Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Difficult-to-treat gout flares: eligibility for interleukin-1 inhibition in private practice is uncommon according to current EMA approval.
Pascart, Tristan; Norberciak, Laurène; Ea, Hang-Korng; Graf, Sahara; Guggenbuhl, Pascal; Lioté, Frédéric.
Afiliação
  • Pascart T; Service de rhumatologie, Hôpital Saint-Philibert, Université de Lille, Lomme, France.
  • Norberciak L; Laboratoire PMOI, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
  • Ea HK; Département de recherche médicale, Hôpital Saint-Philibert, Université de Lille, Lomme, France.
  • Graf S; Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
  • Guggenbuhl P; AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, pôle appareil locomoteur, service de Rhumatologie, centre Viggo Petersen, Paris, France.
  • Lioté F; Inserm, UMR 1132, centre Viggo Petersen, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 58(12): 2181-2187, 2019 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31177284
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the proportion of patients with difficult-to-treat or difficult-to-prevent acute gout attacks eligible for IL-1 inhibition. METHODS: Participants included in the French cross-sectional GOSPEL cohort (n = 1003 gout patients) were examined for contraindications and intolerance to standard of care (SoC) drugs of gout flares (colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and systemic glucocorticoids). Patients were classified as definitely eligible for first-line IL-1 inhibition (canakinumab) according to European summary of product characteristics (contraindications/intolerance to SoC and at least three flares per year) without any other anti-inflammatory options (contraindications/intolerance only), or potentially eligible (precaution of use). Eligibility to receive IL-1 during an on-going flare related to insufficient efficacy was assessed (second-line eligibility). RESULTS: Definite first-line eligibility for IL-1 therapy was found in 10 patients (1%) and contraindication to all SoC therapies in nine patients who had presented <3 flares in the past 12 months. At least precaution of use for SoC therapies was noted for 218/1003 patients (21.7%). Of 487 patients experiencing flares at baseline, 114 (23.4%) were still experiencing pain scored ⩾4/10 numeric scale on day 3, one of whom could not receive further SoC drugs. Only nine of them had three or more flares in the past year and were eligible for second-line IL-1 inhibition. CONCLUSION: Despite significant numbers of patients without any SoC anti-inflammatory therapeutic options for gout flares, eligibility for IL-1 inhibition therapy according to current European approval is rare.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides / Colchicina / Supressores da Gota / Definição da Elegibilidade / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Exacerbação dos Sintomas / Glucocorticoides / Gota Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Assunto da revista: REUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides / Colchicina / Supressores da Gota / Definição da Elegibilidade / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Exacerbação dos Sintomas / Glucocorticoides / Gota Limite: Aged / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatology (Oxford) Assunto da revista: REUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França