations and recent updates in the management of venous thrombosis, acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke, coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction, and peripheral artery disease after revascularization.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Tromboembolia , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia
4.
Circulation ; 150(6): e129-e150, 2024 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899464

RESUMO

There is significant variability in the efficacy and safety of oral P2Y12 inhibitors, which are used to prevent ischemic outcomes in common diseases such as coronary and peripheral arterial disease and stroke. Clopidogrel, a prodrug, is the most used oral P2Y12 inhibitor and is activated primarily after being metabolized by a highly polymorphic hepatic cytochrome CYP2C219 enzyme. Loss-of-function genetic variants in CYP2C219 are common, can result in decreased active metabolite levels and increased on-treatment platelet aggregation, and are associated with increased ischemic events on clopidogrel therapy. Such patients can be identified by CYP2C19 genetic testing and can be treated with alternative therapy. Conversely, universal use of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor or prasugrel, which are not dependent on CYP2C19 for activation, has been recommended but can result in increased bleeding. Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that a precision medicine approach in which loss-of-function carriers are prescribed ticagrelor or prasugrel and noncarriers are prescribed clopidogrel results in reducing ischemic events without increasing bleeding risk. The evidence to date supports CYP2C19 genetic testing before oral P2Y12 inhibitors are prescribed in patients with acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical implementation of such genetic testing will depend on among multiple factors: rapid availability of results or adoption of the concept of performing preemptive genetic testing, provision of easy-to-understand results with therapeutic recommendations, and seamless integration in the electronic health record.


Assuntos
Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19 , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y , Humanos , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/metabolismo , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , American Heart Association , Estados Unidos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Testes Farmacogenômicos , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico
5.
Circulation ; 150(4): 317-335, 2024 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39038086

RESUMO

For almost two decades, 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been the only class I recommendation on DAPT in American and European guidelines, which has resulted in 12-month durations of DAPT therapy being the most frequently implemented in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) across the globe. Twelve-month DAPT was initially grounded in the results of the CURE (Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events) trial, which, by design, studied DAPT versus no DAPT rather than the optimal DAPT duration. The average DAPT duration in this study was 9 months, not 12 months. Subsequent ACS studies, which were not designed to assess DAPT duration, rather its composition (aspirin with prasugrel or ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel) were further interpreted as supportive evidence for 12-month DAPT duration. In these studies, the median DAPT duration was 9 or 15 months for ticagrelor and prasugrel, respectively. Several subsequent studies questioned the 12-month regimen and suggested that DAPT duration should either be fewer than 12 months in patients at high bleeding risk or more than 12 months in patients at high ischemic risk who can safely tolerate the treatment. Bleeding, rather than ischemic risk assessment, has emerged as a treatment modifier for maximizing the net clinical benefit of DAPT, due to excessive bleeding and no clear benefit of prolonged treatment regimens in high bleeding risk patients. Multiple DAPT de-escalation treatment strategies, including switching from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel, reducing the dose of prasugrel or ticagrelor, and shortening DAPT duration while maintaining monotherapy with ticagrelor, have been consistently shown to reduce bleeding without increasing fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular or cerebral ischemic risks compared with 12-month DAPT. However, 12-month DAPT remains the only class-I DAPT recommendation for patients with ACS despite the lack of prospectively established evidence, leading to unnecessary and potentially harmful overtreatment in many patients. It is time for clinical practice and guideline recommendations to be updated to reflect the totality of the evidence regarding the optimal DAPT duration in ACS.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Humanos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/administração & dosagem , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação
6.
Circulation ; 149(8): 562-573, 2024 02 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878786

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Stopping aspirin within 1 month after implantation of a drug-eluting stent for ticagrelor monotherapy has not been exclusively evaluated for patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ticagrelor monotherapy after <1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is noninferior to 12 months of ticagrelor-based DAPT for adverse cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial, 2850 patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation at 24 centers in South Korea were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ticagrelor monotherapy (90 mg twice daily) after <1 month of DAPT (n=1426) or 12 months of ticagrelor-based DAPT (n=1424) between April 24, 2019, and May 31, 2022. The primary end point was the net clinical benefit as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding at 1 year after the index procedure in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary end points were the individual components of the primary end point. RESULTS: Among 2850 patients who were randomized (mean age, 61 years; 40% ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction), 2823 (99.0%) completed the trial. Aspirin was discontinued at a median of 16 days (interquartile range, 12-25 days) in the group receiving ticagrelor monotherapy after <1 month of DAPT. The primary end point occurred in 40 patients (2.8%) in the group receiving ticagrelor monotherapy after <1-month DAPT, and in 73 patients (5.2%) in the ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT group (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.37-0.80]; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.002 for superiority). This finding was consistent in the per-protocol population as a sensitivity analysis. The occurrence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy after <1-month DAPT group compared with the 12-month DAPT group (1.2% versus 3.4%; hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20-0.61]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that stopping aspirin within 1 month for ticagrelor monotherapy is both noninferior and superior to 12-month DAPT for the 1-year composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding, primarily because of a significant reduction in major bleeding, among patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving drug-eluting stent implantation. Low event rates, which may suggest enrollment of relatively non-high-risk patients, should be considered in interpreting the trial. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03797651.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Stents Farmacológicos , Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Trombose , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Stents Farmacológicos/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia/etiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Trombose/etiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Circulation ; 150(2): 91-101, 2024 Jul 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742915

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The administration of intravenous cangrelor at reperfusion achieves faster onset of platelet P2Y12 inhibition than oral ticagrelor and has been shown to reduce myocardial infarction (MI) size in the preclinical setting. We hypothesized that the administration of cangrelor at reperfusion will reduce MI size and prevent microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment-elevation MI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted between November 2017 to November 2021 in 6 cardiac centers in Singapore. Patients were randomized to receive either cangrelor or placebo initiated before the primary percutaneous coronary intervention procedure on top of oral ticagrelor. The key exclusion criteria included presenting <6 hours of symptom onset; previous MI and stroke or transient ischemic attack; on concomitant oral anticoagulants; and a contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. The primary efficacy end point was acute MI size by cardiovascular magnetic resonance within the first week expressed as percentage of the left ventricle mass (%LVmass). Microvascular obstruction was identified as areas of dark core of hypoenhancement within areas of late gadolinium enhancement. The primary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-defined major bleeding in the first 48 hours. Continuous variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test (reported as median [first quartile-third quartile]), and categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact test. A 2-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 209 recruited patients, 164 patients (78%) completed the acute cardiovascular magnetic resonance scan. There were no significant differences in acute MI size (placebo, 14.9% [7.3-22.6] %LVmass versus cangrelor, 16.3 [9.9-24.4] %LVmass; P=0.40) or the incidence (placebo, 48% versus cangrelor, 47%; P=0.99) and extent of microvascular obstruction (placebo, 1.63 [0.60-4.65] %LVmass versus cangrelor, 1.18 [0.53-3.37] %LVmass; P=0.46) between placebo and cangrelor despite a 2-fold decrease in platelet reactivity with cangrelor. There were no Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-defined major bleeding events in either group in the first 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Cangrelor administered at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention did not reduce acute MI size or prevent microvascular obstruction in patients with ST-segment-elevation MI given oral ticagrelor despite a significant reduction of platelet reactivity during the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03102723.


Assuntos
Monofosfato de Adenosina , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/tratamento farmacológico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Duplo-Cego , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Monofosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Monofosfato de Adenosina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Singapura , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/administração & dosagem
8.
Lancet ; 404(10456): 937-948, 2024 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months is the standard of care after coronary stenting in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this individual patient-level meta-analysis was to summarise the evidence comparing DAPT de-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy versus continuing DAPT for 12 months after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation. METHODS: A systematic review and individual patient data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised trials with centrally adjudicated endpoints was performed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy (90 mg twice a day) after short-term DAPT (from 2 weeks to 3 months) versus 12-month DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a coronary drug-eluting stent. Randomised trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with DAPT after coronary revascularisation were searched in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and two websites (www.tctmd.com and www.escardio.org) from database inception up to May 20, 2024. Trials that included patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulants were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The principal investigators of the eligible trials provided IPD by means of an anonymised electronic dataset. The three ranked coprimary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) tested for non-inferiority in the per-protocol population; and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding and all-cause death tested for superiority in the intention-to-treat population. All outcomes are reported as Kaplan-Meier estimates. The non-inferiority was tested using a one-sided α of 0·025 with the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1·15 (hazard ratio [HR] scale), followed by the ranked superiority testing at a two-sided α of 0·05. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024506083). FINDINGS: A total of 8361 unique citations were screened, of which 610 records were considered potentially eligible during the screening of titles and abstracts. Of these, six trials that randomly assigned patients to ticagrelor monotherapy or DAPT were identified. De-escalation took place a median of 78 days (IQR 31-92) after intervention, with a median duration of treatment of 334 days (329-365). Among 23 256 patients in the per-protocol population, MACCE occurred in 297 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 2·8%) with ticagrelor monotherapy and 332 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 3·2%) with DAPT (HR 0·91 [95% CI 0·78-1·07]; p=0·0039 for non-inferiority; τ2<0·0001). Among 24 407 patients in the intention-to-treat population, the risks of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (Kaplan-Meier estimate 0·9% vs 2·1%; HR 0·43 [95% CI 0·34-0·54]; p<0·0001 for superiority; τ2=0·079) and all-cause death (Kaplan-Meier estimate 0·9% vs 1·2%; 0·76 [0·59-0·98]; p=0·034 for superiority; τ2<0·0001) were lower with ticagrelor monotherapy. Trial sequential analysis showed strong evidence of non-inferiority for MACCE and superiority for bleeding among the overall and ACS populations (the z-curve crossed the monitoring boundaries or the required information size without crossing the futility boundaries or approaching the null). The treatment effects were heterogeneous by sex for MACCE (p interaction=0·041) and all-cause death (p interaction=0·050), indicating a possible benefit in women with ticagrelor monotherapy, and by clinical presentation for bleeding (p interaction=0·022), indicating a benefit in ACS with ticagrelor monotherapy. INTERPRETATION: Our study found robust evidence that, compared with 12 months of DAPT, de-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy does not increase ischaemic risk and reduces the risk of major bleeding, especially in patients with ACS. Ticagrelor monotherapy might also be associated with a mortality benefit, particularly among women, which warrants further investigation. FUNDING: Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Ticagrelor , Humanos , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/administração & dosagem , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/métodos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Stents Farmacológicos , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Lancet ; 403(10439): 1866-1878, 2024 May 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement to treat acute coronary syndromes, international clinical guidelines generally recommend dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor for 12 months to prevent myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis. However, data on single antiplatelet therapy with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor earlier than 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with an acute coronary syndrome are scarce. The aim of this trial was to assess whether the use of ticagrelor alone, compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin, could reduce the incidence of clinically relevant bleeding events without an accompanying increase in major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE). METHODS: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, patients aged 18 years or older with an acute coronary syndrome who completed the IVUS-ACS study and who had no major ischaemic or bleeding events after 1-month treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy were randomly assigned to receive oral ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) plus oral aspirin (100 mg once daily) or oral ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) plus a matching oral placebo, beginning 1 month and ending at 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (11 months in total). Recruitment took place at 58 centres in China, Italy, Pakistan, and the UK. Patients were required to remain event-free for 1 month on dual antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents. Randomisation was done using a web-based system, stratified by acute coronary syndrome type, diabetes, IVUS-ACS randomisation, and site, using dynamic minimisation. The primary superiority endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [known as BARC] types 2, 3, or 5). The primary non-inferiority endpoint was MACCE (defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, definite stent thrombosis, or clinically driven target vessel revascularisation), with an expected event rate of 6·2% in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group and an absolute non-inferiority margin of 2·5 percentage points between 1 month and 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The two co-primary endpoints were tested sequentially; the primary superiority endpoint had to be met for hypothesis testing of the MACCE outcome to proceed. All principal analyses were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03971500, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Sept 21, 2019, and Oct 27, 2022, 3400 (97·0%) of the 3505 participants in the IVUS-ACS study were randomly assigned (1700 patients to ticagrelor plus aspirin and 1700 patients to ticagrelor plus placebo). 12-month follow-up was completed by 3399 (>99·9%) patients. Between month 1 and month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention, clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 35 patients (2·1%) in the ticagrelor plus placebo group and in 78 patients (4·6%) in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·45 [95% CI 0·30 to 0·66]; p<0·0001). MACCE occurred in 61 patients (3·6%) in the ticagrelor plus placebo group and in 63 patients (3·7%) in the ticagrelor plus aspirin group (absolute difference -0·1% [95% CI -1·4% to 1·2%]; HR 0·98 [95% CI 0·69 to 1·39]; pnon-inferiority<0·0001, psuperiority=0·89). INTERPRETATION: In patients with an acute coronary syndrome who had percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary drug-eluting stents and remained event-free for 1 month on dual antiplatelet therapy, treatment with ticagrelor alone between month 1 and month 12 after the intervention resulted in a lower rate of clinically relevant bleeding and a similar rate of MACCE compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin. Along with the results from previous studies, these findings show that most patients in this population can benefit from superior clinical outcomes with aspirin discontinuation and maintenance on ticagrelor monotherapy after 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. FUNDING: The Chinese Society of Cardiology, the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China, and the Jiangsu Provincial & Nanjing Municipal Clinical Trial Project. TRANSLATION: For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Aspirina , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hemorragia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Ticagrelor , Humanos , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Método Duplo-Cego , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/administração & dosagem , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
N Engl J Med ; 387(11): 967-977, 2022 09 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36018037

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A polypill that includes key medications associated with improved outcomes (aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and statin) has been proposed as a simple approach to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular death and complications after myocardial infarction. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patients with myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months to a polypill-based strategy or usual care. The polypill treatment consisted of aspirin (100 mg), ramipril (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), and atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg). The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischemic stroke. RESULTS: A total of 2499 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a median of 36 months. A primary-outcome event occurred in 118 of 1237 patients (9.5%) in the polypill group and in 156 of 1229 (12.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.96; P = 0.02). A key secondary-outcome event occurred in 101 patients (8.2%) in the polypill group and in 144 (11.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.90; P = 0.005). The results were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Medication adherence as reported by the patients was higher in the polypill group than in the usual-care group. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin within 6 months after myocardial infarction resulted in a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than usual care. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020; SECURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02596126; EudraCT number, 2015-002868-17.).


Assuntos
Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Atorvastatina/efeitos adversos , Atorvastatina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , AVC Isquêmico/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Ramipril/efeitos adversos , Ramipril/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Secundária/métodos
11.
Hum Genomics ; 18(1): 2, 2024 Jan 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173046

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel is a widely prescribed prodrug that requires activation via specific pharmacogenes to exert its anti-platelet function. Genetic variations in the genes encoding its transporter, metabolizing enzymes, and target receptor lead to variability in its activation and platelet inhibition and, consequently, its efficacy. This variability increases the risk of secondary cardiovascular events, and therefore, some variations have been utilized as genetic biomarkers when prescribing clopidogrel. METHODS: Our study examined clopidogrel-related genes (CYP2C19, ABCB1, PON1, and P2Y12R) in a cohort of 298 healthy Emiratis individuals. The study used whole exome sequencing (WES) data to comprehensively analyze pertinent variations of these genes, including their minor allele frequencies, haplotype distribution, and their resulting phenotypes. RESULTS: Our data shows that approximately 37% (n = 119) of the cohort are likely to benefit from the use of alternative anti-platelet drugs due to their classification as intermediate or poor CYP2C19 metabolizers. Additionally, more than 50% of the studied cohort exhibited variants in ABCB1, PON1, and P2YR12 genes, potentially influencing clopidogrel's transport, enzymatic clearance, and receptor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing these alleles and genotype frequencies may explain the clinical differences in medication response across different ethnicities and predict adverse events. Our findings underscore the need to consider genetic variations in prescribing clopidogrel, with potential implications for implementing personalized anti-platelet therapy among Emiratis based on their genetic profiles.


Assuntos
Hidrocarboneto de Aril Hidroxilases , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Humanos , Clopidogrel/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Ticlopidina/uso terapêutico , Ticlopidina/farmacologia , Emirados Árabes Unidos , Hidrocarboneto de Aril Hidroxilases/genética , Genótipo , Arildialquilfosfatase/genética
12.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(8): JC87, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102718

RESUMO

SOURCE CITATION: Park DY, Hu JR, Jamil Y, et al. Shorter dual antiplatelet therapy for older adults after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e244000. 38546647.


Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Humanos , Idoso , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Esquema de Medicação
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(6): JC64, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830214

RESUMO

SOURCE CITATION: Hong SJ, Lee SJ, Suh Y, et al; T-PASS (Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Patients Treated With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Acute Coronary Syndrome) Investigators. Stopping aspirin within 1 month after stenting for ticagrelor monotherapy in acute coronary syndrome: the T-PASS randomized noninferiority trial. Circulation. 2024;149:562-573. 37878786.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Stents Farmacológicos , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Ticagrelor , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos de Equivalência como Asunto
14.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(8): JC86, 2024 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102721

RESUMO

SOURCE CITATION: Ge Z, Kan J, Gao X, et al; ULTIMATE-DAPT investigators. Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Lancet. 2024;403:1866-1878. 38599220.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Aspirina , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Ticagrelor , Humanos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Ticagrelor/administração & dosagem
17.
Eur Heart J ; 45(34): 3124-3131, 2024 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39056269

RESUMO

Multivessel coronary artery disease is present in ∼50% of patients with acute coronary syndrome and, compared with single-vessel disease, entails a higher risk of new ischaemic events and a worse prognosis. Randomized controlled trials have shown the superiority of 'complete revascularization' over culprit lesion-only treatment. Trials, however, only included patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and evidence regarding complete revascularization with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery after culprit lesion-only PCI ('hybrid revascularization') is lacking. The CABG after PCI is an open, non-negligible therapeutic option, for patients with non-culprit left main and/or left anterior descending coronary artery disease where evidence in chronic coronary syndrome patients points in several cases to a preference of CABG over PCI. This valuable but poorly studied 'PCI first-CABG later' option presents, however, relevant challenges, mostly in the need of interrupting post-stenting dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for surgery to prevent excess bleeding. Depending on patients' clinical characteristics and coronary anatomical features, either deferring surgery after a safe interruption of DAPT or bridging DAPT interruption with intravenous short-acting antithrombotic agents appears to be a suitable option. Off-pump minimally invasive surgical revascularization, associated with less operative bleeding than open-chest surgery, may be an adjunctive strategy when revascularization cannot be safely deferred and DAPT is not interrupted. Here, the rationale, patient selection, optimal timing, and adjunctive strategies are reviewed for an ideal approach to hybrid revascularization in post-acute coronary syndrome patients to support physicians' choices in a case-by-case patient-tailored approach.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Seleção de Pacientes
18.
Eur Heart J ; 45(8): 572-585, 2024 Feb 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240716

RESUMO

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the standard antithrombotic treatment after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Several trials have challenged guideline-recommended DAPT after PCI by testing the relative clinical effect of an aspirin-free antiplatelet approach-consisting of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course (mostly 1-3 months) of DAPT-among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). Overall, these studies have shown P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding without an increase in thrombotic or ischaemic events compared with continued DAPT. Moreover, the effects of the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy without prior DAPT or following a very short course of DAPT after PCI are being investigated in emerging studies, of which one has recently reported unfavourable efficacy results associated with the aspirin-free approach compared with conventional DAPT. Finally, P2Y12 inhibitor alone has been compared with aspirin alone as chronic therapy after DAPT discontinuation, thus challenging the historical role of aspirin as a standard of care for secondary prevention following PCI. A thorough understanding of study designs, populations, treatments, results, and limitations of trials testing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. DAPT or vs. aspirin is required to consider adopting this treatment in clinical practice. This review addresses the use of aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for OAC, providing an overview of clinical evidence, guideline indications, practical implications, ongoing issues, and future perspectives.


Assuntos
Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla , Quimioterapia Combinada , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Eur Heart J ; 45(34): 3138-3148, 2024 Sep 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39016180

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study assessed the impact of incorporating cancer as a predictor on performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score. METHODS: A nationally linked cohort of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients between 1 January 2005 and 31 March 2019 was derived from the UK Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project and the UK Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registries. The primary outcome was major bleeding at 1 year. A new modified score was generated by adding cancer as a binary variable to the PRECISE-DAPT score using a Cox regression model and compared its performance to the original PRECISE-DAPT score. RESULTS: A total of 216 709 ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients were included, of which 4569 had cancer. The original score showed moderate accuracy (C-statistic .60), and the modified score showed modestly higher discrimination (C-statistics .64; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04) even in patients without cancer (C-statistics .63; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04). The net reclassification index was .07. The bleeding rates of the modified score risk categories (high, moderate, low, and very low bleeding risk) were 6.3%, 3.8%, 2.9%, and 2.2%, respectively. According to the original score, 65.5% of cancer patients were classified as high bleeding risk (HBR) and 21.6% were low or very low bleeding risk. According to the modified score, 94.0% of cancer patients were HBR, 6.0% were moderate bleeding risk, and no cancer patient was classified as low or very low bleeding risk. CONCLUSIONS: Adding cancer to the PRECISE-DAPT score identifies the majority of patients with cancer as HBR and can improve its discrimination ability without undermining its performance in patients without cancer.


Assuntos
Hemorragia , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Idoso , Medição de Risco/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Sistema de Registros , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea
20.
Eur Heart J ; 45(33): 3045-3056, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a potent P2Y12 inhibitor is recommended for 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Monotherapy with a potent P2Y12 inhibitor after short-term DAPT is an attractive option to better balance the risks of ischaemia and bleeding. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT, especially in patients with ACS. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from inception to 11 November 2023, and for the primary analysis, individual patient data were pooled from the relevant randomized clinical trials comparing ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term (≤3 months) DAPT with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT, exclusively in ACS patients undergoing DES implantation. The co-primary endpoints were ischaemic endpoint (composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and bleeding endpoint [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding] at 1 year. RESULTS: Individual patient data from two randomized clinical trials including 5906 ACS patients were analysed. At 1 year, the primary ischaemic endpoint did not differ between the ticagrelor monotherapy and ticagrelor-based DAPT groups [1.9% vs. 2.5%; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-1.13; P = .194]. The incidence of the primary bleeding endpoint was lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy group (2.4% vs. 4.5%; adjusted HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.40-0.72; P < .001). The results were consistent in a secondary aggregate data meta-analysis including the ACS subgroup of additional randomized clinical trials which enrolled patients with ACS as well as chronic coronary syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients undergoing DES implantation, ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT was associated with less major bleeding without a concomitant increase in ischaemic events compared with ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023476470).


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária , Ticagrelor , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Ticagrelor/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Stents Farmacológicos , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/administração & dosagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Feminino , Masculino , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa