Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Socioeconomic factors as predictors of organ donation.
Shah, Malay B; Vilchez, Valery; Goble, Adam; Daily, Michael F; Berger, Jonathan C; Gedaly, Roberto; DuBay, Derek A.
Afiliação
  • Shah MB; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Electronic address: malay.shah@uky.edu.
  • Vilchez V; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Goble A; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Daily MF; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Berger JC; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Gedaly R; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • DuBay DA; Division of Abdominal Transplantation, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
J Surg Res ; 221: 88-94, 2018 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29229159
BACKGROUND: Despite numerous initiatives to increase solid organs for transplant, the gap between donors and recipients widens. There is little in the literature identifying socioeconomic predictors for donation. We evaluate the correlation between socioeconomic factors and familial authorization for donation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adult potential donor referrals between 2007 and 2012 to our organ procurement organization (OPO) was performed. Potential donor information was obtained from the OPO database, death certificates, and the US Census Report. Data on demographics, education, residence, income, registry status, cause and manner of death, as well as OPO assessments and approach for donation were collected. End point was familial authorization for donation. RESULTS: A total of 1059 potential donors were included, with an overall authorization rate of 47%. The majority was not on the donor registry (73%). Younger donors (18-39 y: odds ratio [OR] = 4.9, P < 0.001; 40-60 y: OR = 2.1, P < 0.001), higher levels of education (college: OR = 2.5, P = 0.005; graduate studies: OR = 3.9, P = 0.002), prior listing on the donor registry (OR = 10.3, P < 0.001), and residence in counties with lower poverty rates than the US rates (OR = 1.7, P = 0.02) were independently associated with higher authorization rates. Decoupling (OR = 3.1, P < 0.001) and donation first mentioned by the local health care provider (OR = 1.8, P = 0.01) were also independently associated with higher authorization rates. CONCLUSIONS: Donor registration correlated most strongly with the highest authorization rates. These results indicate that public educational efforts in populations with unfavorable socioeconomic considerations may be beneficial in improving donor registration. Collaborations with local providers as well as OPO in-hospital assessments and approach techniques can help with improving authorization rates.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article