Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using a dynamic adherence Markov model to assess the efficiency of Respiratory Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (RMTAC) on asthma patients in Malaysia.
Yong, Yee Vern; Shafie, Asrul Akmal.
Afiliação
  • Yong YV; Formulary Management Branch, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Shafie AA; 2Discipline of Social & Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang, Malaysia.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 16: 36, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30377414
BACKGROUND: Respiratory Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic (RMTAC) is an initiative by the Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia to improve patients' medication adherence, as an adjunct to the usual physician care (UC). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of combined strategy of RMTAC and UC (RMTAC + UC) vs. UC alone in asthma patients, from the MOH Malaysia perspective. METHODS: A lifetime horizon dynamic adherence Markov model with monthly cycle was developed, for quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and hospitalization averted outcomes. Transition probabilities of composite asthma control and medication adherence, utilities, costs, and mortality rates due to all causes were measured from local data sources. Effectiveness, exacerbation rates, and asthma mortality rates were taken from non-local data sources. One-way sensitivity analysis (SA) was conducted for assessing parameter uncertainties, whereas probabilistic SA (PSA) was conducted on a different set of utilities and effectiveness data. Costs were adjusted to 2014 US dollars ($). Both costs and benefits were discounted at a 3% rate annually. RESULTS: RMTAC + UC was found to be a dominant alternative compared to UC alone; $- 13,639.40 ($- 109,556.90 to $104,445.54) per QALY gained and $- 428.93 ($- 521.27 to ($- 328.69)) per hospitalization averted. These results were found to be robust against changes in all parameters except utilities in the one-way SA, and for both scenarios in PSA. CONCLUSIONS: RMTAC + UC is more effective and yet cheaper than UC alone, from the MOH perspective. For the benefit of both MOH and patients, RMTAC is thus recommended to be remained, and expanded to more healthcare settings where possible.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Malásia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Idioma: En Revista: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Malásia