Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stakeholder Experiences with the Single IRB Review Process and Recommendations for Food and Drug Administration Guidance.
Corneli, Amy; Dombeck, Carrie B; McKenna, Kevin; Calvert, Sara B.
Afiliação
  • Corneli A; Associate professor in the Department of Population Health Sciences at Duke University School of Medicine, a lead social scientist for the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, and a faculty member of the Duke Clinical Research Institute.
  • Dombeck CB; Research program leader in the Department of Population Health Sciences at Duke University School of Medicine and a research associate of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.
  • McKenna K; Research program leader in the Department of Population Health Sciences at Duke University School of Medicine and a research associate of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.
  • Calvert SB; Clinical trials project leader III at Duke Clinical Research Institute and a senior project manager of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.
Ethics Hum Res ; 43(3): 26-36, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34019339
ABSTRACT
The revised Common Rule requires using a single institutional review board (sIRB) for U.S.-based, multisite, nonexempt, federally conducted or supported research with human participants. The 21st Century Cures Act directs the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to harmonize differences between HHS and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations governing research with humans. Anticipating that the FDA may update its 2006 centralized IRB guidance, we conducted interviews with 34 stakeholders engaged in FDA-regulated clinical research to identify benefits and challenges of using sIRBs and to gather recommendations for revising the FDA's guidance. The main benefits were consistency and standardization, speed and efficiency, and streamlining and simplification. The main challenges were uncertainty at local institutions, including addressing local context; decreased timeliness of the research review process; variable processes; and insufficient communication. Several recommendations for FDA guidance focused on the local context and communication plans. Findings suggest that the sIRB review process may be gaining efficiency although challenges remain.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comunicação / Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ethics Hum Res Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comunicação / Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Ethics Hum Res Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article