Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety of Ipragliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Pooled Analysis of Phase II/III/IV Clinical Trials.
Kashiwagi, Atsunori; Shestakova, Marina V; Ito, Yuichiro; Noguchi, Masahiro; Wilpshaar, Wim; Yoshida, Satoshi; Wilding, John P H.
Afiliação
  • Kashiwagi A; Kusatsu General Hospital, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan. kashiwagi@kusatsu-gh.or.jp.
  • Shestakova MV; Endocrinology Research Centre, Diabetes Institute, Moscow, Russia.
  • Ito Y; Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Noguchi M; Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Wilpshaar W; Astellas Pharma Europe B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Yoshida S; Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Wilding JPH; Obesity and Endocrinology Research, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Diabetes Ther ; 10(6): 2201-2217, 2019 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31606880
INTRODUCTION: Ipragliflozin is a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The objective of this pooled analysis was to characterise the safety profile of ipragliflozin based on safety data from published randomised controlled trials. METHODS: Safety data from 12 randomised, phase II/III/IV placebo-controlled, parallel group, comparative studies of ipragliflozin in patients with T2DM were pooled. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analysed for patients who had received at least one dose of ipragliflozin 50 mg (n = 1209) or placebo (n = 796) in studies lasting for up to 24 weeks. TEAEs of special interest and serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed, as well as abnormal laboratory test and vital sign measurements. RESULTS: The overall incidences of TEAEs and SAEs between the ipragliflozin and placebo groups were similar, 63.8% vs 59.3% and 2.5% vs 3.3%, respectively. The incidence of TEAEs leading to permanent discontinuation was lower for ipragliflozin (3.6%) than placebo (6.5%). The incidences of TEAEs of special interest including those related to urinary tract infection, cardiovascular events, renal disorder, fracture, malignant tumours and hypoglycaemia were also similar between the groups. Genital infections were more frequent with ipragliflozin (2.4%) than placebo (0.6%), as were pollakiuria/polyuria (6.0% vs 2.0%), volume depletion (4.9% vs 1.8%) and skin/subcutaneous tissue disorders (7.7% vs 4.4%). There were no reported cases of diabetic ketoacidosis, fractures, lower-limb amputation or Fournier's gangrene in ipragliflozin-treated patients across the 12 studies. CONCLUSION: In randomised, placebo-controlled trials of patients with T2DM, ipragliflozin was well tolerated, with a similar overall incidence of TEAEs to placebo. No new safety signals were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01071850, NCT00621868, NCT01057628, NCT01117584, NCT01135433, NCT01225081, NCT01242215, NCT02175784, NCT01505426, NCT02452632, NCT02794792, NCT01316094. FUNDING: Astellas Pharma Inc.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão