Construct validity of the enfranchisement scale of the community participation indicators.
Clin Rehabil
; 36(2): 263-271, 2022 Feb.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34414799
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
This study examined the construct validity of the Enfranchisement scale of the Community Participation Indicators.DESIGN:
We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected in a cross-sectional study of rehabilitation outcomes.SUBJECTS:
The parent study included 604 community-dwelling adults with chronic traumatic brain injury, stroke, or spinal cord injury. The sample had a mean age of 64.1 years, was two-thirds male, and included a high proportion of racial minorities (n = 250, 41.4%). MAINMEASURES:
The Enfranchisement scale contains two subscales the Control subscale and the Importance subscale. We examined correlations between each Enfranchisement subscale and measures of participation, environment, and impairments. The current analyses included cases with at least 80% of items completed on each subscale (Control subscale n = 391; Importance subscale n = 219). Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation.RESULTS:
The sample demonstrated high scores, indicating poor enfranchisement (Control subscale M = 51.7; Importance subscale M = 43.0). Both subscales were most strongly associated with measures of participation (Control subscale r = 0.56; Importance subscale r = 0.52), and least strongly associated with measures of cognition (Control subscale r = 0.03; Importance subscale r = 0.03). The Importance subscale was closely associated with depression (r = 0.54), and systems, services, and policies (r = 0.50). Both subscales were associated with social attitudes (Control subscale r = 0.44; Importance subscale r = 0.44) and social support (Control subscale r = 0.49; Importance subscale r = 0.41).CONCLUSIONS:
We found evidence of convergent validity between the Enfranchisement scale and measures of participation, and discriminant validity between the Enfranchisement scale and measures of disability-related impairments. The analyses also revealed the importance of the environment to enfranchisement outcomes.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Traumatismos da Medula Espinal
/
Pessoas com Deficiência
/
Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Clin Rehabil
Assunto da revista:
REABILITACAO
Ano de publicação:
2022
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos