Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator therapy in cardiac sarcoidosis.
Mathijssen, Harold; Bakker, Annelies L M; Balt, Jippe C; Akdim, Fatima; van Es, H Wouter; Veltkamp, Marcel; Grutters, Jan C; Post, Marco C.
Afiliação
  • Mathijssen H; Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Bakker ALM; Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Balt JC; Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Akdim F; Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • van Es HW; Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Veltkamp M; Department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Grutters JC; Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Post MC; Department of Pulmonology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 33(6): 1272-1280, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35411644
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is associated with an increased risk for sudden cardiac death. An implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) is recommended in a subgroup of CS patients. However, the recommendations for primary prevention differ between guidelines. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICDs in CS and to identify predictors of appropriate therapy.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed in CS patients with an ICD implantation between 2010 and 2019. Primary outcome was appropriate ICD therapy. Independent predictors were calculated using Cox proportional hazard analysis.

RESULTS:

105 patients were included. An ICD was implanted for primary prevention in 79%. During a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 34 patients (32.4%) received appropriate ICD therapy of whom 24 (22.9%) received an appropriate shock. Three patients (2.9%) received an inappropriate shock due to atrial fibrillation. Independent predictors of appropriate therapy included prior ventricular arrhythmias (hazard ratio [HR] 10.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-21.9]) and right ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (HR 3.6 [95% CI 1.7-7.6]). Within the primary prevention group, right ventricular LGE (HR 5.7 [95% CI 1.6-20.7]) was the only independent predictor of appropriate therapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ between patients with and without appropriate therapy (44.4% vs. 45.6%, p = .70).

CONCLUSION:

In CS patients with an ICD, a high rate of appropriate therapy was observed and a low rate of inappropriate shocks. Prior ventricular arrhythmias and right ventricular LGE were independent predictors of appropriate therapy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoidose / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Miocardite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sarcoidose / Desfibriladores Implantáveis / Miocardite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda