Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of women's sexual outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction.
van de Grift, Tim C; Mureau, Marc A M; Negenborn, Vera N; Dikmans, Rieky E G; Bouman, Mark-Bram; Mullender, Margriet G.
Afiliação
  • van de Grift TC; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mureau MAM; Department Medical Psychology and Sexology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Negenborn VN; Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dikmans REG; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bouman MB; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mullender MG; Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychooncology ; 29(8): 1272-1279, 2020 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32419285
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Although breast reconstruction has become an important treatment modality following mastectomy, few studies assessed predictors of postoperative sexual outcomes after breast reconstruction. Therefore, we aimed to study three sexual outcomes following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), and associate multiple biopsychosocial factors with these outcomes.

METHODS:

Data collection was part of a multicenter prospective study on IBBR. A predictive model was tested including medical, background and psychological predictors, partner relationship factors and physical sexual function. Data collection included clinical and questionnaire data (preoperatively and 1 year following reconstruction) using the BREAST-Q Sexual well-being scale (BQ5), and questions regarding sexual dysfunction and sexual satisfaction questions (Female Sexual Function Index).

RESULTS:

The study sample consisted of 88 women who underwent mastectomy and IBBR. Mean postoperative BQ5 scores were lower than before surgery (M = 58 [SD = 18] vs 65 [SD = 20]; P = .01, Wilks' Lamdba = .88). Sexual dysfunctions were related strongest to orgasm inability and vaginal lubrication issues. The tested models predicted 37%-46% of the sexual

outcomes:

sexual outcomes were mostly predicted by psychosocial well-being, physical sexual function and partner support. Preoperative sexual and psychosocial well-being were positively associated with postoperative sexual well-being (r = 0.45 and r = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although moderately positive sexual outcomes were reported after IBBR, some women reported issues with vaginal lubrication, breast sensation and orgasm. Sexual dysfunctions were predicted by vaginal lubrication and medical treatments, while sexual well-being and satisfaction were more predicted by psychosocial well-being and partner support. We advocate supportive care that includes partners and psychosocial functioning to optimize sexual outcomes after IBBR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas / Neoplasias da Mama / Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas / Implante Mamário Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas / Neoplasias da Mama / Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas / Implante Mamário Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda