Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Models Predicting Postpartum Glucose Intolerance Among Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review.
Belsti, Yitayeh; Moran, Lisa; Handiso, Demelash Woldeyohannes; Versace, Vincent; Goldstein, Rebecca; Mousa, Aya; Teede, Helena; Enticott, Joanne.
Afiliação
  • Belsti Y; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Moran L; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Handiso DW; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Versace V; Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.
  • Goldstein R; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Mousa A; Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Teede H; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Enticott J; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Curr Diab Rep ; 23(9): 231-243, 2023 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37294513
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the crucial role that prediction models play in guiding early risk stratification and timely intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), their use is not widespread in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to examine the methodological characteristics and quality of existing prognostic models predicting postpartum glucose intolerance following GDM. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic review was conducted on relevant risk prediction models, resulting in 15 eligible publications from research groups in various countries. Our review found that traditional statistical models were more common than machine learning models, and only two were assessed to have a low risk of bias. Seven were internally validated, but none were externally validated. Model discrimination and calibration were done in 13 and four studies, respectively. Various predictors were identified, including body mass index, fasting glucose concentration during pregnancy, maternal age, family history of diabetes, biochemical variables, oral glucose tolerance test, use of insulin in pregnancy, postnatal fasting glucose level, genetic risk factors, hemoglobin A1c, and weight. The existing prognostic models for glucose intolerance following GDM have various methodological shortcomings, with only a few models being assessed to have low risk of bias and validated internally. Future research should prioritize the development of robust, high-quality risk prediction models that follow appropriate guidelines, in order to advance this area and improve early risk stratification and intervention for glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes among women who have had GDM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional / Intolerância à Glucose / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Curr Diab Rep Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Gestacional / Intolerância à Glucose / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Curr Diab Rep Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália