Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial.
Jamshidi, Ahmadreza; Vojdanian, Mahdi; Soroush, Mohsen; Akbarian, Mahmoud; Aghaei, Mehrdad; Hajiabbasi, Asghar; Mirfeizi, Zahra; Khabbazi, Alireza; Alishiri, Gholamhosein; Haghighi, Anousheh; Salimzadeh, Ahmad; Karimzadeh, Hadi; Shirani, Fatemeh; Fard, Mohammad Reza Hatef; Nazarinia, MohammadAli; Soroosh, Soosan; Anjidani, Nassim; Gharibdoost, Farhad.
Afiliação
  • Jamshidi A; Rheumatology Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Vojdanian M; Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Soroush M; Rheumatology Department, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Akbarian M; Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Aghaei M; Golestan Rheumatology Research Center (GRRC), Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
  • Hajiabbasi A; Department of Rheumatology, Guilan Rheumatology Research Center, School of Medicine, Razi Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
  • Mirfeizi Z; Rheumatic Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  • Khabbazi A; Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
  • Alishiri G; Chemical Injuries Research Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Haghighi A; Rheumatology Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Salimzadeh A; Rheumatology Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Karimzadeh H; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Shirani F; Department of Rheumatology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Fard MRH; Rheumatology Ward, Internal Medicine Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
  • Nazarinia M; Shiraz Geriatric Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Soroosh S; Rheumatology Department, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Anjidani N; Medical Department, Orchid Pharmed Company, Tehran, Iran.
  • Gharibdoost F; Rheumatology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. gharibdoostfarhad@gmail.com.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 24(1): 161, 2022 06 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35773713
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVE:

Osteoporosis is a global health concern with an increasing prevalence worldwide. Denosumab is an antiresoptive agent that has been demonstrated to be effective and safe in osteoporotic patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) to the originator product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.

METHODS:

In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, postmenopausal osteoporotic patients received 60 mg of subcutaneous Arylia or Prolia® at months 0, 6, and 12 and were followed up for 18 months. The primary endpoint was the noninferiority of the biosimilar product to the reference product in the percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) in 18 months at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip, and femoral neck. The secondary endpoints were safety assessment, the incidence of new vertebral fractures, and the trend of bone turnover markers (BTMs).

RESULTS:

A total of 190 patients were randomized to receive either biosimilar (n = 95) or reference (n = 95) denosumab. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, the lower limits of the 95% two-sided confidence intervals of the difference between Arylia and Prolia® in increasing BMD were greater than the predetermined noninferiority margin of - 1.78 at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck sites (mean differences [95% CIs] of 0.39 [- 1.34 to 2.11], 0.04 [- 1.61 to 1.69], and 0.41 [- 1.58 to 2.40], respectively). The two products were also comparable in terms of safety, new vertebral fractures, and trend of BTMs.

CONCLUSION:

The efficacy of the biosimilar denosumab was shown to be noninferior to that of the reference denosumab, with a comparable safety profile at 18 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03293108 ; Registration date 2017-09-19.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa / Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Medicamentos Biossimilares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arthritis Res Ther Assunto da revista: REUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa / Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Medicamentos Biossimilares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Arthritis Res Ther Assunto da revista: REUMATOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Irã