Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy.
Bedke, Jens; Leichtle, Ulf; Lorenz, Andrea; Nagele, Udo; Stenzl, Arnulf; Kruck, Stephan.
Afiliação
  • Bedke J; Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. bedke@live.com
Urolithiasis ; 41(2): 153-7, 2013 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23503877
ABSTRACT
Ureterorenoscopy (URS) has revolutionized upper urinary tract stone therapy. However, the size of the working channel and the stone baskets limit irrigation flow as well as vision. This study determined further improvements of irrigation flow, deflection capacities and impairments of breaking resistance in a new 1.2 French (F) ultra-miniaturized basket. Irrigation measurements were performed in semirigid URS (semiURS, working channel 5F) and in flexible URS (flexURS, 3.6F) in 0°, 90° and 270° deflection with 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets and compared with empty channel. Breaking strength of 1.2F, 1.8F and 1.9F baskets were evaluated using a material testing machine. Tested baskets affected irrigation in semiURS and flexURS (p < 0.05). Mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean) for semiURS flow rates counted 197.1 ± 2.0, 140.9 ± 1.6, 111.1 ± 1.5, 98.0 ± 1.3 and 77.1 ± 0.9 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets (p < 0.05). Using unbent flexURS flow rates of 44.2 ± 0.4, 20.4 ± 0.2, 5.9 ± 0.1, 5.4 ± 0.1 and 1.5 ± 0.1 ml/min for empty channel, 1.2F, 1.8F, 1.9F and 2.2F baskets, were observed (p < 0.05). The 1.2F versus 2.2F basket showed a 13.6-fold increase in flexURS irrigation (p < 0.05), while only the 2.2F basket reduced deflection by 20.3 %. The breaking strength decreased with a reduced basket size (1.2F 6.4 ± 0.46 vs. 1.8F 16.8 ± 2.79 vs. 1.9F 32.2 ± 2.74 N, p < 0.05). Ultra-miniaturized baskets of 1.2F ensured a sufficient irrigation flow as needed for high quality vision in URS stone management. However, miniaturization of the 1.2F basket resulted in a reduced breaking strength compared with larger sized devices which in turn may hamper stone removal by an increased vulnerability.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureteroscopia / Ureteroscópios / Urolitíase Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urolithiasis Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ureteroscopia / Ureteroscópios / Urolitíase Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Urolithiasis Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha