Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Boosting Immune Responses Following Fractional-Dose Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Resik, Sonia; Tejeda, Alina; Diaz, Manuel; Okayasu, Hiromasa; Sein, Carolyn; Molodecky, Natalie A; Fonseca, Magile; Alemany, Nilda; Garcia, Gloria; Hung, Lai Heng; Martinez, Yenisleydis; Sutter, Roland W.
Afiliação
  • Resik S; Pedro Kouri Institute of Tropical Medicine, Havana.
  • Tejeda A; Provincial Center for Hygiene, Epidemiology, and Microbiology, Camaguey, Cuba.
  • Diaz M; Pedro Kouri Institute of Tropical Medicine, Havana.
  • Okayasu H; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Sein C; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Molodecky NA; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Fonseca M; Pedro Kouri Institute of Tropical Medicine, Havana.
  • Alemany N; Provincial Center for Hygiene, Epidemiology, and Microbiology, Camaguey, Cuba.
  • Garcia G; Provincial Center for Hygiene, Epidemiology, and Microbiology, Camaguey, Cuba.
  • Hung LH; Pedro Kouri Institute of Tropical Medicine, Havana.
  • Martinez Y; Pedro Kouri Institute of Tropical Medicine, Havana.
  • Sutter RW; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Infect Dis ; 215(2): 175-182, 2017 Jan 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28073858
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Fractional-dose administration of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (fIPV) could increase IPV affordability and stretch limited supplies. We assessed immune responses following fIPV administered intradermally, compared with full-dose IPV administered intramuscularly, among adults with a history of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) receipt.

METHODS:

We conducted a randomized, controlled noninferiority trial in Cuba. fIPV or IPV were administered on days 0 and 28; serum was collected on days 0, 7, 28, and 56 for analysis by a neutralization assay. The primary end point was seroconversion or a ≥4-fold rise in antibody titer. The noninferiority limit was 10%. The secondary end point was safety, assessed by the number and intensity of adverse reactions.

RESULTS:

A total of 503 of 534 enrolled participants (94.2%) completed all study requirements. Twenty-eight days after the first dose, 94.8%, 98.0%, and 98.0% of fIPV recipients had an immune response to poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3, respectively, compared with 98.1% (P = .06), 98.0% (P = 1.00), and 99.2% (P = .45) in the IPV arm. Noninferiority was achieved on days 7, 28, and 56 for all serotypes. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION:

fIPV induced similar boosting immune responses, compared with full-dose IPV. This suggests that fIPV would be an effective strategy to boost population immunity in an outbreak situation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ACTRN12615000305527.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poliomielite / Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado / Imunização Secundária Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Caribe / Cuba Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poliomielite / Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado / Imunização Secundária Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Caribe / Cuba Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Dis Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article