Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of Pomalidomide, Carfilzomib, and Daratumumab for the Treatment of Patients with Heavily Pretreated Relapsed-refractory Multiple Myeloma in the United States.
Pelligra, Christopher G; Parikh, Kejal; Guo, Shien; Chandler, Conor; Mouro, Jorge; Abouzaid, Safiya; Ailawadhi, Sikander.
Afiliação
  • Pelligra CG; Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts. Electronic address: christopher.pelligra@evidera.com.
  • Parikh K; Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey.
  • Guo S; Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts.
  • Chandler C; Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts.
  • Mouro J; Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey.
  • Abouzaid S; Celgene Corporation, Summit, New Jersey.
  • Ailawadhi S; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Clin Ther ; 39(10): 1986-2005.e5, 2017 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28967482
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM-d), daratumumab monotherapy (DARA), and carfilzomib monotherapy (CAR) have been approved for use in the treatment of patients with heavily pretreated relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the US, based on findings from the MM-002, SIRIUS, and PX-171-003-A1 studies, respectively. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of POM-d, DARA, and CAR in this patient population from a US payer's perspective.

METHODS:

A cost-effectiveness model was developed to estimate the cost and health outcomes over a 3-year time horizon in 3 health states progression-free, post-progression, and death. The main efficacy data source was a matching-adjusted indirect comparison using data from the aforementioned studies. Direct medical costs were considered, including treatment acquisition and administration (initial line and subsequent line), pre- and post-medication, prophylaxis treatment, adverse event management, and health care resource utilization. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. A scenario analysis that assumed equal efficacy across all 3 treatments was conducted. Costs, life-years, and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated and discounted at 3% per annum.

FINDINGS:

Over 3 years, the use of POM-d was associated with similar life-years and quality-adjusted life-years gained compared with DARA and CAR (incremental life-years, +0.02 and +0.07, respectively; quality-adjusted life-years, +0.01 and +0.05), and with a cost less than that of DARA (-$8,919) and similar to that of CAR (-$195). Sensitivity analyses illustrated that the results were sensitive to progression-free survival, treatment duration, and drug costs. An equal efficacy scenario resulted in cost-savings relative to those of both DARA and CAR (-$11,779 and -$12,595). IMPLICATIONS POM-d may be a cost-effective treatment option relative to DARA or CAR in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM in the US.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oligopeptídeos / Talidomida / Dexametasona / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Anticorpos Monoclonais / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ther Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oligopeptídeos / Talidomida / Dexametasona / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Anticorpos Monoclonais / Mieloma Múltiplo Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Ther Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article