Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Switching to cigarette brand variants with different filter ventilation levels: a descriptive analysis.
Carroll, Dana Mowls; Tessier, Katelyn; Luo, Xianghua; Stepanov, Irina S; Shields, Peter G; O'Connor, Richard; Rees, Vaughan W; Cummings, Michael; Bickel, Warren; Hatsukami, Dorothy.
Afiliação
  • Carroll DM; Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA dcarroll@umn.edu.
  • Tessier K; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Luo X; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Stepanov IS; Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Shields PG; Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • O'Connor R; Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Rees VW; James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
  • Cummings M; Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
  • Bickel W; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hatsukami D; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Tob Control ; 2023 Jan 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690447
BACKGROUND: Regulation of filter ventilation (FV) has been proposed to reduce misperceptions that ventilation reduces the health risks of smoking. We describe smoking behaviour and exposure after switching to a cigarette brand variant (CBV) with a different FV level. METHODS: Wave 1 (2013-2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco Use and Health Study was merged with FV levels of participants' CBV and restricted to adults with a usual CBV, smoked daily and included in wave 4 (2016-2017; n=371). Generalised estimation equations method modelled changes in FV and cigarettes per day (CPD), quit interest, total nicotine equivalents (TNE) and total NNAL (biomarker of a tobacco-specific carcinogen). FV change was defined as a change in CBV resulting in a ≥20% increase or decrease in FV. Secondary analyses used FV change based on an increase from <5% to >10% or a decrease from >10% to <5%. RESULTS: A non-significant pattern indicating an increase of 0.97 and 0.49 CPD was observed among those who switched to a CBV and increased FV by ≥20% and from <5% to >10%, respectively. A non-significant pattern indicating a decrease of 1.31 and 1.97 CPD was observed among those who decreased FV by ≥20% and from >10% to <5%, respectively. Changes in quit interest and biomarkers were also non-significant with one exception: greater reduction in TNE among those who decreased from >10% to <5% FV versus no change (-8.51 vs -0.25 nmol/mg creatinine; p=0.0447). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to CBV with lower FV does not appear to increase exposure and may even reduce exposure for some. Additional investigations are recommended to confirm these descriptive findings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos