Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Split dosing with a low-volume preparation is not inferior to split dosing with a high-volume preparation for bowel cleansing in patients with a history of colorectal resection: a randomized trial.
Mussetto, Alessandro; Frazzoni, Leonardo; Paggi, Silvia; Dari, Silvia; Laterza, Liboria; Radaelli, Franco; Hassan, Cesare; Triossi, Omero; Fuccio, Lorenzo.
Afiliação
  • Mussetto A; Division of Gastroenterology, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
  • Frazzoni L; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Paggi S; Division of Endoscopy, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.
  • Dari S; Division of Gastroenterology, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
  • Laterza L; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
  • Radaelli F; Division of Endoscopy, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.
  • Hassan C; Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
  • Triossi O; Division of Gastroenterology, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy.
  • Fuccio L; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Endoscopy ; 47(10): 917-24, 2015 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25910064
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY

AIM:

The study compared the efficacy of bowel cleansing using a low-volume mixed preparation (15 mg bisacodyl plus 2 L polyethylene glycol [PEG] solution) versus a standard high-volume preparation (4 L PEG) in patients with previous colorectal resection. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

A total of 120 patients with prior colorectal resection for cancer undergoing surveillance colonoscopy were randomized to receive either a split-dose low-volume (n = 60) or high-volume (n = 60) preparation for bowel cleansing. The quality of bowel preparation, rated according to a modified Ottawa Bowel Preparation scale (mOBPS), represented the primary outcome measure. Tolerability, safety, and lesion detection rates were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS:

No significant difference was observed between the low-volume and high-volume preparations in achievement of adequate cleansing (i. e. mOBPS ≤ 4; low-volume vs. high-volume group, 85.0 % vs. 81.7 %, P = 0.624). The low-volume preparation showed a higher success rate for cleansing of the right colon (P = 0.025); better tolerability in terms of intake of the whole amount of the preparation (P < 0.001) was also observed. According to the logistic regression analysis, the only predictors of unsuccessful cleansing were previous left colectomy (P = 0.012) and a longer elapsed time since the intervention (P = 0.034). Lesion detection rates were comparable between the groups. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION:

A low-volume preparation is not inferior to a high-volume preparation for adequate bowel cleansing in patients with prior colorectal resection for cancer. If larger, multicenter, prospective studies confirm our findings, a low-volume preparation will represent a more tolerable option for such patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT01887158.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polietilenoglicóis / Bisacodil / Catárticos / Colonoscopia / Colectomia / Colo / Ácido Cítrico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Endoscopy Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polietilenoglicóis / Bisacodil / Catárticos / Colonoscopia / Colectomia / Colo / Ácido Cítrico Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Endoscopy Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália