Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The utility of a multi-orifice epidural catheter when using the "Spray-as-You-Go" technique for topical Airway Anesthesia during Flexible Bronchoscopy, a randomised trial.
Cai, Yaoyao; Chen, Limei; Dong, Dongmei; Ye, Min; Jin, Xiuling; Liu, Fuli.
Afiliação
  • Cai Y; Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Zhejiang, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Chen L; Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Zhejiang, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Dong D; , Wenzhou City, China.
  • Ye M; Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Zhejiang, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Jin X; Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Zhejiang, Zhejiang Province, China.
  • Liu F; Department of Pneumology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 325000, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 37(1): 55-62, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35441943
BACKGROUND: Lidocaine administered through the working channel of a flexible bronchoscope can provide effective local anesthesia but cannot achieve good distribution in the airway. This study was undertaken to determine whether lidocaine delivered via a multi-orifice epidural catheter (three orifices/openings) is superior to conventional method and if a better distribution and decreased the cough reflex can be achieved. METHODS: The patients (N = 100; 50 in each group) were randomized to receive either topical airway anesthesia by the "spray-as-you-go" technique via conventional application (group C) through the working channel of the bronchoscope or via a triple-orifice epidural catheter (group E). The primary outcome measurement was the cough severity, which was documented using a 4-point scale. Bronchoscopists and nurses assessed the coughing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for cough, total consumption of propofol and lidocaine, requirement frequency of propofol and topical anesthesia, PACU retention time, and adverse events were also compared. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the median cough severity scores between the two groups (group C: 3 vs. group E: 2, P = 0.004). The median visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for the cough, were significantly higher in group C than those in group E (bronchoscopist: 3 vs. 2 P = 0.002; nurse: 3 vs. 2, P < 0.001). The incidence of cough was significantly higher in group C in the trachea, left and right bronchi. The highest respiratory rate was higher in group C than in group E (P < 0.01). Eight patients in group C and two patients in group E had an oxygen saturation below 90% during flexible bronchoscopy(FB) (P = 0.046). More patients in group C required extra topical anesthesia than in group E (P < 0.001). The total lidocaine consumption was also higher in group C than that in group E (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endotracheal topical anesthesia via the multi-orifice epidural catheter (three holes/openings) during flexible bronchoscopy using the "spray-as-you-go" technique was appeared to be superior to the conventional method.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Anestesia Local Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Monit Comput Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Propofol / Anestesia Local Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Monit Comput Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China