Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality of life and home parenteral nutrition: a survey of UK healthcare professionals' knowledge, practice and opinions.
Kirk, Colette; Pearce, Mark S; Mathers, John C; Thompson, Nicholas P; Gemmell, Lisa; Jones, David E.
Afiliação
  • Kirk C; Newcastle NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Pearce MS; Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Mathers JC; Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Thompson NP; Human Nutrition Research Centre, Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Gemmell L; Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Jones DE; Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 36(3): 687-696, 2023 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36239126
BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in the assessment of health-related quality of life (QoL) in the care of patients treated with home parenteral nutrition (HPN). However, it is not known whether healthcare professionals (HCPs) have embedded QoL assessment into routine clinical practice in line with current guidelines to favour a more holistic approach to HPN care. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, current practice and the opinions of HCPs regarding QoL in care of patients on HPN. METHODS: An online survey was distributed via email to HCPs working with HPN patients throughout England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Participants were identified using a mailing list for the British Intestinal Failure Alliance, a specialist group within the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 67 professionals comprising 24 dietitians, 17 nurses, 14 gastroenterologists, 6 pharmacists, 5 surgeons and 1 psychologist. Of these, 54 (80%) participants agreed that the measurement of QoL is useful. In contrast, 38 (57%) of all participants, including 27 (50%) of those participants who agreed that the measurement of QoL was useful, never measured QoL. Knowledge of QoL literature was rated as poor or very poor by 27 (40%) participants. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the perceived usefulness and importance of QoL assessment, very few HCPs embed it into clinical practice. Knowledge of QoL literature and QoL tools is variable, and there is significant variability in QoL practice. This is clear in terms of the frequency of QoL assessments and heterogeneity in methodology. In contrast, there was almost unanimous agreement that the complications associated with HPN contribute to poorer QoL. There is a need for specific, evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines detailing how to define and measure QoL in this patient population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Nutr Diet Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Nutrição Parenteral no Domicílio Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Nutr Diet Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article