Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the investigational device exemption and post-approval trials of the Melody transcatheter pulmonary valve.
Kreutzer, Jacqueline; Armstrong, Aimee K; Rome, Jonathan J; Zellers, Thomas M; Balzer, David T; Zampi, Jeffrey D; Cabalka, Allison K; Javois, Alexander J; Turner, Daniel R; Gray, Robert G; Moore, John W; Weng, Shicheng; Jones, Thomas K; Khan, Danyal M; Vincent, Julie A; Hellenbrand, William E; Cheatham, John P; Bergersen, Lisa J; McElhinney, Doff B.
Afiliação
  • Kreutzer J; Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Armstrong AK; The Heart Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Rome JJ; Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Zellers TM; Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern and the Heart Center at Children's Health, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Balzer DT; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine/Saint Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Zampi JD; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Cabalka AK; Division of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Javois AJ; Advocate Children's Hospital, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, Advocate Children's Hospital, University of Illinois Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Turner DR; Division of Cardiology, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  • Gray RG; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Moore JW; Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Rady Children's Hospital, UC San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Weng S; Department of Biostatistics, Medtronic, Framingham, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Jones TK; Department of Cardiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Khan DM; The Heart Program, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • Vincent JA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Hellenbrand WE; Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
  • Cheatham JP; The Heart Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Bergersen LJ; Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • McElhinney DB; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lucille Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 98(2): E262-E274, 2021 08 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33780150
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We compared 5-year outcomes of transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) replacement with the Melody TPV in the post-approval study (PAS) and the investigational device exemption (IDE) trial.

BACKGROUND:

As a condition of approval of the Melody TPV after the IDE trial, the Food and Drug Administration required that a PAS be conducted to evaluate outcomes of TPV replacement in a "real-world" environment. The 5-year outcomes of the PAS have not been published, and the IDE and PAS trials have not been compared.

METHODS:

The cohorts comprised all patients catheterized and implanted at 5 IDE sites and 10 PAS sites. Differences in trial protocols were detailed. Time-related outcomes and valve-related adverse events were compared between the two trials with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing.

RESULTS:

167 patients (median age, 19 years) were catheterized and 150 underwent TPV replacement in the IDE trial; 121 were catheterized (median age, 17 years) and 100 implanted in the PAS. Freedom from hemodynamic dysfunction (p = .61) or any reintervention (p = .74) over time did not differ between trials. Freedom from stent fracture (p = .003) and transcatheter reintervention (p = .010) were longer in PAS, whereas freedom from explant (p = .020) and TPV endocarditis (p = .007) were shorter. Clinically important adverse events (AEs) were reported in 14% of PAS and 7.2% of IDE patients (p = .056); the incidence of any particular event was low in both.

CONCLUSIONS:

Hemodynamic and time-related outcomes in the PAS and IDE trials were generally similar, confirming the effectiveness of the Melody TPV with real-world providers. There were few significant complications and limited power to identify important differences in AEs. The lack of major differences in outcomes between the two studies questions the usefulness of mandated costly post-approval studies as part of the regulatory process for Class III medical devices.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Pulmonar / Insuficiência da Valva Pulmonar / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Pulmonar / Insuficiência da Valva Pulmonar / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos