Prognostic Factors for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all prognostic factors for advanced colorectal neoplasia (aCRN, high-grade dysplasia, or CRC) in patients with IBD. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted according to the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Random-effects models were created separately for odds and hazard ratios, different study designs, and univariable or multivariable data. The evidence for all prognostic factors was categorized as "weak", "moderate", or "strong", based on estimate of effect sizes, heterogeneity, and risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 164 studies were included, allowing pooled analysis of 31 potential prognostic factors. In the univariable analysis, the evidence for extensive disease was classified as strong while evidence for low-grade dysplasia, strictures, primary sclerosing cholangitis, post-inflammatory polyps, family history of CRC, and ulcerative colitis versus Crohn's disease was considered moderate. Evidence for any dysplasia, colon segment resection, aneuploidy, male sex, and age was classified as weak. In addition, histologic inflammation was identified as a risk factor in multivariable analysis (weak evidence). The evidence for the protective factors colonoscopic surveillance, 5-Aminosalicylic Acid, thiopurines, and smoking was moderate in univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis provided weak evidence for statin use. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we identified 13 risk factors and 5 protective factors for aCRN in IBD patients, based on univariable and/or multivariable pooled analyses. These findings might lay the groundwork for an improved CRC risk stratification-based surveillance in IBD.

Expression of CA2 and CA9 carbonic anhydrases in ulcerative colitis and ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by chronic inflammation in the colonic mucosa and submucosa with repeating relapse and remission, but the pathogenesis is unknown. Patients with long-standing UC are at high risk of neoplasm development. The aim of the present study was to identify molecules whose expression is associated with UC and UC-associated colorectal cancer (UCCA). Biopsy specimens from UC and normal colonic mucosae were analyzed using a proteomics approach, in which carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) was identified as a molecule downregulated in UC mucosae. Immunohistochemically, CA2 expression was detected in normal and diverticulitis mucosal epithelia, and its expression decreased as UC activity increased. CA2 expression was almost undetectable in UCCA. We also analyzed the expression of another carbonic anhydrase, CA9, and its upstream molecule, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), both of which are induced under hypoxic conditions. It was revealed that CA9 expression was relatively low in normal, diverticulitis and UC mucosae, and was upregulated in UCCA. HIF-1α expression was consistently low in all tissue types examined. In conclusion, these results suggest that CA2 and CA9 may be possible indicators of UC activity and UCCA development, respectively.

Methylation Analysis of Colitis-Associated Colorectal Carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis is a well-known inflammatory bowel disease. Patients have an increased risk of developing colitis associated carcinoma (CAC). It is important for patient management to be able to distinguish between ulcerative colitis associated carcinoma and sporadic carcinoma (sCRC). However, this distinction is frequently very challenging. It is not readily possible to differentiate this histologically. However, the diagnosis is crucial for the patient's further treatment and follow-up. An attempt was therefore made to develop a diagnostic regime that would enable a reliable distinction between sCRC and CAC. METHODS: We screened 96 patients analyzing more than 850,000 methylation hotspots, to detect distinct epigenetic patterns between both types of carcinomas. Patients with sporadic carcinoma and colitis-associated carcinoma as well as patients with normal colon and patients with confirmed ulcerative colitis without neoplasia were used for the analysis. By extensively filtering the results, methylation sites relevant to distinguish between CAC and sCRC were identified. RESULTS: After the results were filtered, three methylation sites relevant to distinguish between CAC and sCRC were identified. For this purpose, methylation limit values were defined, which favor the samples as CAC or sCRC up to a certain methylation value of the methylation sites. The combination of three methylation sites allows a correct assignment to CAC or sCRC in 94.5% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The results show that these three methylation sites are promising markers in the diagnosis of CAC vs sCRC. Nevertheless, the diagnosis should always be made in conjunction with histomorphological analyses.

Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colitis-associated Colorectal Cancer - Current Concepts, Future Trends.

Colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC) remains a critical complication of ulcerative colitis (UC) with a mortality of approximately 15%, which makes early CAC diagnosis crucial. The current standard of surveillance, with repetitive colonoscopies and histological testing of biopsied mucosa samples, is burdensome and expensive, and therefore less invasive methods and reliable biomarkers are needed. Significant progress has been made, thanks to continuous extensive research in this field, however, no clinically relevant biomarker has been established so far. This review of the current literature presents the genetic and molecular differences between CAC and sporadic colorectal cancer and covers progress made in the early detection of CAC carcinogenesis. It focuses on biomarkers under development, which can easily be tested in samples of body fluids or breath and, once made clinically available, will help to differentiate between progressors (UC patients who will develop dysplasia) from non-progressors and enable early intervention to decrease the risk of cancer development.

Topical application of Chlorin e6-PVP (Ce6-PVP) for improved endoscopic detection of neoplastic lesions in a murine colitis-associated cancer model.

Screening colonoscopy is crucial in reducing the mortality of colorectal cancer. However, detecting adenomas against the backdrop of an inflamed mucosa (e.g. in ulcerative colitis) remains exceedingly difficult. Therefore, we aimed to improve neoplastic lesion detection by employing a fluorescence-based endoscopic approach. We used the well-established murine AOM/DSS model to induce inflammation-driven carcinogenesis in the colon. In our diagnostic approach, we evaluated Chlorin e6 polyvinylpyrrolidone (Ce6-PVP)-based fluorescence endoscopy in comparison to standard white-light endoscopy. A specialized pathologist then analyzed the histology of the detected lesions. Complementary in vitro studies were performed using human cell lines and a murine organoid system. Ce6-PVP-based fluorescence endoscopy had an improved detection rate of 100% (8/8) in detecting high-grade dysplasias and carcinomas over white-light detection alone with 75% (6/8). Trade-off for this superior detection rate was an increased rate of false positive lesions with an increase in the false discovery rate from 45% for white-light endoscopy to 81% for fluorescence endoscopy. We demonstrate in a proof-of-concept study that Ce6-PVP-based fluorescence endoscopy is a highly sensitive red flag technology to identify biopsy-worthy lesions in the colon.