Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Net efficacy adjusted for risk (NEAR): a simple procedure for measuring risk:benefit balance.
Boada, José N; Boada, Carlos; García-Sáiz, Mar; García, Marcelino; Fernández, Eduardo; Gómez, Eugenio.
Afiliação
  • Boada JN; Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Canary Islands, University of La Laguna, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. boadajuarez@gmail.com
PLoS One ; 3(10): e3580, 2008.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18974868
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although several mathematical models have been proposed to assess the riskbenefit of drugs in one measure, their use in practice has been rather limited. Our objective was to design a simple, easily applicable model. In this respect, measuring the proportion of patients who respond favorably to treatment without being affected by adverse drug reactions (ADR) could be a suitable endpoint. However, remarkably few published clinical trials report the data required to calculate this proportion. As an approach to the problem, we calculated the expected proportion of this type of patients. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

FINDINGS:

Theoretically, responders without ADR may be obtained by multiplying the total number of responders by the total number of subjects that did not suffer ADR, and dividing the product by the total number of subjects studied. When two drugs are studied, the same calculation may be repeated for the second drug. Then, by constructing a 2 x 2 table with the expected frequencies of responders with and without ADR, and non-responders with and without ADR, the odds ratio and relative risk with their confidence intervals may be easily calculated and graphically represented on a logarithmic scale. Such measures represent "net efficacy adjusted for risk" (NEAR). We assayed the model with results extracted from several published clinical trials or meta-analyses. On comparing our results with those originally reported by the authors, marked differences were found in some cases, with ADR arising as a relevant factor to balance the clinical benefit obtained. The particular features of the adverse reaction that must be weighed against benefit is discussed in the paper.

CONCLUSION:

NEAR representing overall risk-benefit may contribute to improving knowledge of drug clinical usefulness. As most published clinical trials tend to overestimate benefits and underestimate toxicity, our measure represents an effort to change this trend.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha