Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assent in Pediatric Critical Care Research: A Cross-Sectional Stakeholder Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Boards, Research Coordinators, Pediatric Critical Care Researchers, and Nurses.
O'Hearn, Katie; Cayouette, Florence; Cameron, Saoirse; Martin, Dori-Ann; Tsampalieros, Anne; Menon, Kusum.
Afiliação
  • O'Hearn K; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Cayouette F; Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Cameron S; Children's Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
  • Martin DA; Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  • Tsampalieros A; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Clinical Research Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  • Menon K; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 24(4): e179-e189, 2023 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36511694
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Survey of four stakeholder groups involved in defining and obtaining assent for research in Canadian PICUs to better understand their perspectives and perceived barriers to assent.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING:

Fourteen tertiary-care pediatric hospitals in Canada.

PARTICIPANTS:

Research Ethics Board Chairs, pediatric critical care nurses, research coordinators, and researchers.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

A total of 193 participants responded. Thirty-seven percent (59/159) thought it was "Never/Almost Never" (59/159, 37%) feasible to obtain assent during the first 48 hours of PICU admission, and 112 of 170 (66%) indicated there are unique barriers to assent at the time of enrollment in PICU studies. Asking children for assent was most frequently rated as Important/Very Important for interviews/focus groups with the child (138/180, 77%), blood sample collection with a needle poke for research (137/178, 77%), and studies involving genetic testing with results communicated to the child/legal guardian (134/180, 74%). In two scenarios where a child and legal guardian disagreed about study participation, most respondents indicated that whether the child should still be enrolled would depend on the patient's age (34-36%), and/or the risk of the study (24-28%). There was a lack of consensus over how the assent process should be operationalized, and when and for how long children should be followed to seek assent for ongoing study participation. Most stakeholders (117/158, 74%) thought that children should have the opportunity to decide if their samples could stay in a biobank once they are old enough to do so.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was an overall lack of consensus on the feasibility of, and challenges associated with, obtaining assent at the time of study enrollment and on how key aspects of the assent process should be operationalized in the PICU. This highlights the need for guidelines to clarify the assent process in pediatric critical care research.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ética em Pesquisa / Enfermeiros Pediátricos Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Crit Care Med Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ética em Pesquisa / Enfermeiros Pediátricos Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Child / Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Crit Care Med Assunto da revista: PEDIATRIA / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá