Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and radiological outcomes of novel digital workflow and dynamic navigation for single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone: 1-year prospective case series.
Pozzi, Alessandro; Arcuri, Lorenzo; Carosi, Paolo; Nardi, Alessandra; Kan, Joseph.
Afiliação
  • Pozzi A; Goldstein Center for Esthetic and Implant Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
  • Arcuri L; Private Practice Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Carosi P; Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, PhD in Materials for Health, Environment and Energy-Dentistry, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Nardi A; Department of Chemical Science and Technologies, PhD in Materials for Health, Environment and Energy-Dentistry, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Kan J; Department of Mathematics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 32(12): 1397-1410, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34467555
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical, radiological performance of novel digital workflow integrating dynamic navigation to streamline in one-visit single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients requiring one single-implant in aesthetic zone of both jaws were treated between May and September 2017. Primary outcomes were implant and prosthetic success rates, surgical and prosthetic complications, marginal bone loss (MBL), final pink aesthetic score (PES-f), and implant stability quotient (ISQ-f). Secondary outcomes were ISQ-0 and PES-0 at implant positioning and PES-p at definitive prosthesis placement. Potential effect of jaw (maxilla vs mandible), biotype (thin vs thick), type of incision (flap vs flapless), and implant site (healed vs. post-extractive) on the primary outcomes (MBL, PES-f, and ISQ-f) was evaluated through a multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-two implants were placed (follow-up 18.6, 15-20 months). One post-extractive implant failed. No other surgical, biological complications occurred, accounting for 98.10% cumulative success rate (CSR). No definitive prostheses failed. Mean MBL was -0.63 ± 0.25 mm (-1.69 to -0.06). PES-f was 12.34 ± 1.41 (9-14). ISQ-f was 78.1 ± 3.2 (70-84). Age had significantly negative effect on MBL and PES-f (p = .0058 and p = .0052). No other variables significantly affected primary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Within study limitations, investigated digital workflow integrating dynamic navigation was reliable for single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone in one visit. No statistically significant difference was found for MBL, PES-f, and ISQ-f, considering type of incision (flap vs. flapless), implant site (healed vs post-extractive), jaw (maxilla vs. mandible), and biotype (thick vs. thin). Live-tracked dynamic navigation may have contributed to improve operator clinical performance regardless of implant site characteristics. Further investigations are needed to confirm positive outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente / Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente / Carga Imediata em Implante Dentário Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos