Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Uncertainty-aware spot rejection rate as quality metric for proton therapy using a digital tracking calorimeter.
Schilling, Alexander; Aehle, Max; Alme, Johan; Barnaföldi, Gergely Gábor; Bodova, Tea; Borshchov, Vyacheslav; van den Brink, Anthony; Eikeland, Viljar; Feofilov, Gregory; Garth, Christoph; Gauger, Nicolas R; Grøttvik, Ola; Helstrup, Håvard; Igolkin, Sergey; Keidel, Ralf; Kobdaj, Chinorat; Kortus, Tobias; Leonhardt, Viktor; Mehendale, Shruti; Ningappa Mulawade, Raju; Harald Odland, Odd; O'Neill, George; Papp, Gábor; Peitzmann, Thomas; Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime; Piersimoni, Pierluigi; Protsenko, Maksym; Rauch, Max; Ur Rehman, Attiq; Richter, Matthias; Röhrich, Dieter; Santana, Joshua; Seco, Joao; Songmoolnak, Arnon; Sudár, Ákos; Tambave, Ganesh; Tymchuk, Ihor; Ullaland, Kjetil; Varga-Kofarago, Monika; Volz, Lennart; Wagner, Boris; Wendzel, Steffen; Wiebel, Alexander; Xiao, RenZheng; Yang, Shiming; Zillien, Sebastian.
Afiliação
  • Schilling A; Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany.
  • Aehle M; Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
  • Alme J; Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
  • Barnaföldi GG; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Bodova T; Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Borshchov V; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • van den Brink A; Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPELTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Eikeland V; Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Feofilov G; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Garth C; St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Gauger NR; Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
  • Grøttvik O; Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
  • Helstrup H; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Igolkin S; Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway.
  • Keidel R; St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
  • Kobdaj C; Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany.
  • Kortus T; Chair for Scientific Computing, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
  • Leonhardt V; Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
  • Mehendale S; Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany.
  • Ningappa Mulawade R; Scientific Visualization Lab, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
  • Harald Odland O; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • O'Neill G; Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany.
  • Papp G; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Peitzmann T; Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Pettersen HES; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Piersimoni P; Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/A Pázmány P. Sétány, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Protsenko M; Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Rauch M; Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, NO-5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Ur Rehman A; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Richter M; UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
  • Röhrich D; Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPELTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Santana J; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Seco J; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Songmoolnak A; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Sudár Á; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Tambave G; Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, D-67549 Worms, Germany.
  • Tymchuk I; Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Ullaland K; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Varga-Kofarago M; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Volz L; Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
  • Wagner B; Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Wendzel S; Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Wiebel A; Center for Medical and Radiation Physics (CMRP), National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Bhubaneswar, India.
  • Xiao R; Research and Production Enterprise 'LTU' (RPELTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Yang S; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Zillien S; Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary.
Phys Med Biol ; 68(19)2023 09 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652034
ABSTRACT
Objective.Proton therapy is highly sensitive to range uncertainties due to the nature of the dose deposition of charged particles. To ensure treatment quality, range verification methods can be used to verify that the individual spots in a pencil beam scanning treatment fraction match the treatment plan. This study introduces a novel metric for proton therapy quality control based on uncertainties in range verification of individual spots.Approach.We employ uncertainty-aware deep neural networks to predict the Bragg peak depth in an anthropomorphic phantom based on secondary charged particle detection in a silicon pixel telescope designed for proton computed tomography. The subsequently predicted Bragg peak positions, along with their uncertainties, are compared to the treatment plan, rejecting spots which are predicted to be outside the 95% confidence interval. The such-produced spot rejection rate presents a metric for the quality of the treatment fraction.Main results.The introduced spot rejection rate metric is shown to be well-defined for range predictors with well-calibrated uncertainties. Using this method, treatment errors in the form of lateral shifts can be detected down to 1 mm after around 1400 treated spots with spot intensities of 1 × 107protons. The range verification model used in this metric predicts the Bragg peak depth to a mean absolute error of 1.107 ± 0.015 mm.Significance.Uncertainty-aware machine learning has potential applications in proton therapy quality control. This work presents the foundation for future developments in this area.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia com Prótons Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Biol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia com Prótons Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Phys Med Biol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha