Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 111
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Urol ; 203(5): 991-995, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31821067

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In-flight medical events are rare but may cause significant distress as access to care is limited. There is a paucity of data on in-flight urological medical events. We describe urological in-flight medical emergencies and report clinical and flight outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all in-flight urological medical emergencies between 2015 and 2017 from MedAire®, a ground based medical support center that provides remote medical advisory services to approximately 35% of commercial airline passenger traffic worldwide. Our primary end point was the incidence rates of in-flight urological medical events. We also characterized the types of in-flight medical emergencies, in-flight management and their impact on flight status. Statistical analyses included Student's t-tests, chi-square analysis and analysis of variance. RESULTS: We identified 1,368 (1%) urological in-flight medical emergencies from a total of 138,612 in-flight medical emergencies, with an incidence of 0.5 per million passengers. The most common in-flight medical emergencies were lower urinary tract symptoms (35%), urinary retention (30%) and flank pain (21%). Among in-flight medical emergencies 883 (60%) resolved in flight, 273 (28%) required on-arrival medical evaluation and 21 (1.5%) resulted in flight diversions. Of the flight diversions the majority were due to urinary retention (12, 57%) and less commonly flank pain (6, 28%) and testicular/abdominal pain (3, 15%). CONCLUSIONS: The most common causes of urological in-flight medical emergencies are lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary retention and renal colic, the majority of which resolved in flight. These data are useful for informing flight personnel and emergency kit equipment needs to minimize the impact of these events when they occur.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves , Emergências/epidemiologia , Viagem , Triagem/organização & administração , Doenças Urológicas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Saúde Global , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico
2.
Br J Dermatol ; 181(1): 55-64, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585313

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Airline pilots and cabin crew are potentially exposed to hazardous ultraviolet and cosmic radiation, which may increase their risk of melanoma and other skin cancers. OBJECTIVES: To establish precise risks of melanoma and keratinocyte cancer (KC) for airline pilots and for cabin crew based on all studies published to date. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, ISI Science Citation Index, Embase, SCOPUS and CINAHL to June 2018. All studies of melanoma and KC risk and mortality in airline pilots and cabin crew compared with the general population were eligible. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were pooled using random effects models. RESULTS: From 5866 papers retrieved, we reviewed 44 full-text articles, of which 12 studies with data collected mostly between the 1970s and 1990s were eligible for inclusion. The pooled SIR (pSIR) for melanoma in pilots was 2.03 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.71-2.40] and in cabin crew it was 2.12 (95% CI 1.71-2.62). For pilots, the pooled SMR for melanoma was 1.99 (95% CI 1.17-3.40) and for cabin crew it was 1.18 (95% CI 0.73-1.89). For KC, the pSIR was 1.86 (95% CI 1.54-2.25) in pilots and 1.97 (95% CI 1.25-2.96) in cabin crew. There was no evidence of study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence shows that airline pilots and cabin crew have about twice the risk of melanoma and other skin cancers than the general population, with pilots more likely to die from melanoma. However, most of the evidence was collected several decades ago and their relevance to contemporary levels of risk is uncertain.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Radiação Cósmica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Melanoma/etiologia , Mortalidade , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Pilotos/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etiologia , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 35(10): 687-691, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27941573

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: More than 3 billion passengers are transported every year on commercial airline flights worldwide, many of whom are children. The incidence of in-flight medical events (IFMEs) affecting children is largely unknown. This study seeks to characterize pediatric IFMEs, with particular focus on in-flight injuries (IFIs). METHODS: We reviewed the records of all IFMEs from January 2009 to January 2014 involving children treated in consultation with a ground-based medical support center providing medical support to commercial airlines. RESULTS: Among 114 222 IFMEs, we identified 12 226 (10.7%) cases involving children. In-flight medical events commonly involved gastrointestinal (35.4%), infectious (20.3%), neurological (12.2%), allergic (8.6%), and respiratory (6.3%) conditions. In addition, 400 cases (3.3%) of IFMEs involved IFIs. Subjects who sustained IFIs were younger than those involved in other medical events (3 [1-8] vs 7 [3-14] y, respectively), and lap infants were overrepresented (35.8% of IFIs vs 15.9% of other medical events). Examples of IFIs included burns, contusions, and lacerations from falls in unrestrained lap infants; fallen objects from the overhead bin; and trauma to extremities by the service cart or aisle traffic. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric IFIs are relatively infrequent given the total passenger traffic but are not negligible. Unrestrained lap children are prone to IFIs, particularly during meal service or turbulence, but not only then. Children occupying aisle seats are vulnerable to injury from fallen objects, aisle traffic, and burns from mishandled hot items. The possible protection from using in-flight child restraints might extend beyond takeoff and landing operations or during turbulence.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Contusões/epidemiologia , Tratamento de Emergência/tendências , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Lacerações/epidemiologia , Masculino , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia
4.
N Engl J Med ; 368(22): 2075-83, 2013 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23718164

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, 2.75 billion passengers fly on commercial airlines annually. When in-flight medical emergencies occur, access to care is limited. We describe in-flight medical emergencies and the outcomes of these events. METHODS: We reviewed records of in-flight medical emergency calls from five domestic and international airlines to a physician-directed medical communications center from January 1, 2008, through October 31, 2010. We characterized the most common medical problems and the type of on-board assistance rendered. We determined the incidence of and factors associated with unscheduled aircraft diversion, transport to a hospital, and hospital admission, and we determined the incidence of death. RESULTS: There were 11,920 in-flight medical emergencies resulting in calls to the center (1 medical emergency per 604 flights). The most common problems were syncope or presyncope (37.4% of cases), respiratory symptoms (12.1%), and nausea or vomiting (9.5%). Physician passengers provided medical assistance in 48.1% of in-flight medical emergencies, and aircraft diversion occurred in 7.3%. Of 10,914 patients for whom postflight follow-up data were available, 25.8% were transported to a hospital by emergency-medical-service personnel, 8.6% were admitted, and 0.3% died. The most common triggers for admission were possible stroke (odds ratio, 3.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.88 to 6.03), respiratory symptoms (odds ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.48 to 3.06), and cardiac symptoms (odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.77). CONCLUSIONS: Most in-flight medical emergencies were related to syncope, respiratory symptoms, or gastrointestinal symptoms, and a physician was frequently the responding medical volunteer. Few in-flight medical emergencies resulted in diversion of aircraft or death; one fourth of passengers who had an in-flight medical emergency underwent additional evaluation in a hospital. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health.).


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Emergências/epidemiologia , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Aviação , Emergências/classificação , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doenças Respiratórias/terapia , Síncope/epidemiologia , Síncope/terapia , Viagem , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 88(7): 905-11, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25595563

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Piloting is a special profession with prolonged stress, which could induce the occurrence of TMD. This sample is useful to reduce the effect of confounders in the analyses. Based on this, the present study aims to determine the prevalence and associated factors for TMD in civilian pilots of China. METHODS: A cross-sectional epidemiological survey was carried out in 616 male subjects (aged 23-52 years). The questionnaire included general information, chewing preference (bilateral or unilateral), and Trait Anxiety section of Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T). The clinical examination contained TMD screening per research diagnostic criteria for TMD and diagnosis of sleep bruxism per American Academy of Sleep Medicine standards. The level of statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The program was conducted from June 2012 to April 2013, in which period, and the percentage of TMD in the samples we examined was 33.3 % (=205/616). Only high anxiety (OR 2.48; 95 % CI 1.25-4.90) and unilateral chewing preference (OR 12.67; 95 % CI 7.77-20.65) were the most significant associated factors with TMD. Also, salivary cortisol and the STAI-T score had a significant correlation (r = 0.47, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: It was more reliable to study the associated factors on TMD with the exclusion of the possible confounding factors, and only unilateral chewing preference and psychological stress had a significant association with TMD. In addition, the salivary cortisol levels might assist to assess psychological stress in epidemiological research.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Ansiedade/complicações , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/epidemiologia , Adulto , Aeronaves , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/fisiopatologia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/análise , Masculino , Mastigação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Profissionais/fisiopatologia , Doenças Profissionais/psicologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Saliva/química , Bruxismo do Sono/complicações , Bruxismo do Sono/epidemiologia , Bruxismo do Sono/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 85(5): 573-5, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24834573

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Historically, neurologic conditions are a major cause for removing aviators from flying status. Early neuropsychiatry studies included psychiatric conditions along with neurologic disorders. Previously reported data specifically addressing neurologic conditions in aviators are limited. And there is little current neurology-specific data reported. METHODS: A retrospective review was done on patients with diagnoses evaluated by Neurology at the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine Aeromedical Consultation Service (ACS) between 2000 and 2012 using ACS records and databases to identify cases. Patient demographics, major diagnoses with associated International Classification of Diseases (9th rev.) codes, and aeromedical disposition recommendations were abstracted into a separate database for analysis. RESULTS: In total, 871 cases were identified. Patients were predominantly male (91%) with average age 34 and were predominantly pilots (69%). The top neurology-related diagnoses found in our series were headaches, head injuries, and radiculopathies. Of the cases evaluated, 570 aviators (65%) were recommended by ACS to return to flying status. Waiver authorities accepted 88% of ACS recommendations. DISCUSSION: Current patterns in neurologic conditions in the selected population of cases evaluated by the ACS were presented. Of the neurologic diagnoses seen, a novel finding was the prominence of head injuries in our series not seen in previous studies. This may be due to more stringent aeromedical standards with advances in medical practice and underscores that this issue is not just about disability but affects aircrew operational readiness. Most cases of neurologic disease evaluated by the ACS were recommended for return to flying status.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/epidemiologia , Neurologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Faculdades de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
J Appl Meas ; 15(2): 200-12, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24950537

RESUMO

This study assessed the ability of military aircrews to adapt to stressors when undergoing centrifuge training and determined what equipment items caused perceived stress and needed to be upgraded. We used questionnaires and the Rasch model to measure aircrew personnel's ability to adapt to centrifuge training. The measurement items were ranked by 611 military aircrew personnel. Analytical results indicated that the majority of the stress perceived by aircrew personnel resulted from the lightproof cockpit without outer reference. This study prioritized the equipment requiring updating as the lightproof cockpit design, the dim lighting of the cockpit, and the pedal design. A significant difference was found between pilot and non-pilot subjects' stress from the pedal design; and considerable association was discernible between the seat angle design and flight hours accrued. The study results provide aviators, astronauts, and air forces with reliable information as to which equipment items need to be urgently upgraded as their present physiological and psychological effects can affect the effectiveness of centrifuge training.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves , Centrifugação/psicologia , Gravidade Alterada , Militares/educação , Militares/psicologia , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adaptação Psicológica , Aptidão , Humanos , Modelos Estatísticos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
8.
Mil Med ; 189(7-8): e1571-e1576, 2024 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38334294

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cervical disc displacement (CDD) may disqualify pilots from flying and have a profound impact on military unit capability. The objective of this retrospective database review is to characterize the incidence and demographic predictors of symptomatic cervical spine disc displacement in pilots of fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft and ground-based controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Defense Military Epidemiology Database was queried for first-occurrence ICD-9 code 722.0: CDD cases from 2007 to 2015. Injury count rates among aircraft groups and overall incidence per 1,000 person-years were calculated and standardized for age, gender, and military rank, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared to determine significance. RESULTS: There were 934 new cases of CDD among active duty U.S. Military pilots during the study period. The overall incidence of CDD in all pilots during this time frame was 2.715 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 2.603-2.830). Helicopter pilots had a significantly higher incidence compared to all other aircraft pilots and crew at 3.79 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 3.48-4.13). This finding remained statistically significant after standardizing for age, gender, and rank. Among all military officers, increasing age was a risk factor for CDD. CONCLUSIONS: The U.S. Military helicopter pilots have an increased risk compared to fixed-wing pilots and non-pilot controls. CDD remains a rare, though career-threatening, condition. Increased education and awareness training are warranted for both helicopter pilots and flight physicians to recognize signs and symptoms of cervical pathology. Continued investigations into preventive measures to minimize injury and time unfit for flight are warranted.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral , Militares , Pilotos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pilotos/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Vértebras Cervicais/lesões , Deslocamento do Disco Intervertebral/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Medicina Aeroespacial/métodos , Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 83(10): 1001-5, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23066624

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: It has long been believed that airline pilots are healthier than the general population. There are a number of reasons why this should be the case. However, there is very little evidence to support this belief as fact. This study investigates the health of the pilot population of an Oceanic based airline compared to the health of the general population. METHODS: Pilots who conducted their medical certificate renewal at the airline's medical unit between 1 November 2009 and 31 October 2010 were included. A medical questionnaire was completed by each pilot at the time of their medical certificate renewal. Data from the questionnaire was entered into a database as well as the pilot's BMI, blood pressure, lipid profile, and blood glucose level. The comparison population was the population who completed the New Zealand Health Survey (NZHS) between 2006-2007. Demographic, lifestyle characteristics, and health status data from the pilots was compared to the NZHS using a Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Included in the study were 595 pilots. With respect to most medical conditions, pilots had a lower prevalence when compared to the general population. Pilots had a higher prevalence of kidney disease (3.3% vs 0.6%) and melanoma skin cancer (19 per 1000 vs 0.4 per 1000). DISCUSSION: This study suggests that pilots in New Zealand are healthier than the general population with respect to most medical conditions. The two medical conditions that were identified as being overrepresented in pilots may be the result of the occupational environment.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Morbidade , Ocupações/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Visita a Consultório Médico/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
14.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 81(11): 1037-40, 2010 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21043302

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Each year, close to 2 billion passengers travel on commercial airlines. In-flight medical events result in suboptimal care due to a variety of factors. Flight diversions due to medical emergencies carry a significant financial and legal cost. The purpose of this study was to determine the causes of in-flight medical diversions from Air Canada. METHODS: This was a review of in-flight medical emergencies from 2004-2008. Both telemedicine and Air Canada databases were crossreferenced to capture all incidents. Presenting complaints were categorized by systems. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Over the 5 yr, there were 220 diversions, of which 91 (41.4%) of the decisions were made by pilots or onboard medical personnel. During this period there were 5386 telemedicine contacts with ground support providers, who on average recommended 2.4 diversions per 100 calls. The rate for diversions almost doubled from 2006 to 2007, with a sharp drop in telemedicine contacts during the same period. The four most common categories resulting in diversions were cardiac (58 diversions, 26.4%), neurological (43 diversions, 19.5%), gastrointestinal (GI) (25 diversions, 11.4%), and syncope (22 diversions, 10.0%). Only 6.8% of all diversions were due to cardiac arrest. DISCUSSION: Medical conditions most commonly leading to diversions were cardiac, neurological, gastrointestinal, and syncope. Our study showed that a decrease in telemedicine contact during this period was accompanied by an increase in diversions, while increased pre-screening of passengers did not prove effective in decreasing diversion rates.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Comércio , Humanos , Incidência , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Aviat Space Environ Med ; 81(6): 589-92, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20540452

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of panic disorder (PD) among military pilots and navigators poses questions with respect to medical care and waiver policy, but the prevalence of such disorders is unclear. We studied the epidemiology of PD in a USAF aircrew population. METHODS: Occurrence of PD during the period 2001-2008 was determined using the USAF Aeromedical Information Management Waiver Tracking System, a database containing medical disqualifications and waivers for the entire population of both qualified and disqualified (grounded) USAF aviators. RESULTS: The mean annual USAF pilot and navigator population averaged 17,727 during the study period. The database yielded nine cases labeled as PD. After records review by two experienced aeromedical psychiatrists, only three of the nine cases met diagnostic criteria for PD. Estimated annual PD prevalence was 0.002% (2/100,000) in USAF pilots and navigators. Annual prevalence of PD was 2.7% in the general U.S. population 18 yrS. of age and older and 2.4% in a group of manager/professionals. Odds ratios were 1228 (55/27,269) and 1089 (49/24,175) for the general population and manager/professionals, respectively. DISCUSSION: One of three individuals with PD received a waiver to resume flying after successful treatment. Five of the six cases not meeting criteria for PD (but suffering from varying degrees of situational and/or stress related anxiety) were flying with waivers. The negligible annual PD prevalence in USAF pilots and navigators likely reflects lower aircrew vulnerability to PD because of selection and training processes and does not pose a disease burden upon force strength.


Assuntos
Aeronaves/estatística & dados numéricos , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtorno de Pânico/epidemiologia , Segurança/estatística & dados numéricos , Adaptação Psicológica , Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Intervalos de Confiança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estresse Psicológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
J Travel Med ; 27(2)2020 03 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31180493

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study reports the global occurrence of in-flight emergency births on commercial airlines. To date, no existing research investigating in-flight emergency births has been published. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of all known in-flight births on commercial airlines between 1929 and 2018. RESULTS: Between 1929 and 2018, there were 74 infants born on 73 commercial flights. Seventy-one of the infants survived delivery, two died shortly after delivery and the status of one is unknown. Seventy-seven percent of the flights were designated international flights, and 26% of all flights were diverted due to the in-flight emergency births. The gestational age at delivery ranged from 25 to 38 weeks with 10% of the infants born at 37-38 weeks, 16% born at 34-36 weeks, 19% born at 31-33 weeks and 12% born prior to 32 weeks. Physicians, nurses, the flight crew and other medical personnel provided medical assistance in 45% of the births. CONCLUSION: In-flight emergency births are infrequent but not trivial. Commercial airlines are dependent on physicians and other medically trained passengers to help with in-flight deliveries.Despite US Federal Aviation Authority and Joint Aviation Authority standards, on-board medical and first aid kits are depleted and inadequate for in-flight deliveries.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial , Aviação , Entorno do Parto , Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aviação/estatística & dados numéricos , Entorno do Parto/estatística & dados numéricos , Emergências , Feminino , Primeiros Socorros/normas , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Parto , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sobrevida
17.
Mil Med ; 185(Suppl 1): 390-395, 2020 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Military aircrews' health status is critical to their mission readiness, as they perform physically and cognitively demanding tasks in nontraditional work environments. Research Objectives: Our objective is to develop a broad operational risk assessment framework and demonstrate its applicability to health risks to aircrews because of airborne chemical exposure, considering stressors such as heat and exertion. METHODS: Extrapolation of generic exposure standards to military aviation-specific conditions can include computation of risk-relevant internal dosimetry estimates by incorporating changes in breathing patterns and blood flow distribution because of aspects of the in-flight environment. We provide an example of the effects of exertion on peak blood concentrations of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene computed using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. RESULTS: Existing published collections on the effects of flight-related stressors on breathing patterns and blood flow address only a limited number of stressors. Although data exist that can be used to develop operational exposure limits specific to military aircrew activities, efforts to integrate this information in specific chemical assessments have been limited. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to develop operational exposure limits would benefit from guidance on how to make use of existing assessments and expanded databases of the impact of environmental stressors on adult human physiology.


Assuntos
Aeronaves/instrumentação , Substâncias Perigosas/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Medicina Aeroespacial/métodos , Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves/estatística & dados numéricos , Derivados de Benzeno/análise , Derivados de Benzeno/sangue , Substâncias Perigosas/sangue , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Estados Unidos , United States Environmental Protection Agency/organização & administração , United States Environmental Protection Agency/estatística & dados numéricos
18.
Mil Med ; 185(Suppl 1): 383-389, 2020 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074315

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Military and civil aviation have documented physiological episodes among aircrews. Therefore, continued efforts are being made to improve the internal environment. Studies have shown that exposures to many organic compounds present in emissions are known to cause a variety of physiological symptoms. We hypothesize that these compounds may reversibly inhibit acetylcholinesterase, which may disrupt synaptic signaling. As a result, neural proteins leak through the damaged blood-brain barrier into the blood and in some, elicit an autoimmune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neural-specific autoantibodies of immunoglobulin-G (IgG) class were estimated by the Western blotting technique in the sera of 26 aircrew members and compared with the sera of 19 normal healthy nonaircrew members, used as controls. RESULTS: We found significantly elevated levels of circulating IgG-class autoantibodies to neurofilament triplet proteins, tubulin, microtubule-associated tau proteins (Tau), microtubule-associated protein-2, myelin basic protein, and glial fibrillary acidic protein, but not S100 calcium-binding protein B compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSION: Repetitive physiological episodes may initiate cellular injury, leading to neuronal degeneration in selected individuals. Diagnosis and intervention should occur at early postinjury periods. Use of blood-based biomarkers to assess subclinical brain injury would help in both diagnosis and treatment.


Assuntos
Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Fenômenos Fisiológicos/fisiologia , Medicina Aeroespacial/métodos , Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves , Autoanticorpos/análise , Autoanticorpos/sangue , Biomarcadores/análise , Biomarcadores/sangue , Western Blotting/métodos , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida/análise , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida/sangue , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/análise , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Proteínas Associadas aos Microtúbulos/análise , Proteínas Associadas aos Microtúbulos/sangue , Proteína Básica da Mielina/análise , Proteína Básica da Mielina/sangue , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/análise , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/sangue , Proteínas S100/análise , Proteínas S100/sangue , Tubulina (Proteína)/análise , Tubulina (Proteína)/sangue
19.
Mil Med ; 184(3-4): e143-e147, 2019 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222264

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Female aviators with health conditions may face a variety of occupational impacts. Outcomes may include a waiver for continued flight or a permanent suspension, in which flight is no longer possible. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of medical diagnosis among female U.S. Army aviators over a ten year period and identify associations of clinical diagnoses leading to waiver or permanent suspension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a secondary data analysis; data were retrieved on 1,282 female, rated aviator patients from an Army Aviation epidemiological database. The archival dataset was composed of a total of 6,856 cases between June 2005 and June 2015. Age ranged from 19 to 58 years. The data were examined in terms of raw ICD-9 diagnostic codes, grouped system diagnoses (diagnosis categories), and occupational consequence. Spearman's rho correlations were used to determine associations between diagnosis, waiver and permanent suspension. RESULTS: The leading diagnoses were pregnancy, normal delivery, and allergic rhinitis. The systems approach yielded pregnancy, orthopedic disorders, and spinal disorders as the leading diagnosis categories. Leading waivered conditions included spinal, psychiatric, and neurological disorders. In terms of permanent suspension, the leading cause was depression, followed by migraine and post-traumatic stress disorders. In almost all diagnostic groupings, the Spearman's rho correlation coefficients between age and diagnosis were positively related. However, age was not associated with negative occupational outcome (permanent suspension), generally. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of conditions negatively impact the health and occupational status of female aviators, with disparate occupational impacts. Prevalent conditions differed from those reported previously for all aviators in a predominantly male population. The absence of cardiovascular disease is a significant change from 20-30 years ago. Among all medical diagnoses, a minority are responsible for a greater occupational burden.


Assuntos
Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Pilotos/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação da Capacidade de Trabalho , Adulto , Medicina Aeroespacial/métodos , Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Militares/psicologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform ; 90(10): 882-890, 2019 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31558197

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During flight, fast jet pilots frequently move their heads into extreme positions while withstanding large amounts of stress on their cervical spines. These factors are thought to contribute to episodes of neck pain.METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous neck pain prevalence data in fast jet pilots to determine an overall pooled prevalence. Subgroup analyses were performed according to when pilots complained about their neck pain, whether these same pilots sought treatment, and if they lost time from flying. Four research databases were searched. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were written in English, involved a group of fast jet pilots who were actively flying high performance aircraft, and reported quantitative prevalence data about neck pain in these pilots. These eligibility criteria were independently applied by two reviewers and risk of bias was evaluated. MetaXL software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.RESULTS: In total, 8003 fast jet pilots across 18 eligible studies were included in the review. The overall pooled prevalence of neck pain in fast jet pilots was 51%. It was found that 39% of subjects lost time from flying, while only 32% sought medical treatment.DISCUSSION: Neck pain in fast jet pilots adversely affects operational capabilities of defense forces. The prevalence of neck pain varies according to the definitions or thresholds of complaints used across the literature. Further research is required to standardize the definition of neck pain.Riches A, Spratford W, Witchalls J, Newman P. A systemic review and meta-analysis about the prevalence of neck pain in fast jet pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019; 90(10):882-890.


Assuntos
Medicina Aeroespacial/estatística & dados numéricos , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Cervicalgia/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Pilotos/estatística & dados numéricos , Aeronaves , Humanos , Prevalência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa