Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Uterotonic drugs to prevent postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis.
Gallos, Ioannis; Williams, Helen; Price, Malcolm; Pickering, Karen; Merriel, Abi; Tobias, Aurelio; Lissauer, David; Gee, Harry; Tunçalp, Özge; Gyte, Gillian; Moorthy, Vidhya; Roberts, Tracy; Deeks, Jonathan; Hofmeyr, Justus; Gülmezoglu, Metin; Coomarasamy, Arri.
Afiliação
  • Gallos I; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Williams H; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Price M; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Pickering K; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Merriel A; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Tobias A; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Lissauer D; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Gee H; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Tunçalp Ö; Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Gyte G; Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Centre for Women's Health Research, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
  • Moorthy V; National Childbirth Trust, London, UK.
  • Roberts T; Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Deeks J; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hofmeyr J; Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Gülmezoglu M; Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand/Fort Hare, Eastern Cape Department of Health, East London, South Africa.
  • Coomarasamy A; Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Health Technol Assess ; 23(9): 1-356, 2019 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30821683
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the most common reason why mothers die in childbirth worldwide. Although most healthy women can cope well with blood loss after birth, some do not, and this can pose a serious risk to their health and even life. To reduce blood loss after birth, the routine administration of a drug to contract the uterus (uterotonic) has become standard practice across the world. This research seeks to identify which is the most effective and cost-effective drug. Different drugs have been used for reducing the occurrence of PPH. They include oxytocin, misoprostol, ergometrine, carbetocin, and combinations of these drugs, each with different effectiveness and side effects. The study synthesised the available evidence to compare all of these drugs and combinations thereof. After putting the results of all available comparisons together in a network, a ranking among them was calculated, and provided robust effectiveness and side-effect profiles for each drug and their associated costs. The study included 137 randomised trials, involving a total of 87,466 women. The results suggested that ergometrine plus oxytocin, carbetocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin are the most effective strategies for preventing PPH and are more effective than the currently recommended drug, oxytocin. Each of these three strategies had almost 100% probability of being ranked first, second or third most effective. Oxytocin was ranked fourth with an almost 0% probability of being ranked in the top three. Ergometrine plus oxytocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin were the worst drug combinations for side effects, with carbetocin having the most favourable side-effect profile. Carbetocin could prevent approximately one further event of PPH out of three in comparison with oxytocin. However, existing carbetocin studies were small and of poor quality. There is need for a large high-quality study comparing carbetocin with the current standard treatment of oxytocin for the prevention of PPH. The cost analyses of the alternative drug strategies remain inconclusive.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ocitócicos / Ocitocina / Misoprostol / Quimioterapia Combinada / Ergonovina / Metanálise em Rede / Hemorragia Pós-Parto Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Health Technol Assess Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / TECNOLOGIA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ocitócicos / Ocitocina / Misoprostol / Quimioterapia Combinada / Ergonovina / Metanálise em Rede / Hemorragia Pós-Parto Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Health Technol Assess Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / TECNOLOGIA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article