Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of Pedicle Screw Insertion Depth on Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiological Significance of Deeper Screw Placement.
Matsukawa, Keitaro; Konomi, Tsunehiko; Matsubayashi, Kohei; Yamane, Junichi; Yato, Yoshiyuki.
Afiliação
  • Matsukawa K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, 74131Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Japan.
  • Konomi T; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, 74131Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Japan.
  • Matsubayashi K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, 74131Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Japan.
  • Yamane J; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, 74131Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Japan.
  • Yato Y; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, 74131Murayama Medical Center, Musashimurayama, Japan.
Global Spine J ; : 21925682221110142, 2022 Jun 17.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35713986
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the influence of screw size on achieving bone fusion in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

METHODS:

In total, 137 consecutive patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent single-level PLIF at L4-L5 were evaluated. Factors investigated for their contribution to bone fusion included 1) age, 2) sex, 3) body mass index, 4) bone mineral density, 5) intervertebral mobility, 6) screw diameter, 7) screw length, 8) screw fitness in the pedicle (%fill), 9) screw depth in the vertebra (%depth), 10) screw angle, 11) facetectomy, 12) crosslink connector, and 13) cage material.

RESULTS:

Bone fusion was confirmed in 88.2% of patients. The comparison between fusion (+) and fusion (-) groups showed no significant differences in screw size. The %fill and %length were significantly greater in the fusion (+) group than in the fusion (-) group (%fill 58.5% ± 7.5% vs 52.3% ± 7.3%, respectively, P = .005; %depth 59.8% ± 9.7% vs 50.3% ± 13.8%, respectively, P = .025). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that %fill (odds ratio [OR]= 1.11, P = .025) and %depth (OR = 1.09, P = .003) were significant independent factors affecting bone fusion. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified a %fill of 60.0% and a %depth of 54.2% as optimal cutoff values for achieving bone fusion.

CONCLUSIONS:

Screw size should be determined based on the screw fitness in the pedicle (%fill > 60%) and screw insertion depth in the vertebral body (%depth > 54.2%) according to individual vertebral anatomy in L4-L5 PLIF.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Global Spine J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Global Spine J Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão