The Effect of Limb Salvage Efforts in Different Age Groups: Relationships Between Major and Minor Amputations.

"Limb salvage" efforts, such as performing minor amputations before infections spread proximally from the foot to decrease major lower extremity amputation, are an important part of healthcare today. It is unclear whether these efforts are preventing the number of major amputations and improving patients' quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the U.S. healthcare system. Rates of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation (NLEA) among patients with diabetes decreased in the early 2000s but rebounded in the 2010s. We analyzed the proportion of major amputations and differences in amputation rates between age groups in Texas. Patient data was extracted from the Texas Hospital Discharge Data Public Use Data File. Population estimates were obtained from the Texas Population Estimates Program from 2011 to 2015 and from intercensal estimates provided by the U.S. Census Bureau from 2006 to 2010. Raw numbers of minor, major, and all NLEA surgeries and the ratio of major amputations to total amputations per year were reported for each age group. Poisson regression and Joinpoint analyses were performed to capture these changes in trends. Rates of amputations increased, with significant decreasing relative prevalence of major amputations. Patients aged 45 to 64 with diabetes are likely driving these increases. Rates of lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetes increased from 2009 to 2015. This holds for all and minor amputations. In contrast, the ratio of major to all amputations decreased from 2010. Utilization of major and minor amputation differs between age groups, remaining stable in the youngest subjects, with minor amputation rates increasing in those aged 45 to 64.

Pedal arterial calcification score is associated with the risk of major amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: The medial arterial calcification (MAC) score is a simple metric that describes the burden of inframalleolar calcification using a plain foot radiograph. We hypothesized that a higher MAC score would be independently associated with the risk of major amputation in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). METHODS: We performed a single-institution, retrospective study of 250 patients who had undergone infrainguinal revascularization for CLTI from January 2011 to July 2019 and had foot radiographs available for MAC score calculation. A single blinded reviewer assigned MAC scores of 0 to 5 using two-view minimum plain foot radiographs, with 1 point each for calcification of >2 cm in the dorsalis pedis, plantar, and metatarsal arteries and >1 cm in the hallux and non-hallux digital arteries. RESULTS: The MAC score was 0 in 36%, 1 in 5.2%, 2 in 8.4%, 3 in 14%, 4 in 14%, and 5 in 21%. The MAC score was trichotomized to facilitate analysis and clinical utility (mild, MAC score 0-1; moderate, MAC score 2-4; and severe, MAC score 5). The variables independently associated with a higher MAC score were male sex, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and the global limb anatomic staging system pedal score. The MAC score was not associated with the Society for Vascular Surgery WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) grade or overall WIfI stage (P = .58). The median follow-up was 759 days (interquartile range, 264-1541 days). A higher MAC score was significantly associated with the risk of major amputation (P < .0001). In a Cox proportional hazards multiple regression model for major amputation that included the trichotomized MAC score, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and WIfI stage (1-3 vs 4). The MAC score (MAC score 5: hazard ratio [HR], 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-13.1; P = .001; MAC score 2-4: HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.3-8.8; P = .01) and WIfI stage (WIfI stage 4: HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9; P = .03) were significantly associated with the risk of major amputation. In the subsets of patients with the most advanced WIfI stage of 3 to 4 (191 of 250; 76%) and patients with diabetes (185 of 250; 74%), the MAC score further stratified the risk of major amputation on univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The MAC score is a simple, practical tool and a strong independent predictor of major amputation in patients with CLTI. It provides novel clinical data that are currently unmeasured using any validated CLTI staging system. The MAC score is a promising standardized measure of inframalleolar disease burden that can be used in conjunction with the WIfI staging system to help improve outcomes stratification and determine the optimal treatment strategies for patients with CLTI.

Procedural and 12-month in-hospital costs of primary infra-popliteal bypass surgery, infrapopliteal best endovascular treatment, and major lower limb amputation for chronic limb threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a growing global problem due to the widespread use of tobacco and increasing prevalence of diabetes. Although the financial consequences are considerable, few studies have compared the relative cost-effectiveness of different CLTI management strategies. The Bypass vs Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL)-2 trial is randomizing patients with CLTI to primary infrapopliteal (IP) vein bypass surgery (BS) or best endovascular treatment (BET) and includes a comprehensive within-trial cost-utility analysis. The aim of this study is to compare over a 12-month time horizon, the costs of primary IP BS, IP best endovascular treatment (BET), and major limb major amputation (MLLA) to inform the BASIL-2 cost-utility analysis. METHODS: We compared procedural human resource (HR) costs and total in-hospital costs for the index admission, and over the following 12-months, in 60 consecutive patients undergoing primary IP BS (n = 20), IP BET (n = 20), or MLLA (10 transfemoral and 10 transtibial) for CLTI within the BASIL prospective cohort study. RESULTS: Procedural HR costs were greatest for BS (BS £2551; 95% confidence interval [CI], £1934-£2807 vs MLLA £1130; 95% CI, £1046-£1297 vs BET £329; 95% CI, £242-£390; P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis) due to longer procedure duration and greater staff requirement. With regard to the index admission, MLLA was the most expensive due to longer hospital stay (MLLA £13,320; 95% CI, £8986-£18,616 vs BS £8714; 95% CI, £6097-£11,973 vs BET £4813; 95% CI, £3529-£6097; P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis). The total cost of the index admission and in-hospital care over the following 12 months remained least for BET (MLLA £26,327; 95% CI, £17,653-£30,458 vs BS £20,401; 95% CI, £12,071-£23,926 vs BET £12,298; 95% CI, £6961-£15,439; P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 12-month time horizon, MLLA and IP BS are more expensive than IP BET in terms of procedural HR costs and total in-hospital costs. These economic data, together with quality of life data from BASIL-2, will inform the calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for different CLTI management strategies within the BASIL-2 cost-utility analysis.

Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors in Acute Lower Limb Ischaemia: A Population Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contemporary population based incidence of acute lower limb ischaemia (ALI) and factors associated with major amputation/death at one year. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, in hospital, operation, radiological, and autopsy registries were scrutinised to capture 161 citizens of Malmö, Sweden, with ALI between 2015 and 2018. Age and sex specific incidence rates were calculated in the population of Malmö between 2015 and 2018, expressed as number of patients per 100 000 person years (PY). Independent risk factors for major amputation/death at one year were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one patients with ALI gave an overall incidence of 12.2/100 000 PY (95% CI 10.3 - 14.1), with no sex related differences. Embolism (42.2%) was the most common cause of ALI. Among 52 patients with atrial fibrillation, 38.5% were on anticoagulant medication. Endovascular or open vascular revascularisation was performed in 54.7% of patients. The total cause specific mortality ratio was 2.63 (95% CI 1.66 - 3.61)/1 000 deaths, without no sex related differences. The combined major amputation/mortality rate at one year for the whole cohort was 46.6%. Rutherford ≥ IIb ALI (OR 4.19, 95% CI 1.94 - 9.02; p < .001), age (OR 1.03/year, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.06; p = .036), female sex (OR 2.37, 95% 1.07 - 5.26; p = .034), and anaemia (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.08 - 5.62; p = .033) were associated with an increased risk of major amputation/death at one year. The major amputation/mortality rate at one year was 100% (n = 14/14) for patients living in a nursing home on admission. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ALI appears to be unchanged, and major amputation and mortality at one year remain high. It is necessary to include the substantial proportion of patients with ALI that do not undergo revascularisation in epidemiological studies. There is room for improvement in anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation to prevent ALI due to embolism. Research on gender inequalities in patients with ALI is warranted.

Participation in a Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Randomized Trial Is Inversely Correlated With Regional Amputation Rate in Limb Threatening Ischemia Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The National Health Service demonstrated that regions of the United Kingdom with the highest number of patients enrolled in research studies had the lowest risk-adjusted mortality when patients were admitted to the hospital. Our goal was to investigate if this correlation was evident for patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLI) treated in the United States (US). Accordingly, we examined correlations among sites participating in the Best Endovascular versus best Surgical Therapy in patients with Critical (BEST-CLI) trial, a multicenter, National Institute of Health-sponsored, international randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing revascularization strategies in patients with CLI, and regional rates of major amputation from CLI. METHODS: We measured regional participation in the BEST-CLI trial by evaluating trial participation and enrollment rosters. To determine regional rates of lower limb amputation, we queried the Medicare database (2007-2016) for patients with concurrent peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetes, then assessed how many had lower extremity amputations. Correlation of regional amputation rates with distribution of BEST-CLI sites in four US geographical regions was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Simple regression equations were used to calculate the significance of these correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Of 9,231,909 CLI patients, 342,406 underwent amputation in the Medicare dataset. Amputation rates per 1000 CLI patients differed by region (South 40.42, Midwest 40.12, West 34.81, Northeast 31.14). There were 116 US vascular centers, selected by volume and expertise that participated in BEST-CLI with the following distribution: South (n = 30, 26%), Midwest (n = 26, 22%), West (n = 29, 25%), and Northeast (n = 31, 27%). There was a negative correlation between the number of amputations per 1000 for Medicare CLI patients with diabetes and PAD and the number of BEST-CLI sites in the region which trended toward significance (Pearson R= -0.61, P = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS: Amputation rate among Medicare CLI patients is inversely correlated with US BEST-CLI site distribution. Higher participation in clinical research, especially within large RCTs, may be a marker of optimal PAD management.

Early Fasciotomy and Limb Salvage and Complications in Military Lower Extremity Vascular Injury.

BACKGROUND: Military guidelines endorse early fasciotomy after revascularization of lower extremity injuries to prevent compartment syndrome, but the real-world impact is unknown. We assessed the association between fasciotomy and amputation and limb complications among lower extremitys with vascular injury. METHODS: A retrospectively collected lower extremity injury database was queried for limbs undergoing attempted salvage with vascular procedure (2004-2012). Limbs were categorized as having undergone fasciotomy or not. Injury and treatment characteristics were collected, as were intervention timing data when available. The primary outcome measure was amputation. Multivariate models examined the impact of fasciotomy on limb outcomes. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 515 limbs, 335 (65%) with fasciotomy (median 7.7 h postinjury). Of 212 limbs, 174 (84%) with timing data had fasciotomy within 30 min of initial surgery. Compartment syndrome and suspicion of elevated pressure was documented in 127 limbs (25%; 122 had fasciotomy). Tourniquet and shunt use, fracture, multiple arterial and combined arteriovenous injuries, popliteal involvement, and graft reconstruction were more common in fasciotomy limbs. Isolated venous injury and vascular ligation were more common in nonfasciotomy limbs. Fasciotomy timing was not associated with amputation. Controlling for limb injury severity, fasciotomy was not associated with amputation but was associated with limb infection, motor dysfunction, and contracture. Sixty-three percent of fasciotomies were open for >7 d, and 43% had multiple closure procedures. Fasciotomy revision (17%) was not associated with increased amputation or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Fasciotomy after military lower extremity vascular injury is predominantly performed early, frequently without documented compartment pressure elevation. Early fasciotomy is generally performed in severely injured limbs with a subsequent high rate of limb complications.

Long Term Survival and Limb Salvage in Patients With Non-Revascularisable Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide long term survival and limb salvage rates for patients with non-revascularisable (NR) chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, derived from a randomised controlled trial (JUVENTAS) investigating the use of a regenerative cell therapy. Survival and limb salvage of the index limb in CLTI patients without viable options for revascularisation at inclusion were analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was amputation free survival, a composite of survival and limb salvage, at five years after inclusion in the original trial. RESULTS: In 150 patients with NR-CLTI, amputation free survival was 43% five years after inclusion. This outcome was driven by an equal rate of all cause mortality (35%) and amputation (33%). Amputation occurred predominantly in the first year. Furthermore, 33% of those with amputation subsequently died within the investigated period, with a median interval of 291 days. CONCLUSION: Five years after the initial need for revascularisation, about half of the CLTI patients who were deemed non-revascularisable survived with salvage of the index limb. Although the prospects for these high risk patients are still poor, under optimal medical care, amputation free survival seems comparable with that of revascularisable CLTI patients, while the major amputation rate within one year, especially among NR-CLTI patients with ischaemic tissue loss, is very high.

Results After Open and Endovascular Repair of Popliteal Aneurysm: A Matched Comparison Within a Population Based Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors affecting the outcome after open surgical (OSR) and endovascular (ER) repair of popliteal artery aneurysm (PA) in comparable cohorts. METHODS: A matched comparison in a national, population based cohort of 592 legs treated for PA (2008 - 2012), with long term follow up. Registry data from 899 PA patients treated in 2014 - 2018 were analysed for time trends. The 77 legs treated by ER were matched, by indication, with 154 legs treated with OSR. Medical records and imaging were collected. Analysed risk factors were anatomy, comorbidities, and medication. Elongation and angulations were examined in a core lab. The main outcome was occlusion. RESULTS: Patients in the ER group were older (73 vs. 68 years, p = .001), had more lung disease (p = .012), and were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulants more often (p < .001). The hazard ratio (HR with 95% confidence intervals) for occlusion was 2.69 (1.60 - 4.55, p < .001) for ER, but 3.03 (1.26 - 7.27, p = .013) for poor outflow. For permanent occlusion, the HR after ER was 2.47 (1.35 - 4.50, p = .003), but 4.68 (1.89 - 11.62, p < .001) for poor outflow. In the ER subgroup, occlusion was more common after acute ischaemia (HR 2.94 [1.45 - 5.97], p = .003; and poor outflow HR 14.39 [3.46 - 59.92], p < .001). Larger stent graft diameter reduced the risk (HR 0.71 [0.54 - 0.93], p = .014). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for indication and stent graft diameter, elongation increased the risk (HR 1.020 per degree [1.002 - 1.033], p = .030). PAs treated for acute ischaemia had a median stent graft diameter of 6.5 mm, with those for elective procedures being 8 mm (p < .001). Indications and outcomes were similar during both time periods (2008 - 2012 and 2014 - 2018). CONCLUSION: In comparable groups, ER had a 2.7 fold increased risk of any occlusion, and 2.4 fold increased risk of permanent occlusion, despite more aggressive medical therapy. Risk factors associated with occlusion in ER were poor outflow, smaller stent graft diameter, acute ischaemia, and angulation/elongation. An association between indication, acute ischaemia, and small stent graft diameter was identified.

Role of Bypass with Preoperatively Diagnosed Small Caliber Veins in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: In chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), although recent studies suggested that limbs classified as a higher Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) stage would benefit more from bypass surgery than endovascular therapy (EVT), graft unavailability is a major limitation for bypass. However, such graft unavailability is not clearly defined. This study aimed to assess whether bypass with veins judged as small by preoperative ultrasound is acceptable to achieve wound healing. METHODS: Ninety-five limbs classified as WIfI stage 3/4 that underwent infrainguinal bypass with veins were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the preoperative inner diameter of veins. Those with a diameter <2.5 mm were classified as small caliber grafts (SMGs, n=28) and those with a diameter ≥2.5 mm as sufficient caliber grafts (SUGs, n=67), and wound-related outcomes were evaluated. Wound healing rate (WHR) was analyzed in all cohort, and wound recurrence-free rate (WRF) and wound recurrence-free amputation-free survival rate (WRAFS) were calculated for limbs that achieved wound healing. A propensity score matched analysis was also performed to minimize the background difference, and 21 matched pairs were included for the analysis. RESULTS: Although the primary patency rate was significantly worse in SMGs (1-year patency, Crude model: 82.1% in SUGs and 51.0% in SMGs, P=0.0003; matched model: 77.7% in SUGs and 41.6% in SMGs, P = 0.005), the secondary patency rate was maintained in the equivalent level (1-year patency, Crude model: 81.8% in SUGs and 83.1% in SMGs, P=0.26; matched model: 77.7% in SUGs and 78.4% in SMGs, P = 0.24). One-year WHR was equivalent between the groups in both crude and matched models (Crude model: 87.0% in SUGs and 83.8% in SMGs, P=0.13; matched model: 66.3% in SUGs and 61.4% in SMGs, P = 0.65). One-year WRF and WRAFS were also equivalent (Crude model: WRF, 95.9% in SUGs and 100% in SMGs, P = 0.71; WRAFS, 87.2% in SUGs and 88.0% in SMGs, P = 0.78. Matched model: WRF, 100% in SUGs and 100% in SMGs, P = 0.85; WRAFS, 92.9% in SUGs and 78.6% in SMGs, P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Although bypass with small caliber veins showed an inferior primary patency rate, WHR and WRF were equally good if grafts are maintained patent. Bypass with small caliber vein grafts would be an important option to achieve wound healing.

Outcome of Femoral-popliteal Bypass Procedures in Different Ethnic Groups in England: A Retrospective Analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies, mainly from the United States, have reported worse outcomes from lower limb bypass procedures in ethnic minority populations. Limited nationwide data are available from ethnic minority populations from Europe. The aim of this study is to investigate outcomes from lower limb bypass procedures in ethnic minorities from England. METHODS: We enquired the "Hospital Episode Statistics" database, using ICD-10 codes to identify all cases of femoral-popliteal bypass operations from English NHS Hospitals from 01/01/2006 to 31/12/2015. Every case was followed up for 2 years for subsequent events. The primary outcomes were mortality and major leg amputation. Patients were broadly categorised according to Black, Asian and White ethnicity. Chi-square test was used to the ethnic groups and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using White ethnic group with the largest numbers of participants as a reference category. RESULTS: In the examined 10-year period, 20825 femoral-popliteal bypass procedures (250 of Black, 167 of Asian, and 20.408 of White ethnicity) were recorded. Thirty-day and 2-year mortality were 2.8% and 16.8% with no significant ethnic differences. Patients of Black ethnicity had higher risk of limb loss compared to Whites (23.2% vs. 15.6%, OR = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.19, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in amputation rates between Asians and Whites (16.2% vs.. 15.6%, P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients of Black ethnicity are at higher risk of limb loss after a femoropopliteal bypass procedure. Further research is needed to identify the causes of this discrepancy.

Changing Paradigms in Below-the-Knee Arterial Interventions: Are We Saving Legs?

BACKGROUND: Patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) involving the below-the-knee (BTK) arteries are at increased risk of limb loss. Despite improvement in endovascular modalities, it is still unclear whether an aggressive approach results in improved limb salvage. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether an aggressive approach to BTK arterial disease results in improved limb salvage. METHODS: A comparative study of two groups was conducted. Group 1 included patients treated between 2012 and 2014, primarily with transfemoral angioplasty of the tibial arteries. Group 2 included patients treated between 2015-2019 with a wide array of endovascular modalities (stents, multiple tibial artery and pedal angioplasty, retrograde access). Primary endpoint was freedom from amputation at 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 529 BTK interventions were performed. Mean age was 71 ± 10.6 years, 382 (79%) were male. Patients in group 1 were less likely to be taking clopidogrel (66% vs. 83%, P < 0.01) and statins (72 % vs. 87%, P < 0.01). Several therapeutic modalities were used more often in group 2 than in group 1, including pedal angioplasty (24 vs. 43 %, P = 0.01), tibial and pedal retrograde access (0 vs. 10%, P = 0.01), and tibial stenting (3% vs. 25%, P = 0.01). Revascularization of two or more tibial arteries was performed at a higher rate in group 2 (54% vs. 50%, P = 0.45). Estimated freedom from amputation at 40 months follow-up was higher in group 2 (53% vs. 63%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive, multimodality approach in treating BTK arteries results in improved limb salvage.

Resection of Anterior and Lateral Muscle Compartments Does Not Preclude Limb Salvage and Functions.

BACKGROUND: Fasciotomy with resection of nonviable muscle is often necessary when there is a delay in compartment syndrome (CS) diagnosis after revascularization. The reported rate of major amputation following missed CS or delayed fasciotomy ranges from 12% to 35%. Herein, the authors present a series of critically ill patients who experienced delayed CS diagnosis and required complete resection of the anterior and/or lateral compartments but still achieved limb salvage and function. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified five patients from April 2018 to April 2019 within a single institution who met the inclusion criteria. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, risk factors, time to diagnosis following revascularization, muscle compartments resected, operative and wound care details, and functional outcome at follow-up. RESULTS: All of the patients developed CS of the lower extremity following revascularization secondary to acute limb ischemia and required two-incision, four-compartment fasciotomies. Further, they all required serial operative debridements to achieve limb salvage; however, there were no major amputations, and all of the patients were walking at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Delay in CS diagnosis can have devastating consequences, resulting in major amputation. In cases where myonecrosis is isolated to two or fewer compartments, complete compartment muscle resection can be safely performed, and limb preservation and function can be maintained with aggressive wound management and physical therapy.

Neoadjuvant radiation improves margin-negative resection rates in extremity sarcoma but not survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Radiation improves limb salvage in extremity sarcomas. Timing of radiation therapy remains under investigation. We sought to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant radiation (NAR) on surgery and survival of patients with extremity sarcomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional database was used to identify patients with extremity sarcomas undergoing surgical resection from 2000-2016. Patients were categorized by treatment strategy: surgery alone, adjuvant radiation (AR), or NAR. Survival, recurrence, limb salvage, and surgical margin status was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1483 patients were identified. Most patients receiving radiotherapy had high-grade tumors (82% NAR vs 81% AR vs 60% surgery; P < .001). The radiotherapy groups had more limb-sparing operations (98% AR vs 94% NAR vs 87% surgery; P < .001). NAR resulted in negative margin resections (90% NAR vs 79% surgery vs 75% AR; P < .0001). There were fewer local recurrences in the radiation groups (14% NAR vs 17% AR vs 27% surgery; P = .001). There was no difference in overall or recurrence-free survival between the three groups (OS, P = .132; RFS, P = .227). CONCLUSION: In this large study, radiotherapy improved limb salvage rates and decreased local recurrences. Receipt of NAR achieves more margin-negative resections however this did not improve local recurrence or survival rates over.

Outcomes for Angioplasty and Bypass Lower Limb Revascularisation Procedures for Limb Salvage in England: Findings From the Getting It Right First Time Programme.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes for lower limb revascularisation for limb salvage within the National Health Service (NHS) in England. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of administrative data. Data were extracted from the Hospital Episodes Statistics database for England. Data were included for a seven year period (1 April 2011-31 March 2018 inclusive) for all patients aged ≥ 18 years receiving surgery for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Data were extracted for patient age, sex and frailty level, the NHS trusts undertaking the procedure, the technique used (angioplasty, bypass, endarterectomy, or hybrid), the mode of admission (elective or emergency), the surgical speciality, the financial year of admission, length of hospital stay during the procedure, subsequent emergency re-admission, revascularisation procedures within 30 days and subsequent amputation and mortality within one year and within five years. The primary outcome was one year amputation free survival. For analysis, data were separated into diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Multilevel modelling was used to adjust for hierarchy and observed confounding when investigating outcomes. RESULTS: Data were available for 98 109 procedures across 124 hospital trusts. For non-diabetic patients (odds ratio 1.142, 95% confidence interval 1.068-1.222), one year amputation free survival was higher for angioplasty than for bypass. For diabetic patients, there was no difference in the primary outcome. One year amputation rates, 30 day emergency re-admission rates, and length of stay were all lower for angioplasty, and 30 day revascularisation rates were lower for bypass for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Outcomes were generally better for angioplasty than for bypass surgery for lower limb revascularisation for both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The findings should be interpreted with caution given the likely different clinical presentations of those selected for each procedure. Future clinical trials may provide more definitive data.

Contemporary Treatment of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms in 14 Countries: A Vascunet Report.

OBJECTIVE: Popliteal artery aneurysm (PAA) is the second most common arterial aneurysm. Vascunet is an international collaboration of vascular registries. The aim was to study treatment and outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively registered population based data. Fourteen countries contributed data (Australia, Denmark, Finland, France, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Serbia, Sweden, and Switzerland). RESULTS: During 2012-2018, data from 10 764 PAA repairs were included. Mean values with between countries ranges in parenthesis are given. The incidence was 10.4 cases/million inhabitants/year (2.4-19.3). The mean age was 71.3 years (66.8-75.3). Most patients, 93.3%, were men and 40.0% were active smokers. The operations were elective in 73.2% (60.0%-85.7%). The mean pre-operative PAA diameter was 32.1 mm (27.3-38.3 mm). Open surgery dominated in both elective (79.5%) and acute (83.2%) cases. A medial surgical approach was used in 77.7%, and posterior in 22.3%. Vein grafts were used in 63.8%. Of the emergency procedures, 91% (n = 2 169, 20.2% of all) were for acute thrombosis and 9% for rupture (n = 236, 2.2% of all). Thrombosis patients had larger aneurysms, mean diameter 35.5 mm, and 46.3% were active smokers. Early amputation and death were higher after acute presentation than after elective surgery (5.0% vs. 0.7%; 1.9% vs. 0.5%). This pattern remained one year after surgery (8.5% vs. 1.0%; 6.1% vs. 1.4%). Elective open compared with endovascular surgery had similar one year amputation rates (1.2% vs. 0.2%; p = .095) but superior patency (84.0% vs. 78.4%; p = .005). Veins had higher patency and lower amputation rates, at one year compared with synthetic grafts (86.8% vs. 72.3%; 1.8% vs. 5.2%; both p < .001). The posterior open approach had a lower amputation rate (0.0% vs. 1.6%, p = .009) than the medial approach. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with acute ischaemia had high risk of amputation. The frequent use of endovascular repair and prosthetic grafts should be reconsidered based on these results.

Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia With and Without a Free Fibula Flap in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: Limb salvage of the proximal tibia can be difficult due to the growth potential of and functional demands of the pediatric patients. Multiple reconstruction techniques exist, however, the ideal form of reconstruction is yet to be elucidated. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate outcomes in patients with an intercalary resection of the proximal tibia reconstructed with an allograft with or without a free vascularized fibula flap (FVF). METHODS: Seventeen pediatric patients (9 males, 8 females) underwent lower extremity limb salvage with the use of intercalary cadaveric allograft at a mean age of 12±4 years. The most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n=6) and Ewing sarcoma (n=6). Patients were reconstructed with an allograft alone (n=6) or supplemented with an FVF (n=11). RESULTS: All surviving patients had at least 2 years of clinical follow-up, with the mean follow-up of 12±7 years. The mean time to union of the allograft was 11±4 months, with 6 patients requiring additional bone grafting. There was no difference in the need for an additional bone graft (odds ratio=1.14, P=1.0) between patients with an FVF and those without. Four patients underwent an amputation, all with an allograft alone, due to disease recurrence (n=2) and due to infection (n=2). As such, there was a higher 10-year overall limb-salvage rate when the allograft was combined with an FVF compared with an allograft alone (100% vs. 33%, P=0.001). At last follow-up, the mean Mankin and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating was 86%, with a higher mean score in patients reconstructed with an FVF (94% vs. 70%, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Use of an intercalary allograft supplemented with an FVF to reconstruct the proximal tibia provides a durable means of reconstruction with an excellent functional outcome following oncologic proximal tibia resection in a pediatric population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic level.

Temporal trends and hospital costs associated with an endovascular-first approach for acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies suggest similar perioperative outcomes for endovascular and open surgical management of acute limb ischemia (ALI). We sought to describe temporal trends, patient factors, and hospital costs associated with contemporary ALI management. METHODS: We used the weighted National Inpatient Sample to estimate primary ALI cases requiring open or endovascular intervention (2005-2014). We used multivariable regression models to examine temporal trends, patient factors, and hospital costs associated with endovascular-first vs open-first management. RESULTS: Of 116,451 admissions for ALI during the study period, 35.2% were treated by an endovascular-first approach. The percentage of admissions managed with an endovascular-first approach increased over time (P < .001). Independent predictors of endovascular-first management included younger age, male sex, renal insufficiency, and more recent calendar year of admission (P ≤ .02), whereas patients who underwent fasciotomy, those with Medicaid, and those admitted on a weekend were more likely to undergo open-first management (P ≤ .02). Endovascular-first management had higher mean hospital costs than open-first management ($29,719 vs $26,193; P < .001). After adjustment for patient, hospital, and admission characteristics, there was an increase of $981 in treatment costs per year in the endovascular-first group (95% confidence interval [CI], $571-$1392; P < .001), whereas the costs associated with an open-first approach remained relatively stable over time ($10 per year; 95% CI, -$295 to $315; P = .95; P < .001 for interaction). The risk-adjusted odds of in-hospital major amputation was similar in both groups (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.85-1.15; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an endovascular-first approach for the treatment of ALI has significantly increased over time. Although major amputation rates are similar for both approaches, the costs associated with an endovascular-first approach are increasing over time, whereas the costs of open surgery have remained stable. The cost-effectiveness of modern ALI management warrants further investigation.

Benefit of multidisciplinary wound care center on the volume and outcomes of a vascular surgery practice.

OBJECTIVE: Multidisciplinary care is recommended for the treatment of patients with ischemic and diabetic wounds. In addition to integrating care from multiple specialties, outpatient wound care centers provide an opportunity for continuity and organization of care after revascularization or hospitalization. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in the practice patterns and outcomes of patients treated by a tertiary care vascular surgery practice after the introduction of an affiliated outpatient wound care center. METHODS: A prospective institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent lower-extremity revascularization, amputation, or surgical debridement during consecutive 3-year periods before (BWC; n = 735) and after (AWC; n = 1503) the opening of an affiliated wound care center. Patients were included if they underwent intervention for atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease or diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Changes in case volume, surgical indication, and procedural characteristics were assessed. Clinical outcomes included freedom from lower-extremity amputations and mortality. RESULTS: We identified a total of 1751 procedures performed in 1249 limbs that met inclusion criteria. After the opening of the wound clinic, procedures related to limb salvage represented a greater proportion of overall cases performed by the vascular service (19% vs 26%; P < .0001). The volume of lower-extremity interventions increased by 64%, from 662 procedures in the BWC period to 1085 procedures in the AWC period. There was no difference in type of revascularization performed between the two study periods, although surgical debridements (from 8.9% to 13%; P = .01) and infrapopliteal endovascular interventions (from 21% to 28%; P = .04) significantly increased. Compared with BWC patients, AWC patients more frequently presented with DFUs (7.3% vs 13%; P = .002) and chronic wounds (39% vs 45%; P = .05). At 1 year of follow-up, major amputation rates were significantly lower in the AWC group than in the BWC cohort (5.5% vs 8.8%; P = .04). Treatment during the AWC period was associated with a reduced risk of major amputation (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.62; P < .001), but no difference in all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The opening of an outpatient wound center affiliated with a tertiary vascular surgical practice was associated with a higher volume of limb salvage patients and procedures. The risk of major amputation decreased following the opening of the wound care center. Integrating vascular surgeons into wound centers may result in a synergistic system that promotes more aggressive and effective limb salvage.

The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Utilization of Vascular Procedures and Rates of Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Although New York's Medicaid expansion increased coverage in 2001, little is known regarding changes in surgical care utilization among patients with vascular disease. We sought to measure the impact of expansion on the rates of both vascular procedures and amputations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the State Inpatient Databases of New York and Arizona, 1998-2006. Patients aged 18-64 who underwent lower extremity vascular surgery procedures or amputations between 1998 and 2006 were included. Outcomes included rates of total vascular, open vascular, and endovascular procedures, in addition to rates of amputation. A difference-in-difference analysis measured changes in the rates of procedure types, while adjusting for temporal trends in both states. RESULTS: In this cohort (n = 112,624), Medicaid expansion was not associated with a change in mortality (odds ratio 0.92, P = 0.5). Expansion was associated with a lower incidence of total vascular procedures (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.65, P < 0.001) and open vascular procedures (IRR 0.92, P = 0.002), but a higher incidence of endovascular procedures (IRR 1.13, P < 0.001). There was no change in the rate of amputations (IRR 1.02, P = 0.58). In patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (n = 12,668), expansion was associated with a lower incidence of total procedures (IRR 0.59, P < 0.001) and endovascular procedures (IRR 0.59, P < 0.001) but a higher incidence of amputations (IRR 1.43, P = 0.001) and higher odds of mortality (odds ratio 2.21, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: After Medicaid expansion, the rates of total vascular procedures decreased, with no impact on amputations rates. Furthermore, the utilization of limb-saving procedures in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia did not increase.

Editor's Choice - Comparison of Outcomes After Open Surgical and Endovascular Lower Extremity Revascularisation Among End Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis.

OBJECTIVES: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at high risk of complications following open surgical revascularisation (OSR). Endovascular revascularisation (ER) is an option, but its role is unclear. This study sought to characterise the outcomes of ER and OSR in ESRD patients treated for claudication or critical limb ischaemia (CLI). METHODS: The United States Renal Data System was used to investigate outcomes after lower extremity ER and OSR from 2005 to 2011. Primary outcomes were mortality, amputation, and peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates were generated for mortality and amputation, logistic regression models for 30 day predictors, and proportional hazards models for long-term predictors. RESULTS: A total of 20,347 patients underwent OSR and ER (20.3% OSR, 79.7% ER). CLI was the indication in 80.8% of ER and 88.4% of OSR. The unadjusted major amputation rate at 30 days was higher after ER compared with OSR (8.8% vs. 6.4%, p < .001). Conversely, the unadjusted mortality rate at 30 days was lower after ER compared with OSR (8.0% vs. 10.5%, p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for medical covariables and CLI versus claudication status demonstrated increased 30 day mortality risk with OSR compared with ER (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.43-1.79, p < .001), MI (OR 1.38, 1.23-1.54, p < .001), and the combined endpoint of mortality and major amputation (OR 1.57, 1.16-2.12, p = .004), but lower odds of 30 day major amputation alone (OR 0.67, 0.58-0.77, p < .001). Proportional hazards models demonstrated increased long-term mortality risk with OSR compared with ER (HR 1.05, 1.00-1.09, p = .037), without a difference in major amputation (HR 0.99, 0.93-1.05, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of an administrative database, ESRD patients suffer from high mortality and amputation rates following lower extremity revascularisation. Compared with ER, OSR is associated with higher mortality. OSR has better 30 day limb salvage, although long-term outcomes are similar.