Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modified American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System Based on the Node Ratio Can Further Improve the Capacity of Prognosis Assessment for Gastric Cancer Patients.
Yang, Ze-Long; Zhu, Ming-Hua; Han, Xiu-Jing; Liu, Qiang-Wei; Long, Jian-Hai; Wang, Chun-Xi.
Afiliação
  • Yang ZL; Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhu MH; Department of General Surgery, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, China.
  • Han XJ; Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Liu QW; Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Long JH; Anesthesiology and Operation Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Wang CX; Department of General Surgery, People's Liberation Army No. 520 Hospital, Mianyang, China.
Front Oncol ; 9: 329, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31131256
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Our aim was to investigate whether the modified American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system based on the node ratio can further improve the capacity of prognosis assessment for gastric cancer (GC) patients regardless of the number of lymph nodes examined (eLNs).

Methods:

A total of 17,187 GC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. On the basis of a training set of 7,660 GC patients, we built the tumor-node ratio-metastasis (TNrM) staging system, which was then externally validated with a validation set of 9,527 GC patients.

Results:

For the training set, the C-index value of the TNrM staging system was significantly higher than that of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system to predict survival for GC patients (C-index 0.688 vs. 0.671, P < 0.001). Moreover, the C-index value of the TNrM staging system was significantly higher than that of the 8th TNM staging system to predict survival for GC patients with ≤15 eLNs (C-index 0.682 vs. 0.673, P < 0.001), as well as for GC patients with >15 eLNs (C-index 0.700 vs. 0.694, P < 0.001). Similar results were found in the validation set.

Conclusions:

The TNrM staging system predicted survival more accurately and discriminatively than the AJCC 8th TNM staging system for GC patients regardless of the number of eLNs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China