Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Older Adults' Perspectives on Screening for Cognitive Impairment Following Critical Illness: Pre-Implementation Qualitative Study.
Keegan, Alek; Strahley, Ashley; Taylor, Stephanie P; Wilson, Taniya M; Shah, Meehir D; Williamson, Jeff; Palakshappa, Jessica A.
Afiliação
  • Keegan A; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Strahley A; Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Taylor SP; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Wilson TM; Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
  • Shah MD; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Williamson J; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Palakshappa JA; Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Crit Care Explor ; 5(5): e0920, 2023 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37197588
Screening for cognitive impairment following ICU discharge is recommended but not part of routine care. We sought to understand older adults' perspectives on screening for cognitive impairment following an ICU admission to inform the design and delivery of a cognitive screening intervention. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SUBJECTS: Adults 60 years and older within 3 months of discharge from an ICU in an academic health system. INTERVENTIONS: Interviews were conducted via telephone, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. All transcripts were coded in duplicate. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Codes were organized into themes and subthemes inductively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We completed 22 interviews. The mean age of participants was 71 ± 6 years, 14 (63.6%) were men, 16 (72.7%) were White, and 6 (27.3%) were Black. Thematic analysis was organized around four themes: 1) receptivity to screening, 2) communication preferences, 3) information needs, and 4) provider involvement. Most participants were receptive to cognitive screening; this was influenced by trust in their providers and prior experience with cognitive screening and impairment. Participants preferred simple, direct, compassionate communication. They wanted to understand the screening procedure, the rationale for screening, and expectations for recovery. Participants desired input from their primary care provider to have their cognitive screening results placed in the context of their overall health, because they had a trusted relationship, and for convenience. CONCLUSIONS: Participants demonstrated limited understanding of and exposure to cognitive screening but see it as potentially beneficial following an ICU stay. Providers should use simple, straightforward language and place emphasis on expectations. Resources may be needed to assist primary care providers with capacity to provide cognitive screening and interpret results for ICU survivors. Implementation strategies can include educational materials for clinicians and patients on rationale for screening and recovery expectations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Explor Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Explor Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article