Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Digital Professionalism in Patient Care: A Case-Based Survey of Surgery Faculty and Trainees.
Naples, Robert; Costas-Chavarri, Ainhoa; Golden, Daniel W; Gmitter, Elizabeth; French, Judith C; Lipman, Jeremy M.
Afiliação
  • Naples R; Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: naplesr2@ccf.org.
  • Costas-Chavarri A; Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
  • Golden DW; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Gmitter E; Malcolm X College, Health Science and Career Program, Chicago, Illinois.
  • French JC; Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Lipman JM; Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Surg Res ; 253: 193-200, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32380345
BACKGROUND: Use of digital devices have become ubiquitous in healthcare and can create professionalism issues. This study presents opinions of faculty, residents, and medical students to inform policy on the appropriate use of digital devices in the patient care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was administered from September 2018 to October 2018 to faculty and residents within the general surgery department at a large academic medical center and all fourth-year medical students at an affiliated university. The survey included direct statements and case-based scenarios on similar themes to triangulate responses. RESULTS: There were 114 participants in the survey-50 faculty, 26 residents, and 38 medical students. Digital device utilization was equivalent among all groups, and all participants use a smartphone. Digital devices were most frequently used during rounds and clinical conferences. Overall, digital device use was found more appropriate when seen in the case-based format rather than as a direct statement. Furthermore, use of these devices was seen as most appropriate when the provider explained its use or left the room to use the device. CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices are used by faculty and trainees at similar rates for parallel purposes, and the benefits for patient-related care are evident. However, the use of digital devices in the presence of patients should be minimized and always preceded by an explanation. These findings can inform institutional policy when creating guidelines on the professional use of these devices in the patient care setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ética Médica / Comportamento de Busca de Informação / Profissionalismo / Smartphone Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ética Médica / Comportamento de Busca de Informação / Profissionalismo / Smartphone Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article