Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation dose uncertainty and correction for a mouse orthotopic and xenograft irradiation model.
Gan, Gregory N; Altunbas, Cem; Morton, John J; Eagles, Justin; Backus, Jennifer; Dzingle, Wayne; Raben, David; Jimeno, Antonio.
Afiliação
  • Gan GN; a Division of Radiation Oncology, Internal Medicine , University of New Mexico School of Medicine , Albuquerque , NM , USA ;
  • Altunbas C; b Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA ;
  • Morton JJ; b Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA ;
  • Eagles J; c Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine , University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA ;
  • Backus J; c Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine , University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA ;
  • Dzingle W; b Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA ;
  • Raben D; b Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA ;
  • Jimeno A; b Department of Radiation Oncology , University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA ;
Int J Radiat Biol ; 92(1): 50-6, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26689828
PURPOSE: In animal irradiation models, reported dose can vary significantly from the actual doses delivered. We describe an effective method for in vivo dose verification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice bearing commercially-available cell line or patient-derived tumor cell orthotopic or flank xenografts were irradiated using a 160 kVp, 25 mA X-ray source. Entrance dose was evaluated using optically-stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD) and exit dose was assessed using radiochromic film dosimetry. RESULTS: Tumor position within the irradiation field was validated using external fiducial markers. The average entrance dose in orthotopic tumors from 10 OSLDs placed on two different animal irradiation days was 514 ± 37 cGy (range: 437-545). Exit dose measurements taken from seven radiochromic films on two separate days were 341 ± 21 cGy (a 34% attenuation). Flank tumor irradiation doses measured by OSLD were 368 ± 9 cGy compared to exit doses of 330 cGy measured by radiochromic film. CONCLUSION: Variations related to the irradiation model can lead to significant under or overdosing in vivo which can affect tumor control and/or biologic endpoints that are dose-dependent. We recommend that dose measurements be determined empirically based on the mouse model and irradiator used and dose compensation adjustments performed to ensure correct and appropriate doses.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Dosagem Radioterapêutica / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radioterapia Conformacional / Modelos Biológicos / Neoplasias Experimentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Biol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Dosagem Radioterapêutica / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radioterapia Conformacional / Modelos Biológicos / Neoplasias Experimentais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Biol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article