Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of the Immediate Release of Clinical Information Rules on Health Care Delivery to Patients With Cancer.
Anyidoho, P Abena; Verschraegen, Claire F; Markham, Merry Jennifer; Alberts, Steven; Sweetenham, John; Cameron, Kendra; Abu Hejleh, Taher.
Afiliação
  • Anyidoho PA; College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Verschraegen CF; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
  • Markham MJ; College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  • Alberts S; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
  • Sweetenham J; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Cameron K; Association of American Cancer Institutes, Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Abu Hejleh T; Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 19(5): e706-e713, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36780583
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The 21st Century Cures Act mandates the immediate release of clinical information (IRCI) to patients. Immediate sharing of sensitive test results to patients with cancer might have serious unintended consequences for patients and providers.

METHODS:

A 22-question REDCap survey was designed by the Association of American Cancer Institutes Physician Clinical Leadership Initiative Steering Committee to explore oncology providers' opinions on IRCI policy implementation. It was administered twice in 2021 with a 3-month interval. A third survey with a single question seeking providers' opinions about their adaptation to the IRCI mandate was administered 1 year later to those who had responded to the earlier surveys. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. The survey was sent to all Association of American Cancer Institutes cancer center members. In the first or second administration, 167 practitioners answered the survey; 31 responded to the third survey.

RESULTS:

Three quarters of the providers did not favor the new requirement for IRCI and 62% encountered questions from patients about results being sent to them without provider interpretation. Only half of the hospitals had a plan in place to deal with the new IRCI requirements. A third survey, for longitudinal follow-up, indicated a more favorable trend toward adoption of IRCI.

CONCLUSION:

IRCI for patients with cancer was perceived negatively by academic oncology providers after its implementation. It was viewed to be associated with higher levels of patient anxiety and complaints about the care delivered. Providers preferred to discuss test results with patients before release.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes / Neoplasias Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes / Neoplasias Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: JCO Oncol Pract Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article