Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Zika in Pernambuco: rewriting the first outbreak.
Brito, Carlos Alexandre Antunes de; Brito, Cecilia Coelho Moraes de; Oliveira, Augusto César; Rocha, Marilia; Atanásio, Caio; Asfora, Carolina; Matos, Júlio Dourado; Lima, Anton Saraiva; Albuquerque, Maria Fátima Militão.
Afiliação
  • Brito CA; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Brito CC; Programa de Graduação em Medicina, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Oliveira AC; Programa de Graduação em Medicina, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Rocha M; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Atanásio C; Programa de Graduação em Medicina, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Asfora C; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Matos JD; Programa de Graduação em Medicina, Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Lima AS; Departamento de Medicina Clínica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
  • Albuquerque MF; Departamento de Saúde Pública, Centro de Pesquisa Aggeu Magalhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ; 49(5): 553-558, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27812648
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A Zika virus epidemic was registered in 2015 in Northeast Brazil. In the State of Pernambuco, thousands of classical cases transpired, and in the following months, neurological disturbances in adults and microcephaly in newborns emerged as complications. After the peak of the epidemic, the official system reported only four cases of Zika virus but over 100,000 cases of dengue virus. The vigilance system was unable to retrospectively estimate cases or to issue an alert to officially notified cases with possible inconsistence concerning specific arbovirosis diagnoses.

METHODS:

To evaluate the frequency of different arbovirosis diagnoses based on clinical-epidemiologic criteria, from January to April 2015, we conducted a hospital-based cross-sectional study retrospectively analyzing suspected cases of arbovirosis.

RESULTS:

Of 1 , 046 total suspected cases of arbovirus, 895 (86%) were classified as probable Zika virus cases, and 151 (14%) as probable dengue virus cases. The most frequent manifestations in probable Zika virus cases were exanthema (100%), pruritus (50.7%), fever (20.4%) and arthralgia (27.7%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In contrast to the official data, during the peak months of the arbovirosis epidemic of 2015, most cases were compatible with Zika virus infections. Hospital-based studies, although retrospective and based on secondary data from clinical files, might provide a better estimate of the number of cases relative to currently available data, if derived from several urgent care units of representative areas of a city or state.This would partially retrospectively correct some inconsistences regarding official notifications.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Surtos de Doenças / Infecção por Zika virus Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Surtos de Doenças / Infecção por Zika virus Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Middle aged / Newborn País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil