Agonist antibody to MuSK protects mice from MuSK myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic and severe disease of the skeletal neuromuscular junction (NMJ) in which the effects of neurotransmitters are attenuated, leading to muscle weakness. In the most common forms of autoimmune MG, antibodies attack components of the postsynaptic membrane, including the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) or muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). MuSK, a master regulator of NMJ development, associates with the low-density lipoprotein-related receptor 4 (Lrp4) to form the signaling receptor for neuronal Agrin, a nerve-derived synaptic organizer. Pathogenic antibodies to MuSK interfere with binding between MuSK and Lrp4, inhibiting the differentiation and maintenance of the NMJ. MuSK MG can be debilitating and refractory to treatments that are effective for AChR MG. We show here that recombinant antibodies, derived from MuSK MG patients, cause severe neuromuscular disease in mice. The disease can be prevented by a MuSK agonist antibody, presented either prophylactically or after disease onset. These findings suggest a therapeutic alternative to generalized immunosuppression for treating MuSK MG by selectively and directly targeting the disease mechanism.

Mendelian randomization and colocalization analysis reveal novel drug targets for myasthenia gravis.

OBJECTIVE: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a complex autoimmune disease affecting the neuromuscular junction with limited drug options, but the field of MG treatment recently benefits from novel biological agents. We performed a drug-targeted Mendelian randomization (MR) study to identify novel therapeutic targets of MG. METHODS: Cis-expression quantitative loci (cis-eQTL), which proxy expression levels for 2176 druggable genes, were used for MR analysis. Causal relationships between genes and disease, identified by eQTL MR analysis, were verified by comprehensive sensitivity, colocalization, and protein quantitative loci (pQTL) MR analyses. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis was also performed to extend targets, followed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to explore the serum level of drug targets in MG patients. A phenome-wide MR analysis was then performed to assess side effects with a clinical trial review assessing druggability. RESULTS: The eQTL MR analysis has identified eight potential targets for MG, one for early-onset MG and seven for late-onset MG. Further colocalization analyses indicated that CD226, CDC42BPB, PRSS36, and TNFSF12 possess evidence for colocalization with MG or late-onset MG. pQTL MR analyses identified the causal relations of TNFSF12 and CD226 with MG and late-onset MG. Furthermore, PPI analysis has revealed the protein interaction between TNFSF12-TNFSF13(APRIL) and TNFSF12-TNFSF13B(BLyS). Elevated TNFSF13 serum level of MG patients was also identified by ELISA experiments. This study has ultimately proposed three promising therapeutic targets (TNFSF12, TNFSF13, TNFSF13B) of MG. CONCLUSIONS: Three drug targets associated with the BLyS/APRIL pathway have been identified. Multiple biological agents, including telitacicept and belimumab, are promising for MG therapy.

Clinical outcome and peripheral immune profile of myasthenic crisis with omicron infections: A prospective cohort study.

The impact of Omicron infections on the clinical outcome and immune responses of myasthenia gravis (MG) remained largely unknown. From a prospective multicenter MG cohort (n = 189) with 197 myasthenic crisis (MC), we finally included 41 independent MG patients to classify into two groups: the Omicron Group (n = 13) and the Control Group (n = 28). In this matched cohort study, all-cause mortality was 7.69% (1/13) in Omicron Group and 14.29% (4/28) in Control Group. A higher proportion of elevated serum IL-6 was identified in the Omicron Group (88.89% vs 52.38%, P = 0.049). In addition, the proportions of CD3+CD8+T in lymphocytes and Tregs in CD3+CD4+ T cells were significantly elevated in the Omicron Group (both P = 0.0101). After treatment, the Omicron Group exhibited a marked improvement in MG-ADL score (P = 0.026) and MG-QoL-15 (P = 0.0357). MCs with Omicron infections were associated with elevated serum IL-6 and CD3+CD8+T response. These patients tended to present a better therapeutic response after fast-acting therapies and anti-IL-6 treatment.

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in adults with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Numerous clinical trials for myasthenia gravis (MG) treatment have been conducted recently, with satisfactory cognitive and clinical results. However, due to the limited evidence for direct comparison of the safety and effectiveness of various drugs, there is a need for further exploration of the advantages and disadvantages of different monoclonal antibodies and immunosuppressants. Thus, in the present network meta-analysis (NMA), we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in treating MG. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between January 1, 2000 and March 6, 2024. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.3), JAGS, and STATA (version 15.0). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value was calculated to assess the potential efficacy of each drug and the likelihood of adverse events (AEs), with higher SUCRA values indicating better efficacy or a lower likelihood of AEs. This NMA included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 13 drugs and 1,657 patients. Based on changes in Quantitative MG and MG Composite scores, batoclimab was most likely to exert the best therapeutic effects, with SUCRA values of 99% and 92%, respectively. Rozanolixzumab performed better than the other drugs in terms of the MG Activities of Daily Living score (85%). Eculizumab exhibited the highest potential in reducing the 15-item revised version of the MG Quality of Life score (96%). Regarding safety, belimumab had the highest SUCRA value (85%), demonstrating the lowest likelihood of AEs. In conclusion, all immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies analyzed in this study were more effective than the placebo in treating MG, with rozanolixzumab and batoclimab potentially being the most effective. Regarding safety, rozanolixzumab exhibited a higher likelihood of AEs than did placebo. The conclusions guide the clinical selection of effective drugs and offer insights for future drug experiments.

Comorbidity of Myasthenia gravis and Graves' disease as immune reconstitution-associated autoimmune disease in HIV infection: A case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidity of Myasthenia gravis (MG) and Graves' disease (GD) in treated HIV-infected individuals has rarely been described and little study has been done on the link between HIV-related immune reconstitution and autoimmune diseases occurring post antiretroviral therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we report on a 33-year-old Chinese man with HIV infection who had been virologically suppressed since 2018. The patient was diagnosed with GD and was treated in 2020. Early in 2022, he developed fluctuating weakness and fatigue involving the bilateral extraocular muscles and limbs. With a positive neostigmine test, he was considered to have MG, but showed a poor response to oral medication. After multiple failed medication attempts, a thymectomy was finally performed to resolve his symptoms. The consecutive onset of immunological events may have partially resulted from immune reconstitution after viral control. CONCLUSIONS: This is a rare case of HIV-related immune reconstitution-associated autoimmune disease (IRAD) with comorbidity of MG and GD which was reported initially. Cooperation with multidisciplinary teams is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and to promote the overall health of HIV-infected patients.

Measuring treatment adverse event burden in myasthenia gravis: Single-center prospective evaluation utilizing the Adverse Event Unit (AEU).

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: We developed a patient- and physician-weighted consensus unit called the adverse event unit (AEU) that quantifies and compares adverse event (AE) burden among any group of medications in neurological patients. In this study we evaluated preliminary validity and feasibility of measuring AE burden with the AEU in myasthenia gravis (MG). METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, 1-year, observational study of adult MG patients presenting for routine care between April 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022. The MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), the 15-item MG Quality of Life revised (MG-QOL15r), MG-Composite, and AEU scores were obtained at all visits. A priori primary feasibility metric was AEU completion rate equal to (within 3.8%, one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]) or better than MG-ADL completion rate. Time to administer AEU and MG-ADL/MG-QOL15r, correlation between AEU total score and MG-QOL15r, and median AEU scores for each MG medication were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients completed 67 study visits; side effects were reported at 75% of the visits. The study met the primary feasibility endpoint; AEU and MG-ADL were recorded at all visits. Times to administer the AEU (median 5 minutes) and MG-ADL/MG-QOL15r were similar. We observed a weak correlation of 0.29 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.51, P = .032) between AEU and MG-QOL15r scores. Non-statistically significant differences in median AEU scores were observed among MG medications. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrate preliminary feasibility and validity of using the AEU to measure AE burden in MG. Future studies will compare AE burden among MG treatments and evaluate clinically meaningful AEU scores in MG.

Single institution experience with efgartigimod in patients with myasthenia gravis: Patient selection, dosing schedules, treatment response, and adverse events.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Efgartigimod is a neonatal Fc receptor blocker and was the first approved medication in its class for the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). As a novel therapy, little is known about the use of efgartigimod in clinical practice. This study aims to describe how efgartigimod is being incorporated into the current therapeutic landscape of MG. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 17 patients with gMG treated with efgartigimod at the University of Pennsylvania between January 2022 and June 2023. RESULTS: Efgartigimod was selected mainly for patients who were treatment refractory, had side effects to other treatments, and/or required quick improvement in their symptoms. All patients had been previously treated with at least one medication for MG and had an average baseline Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of 9.1. The patients treated with efgartigimod improved their MG-ADL score by an average of 5.5 points at 3 months (p < .001) and 7.1 points by 6 months (p < .001). Forty percent of patients achieved minimal symptom expression. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 43.7% of patients on efgartigimod, the most common being mild infection (urinary tract infection and thrush). There were no serious AEs. DISCUSSION: This study found efgartigimod to be efficacious, well tolerated, and safe in patients with MG. Efgartigimod should be considered as an add-on therapy, a bridge therapy, or as a monotherapy if patients have difficulty tolerating other treatments.

Retrospective review of patients with myasthenia gravis switched from plasma exchange therapy to efgartigimod treatment.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is sometimes used as maintenance therapy for the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). Efgartigimod is a newly approved monoclonal antibody targeting the neonatal Fc receptor, effectively reducing immunoglobulin G levels in the treatment of MG. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical experience of switching patients from maintenance TPE treatment to efgartigimod infusions. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on patients previously treated with maintenance TPE for the diagnosis of MG and subsequently switched to efgartigimod infusions. Clinical characteristics and response to treatment switch were described. RESULTS: Five of seven patients demonstrated improvement on Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America-post intervention status, one was unchanged and one was in pharmacological remission. This was reflected in pre- and postswitch MG activities of daily living and MG manual muscle testing scores. All patients have continued on efgartigimod therapy. The duration of treatment with efgartigimod at the time of this review ranged from 1 to 13 months. Recurrent uncomplicated infections were noted in two patients on efgartigimod therapy. Maintenance dosing regimens of efgartigimod varied based on clinical response to treatment and side effects. DISCUSSION: In this series, efgartigimod appeared effective and well tolerated in patients switched from TPE.

How should newer therapeutic agents be incorporated into the treatment of patients with myasthenia gravis?

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a postsynaptic neuromuscular junction disorder that results in fatigable muscle weakness. The traditional treatment approach includes the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and steroid-sparing immunosuppressant therapies (ISTs) for chronic management, whereas exacerbations and crises are managed with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PLEX). Over the past 6 years, four new therapeutic agents with novel immunological mechanisms of action-complement and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition-were approved as a result of clinically significant improvement in gMG symptoms of those treated with these newer agents in Phase 3 clinical trials. At present, it is unclear when and in whom to initiate these therapeutic agents and how to integrate them into the current treatment paradigm. When selecting a newer therapeutic agent, we use a simple equation: Value = Clinical Improvement/(Cost + Side Effects + Treatment Burden), which guides our decision-making. We consider using these novel therapeutic agents in two specific clinical situations. Firstly, the newer agents are fast-acting, suggesting they can be used in clinically unstable patients as "bridge therapy," and secondly, they provide additional options for those patients considered treatment-refractory. There are downsides, however, including treatment cost, unique side effect profiles, and intravenous and subcutaneous drug administration (though for some, this may be an advantage). As additional drugs enter the marketplace with unique mechanisms of action, routes of administration, and dosing schedules, the placement of the novel therapeutic agents in the gMG treatment algorithm will likely evolve.

Efgartigimod in refractory autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc-receptor inhibitor, has recently been approved as treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to systematically assess short- and long-term effectiveness of efgartigimod in patients with refractory MG. METHODS: Sixteen patients with refractory autoimmune acetylcholine receptor MG were treated with efgartigimod. Data were collected from January 2021 to March 2023 on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (MGC) and the 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life questionnaire (MG-QoL15r). RESULTS: A favorable outcome was seen in 56% of patients at the last measurement. Out of 16 patients, 50% were an MG-ADL responder after the first treatment cycle. After 4 weeks, a clinically meaningful improvement compared to baseline was seen on the MG-ADL, QMG, and MGC. There was a statistically significant improvement on the MGQoL15r from baseline to week 4. The improvement was maintained until the last measurement for the MGC and the MGQoL15r. At the last visit, all patients had discontinued 4-weekly dosages, shifting to administration frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 weeks. Drug doses could be decreased for prednisolone (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2), and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 9). Frequency of plasma exchange was decreased in nine patients. DISCUSSION: In patients with refractory MG, efgartigimod was effective for at least half of all patients. Patients required more frequent dosing compared to the ADAPT phase 3 trial. In 80% of the patients concurrent medication could be reduced or discontinued.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis. METHODS: Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients. DISCUSSION: Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Burden of illness and costs in patients with myasthenia gravis currently receiving treatment in the United States.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: If myasthenia gravis (MG) symptoms are inadequately controlled, patients may experience exacerbations or life-threatening myasthenic crises. Patients with inadequately controlled MG symptoms tend to be treated with chronic intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy and/or multiple immunosuppressant therapies (ISTs). This study aimed to examine disease burden, healthcare resource utilization, and associated costs in these patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using a claims database. Patients with MG were classified into three cohorts based on treatment over a 1-y follow-up period: (a) treated with four or more IVIg episodes (chronic IVIg cohort); (b) received two or more non-steroidal ISTs (NSISTs) sequentially (multiple NSIST cohort); (c) received neither chronic IVIg nor multiple NSISTs (reference cohort). Incidences of crises and exacerbations and annual healthcare costs in each cohort were estimated. RESULTS: In total, 3516 patients with MG were included in the analysis. Compared with the reference cohort (n = 2992), the MG crisis rate was approximately twice as high in both the chronic IVIg (n = 324) and multiple NSIST (n = 291) cohorts (p < 0.001); and the MG exacerbation rate was approximately four-fold higher in the chronic IVIg cohort (p < 0.001) and three-fold higher in the multiple NSIST cohort (p < 0.001). Median annual MG-related inflation-adjusted total healthcare costs were higher in the chronic IVIg ($81,900) and multiple NSIST ($30,300) cohorts than in the reference cohort ($2540). DISCUSSION: The burden of crises/exacerbations was substantially higher and healthcare costs were considerably greater in patients with MG treated with chronic IVIg or multiple NSISTs than in patients not receiving these treatments.

Novel uses of complement inhibitors in myasthenia gravis-Two case reports.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, life-threatening immune-related adverse effect (irAE) of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. C5-complement inhibitors are effective treatments for acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR ab) positive generalized MG. We describe the use of eculizumab/ravulizumab in two patients with MG receiving concomitant pembrolizumab. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of two medical records. RESULTS: Patient 1: An 80-year-old male with recurrent, non-muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder developed ICI-induced AChR ab positive MG (ICI-MG), myositis, and myocarditis 2 weeks after the first dose of pembrolizumab. Myositis responded to corticosteroids. MG responded to eculizumab, followed by ravulizumab. He died of metastatic cancer 8 months later. Patient 2: A 58-year-old male had refractory thymoma-associated AChR ab-positive MG, which responded to eculizumab. He developed metastatic Merkel cell cancer necessitating pembrolizumab. MG remained stable on eculizumab. He had no irAEs for 22 months, with positron emission tomographic resolution of cancer. He then developed mild, indolent retinal vasculitis, which responded to prednisone. Discontinuation of pembrolizumab for 5 months resulted in cancer recurrence; pembrolizumab was resumed with peri-infusion pulse prednisone. MG remained stable and he continues eculizumab. DISCUSSION: In the first patient, eculizumab, followed by ravulizumab, improved ICI-MG. In the second patient, eculizumab treatment may have had a prophylactic effect on the development of ICI-induced irAEs. The effect of complement inhibition on cancer outcomes of ICI therapy is unknown. A possible biologic basis for complement inhibitors in reducing irAEs of ICI, especially in the presence of underlying autoimmune disease, merits evaluation.

The impact of patients' pre-treatment expectations on immunosuppressive treatment outcomes in myasthenia gravis: A pilot correlational study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The impact of treatment expectations on active treatment outcomes has not been specifically investigated in neuromuscular disorders. We thus explored in myasthenia gravis (MG) the contribution of patients' pre-treatment expectations combined with an immunosuppressant drug on treatment outcomes. METHODS: This pilot correlational study involved 17 patients with generalized MG, scheduled to start immunosuppressant azathioprine. At baseline, a healthcare professional administered: (i) the Stanford Expectations of Treatment Scale; (ii) a structured checklist paper form asking patients which side-effects they expected to develop after starting azathioprine, coupled with a standardized framing of statements. Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score and daily dose of concomitant drugs were assessed by neurologists as clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes and side-effects were re-assessed at 3 and 6 months, and clinical outcomes were monitored at 18 months. RESULTS: Clinically significant improvement in the QMG scores was achieved at 3 or 6 months. The level of state anxiety appeared to act as moderator of pre-treatment negative expectations (strong, positive, indicative correlation, rs = .733, p = .001). The latter were, in turn, associated with the fulfillment of side-effects that patients expected to develop with the new treatment (moderate, positive, indicative correlation, rs = .699, p = .002). No significant correlation emerged between positive and negative expectations. DISCUSSION: Our findings show a very quick clinical response and also suggest that patients' expectations and anxiety contributed to treatment outcomes, highlighting the importance of promoting safety messages and education strategies around newly introduced treatments. Future goals include evaluating a larger cohort that includes a matched control group.

Refocusing generalized myasthenia gravis: Patient burden, disease profiles, and the role of evolving therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) continues to present significant challenges for clinical management due to an unpredictable disease course, frequent disease fluctuations, and varying response to therapy. The recent availability of new pharmacologic therapies presents a valuable opportunity to reevaluate how this disease is classified, assessed, and managed and identify new ways to improve the clinical care of patients with gMG. METHODS: Narrative review was made of publications identified via searches of PubMed and selected congresses (January 2000-September 2022). RESULTS: New consensus definitions are required to ensure consistency, to better characterize patients, and to identify patients who will benefit from specific drugs and earlier use of these agents. There is a need for more frequent, standardized patient assessment to identify the cause of motor function deficits, provide a clearer picture of the disease burden and its impact on daily living and quality of life (QoL), and better support treatment decision-making. Novel approaches that target different components of the immune system will play a role in more precise treatment of patients with gMG, alongside the development of new algorithms to guide individualized patient management. CONCLUSIONS: gMG has a physical, mental, and social impact, resulting in a considerable burden of disease and substantially decreased QoL, despite standard treatments. The availability of novel, targeted treatments that influence key pathological mediators of gMG, together with new biomarkers, offers the potential to optimize patient management and ultimately enables a greater number of patients to achieve minimal manifestation status and a reduced burden of disease.

Efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis: A real-life experience at a national reference center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inhibition of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) for IgG is a promising new therapeutic strategy for antibody-mediated disorders. We report our real-life experience with efgartigimod (EFG) in 19 patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) along a clinical follow-up of 14 months. METHODS: EFG was administered according to the GENERATIVE protocol (consisting of a Fixed period of two treatment cycles [given 1 month apart] of four infusions at weekly intervals, followed by a Flexible period of re-cycling in case of worsening). Eight patients were positive for acetylcholine receptor antibody, four for muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibody, and two for lipoprotein-related protein 4 antibody, and five were classified as triple negative. Efficacy of EFG was assessed by the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Myasthenia Gravis Composite, and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis scales. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of patients needed three treatment cycles, 26% needed four, and 21% needed five along the 14-month clinical follow-up. Meaningful improvement was observed at the end of each cycle with the clinical scores adopted. EFG had a dramatic effect on disease course, as during the year before treatment eight of 19 patients (42%) were hospitalized, and 15 of 19 (79%) needed treatment with plasma exchange or immunoglobulins; three of 19 (16%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. During EFG, none of the patients was hospitalized and only one patient required plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulins. No major side effects or infusion-related reactions occurred. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that EFG was safe and modified significantly the course of the disease along a 14-month follow-up. Our experience strengthens the role of FcRn inhibition as an effective new tool for long-term treatment of gMG.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Double-seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSNMG) is defined as myasthenia gravis (MG) without detectable or low affinity antibodies to acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). There are limited data on detailed clinical features and outcomes after treatment in dSNMG patients. The aim was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in dSNMG patients based on MG scales. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with MG who had negative AChR or MuSK antibodies and they were compared with an AChR-positive MG cohort. Correlations were made with data from the first and last clinic visits, between demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and disease severity, based on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America category, Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII), Patient Acceptable Symptom State and simple single question (SSQ). RESULTS: Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria for dSNMG. The baseline MGII and SSQ scores in the dSNMG cohort showed no significant differences from the AChR group (p = 0.94 and p = 0.46). The dSNMG cohort MGII and SSQ scores improved significantly at the last clinical evaluation (p = 0.001 and p = 0.047). The MGII improvement in the AChR cohort was significantly better (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The initial severity of dSNMG based on clinical scores is similar to antibody-positive MG patients. There is significant clinical improvement in dSNMG patients after therapy, measured in the last clinical evaluation. This supports an immune pathophysiology of many dSNMG patients.

Effect of efgartigimod on muscle group subdomains in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis: post hoc analyses of the phase 3 pivotal ADAPT study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare, chronic, neuromuscular autoimmune disease mediated by pathogenic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies. Patients with gMG experience debilitating muscle weakness, resulting in impaired mobility, speech, swallowing, vision and respiratory function. Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment engineered for increased binding affinity to neonatal Fc receptor. The neonatal Fc receptor blockade by efgartigimod competitively inhibits endogenous IgG binding, leading to decreased IgG recycling and increased degradation resulting in lower IgG concentration. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of efgartigimod were evaluated in the ADAPT study. Key efficacy outcome measures included Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. Efgartigimod demonstrated significant improvement in both the MG-ADL and QMG scores. This post hoc analysis aimed to determine whether all subdomains of MG-ADL and QMG improved with efgartigimod treatment. Individual items of MG-ADL and QMG were grouped into four subdomains: bulbar, ocular, limb/gross motor and respiratory. Change from baseline over 10 weeks in each subdomain was calculated for each group. RESULTS: Greater improvements from baseline were seen across MG-ADL subdomains in participants treated with efgartigimod compared with placebo. These improvements were typically observed 1 to 2 weeks after the first infusion and correlated with reductions in IgG. Similar results were observed across most QMG subdomains. CONCLUSIONS: These post hoc analyses of MG-ADL and QMG subdomain data from ADAPT suggest that efgartigimod is beneficial in improving muscle function and strength across all muscle groups, leading to the observed efficacy in participants with gMG.

Overcoming therapeutic challenges: Successful management of a supposedly triple seronegative, refractory generalized myasthenia gravis patient with efgartigimod.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to highlight neonatal Fc receptor inhibition (efgartigimod) as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) and to emphasize the concept that seronegative MG is greatly constrained by the limitations of currently available diagnostic methods and therapeutic measures. METHODS: We describe the first refractory, generalized MG (gMG) patient successfully treated with efgartigimod after testing negative on standard autoantibody detection tests. RESULTS: Our patient presented with severe fluctuating bulbar and generalized weakness, resulting in multiple myasthenic crises requiring intubation. After a 28-year medical history of multiple failed lines of treatment, our patient was started on efgartigimod. Over five treatment cycles, a definite improvement in her clinical condition was observed (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class: IIIb to IIb; MG-Activities of Daily Living score: 11 to 0; MG-Quality of Life 15 score: 30 to 0; Quantitative MG score: 28 to 6). Standard autoantibody detection tests failed to detect known pathogenic autoantibodies, but cell-based assay (CBA) identified autoantibodies against clustered adult acetylcholine receptor (AChR). CONCLUSIONS: In light of recent approvals of efgartigimod by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration exclusively for AChR-positive gMG forms, our case highlights evidence suggesting that such an approach might be shortsighted and could limit therapeutic options for patients with refractory seronegative gMG. Additionally, introducing more sensitive analytical techniques, exemplified by CBA, may help bridge the gap between seronegative and seropositive patients. This represents an urgent unmet need for gMG patients, as the antibody profile dramatically influences the therapeutic approach.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical study of telitacicept in adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of telitacicept in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) who tested positive for acetylcholine receptor antibodies or muscle-specific kinase antibodies and were receiving standard-of-care therapy. METHODS: Patients meeting the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned to receive telitacicept subcutaneously once a week for 24 weeks in addition to standard-of-care treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score from baseline to week 24. Secondary efficacy endpoints included mean change in QMG score from baseline to week 12 and gMG clinical absolute score from baseline to week 24. Additionally, safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of the 41 patients screened were randomly selected and enrolled. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) reduction in QMG score from baseline to week 24 was 7.7 (± 5.34) and 9.6 (± 4.29) in the 160 mg and 240 mg groups, respectively. At week 12, mean reductions in QMG scores for these two groups were 5.8 (± 5.85) and 9.5 (± 5.03), respectively, indicating rapid clinical improvement. Safety analysis revealed no adverse events leading to discontinuation or mortalities. All patients showed consistent reductions in serum immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG and IgM levels throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Telitacicept demonstrated safety, good tolerability and reduced clinical severity throughout the study period. Further validation of the clinical efficacy of telitacicept in gMG will be conducted in an upcoming phase 3 clinical trial.