Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase II study of vemurafenib followed by ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma.
Amin, Asim; Lawson, David H; Salama, April K S; Koon, Henry B; Guthrie, Troy; Thomas, Sajeve S; O'Day, Steven J; Shaheen, Montaser F; Zhang, Bin; Francis, Stephen; Hodi, F Stephen.
Afiliação
  • Amin A; Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Medical Oncology, 1021 Morehead Medical Drive, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA.
  • Lawson DH; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA.
  • Salama AK; Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC USA.
  • Koon HB; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA.
  • Guthrie T; Baptist Cancer Institute, Jacksonville, FL USA.
  • Thomas SS; MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, FL USA.
  • O'Day SJ; John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, CA USA.
  • Shaheen MF; University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM USA.
  • Zhang B; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ USA ; Current Address: KBP BioSciences, Princeton, NJ USA.
  • Francis S; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ USA.
  • Hodi FS; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA.
J Immunother Cancer ; 4: 44, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27532019
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ipilimumab (IPI), an anti-CTLA-4 antibody, and vemurafenib (VEM), a BRAF inhibitor, have distinct mechanisms of action and shared toxicities (e.g., skin, gastrointestinal [GI] and hepatobiliary disorders) that may preclude concomitant administration. Concurrent administration of IPI and VEM previously showed significant dose-limiting hepatotoxicity in advanced melanoma. This single-arm, open-label, phase II study evaluated a sequencing strategy with these two agents in previously untreated patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma.

METHODS:

This study was divided into two parts. During Part 1 (VEM1-IPI), patients received VEM 960 mg twice daily for 6 weeks followed by IPI 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses (induction), then every 12 weeks (maintenance) beginning at week 24 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During Part 2 (VEM2), patients who progressed after IPI received VEM at their previously tolerated dose. The primary objective was to estimate the incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related skin adverse events (AEs) during VEM1-IPI.

RESULTS:

All patients who were initially treated with VEM (n = 46) received IPI induction therapy; 8 received IPI maintenance and 19 were treated during VEM2. During VEM1-IPI, the incidence of grade 3/4 drug-related AEs associated with the skin, GI tract, and hepatobiliary system was 32.6 %, 21.7 %, and 4.3 %, respectively. There were no drug-related deaths. At a median follow-up of 15.3 months, median overall survival was 18.5 months. Median progression-free survival was 4.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

VEM (960 mg twice daily for 6 weeks) followed by IPI 10 mg/kg has a manageable safety profile. The benefits/risks of BRAF inhibitors followed by immunotherapy should be evaluated further in light of continuing developments in treatment options for metastatic melanoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01673854 (CA184-240) Registered 24 August 2012.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Immunother Cancer Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article