Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Residency Application Advising: Medical Student & Faculty Advisor Perceived Barriers & Expectations.
Joshi, Sonal; Moreci, Rebecca; Daniel, Yannet; Seenivasan, Akshay; Baker, Jessica E; Ibarra, Maria P; Shehirian, Rita; Kwakye, Gifty.
Afiliação
  • Joshi S; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: sonalj@umich.edu.
  • Moreci R; Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Training and Research, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Daniel Y; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Seenivasan A; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Baker JE; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Ibarra MP; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Shehirian R; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Kwakye G; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Training and Research, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Surg Res ; 293: 670-675, 2024 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37839098
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Given the rapidly changing landscape of residency applications, many medical students struggle to identify guidance from faculty advisors. Additionally, faculty advisors may find it difficult to maintain up-to-date knowledge on changes such as the new supplemental application. These gaps could potentially lead to inequitable advising. The objective of this study was to identify both students' and faculty's perceived barriers and expectations for residency application advising.

METHODS:

Anonymous surveys were administered to both fourth-year medical students and faculty advisors at a single institution within 2 mo of the residency application deadline. Survey questions assessed student and faculty barriers to establishing the advisor-advisee relationships, as well as expectations of the advisor role. Surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS:

We identified that the majority of students (57%) did not have a faculty advisor within weeks of the application deadline, and an equal amount felt that finding an advisor was either somewhat difficult or extremely difficult. Of all the students, 60% felt their biggest barrier was not knowing how to find an advisor. Though faculty felt equipped to advise students, 75% of faculty in the participating specialties had advising concerns regarding the supplemental application or were unaware of the changes.

CONCLUSIONS:

We identified gaps in the residency application advising process from both student and faculty perspectives. Future work involves increasing awareness of the resources and opportunities available to students to improve advising relationships. Standardized training tools and resources for faculty will result in more consistent and reliable faculty advising.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Internato e Residência Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Internato e Residência Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article