Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Real-World Experience from a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France) Highlights the Urgent Need to Abandon Immunohistochemistry for ROS1 Rearrangement Screening of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Hofman, Véronique; Goffinet, Samantha; Bontoux, Christophe; Long-Mira, Elodie; Lassalle, Sandra; Ilié, Marius; Hofman, Paul.
Afiliação
  • Hofman V; Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, University Côte d'Azur, FHU OncoAge, Pasteur Hospital, 06000 Nice, France.
  • Goffinet S; Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Pasteur Hospital, 06000 Nice, France.
  • Bontoux C; Team 4, IRCAN Inserm U1081, CNRS 7284, Université Côte d'Azur, 06100 Nice, France.
  • Long-Mira E; Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, University Côte d'Azur, FHU OncoAge, Pasteur Hospital, 06000 Nice, France.
  • Lassalle S; Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Pasteur Hospital, 06000 Nice, France.
  • Ilié M; Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, University Côte d'Azur, FHU OncoAge, Pasteur Hospital, 06000 Nice, France.
  • Hofman P; Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Pasteur Hospital, 06000 Nice, France.
J Pers Med ; 13(5)2023 May 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37240980
ABSTRACT
The detection of ROS1 rearrangements in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) permits administration of efficient targeted therapy. Detection is based on a testing algorithm associated with ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by ROS1 FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm positivity. However, (i) ROS1 rearrangements are rare (1-2% of NS-NSCLC), (ii) the specificity of ROS1 IHC is not optimal, and (iii) ROS1 FISH is not widely available, making this algorithm challenging to interpret time-consuming. We evaluated RNA NGS, which was used as reflex testing for ROS1 rearrangements in NS-NSCLC with the aim of replacing ROS1 IHC as a screening method. ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS were prospectively performed in 810 NS-NSCLC. Positive results were analyzed by ROS1 FISH. ROS1 IHC was positive in 36/810 (4.4%) cases that showed variable staining intensity while NGS detected ROS1 rearrangements in 16/810 (1.9%) cases. ROS1 FISH was positive in 15/810 (1.8%) of ROS1 IHC positive cases and in all positive ROS1 NGS cases. Obtaining both ROS1 IHC and ROS1 FISH reports took an average of 6 days, while obtaining ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS reports took an average of 3 days. These results showed that systematic screening for the ROS1 status using IHC must be replaced by NGS reflex testing.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pers Med Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França