Does Maxillomandibular Fixation Technique Affect Occlusion Quality in Segmental LeFort I Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND: Segmental maxillary osteotomies require precise occlusal control due to variability in individual segment positioning. The role of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) technique on occlusal control has not been validated. PURPOSE: The purpose is to measure and compare the accuracy of occlusal positioning among MMF techniques. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a double-blinded in vitro study on experiment models to simulate a 3-piece LeFort I osteotomy. The models were constricted posteriorly and expanded using 3 different MMF techniques and compared to the unaltered baseline occlusion. Based on sample size calculation, 32 separate attempts were made for each MMF technique. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was MMF technique (brackets, MMF screws, and embrasure wires). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was the visual occlusal analysis score, a 1.00 to 4.00 continuous scale measuring the similarity of the achieved occlusion to the planned (control) occlusion assessed by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon and an orthodontist. High visual occlusal analysis score indicated greater occlusal accuracy, with 3.50 defined as the threshold for accuracy. The secondary outcome variable was the linear error of the achieved occlusion at the canine and first molar teeth, with lower error indicating greater accuracy. An a priori accuracy threshold of 0.5 mm was set for this variable. COVARIATES: None. ANALYSES: Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc testing was used to analyze the difference in the outcome variables of interest. P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two attempts for each technique showed that brackets had higher VAOS than MMF screws and embrasure wires (median differences 1.49 and 0.48, P < .001), and had lower linear occlusal error (median differences 0.35 to 0.99 mm, P < .001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: MMF technique influences the quality of occlusal control, with greater visual rating scores and lower linear errors seen with brackets than with embrasure wires or MMF screws.

Surgical Protocol for a Safe Lateral Nasal Wall Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the anatomy and anatomic variations of the lateral nasal wall area to identify safe access points, determine the optimum osteotomy line for Le Fort I osteotomies, and define a surgical protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The angulations and widths of 160 lateral nasal walls and the distances of the greater palatine canal were measured on axial images from coronal sections 5 mm over the deepest point of the nasal base. RESULTS: The average angle between the anterior lateral nasal wall and the medial maxillary sinus wall was 160 degrees in females and 165.67 degrees in males for the right and 155.90 degrees in females and 163.22 degrees in males for the left side. Statistically significant differences were found in the lengths, angulations, and widths of the lateral nasal walls between females and males. CONCLUSION: This study described the mean angulations and linear distances between anatomic structures of the lateral nasal wall and it defines the "Medipol protocol" for a safe osteotomy.

The Precise Midline Positioning Instrument for Le Fort I Osteotomy.

To reduce the deviations in the horizontal direction of posterior maxilla during the maxilla Le Fort I osteotomy, the authors develop and validate the precise midline positioning instrument for Le Fort I osteotomy, which can guide the precise relocation of the truncated maxillary bone segment. The patent application for the precise midline positioning instrument for Le Fort I osteotomy is already submitted (patent no: 201711245533.6, China). The accuracy of Le Fort I osteotomy can be improved significantly, because of the amplification effect of this patent on the rotation/micro-movement of the posterior maxilla in all directions to achieve the precise movement and pairing of the maxillary bone segment. And this method is simple, efficient, and laborsaving.

Custom-Made Titanium Miniplates Associated With Ultrahigh-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene Graft in Orthognathic Surgery: An Adjunct to Maxillary Advancement.

Patients with considerable maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies and maxillary hypoplasia require corrective treatment through orthognathic surgery. However, in the treatment of severe maxillary retrognathism, it is necessary to reconstruct areas of bone deficiency through grafting techniques in addition to maxillary advancement using only the Le Fort I osteotomy. Treatment in these patients is more challenging and requires high surgical predictability. Alloplastic materials often have been used for the reconstruction of poor bone contours. Ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is currently an excellent filler material for poor bone regions and is a good substitute for autografts and other alloplastic materials for its unique properties, including high biocompatibility. Insertion of this material in the fixation system customized for virtually planned orthognathic surgeries is an innovative technique. This report describes the insertion of UHMWPE into custom-made titanium miniplates manufactured by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technology for orthognathic surgery consisting of maxillary advancement and mandibular retrusion to treat a patient with Crouzon syndrome, Class III malocclusion, and severe maxillary retrognathism.

Internal Distraction Resulted in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes for Midface Hypoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Both internal and external distraction devices have been used successfully in correcting midface hypoplasia. Although the indication for surgery and the osteotomy techniques may be similar, deciding when to use internal versus external devices has not been studied. The authors studied patient-reported outcomes with FACE-Q and functional surveys for internal and external devices for midface distraction patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent distraction advancement after Le Fort I and Le Fort III were surveyed using the FACE-Q survey and a functional survey. Equal groups of internal and external device patients were compared (n = 64). Data recorded included: sex, age, follow-up, diagnosis, operating room time, expected blood loss, length of stay, distraction length, consolidation time, and complications. RESULTS: Internal and external device groups were similar with regards to patient diagnosis, operative time, expected blood loss, distraction length but consolidation times differed (internal = 3.6 versus external = 1.1 months). For FACE-Q appearance appraisal, there were similarities in domain and scale. For the functional survey (airway/breathing, ocular/vision, occlusion/eating, speech/articulation), there was also similar scoring. However, internal device patients had superior FACE-Q scores for Quality of Life: Social Function (80.9 versus 68.9), Early Life Impact (92.9 versus 62.4), Dental Anxiety (70.2 versus 48.3), Psychological Well-being (87.8 versus 68.6); and Decision Satisfaction (81.2 versus 56.9) and Outcome Satisfaction (91.0 versus 84.7). CONCLUSIONS: Internal and external midface distraction patients had similar patient-reported outcomes for appearance and functional improvement; however, internal device patients were more satisfied with their quality of life and their decision to undergo the procedure.

Technical Modifications for Intraoral Quadrangular Le Fort II Osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II osteotomy (IQLFIIO) represents a reliable surgical method in cases of midfacial deficiency with good functional, esthetic, and stable long-term results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this technical note, we present 3 surgical modifications to previous reports: 1) inferior orbital rim osteotomy by angulated piezosurgical instruments, thereby avoiding the use of chisels in the orbital region; 2) osteosynthetic fixation only laterally at the zygomatic buttress with 2 L-shaped miniplates, thus avoiding paranasal osteosynthesis; and 3) advancement step camouflage in the lateral infraorbital region with a compound mass of autologous bone chips and fibrin glue with the intention to reduce bone block-associated side effects. RESULTS: Thirteen consecutive patients presenting with midfacial deficiency and Class III malocclusion were treated by IQLFIIO and mandibular osteotomy. In all cases, osteotomy and consecutive down fracture could be conducted as planned using the piezotome. No atypical fractures were encountered. No cases of infraorbital nerve anesthesia developed. Midfacial hypesthesia was found in 54% of the operated sides after 3 months, in 23% after 6 months, and in 13% after 12 months. The 5-month postoperative 3-dimensional scans revealed osseous healing at the infraorbital advancement step. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that IQLFIIO can be conducted fully without chisels in the orbital region. Implementation of piezosurgery in IQLFIIO allows for safe bone cutting in the orbital region. Two miniplates and step camouflage with fibrin glue-stabilized bone chips were sufficient for osseous healing. Future studies will focus on quantitative soft to hard tissue changes that occur with IQLFIIO advancement.

External Reference Nasal Pin for Orthognathic Maxillary Positioning: What Is the Proper Method of Placement?

PURPOSE: Intracranial perforation with an external reference nasal pin is a possible complication during maxillary orthognathic surgery. This study attempts to quantify the maximum allowable depth of pin penetration from the soft tissue nasion (STN) and hard tissue nasion (HTN) to the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) and to evaluate the depth and direction of the nasal pin track using postsurgical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients were evaluated. A retrospective cross-sectional chart review evaluated the distance from the STN and HTN to the ACF from random patients on CBCT scans. In addition, a different group of postsurgical orthognathic cases treated between March 2013 and August 2015 were analyzed for the depth and direction of the nasal pin track toward the next anatomic cavity, which included the ACF, frontal sinus, or nasal cavity. RESULTS: We identified 103 random patients, aged 14 to 90 years. The mean distance from the STN to the ACF was 21.85 mm (range, 14.06 to 29.12 mm), and the mean distance from the HTN to the ACF was 14.16 mm (range, 7.35 to 20.53 mm). Forty postsurgical CBCT scans showed an overall nasal pin track depth of 12.91 mm (range, 8.53 to 22.60 mm), with the direction of the pin track toward the nasal cavity in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: The depth of penetration of an external reference nasal pin should be limited to a maximum of 10 to 12 mm from the STN. Initial skin penetration should begin immediately caudal to the STN, and the pin should be directed in a caudal direction to avoid inadvertent entrance into the ACF, as well as to facilitate a relatively safe penetration into the nasal cavity, if the maximum depth is excessive.

Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment.

PURPOSE: Postoperative skeletal and dental changes were evaluated in patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent mandibular setback surgery using an intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) with and without presurgical orthodontic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions who underwent IVRO. Patients treated with pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery (POGS) were compared with patients treated with conventional surgery (CS) with presurgical orthodontics (control) using lateral cephalograms (taken preoperatively, 7 days postoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively). Predictor (group and timing), outcome (cephalometric measurements over time), and other (ie, baseline characteristics) variables were evaluated to determine the differences in postoperative horizontal and vertical positional changes of the mandible, such as point B. Baseline demographics were similar between the groups (N = 37; CS group, n = 17; POGS group, n = 20). The data were analyzed with an independent t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Fisher exact t test, Pearson correlation analysis, and simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean setback of the mandible at point B was similar, but the mandible of the POGS group, particularly the distal segment, moved superiorly during the postoperative period in conjunction with the removal of premature occlusal contacts (P < .001). In the CS group, the mandible had significantly more backward movement 12 months after surgery compared with the POGS group (P < .01). In the POGS group, horizontal and vertical postsurgical changes were linearly correlated with the amount of setback and vertical movement of the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular setback surgery using IVRO without presurgical orthodontics leads to considerably different postoperative skeletal and dental changes compared with conventional treatment, with more superior movement being observed at point B during the 1-year postoperative period.

Rigid External Distractor Aided Conventional Le Fort III Osteotomy Advancement in Adult With Severe Midfacial Hypoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Management of severe midfacial hypoplasia is still a challenge for craniofacial team, adult patients with syndromic midfacial hypoplasia made the situation even worse. The authors present the clinical result in an adult patient with Crouzon syndrome treated by rigid external distractor aided conventional Le Fort III procedure. METHODS: A 26-year-old patient with Crouzon syndrome presented with severe midfacial hypoplasia, a negative overjet of -17 mm, exorbitism, airway obstruction, and masticatory problem, while chief complaint of the patient was abnormal appearance. After Le Fort III osteotomy, rigid external distractor and distraction hooks were fixed. With the aid of rigid external distractor, the midfacial mass was immediately advanced to a desired position, allograft bone grafted in the gaps, and microplate fixed. The device was removed 3 weeks later when the advanced midface was stable. RESULTS: Point A was advanced by 18.6 mm in horizontal and displaced superiorly 0.5 mm in vertical at the time of device removal. Point A moved backward 1.5 mm and upward 0.3 mm at 2-year follow-up. A good and balanced facial profile was obtained in a short treatment period. Airway obstruction symptoms and exorbitism were relieved. CONCLUSIONS: The midfacial advancement achieved by rigid external distractor aided conventional Le Fort III osteotomy is a stable, controllable, and timesaving procedure. This technique may become an important choice for adult patients with severe midfacial hypoplasia.

Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion and multipiece Le Fort I osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To examine and compare the skeletal and dental effects of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) and multipiece Le Fort osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Patients underwent SARPE or multipiece Le Fort I osteotomy to address maxillary transverse deficiency. CBCT scans were taken preoperatively, immediately postoperatively or after retention, and at least 6 months postoperatively. Four landmark measurements and ratios of dental-to-skeletal change were used to follow skeletal and dental widths in the posterior and anterior maxillary regions. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Wilcoxon 2-sample rank-sum test were used to compare the landmark measurements and the ratio of dental-to-skeletal change for the 2 surgeries. A P value less than .05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (mean, 28.3 yr old; 7 women) were enrolled: 9 were treated by multipiece Le Fort I osteotomy and 4 were treated by SARPE. The ratios of dental-to-skeletal expansion in the posterior maxilla for the Le Fort procedure and SARPE were 0.70 ± 0.41 and 25.20 ± 15.8, respectively, and the dental-to-skeletal relapses were 1.17 ± 0.80 and -3.63 ± 3.70, respectively. The ratios of dental-to-skeletal expansion in the anterior maxilla for the Le Fort procedure and SARPE were 0.58 ± 0.38 and 31.80 ± 59.4, respectively, and the dental-to-skeletal relapses were 2.25 ± 3.41 and 4.86 ± 8.10, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was greater correlation between dental and skeletal changes in the multipiece Le Fort procedure, indicating bodily separation of the segments, whereas the SARPE showed noteworthy dental and skeletal tipping. Dental relapse was greater than skeletal relapse for these 2 procedures.

Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy lingual fracture line and le fort I pterygomaxillary separation in orthognathic surgery using cadaver heads: ultrasonic osteotome versus conventional saw.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to observe the quality of the fracture line on the lingual side of the mandible after sagittal split osteotomy and the quality of pterygomaxillary separation after Le Fort I osteotomy using the BoneScalpel ultrasonic osteotome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bimaxillary procedures, according to the standard protocol, were performed using 10 fresh cadaver heads. The ultrasonic osteotome was used in the study group, and a reciprocating saw was used in the control group. Three-dimensional reconstructions of postoperative computed tomographic scans were obtained. The lingual ramus fracture pattern and the pterygomaxillary separation pattern were observed, classified, and compared. Postoperative dissections of the skulls were performed to assess the integrity of the infra-alveolar nerve and the descending palatine artery. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the cutting time of bone between the BoneScalpel and the sagittal saw. Of the sagittal split osteotomies in the study group, 90% showed a good pattern (vertical pattern of fracture line extending to the inferior border of the mandible running behind the mandibular canal) compared with 50% of the sagittal split osteotomies in the control group. Ideal separation of the pterygoid plates without fractures was observed in 80% of the Le Fort I osteotomies in the study group compared with 50% of the osteotomies in the control group. High-level fractures occurred in 30% of cases in the control group compared with none in the study group. The integrities of the infra-alveolar nerve and the descending palatine artery were preserved in all cases. CONCLUSION: Use of the ultrasonic BoneScalpel did not require more time than the conventional method. An improved pattern of lingual fracture lines in mandibular sagittal split osteotomy procedures and the pattern of pterygomaxillary separation in Le Fort I osteotomy procedures were observed.

Completion of nonreducible Le Fort fractures by Le Fort I osteotomy: sometimes an inevitable choice to avoid postoperative malocclusion.

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the use of a simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy for completion of nonreducible Le Fort fractures. We analyzed the clinical and radiological data of 44 patients with Le Fort fractures, 9 of whom presented with a nonreducible type. Seven patients with an incomplete Le Fort I fracture had a contralateral Le Fort I osteotomy, and 2 patients with an incomplete Le Fort III fracture had a true bilateral Le Fort I-type osteotomy. We recorded age and sex, mechanism of injury, level of Le Fort fracture, concomitant mandibular fractures, concomitant maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) and its duration, surgical approach, status of healing, and complications. Follow-ups were at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.All patients recovered their normal pretrauma occlusion without the need for postoperative elastic guidance, except for 1 patient who required light class III traction elastics for 3 weeks to achieve the correct occlusion. None of the patients presented with intraoperative or postoperative complications.The present study has demonstrated that completion of nonreducible Le Fort fractures by Le Fort I osteotomy results in a high rate of success.

Deep Venous Thrombosis in Teen With Crouzon Syndrome Post-Le Fort III Osteotomy With Rigid External Distraction.

Venous thromboembolic events are rare in pediatric patients. Risk factors associated with the development of venous thromboembolic events in pediatric patients include the use of central venous catheters, hospitalization, cancer, sepsis, trauma, surgery, and congenital prothrombotic disorders.The authors present the case of a 14-year-old man with Crouzon syndrome who required Le Fort III osteotomy with rigid external distraction for significant midface hypoplasia who presented postoperatively with an extensive deep venous thrombosis. This is the first reported case of symptomatic venous thrombosis post-Le Fort III osteotomy and rigid external distraction. Although rare, surgeons should be aware of this potential complication.

Individualized Surgical Templates and Titanium Microplates for Le Fort I Osteotomy by Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing.

The authors report the use of novel individualized surgical templates and titanium miniplates for Le Fort I osteotomy and evaluate the accuracy of this technique in vitro. Nine three-dimensional stereolithographic skull models were used to design the templates and titanium microplates and to simulate the operation. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the skulls were acquired preoperatively and were used to generate virtual models. The surgical plans were made based on three-dimensional cephalometric analyses, and osteotomies were then performed virtually. Cylinder-shaped markers were placed to permit the correct location of titanium screws, and individualized surgical templates were designed. The bony segments were then repositioned virtually according to the surgical plans to correct the skeletal deformities. Resin surgical templates were produced by stereolithography rapid prototyping and the titanium miniplates by three-dimensional cutting. Le Fort I osteotomy was performed under the guide of the surgical templates and fixed with the titanium miniplates. Postoperatively, CBCT scans of each skull model were taken, and the differences between the actual and planned surgical outcomes were measured by superimposing the planned and postoperative virtual models generated from CBCT images. The authors demonstrated that the average linear difference between the planned and actual outcomes was <1 mm and the average orientation difference was <1°. The individualized surgical templates and titanium microplates designed in this experimental study permitted the repositioning of the maxillary segment to the correct planned positions during Le Fort I osteotomy, making this technique a promising alternative to the conventional split method.

Stability of Le Fort I Osteotomy With Propeller Graft for Canting Correction in Facial Asymmetry.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the maxillary stability in patients who had undergone Le Fort I osteotomy with propeller graft and mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of maxillary asymmetry. This was a retrospective study on 15 facial asymmetry patients (7 men, 8 women: 22.2 years) requiring surgical correction at the preoperative (T0), immediately postoperative (T1) and 6 months after surgery (T2) stages. To evaluate the skeletal stability, computed tomography (CT) superimposition was used, and skeletal landmarks were measured and compared from the superimposed images according to an x, y, z coordinate system. The skeletal changes at each stage (ΔT1-T0 and ΔT2-T1) were compared by paired t-test (P<0.05). The obtained data on the skeletal changes immediately postoperatively to 6-month follow-up (ΔT2-T1) showed that the Le Fort I osteotomy with propeller graft had effected stable maxillary skeletal stability at the maxillary measurement points (posterior nasal spine (PNS ), nasopalatine canal, U3 crown tip, U3 root apex, and U6 furcation). These results suggested that in cases of facial asymmetry where the upper tooth exposure is proper and anterior-posterior movement of the maxilla is not much required, Le Fort I osteotomy with propeller graft is an effective method for stable canting correction.

The Use of Brainlab Navigation in Le Fort III Osteotomy.

Le Fort III osteotomy is commonly used in the surgical correction of midface hypoplasia, specifically in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. These osteotomies can be associated with significant complications, which are often the result of incomplete or inaccurate osteotomies. Brainlab, a technology first developed for neurosurgery, has been applied to numerous surgical subspecialties. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience using the Brainlab VectorVision2 and Brainlab Curve (Brainlab, Westchester, IL) as an intraoperative guidance system for osteotomy placement during Le Fort III advancement. Three pediatric patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and midface hypoplasia scheduled to undergo Le Fort III advancement were scanned preoperatively with 0.6-mm computed tomography cuts, which were then uploaded to the Brainlab system. All surgeries commenced with rigid fixation of the Brainlab registration device to the patient's skull. The navigation system was used intraoperatively to accurately determine osteotomy sites and trajectories. External distractors were placed without complication. Mean length of surgery was 331 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 500 mL. No transfusion was required with a mean postoperative hemoglobin of 8.3 g/dL. The application of Brainlab technology to Le Fort III advancement proved useful in establishing precise osteotomy lines and trajectories. Looking forward, this technology could be applied to a minimal dissection technique in order to avoid extensive blood loss. Further study would be needed to determine possible benefits such as reduced complications or operative time when using an intraoperative navigation system for image-guided osteotomy placement during Le Fort III advancement.

Weight loss in orthognathic surgery: a clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse weight change, body composition change and Body Mass Index change in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. DESIGN: A service evaluation was undertaken in orthognathic patients pre-operatively and at 4 weeks post-surgery. SETTING: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham outpatient department. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one patients scheduled for single- or two-jaw orthognathic surgery and rigid internal fixation. METHODS: Immediately pre-operatively and at 4 weeks post-surgery the following information was gathered: (1) patient height; (2) patient weight (kg); (3) Patient Body Mass Index; and (4) patient body fat percentage. RESULTS: In the 4-week post-operative period, the average weight loss was -4·96 kg (range: -9·6 to +3·0 kg), with a body fat reduction of -3·07% (range: -5·80% to +2·30%) and an average reduction in Body Mass Index of -1·63 (range: -3·4 to +0·8). There was no statistically significant difference in weight loss (P = 0·1562) or body fat composition change (P = 0·2391) between single- or two-jaw surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in weight loss (P = 0·4858) or body fat composition change (P = 0·5321) between male and female patients. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss observed was similar to that reported in studies using inter-maxillary fixation. Closer psychological and dietetic support is needed for patients who have a low normal or underweight Body Mass Index. Better and more bespoke tailored Oral Nutritional Supplementation must be provided for all orthognathic surgery patients to potentially reduce this significant weight loss.

A modified occlusal wafer for managing partially dentate orthognathic patients--a case series.

A multidisciplinary approach is essential in orthognathic surgery to achieve stable and successful outcomes. The model surgery planning is an important aspect in achieving the desired aims. An occlusal wafer used at the time of surgery aids the surgeon during correct placement of the jaws. When dealing with partially dentate patients, the design of the occlusal wafer requires modification to appropriately position the jaw. Two cases with partially dentate jaws are presented in which the occlusal wafer has been modified to provide stability at the time of surgery.

Maxillary posterior segmentation using an oscillating saw in Le Fort I posterior or superior movement without pterygomaxillary separation.

PURPOSE: Any remaining tuberosity or pterygoid plate frequently interferes with posterior or superior movement of the maxilla, if no pterygomaxillary separation is performed in low-level Le Fort I osteotomy. The objective of this report is to describe a technique for maxillary posterior segmentation using an oscillating saw in Le Fort I posterior or superior movement without pterygomaxillary separation and to present the authors' preliminary multicenter experience with this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent double-jaw surgery at 3 orthognathic surgery centers from May 2010 to December 2012. In all cases, the segmentation procedure was performed using an oscillating saw on a posterior or tuberosity area of the maxilla before downfracture obtained by leverage alone without pterygomaxillary separation, below or near the lower part of the pterygoid plate. RESULTS: In total, 1,231 patients (411 male and 820 female; mean age, 24.9 yr) were enrolled. Mean surgical time for the maxillary procedure was 55.9 minutes. None of the patients received a blood transfusion, and no significant soft or hard tissue complications clinically compromised the healing of the repositioned maxilla. Mean maxillary posterior and superior movements were 3.4 mm (range, 2.1 to 5.6 mm) and 4.0 mm (range, 1.3 to 5.6 mm), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results indicate that this maxillary posterior segmentation procedure using an oscillating saw in low-level stepped Le Fort I osteotomy can be completed safely and effectively for posterior or superior repositioning of the maxilla, with no need to disturb the integrity of the pterygoid plate.

New palatal distraction device by both bone-borne and tooth-borne force application in a paramedian bone anchorage site: surgical and occlusal considerations on clinical cases.

Maxillary constriction is a very common pathology with implications on dental occlusion, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, nasal breathing, and impairment on the smile and face esthetic.New techniques for expansion of the maxillary bones are particularly useful in relation to the new esthetic ideals of smile and face beauty.To achieve a bodily expansion of the maxillary bones, we developed a new rigid palatal distractor device with both tooth-borne and paramedian bone-borne anchorages to achieve a safe and simple anchorage site suitable also for orthodontic appliances.The reported cases show good results, with bodily maxillary expansion and cross-bite correction without any problems or complications. Substantial advantages of this new device and technique, in comparison with other commonly used palatal distractors, consisting of bodily maxillary movements, avoidance of relapse risks, and safe and simple screw insertion site for bone anchorage also suitable for orthodontic movements, are discussed.